[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: SPL: FIT: fix DTC warnings on FIT generation

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: SPL: FIT: fix DTC warnings on FIT generation

[Andre Przywara]

Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about
mismatches between attributed node names (name@<addr>) and a missing
reg property in that node.
Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit Allwinner boards to remove the
bogus addresses from the node names and avoid the warnings.

Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
---
 board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh b/board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh
index b1d6e0e16a..36abe9efed 100755
--- a/board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh
+++ b/board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ cat << __HEADER_EOF
 	#address-cells = <1>;
 
 	images {
-		uboot at 1 {
+		uboot {
 			description = "U-Boot (64-bit)";
 			data = /incbin/("u-boot-nodtb.bin");
 			type = "standalone";
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ cat << __HEADER_EOF
 			compression = "none";
 			load = <0x4a000000>;
 		};
-		atf at 1 {
+		atf {
 			description = "ARM Trusted Firmware";
 			data = /incbin/("$BL31");
 			type = "firmware";
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ cnt=1
 for dtname in $*
 do
 	cat << __FDT_IMAGE_EOF
-		fdt@$cnt {
+		fdt_$cnt {
 			description = "$(basename $dtname .dtb)";
 			data = /incbin/("$dtname");
 			type = "flat_dt";
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ done
 cat << __CONF_HEADER_EOF
 	};
 	configurations {
-		default = "config at 1";
+		default = "config_1";
 
 __CONF_HEADER_EOF
 
@@ -65,11 +65,11 @@ cnt=1
 for dtname in $*
 do
 	cat << __CONF_SECTION_EOF
-		config@$cnt {
+		config_$cnt {
 			description = "$(basename $dtname .dtb)";
-			firmware = "uboot at 1";
-			loadables = "atf@1";
-			fdt = "fdt@$cnt";
+			firmware = "uboot";
+			loadables = "atf";
+			fdt = "fdt_$cnt";
 		};
 __CONF_SECTION_EOF
 	cnt=$((cnt+1))
-- 
2.14.1

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: SPL: FIT: fix DTC warnings on FIT generation

[Simon Glass]

Hi Andre,

On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
> Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about
> mismatches between attributed node names (name@<addr>) and a missing
> reg property in that node.
> Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit Allwinner boards to remove the
> bogus addresses from the node names and avoid the warnings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
>  board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh | 16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

It looks like we have this problem all over the place. The
documentation in doc/uImage now seems to have this problem too.

I wonder if instead we should add reg / #address-cells / #size-cells properties?

Regards,
Simon

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: SPL: FIT: fix DTC warnings on FIT generation

[Jagan Teki]

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
>> Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about
>> mismatches between attributed node names (name@<addr>) and a missing
>> reg property in that node.
>> Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit Allwinner boards to remove the
>> bogus addresses from the node names and avoid the warnings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh | 16 ++++++++--------
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> It looks like we have this problem all over the place. The
> documentation in doc/uImage now seems to have this problem too.
>
> I wonder if instead we should add reg / #address-cells / #size-cells properties?

If the update on dts, might be an another-overhead to maintain u-boot
dts wrt Linux dts sync.

thanks!
-- 
Jagan Teki
Free Software Engineer | www.openedev.com
U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer
Hyderabad, India.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: SPL: FIT: fix DTC warnings on FIT generation

[Tom Rini]

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 02:29:14AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
> > Hi Andre,
> >
> > On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
> >> Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about
> >> mismatches between attributed node names (name@<addr>) and a missing
> >> reg property in that node.
> >> Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit Allwinner boards to remove the
> >> bogus addresses from the node names and avoid the warnings.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> >> ---
> >>  board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh | 16 ++++++++--------
> >>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > It looks like we have this problem all over the place. The
> > documentation in doc/uImage now seems to have this problem too.
> >
> > I wonder if instead we should add reg / #address-cells / #size-cells properties?
> 
> If the update on dts, might be an another-overhead to maintain u-boot
> dts wrt Linux dts sync.

