Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: netrom: refactor code in nr_add_node

["Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com>]

Hi Walter,

Quoting walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>:

> Am 19.10.2017 19:27, schrieb Gustavo A. R. Silva:
>> Code refactoring in order to make the code easier to read and maintain.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
>> ---
>> This code was tested by compilation only (GCC 7.2.0 was used).
>>
>>  net/netrom/nr_route.c | 63  
>> ++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/netrom/nr_route.c b/net/netrom/nr_route.c
>> index fc9cadc..1e5165f 100644
>> --- a/net/netrom/nr_route.c
>> +++ b/net/netrom/nr_route.c
>> @@ -80,6 +80,23 @@ static struct nr_neigh  
>> *nr_neigh_get_dev(ax25_address *callsign,
>>
>>  static void nr_remove_neigh(struct nr_neigh *);
>>
>> +/*      re-sort the routes in quality order.    */
>> +static inline void re_sort_routes(struct nr_node *nr_node, int  
>> ix_x, int ix_y)
>> +{
>> +	struct nr_route nr_route;
>> +
>> +	if (nr_node->routes[ix_y].quality > nr_node->routes[ix_x].quality) {
>> +		if (nr_node->which == ix_x)
>> +			nr_node->which = ix_y;
>> +		else if (nr_node->which == ix_y)
>> +			nr_node->which = ix_x;
>> +
>> +		nr_route              = nr_node->routes[ix_x];
>> +		nr_node->routes[ix_x] = nr_node->routes[ix_y];
>> +		nr_node->routes[ix_y] = nr_route;
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>
>
> Good idea, a bit of nit picking ..
> does ix_ has a special meaning ? otherwise x,y would be sufficient.

ix typical stands for index, but I think just x and y are fine too.

> From the code below i can see: y=x+1 Perhaps that can be used.
>

So are you proposing to use two arguments instead of three?

re_sort_routes(nr_node, 0);


> kernel.h has a swap() macro. so you can  
> swap(nr_node->routes[x],nr_node->routes[y]);
>

Nice, I will use that macro.

> hope that helps,

Definitely. I appreciate your comments.

Thanks!