Anything that DTC is warning about in a dts that we get from the kernel,
should be fixed in the kernel.  The kernel dtc is what we're using, and
is/will/can also complain about it.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20171016/f7666dbb/attachment.sig>

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: SPL: FIT: fix DTC warnings on FIT generation

[Jagan Teki]

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 02:29:14AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
>> > Hi Andre,
>> >
>> > On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
>> >> Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about
>> >> mismatches between attributed node names (name@<addr>) and a missing
>> >> reg property in that node.
>> >> Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit Allwinner boards to remove the
>> >> bogus addresses from the node names and avoid the warnings.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh | 16 ++++++++--------
>> >>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > It looks like we have this problem all over the place. The
>> > documentation in doc/uImage now seems to have this problem too.
>> >
>> > I wonder if instead we should add reg / #address-cells / #size-cells properties?
>>
>> If the update on dts, might be an another-overhead to maintain u-boot
>> dts wrt Linux dts sync.
>
> Anything that DTC is warning about in a dts that we get from the kernel,
> should be fixed in the kernel.  The kernel dtc is what we're using, and
> is/will/can also complain about it.

Yes, this can be true if the node changes are more common in between.

thanks!
-- 
Jagan Teki
Free Software Engineer | www.openedev.com
U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer
Hyderabad, India.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: SPL: FIT: fix DTC warnings on FIT generation

[André Przywara]

Hi,

sorry Simon for dropping the ball earlier. I will try to answer both
Jagan's and your concern below.

On 16/10/17 21:59, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
>> Hi Andre,
>>
>> On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
>>> Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about
>>> mismatches between attributed node names (name@<addr>) and a missing
>>> reg property in that node.
>>> Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit Allwinner boards to remove the
>>> bogus addresses from the node names and avoid the warnings.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>>  board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh | 16 ++++++++--------
>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> It looks like we have this problem all over the place. The
>> documentation in doc/uImage now seems to have this problem too.
>>
>> I wonder if instead we should add reg / #address-cells / #size-cells properties?
> 
> If the update on dts, might be an another-overhead to maintain u-boot
> dts wrt Linux dts sync.

This is not the kernel .dts, but the FIT image description (using the
DTS format), which is purely private to U-Boot. I erroneously used
addresses (fdt at 1) to enumerate different FDTs.
I don't think this is right, since those FDTs don't have anything which
would resemble an address. Instead the SPL just chooses one of them, and
the script generates as many as we give it (from defconfig).

So I don't see much sense in introducing a "reg" property. Multiple
instances of an UART are alive at the same time, so an address property
makes sense. But we just need *one* FDT and some unique name used to
match configuration entries to the appropriate image. Actually those
identifiers could be totally random as well, or we actually use
something derived from the filename.
But for simplicity I'd just go with the underscore notation, unless
someone convinces me otherwise.

Cheers,
Andre.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: SPL: FIT: fix DTC warnings on FIT generation

[Simon Glass]

Hi Andre,

On 16 October 2017 at 23:30, André Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry Simon for dropping the ball earlier. I will try to answer both
> Jagan's and your concern below.
>
> On 16/10/17 21:59, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Andre,
>>>
>>> On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
>>>> Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about
>>>> mismatches between attributed node names (name@<addr>) and a missing
>>>> reg property in that node.
>>>> Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit Allwinner boards to remove the
>>>> bogus addresses from the node names and avoid the warnings.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh | 16 ++++++++--------
>>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> It looks like we have this problem all over the place. The
>>> documentation in doc/uImage now seems to have this problem too.
>>>
>>> I wonder if instead we should add reg / #address-cells / #size-cells properties?
>>
>> If the update on dts, might be an another-overhead to maintain u-boot
>> dts wrt Linux dts sync.
>
> This is not the kernel .dts, but the FIT image description (using the
> DTS format), which is purely private to U-Boot. I erroneously used
> addresses (fdt at 1) to enumerate different FDTs.
> I don't think this is right, since those FDTs don't have anything which
> would resemble an address. Instead the SPL just chooses one of them, and
> the script generates as many as we give it (from defconfig).
>
> So I don't see much sense in introducing a "reg" property. Multiple
> instances of an UART are alive at the same time, so an address property
> makes sense. But we just need *one* FDT and some unique name used to
> match configuration entries to the appropriate image. Actually those
> identifiers could be totally random as well, or we actually use
> something derived from the filename.
> But for simplicity I'd just go with the underscore notation, unless
> someone convinces me otherwise.

OTOH this really just a feature of the DT format. Adding a 'reg'
property can be justified on that basis. Or perhaps we should have an
option for dtc to support 'degenerate' .dts files?

The underscore is normally used for phandles.

Regards,
Simon

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: SPL: FIT: fix DTC warnings on FIT generation

[Lokesh Vutla]

On Tuesday 17 October 2017 02:43 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 02:29:14AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Andre,
>>>
>>> On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
>>>> Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about
>>>> mismatches between attributed node names (name@<addr>) and a missing
>>>> reg property in that node.
>>>> Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit Allwinner boards to remove the
>>>> bogus addresses from the node names and avoid the warnings.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh | 16 ++++++++--------
>>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> It looks like we have this problem all over the place. The
>>> documentation in doc/uImage now seems to have this problem too.
>>>
>>> I wonder if instead we should add reg / #address-cells / #size-cells properties?
>>
>> If the update on dts, might be an another-overhead to maintain u-boot
>> dts wrt Linux dts sync.
> 
> Anything that DTC is warning about in a dts that we get from the kernel,
> should be fixed in the kernel.  The kernel dtc is what we're using, and
> is/will/can also complain about it.

Kernel suppress these warning by default[1] and enables these warnings
with W= compiler option. May be this should be included in u-boot as well?

[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/Makefile.lib#n272

Thanks and regards,
Lokesh

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: SPL: FIT: fix DTC warnings on FIT generation

[Tom Rini]

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:08:57AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tuesday 17 October 2017 02:43 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 02:29:14AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
> >>> Hi Andre,
> >>>
> >>> On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
> >>>> Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about
> >>>> mismatches between attributed node names (name@<addr>) and a missing
> >>>> reg property in that node.
> >>>> Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit Allwinner boards to remove the
> >>>> bogus addresses from the node names and avoid the warnings.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh | 16 ++++++++--------
> >>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> It looks like we have this problem all over the place. The
> >>> documentation in doc/uImage now seems to have this problem too.
> >>>
> >>> I wonder if instead we should add reg / #address-cells / #size-cells properties?
> >>
> >> If the update on dts, might be an another-overhead to maintain u-boot
> >> dts wrt Linux dts sync.
> > 
> > Anything that DTC is warning about in a dts that we get from the kernel,
> > should be fixed in the kernel.  The kernel dtc is what we're using, and
> > is/will/can also complain about it.
> 
> Kernel suppress these warning by default[1] and enables these warnings
> with W= compiler option. May be this should be included in u-boot as well?
> 
> [1]
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/Makefile.lib#n272

We have slightly different logic for that today in
scripts/Makefile.extrawarn, perhaps we need to re-sync?

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20171023/f859df2e/attachment.sig>

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: SPL: FIT: fix DTC warnings on FIT generation

[Lokesh Vutla]

On Tuesday 24 October 2017 02:04 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:08:57AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday 17 October 2017 02:43 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 02:29:14AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Andre,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about
>>>>>> mismatches between attributed node names (name@<addr>) and a missing
>>>>>> reg property in that node.
>>>>>> Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit Allwinner boards to remove the
>>>>>> bogus addresses from the node names and avoid the warnings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>  board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh | 16 ++++++++--------
>>>>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> It looks like we have this problem all over the place. The
>>>>> documentation in doc/uImage now seems to have this problem too.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder if instead we should add reg / #address-cells / #size-cells properties?
>>>>
>>>> If the update on dts, might be an another-overhead to maintain u-boot
>>>> dts wrt Linux dts sync.
>>>
>>> Anything that DTC is warning about in a dts that we get from the kernel,
>>> should be fixed in the kernel.  The kernel dtc is what we're using, and
>>> is/will/can also complain about it.
>>
>> Kernel suppress these warning by default[1] and enables these warnings
>> with W= compiler option. May be this should be included in u-boot as well?
>>
>> [1]
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/Makefile.lib#n272
> 
> We have slightly different logic for that today in
> scripts/Makefile.extrawarn, perhaps we need to re-sync?
> 

ahh you are right. I do not see these warning with the latest U-Boot.
But I still agree with the $patch as these warnings are meant to be
fixed at some point.

Thanks and regards,
Lokesh

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: SPL: FIT: fix DTC warnings on FIT generation

[Masahiro Yamada]

Hi Andre,


2017-10-24 11:03 GMT+09:00 Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>:
>
>
> On Tuesday 24 October 2017 02:04 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:08:57AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday 17 October 2017 02:43 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 02:29:14AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Andre,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about
>>>>>>> mismatches between attributed node names (name@<addr>) and a missing
>>>>>>> reg property in that node.
>>>>>>> Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit Allwinner boards to remove the
>>>>>>> bogus addresses from the node names and avoid the warnings.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>  board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh | 16 ++++++++--------
>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It looks like we have this problem all over the place. The
>>>>>> documentation in doc/uImage now seems to have this problem too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wonder if instead we should add reg / #address-cells / #size-cells properties?
>>>>>
>>>>> If the update on dts, might be an another-overhead to maintain u-boot
>>>>> dts wrt Linux dts sync.
>>>>
>>>> Anything that DTC is warning about in a dts that we get from the kernel,
>>>> should be fixed in the kernel.  The kernel dtc is what we're using, and
>>>> is/will/can also complain about it.
>>>
>>> Kernel suppress these warning by default[1] and enables these warnings
>>> with W= compiler option. May be this should be included in u-boot as well?
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/Makefile.lib#n272
>>
>> We have slightly different logic for that today in
>> scripts/Makefile.extrawarn, perhaps we need to re-sync?
>>
>
> ahh you are right. I do not see these warning with the latest U-Boot.
> But I still agree with the $patch as these warnings are meant to be
> fixed at some point.


Please use "-" instead of "@".

Update all the FIT examples.
You may need to update some C files.


This is the conclusion of Device Tree community.
See the following commit of Linux.



commit b21569cf1de925e0a42c9964bd7f520cb4a4d875
Author: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu Jun 22 09:15:11 2017 +0530

    PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

    Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:

    Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp at 1000000000 has a
    unit name, but no reg property

    Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
    "reg" property.

    Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
    Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
    Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
    Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
    Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
    Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
    Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: SPL: FIT: fix DTC warnings on FIT generation

[André Przywara]

On 24/10/17 03:31, Masahiro Yamada wrote:

Hi,

> 2017-10-24 11:03 GMT+09:00 Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>:
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday 24 October 2017 02:04 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:08:57AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday 17 October 2017 02:43 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 02:29:14AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Andre,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about
>>>>>>>> mismatches between attributed node names (name@<addr>) and a missing
>>>>>>>> reg property in that node.
>>>>>>>> Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit Allwinner boards to remove the
>>>>>>>> bogus addresses from the node names and avoid the warnings.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>  board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh | 16 ++++++++--------
>>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It looks like we have this problem all over the place. The
>>>>>>> documentation in doc/uImage now seems to have this problem too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wonder if instead we should add reg / #address-cells / #size-cells properties?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If the update on dts, might be an another-overhead to maintain u-boot
>>>>>> dts wrt Linux dts sync.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anything that DTC is warning about in a dts that we get from the kernel,
>>>>> should be fixed in the kernel.  The kernel dtc is what we're using, and
>>>>> is/will/can also complain about it.
>>>>
>>>> Kernel suppress these warning by default[1] and enables these warnings
>>>> with W= compiler option. May be this should be included in u-boot as well?
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/Makefile.lib#n272
>>>
>>> We have slightly different logic for that today in
>>> scripts/Makefile.extrawarn, perhaps we need to re-sync?
>>>
>>
>> ahh you are right. I do not see these warning with the latest U-Boot.
>> But I still agree with the $patch as these warnings are meant to be
>> fixed at some point.
> 
> 
> Please use "-" instead of "@".
> 
> Update all the FIT examples.
> You may need to update some C files.

Yeah! "find ./ -type f | xargs -1 sed -i -e s/@/-/g" didn't give the
expected results, though :-D
But I bit the bullet and fixed every @1 sucker I could find, just need
some more time to make proper patches.

Cheers,
Andre.

> 
> 
> This is the conclusion of Device Tree community.
> See the following commit of Linux.
> 
> 
> 
> commit b21569cf1de925e0a42c9964bd7f520cb4a4d875
> Author: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Date:   Thu Jun 22 09:15:11 2017 +0530
> 
>     PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries
> 
>     Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:
> 
>     Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp at 1000000000 has a
>     unit name, but no reg property
> 
>     Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
>     "reg" property.
> 
>     Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
>     Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
>     Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>     Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>     Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>     Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> 
>