* [PATCH] s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
@ 2017-10-25 10:27 Kees Cook
2017-10-26 6:38 ` Martin Schwidefsky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2017-10-25 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiko Carstens
Cc: Harald Freudenberger, Martin Schwidefsky, linux-s390, linux-kernel
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
Cc: Harald Freudenberger <freude@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c | 10 +++++-----
drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h | 2 +-
drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c
index 5f0be2040272..7bd18624e96e 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c
@@ -362,13 +362,13 @@ void ap_wait(enum ap_wait wait)
/**
* ap_request_timeout(): Handling of request timeouts
- * @data: Holds the AP device.
+ * @t: timer making this callback
*
* Handles request timeouts.
*/
-void ap_request_timeout(unsigned long data)
+void ap_request_timeout(struct timer_list *t)
{
- struct ap_queue *aq = (struct ap_queue *) data;
+ struct ap_queue *aq = from_timer(aq, t, timeout);
if (ap_suspend_flag)
return;
@@ -1147,7 +1147,7 @@ static void ap_scan_bus(struct work_struct *unused)
mod_timer(&ap_config_timer, jiffies + ap_config_time * HZ);
}
-static void ap_config_timeout(unsigned long ptr)
+static void ap_config_timeout(struct timer_list *unused)
{
if (ap_suspend_flag)
return;
@@ -1250,7 +1250,7 @@ int __init ap_module_init(void)
goto out_bus;
/* Setup the AP bus rescan timer. */
- setup_timer(&ap_config_timer, ap_config_timeout, 0);
+ timer_setup(&ap_config_timer, ap_config_timeout, 0);
/*
* Setup the high resultion poll timer.
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h b/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h
index 754cf2223cfb..e7077820ae46 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ void ap_flush_queue(struct ap_queue *aq);
void *ap_airq_ptr(void);
void ap_wait(enum ap_wait wait);
-void ap_request_timeout(unsigned long data);
+void ap_request_timeout(struct timer_list *t);
void ap_bus_force_rescan(void);
void ap_queue_init_reply(struct ap_queue *aq, struct ap_message *ap_msg);
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c
index 56b96edffd5b..f4782113e4a3 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c
@@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ struct ap_queue *ap_queue_create(ap_qid_t qid, int device_type)
spin_lock_init(&aq->lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&aq->pendingq);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&aq->requestq);
- setup_timer(&aq->timeout, ap_request_timeout, (unsigned long) aq);
+ timer_setup(&aq->timeout, ap_request_timeout, 0);
return aq;
}
--
2.7.4
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
2017-10-25 10:27 [PATCH] s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup() Kees Cook
@ 2017-10-26 6:38 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2017-11-02 23:36 ` Kees Cook
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Martin Schwidefsky @ 2017-10-26 6:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kees Cook; +Cc: Heiko Carstens, Harald Freudenberger, linux-s390, linux-kernel
On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 03:27:37 -0700
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>
> Cc: Harald Freudenberger <freude@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c | 10 +++++-----
> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h | 2 +-
> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Parked for the second part of the s390 updates for the next merge window.
Thanks.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
2017-10-26 6:38 ` Martin Schwidefsky
@ 2017-11-02 23:36 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-03 6:29 ` Martin Schwidefsky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2017-11-02 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Schwidefsky
Cc: Heiko Carstens, Harald Freudenberger, linux-s390, LKML, Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
<schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 03:27:37 -0700
> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
>> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>>
>> Cc: Harald Freudenberger <freude@de.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
>> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c | 10 +++++-----
>> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h | 2 +-
>> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Parked for the second part of the s390 updates for the next merge window.
> Thanks.
Thanks for getting these staged. I just wanted to check with you,
since I don't see these in -next anywhere yet:
s390: qdio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
s390/sclp: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
s390/cio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
s390/scsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
Are all of these expected to land for -rc1? (Would it help to carry
them in the timer tree?) I've got tree-wide changes ready to go once
all these conversions have landed.
Thanks!
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
2017-11-02 23:36 ` Kees Cook
@ 2017-11-03 6:29 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2017-11-03 20:36 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-16 7:58 ` Kees Cook
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Martin Schwidefsky @ 2017-11-03 6:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kees Cook
Cc: Heiko Carstens, Harald Freudenberger, linux-s390, LKML, Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:36:53 -0700
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
> <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 03:27:37 -0700
> > Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> >> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> >> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
> >>
> >> Cc: Harald Freudenberger <freude@de.ibm.com>
> >> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> >> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> >> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c | 10 +++++-----
> >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h | 2 +-
> >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c | 2 +-
> >> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > Parked for the second part of the s390 updates for the next merge window.
> > Thanks.
>
> Thanks for getting these staged. I just wanted to check with you,
> since I don't see these in -next anywhere yet:
>
> s390: qdio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> s390/sclp: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> s390/cio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> s390/scsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>
> Are all of these expected to land for -rc1? (Would it help to carry
> them in the timer tree?) I've got tree-wide changes ready to go once
> all these conversions have landed.
These patches are parked on a private branches. The features branch
on s390/linux is the one that is used for -next AND for the upstream
merge. And since I do not want to rebase that branch the timer_setup
patches are not in -next as well.
Four of you patches are safe with me, the s390/scsi patch is in
Steffens patch queue. All good I would say.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
2017-11-03 6:29 ` Martin Schwidefsky
@ 2017-11-03 20:36 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-16 7:58 ` Kees Cook
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2017-11-03 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Schwidefsky
Cc: Heiko Carstens, Harald Freudenberger, linux-s390, LKML, Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
<schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:36:53 -0700
> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
>> <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 03:27:37 -0700
>> > Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
>> >> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
>> >> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>> >>
>> >> Cc: Harald Freudenberger <freude@de.ibm.com>
>> >> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
>> >> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
>> >> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
>> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c | 10 +++++-----
>> >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h | 2 +-
>> >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c | 2 +-
>> >> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > Parked for the second part of the s390 updates for the next merge window.
>> > Thanks.
>>
>> Thanks for getting these staged. I just wanted to check with you,
>> since I don't see these in -next anywhere yet:
>>
>> s390: qdio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> s390/sclp: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> s390/cio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> s390/scsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>>
>> Are all of these expected to land for -rc1? (Would it help to carry
>> them in the timer tree?) I've got tree-wide changes ready to go once
>> all these conversions have landed.
>
> These patches are parked on a private branches. The features branch
> on s390/linux is the one that is used for -next AND for the upstream
> merge. And since I do not want to rebase that branch the timer_setup
> patches are not in -next as well.
>
> Four of you patches are safe with me, the s390/scsi patch is in
> Steffens patch queue. All good I would say.
Great, thanks very much for double-check! :)
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
2017-11-03 6:29 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2017-11-03 20:36 ` Kees Cook
@ 2017-11-16 7:58 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-16 8:03 ` Martin Schwidefsky
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2017-11-16 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiko Carstens
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky, Harald Freudenberger, linux-s390, LKML,
Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
<schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:36:53 -0700
> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
>> <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 03:27:37 -0700
>> > Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
>> >> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
>> >> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>> >>
>> >> Cc: Harald Freudenberger <freude@de.ibm.com>
>> >> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
>> >> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
>> >> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
>> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c | 10 +++++-----
>> >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h | 2 +-
>> >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c | 2 +-
>> >> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > Parked for the second part of the s390 updates for the next merge window.
>> > Thanks.
>>
>> Thanks for getting these staged. I just wanted to check with you,
>> since I don't see these in -next anywhere yet:
>>
>> s390: qdio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> s390/sclp: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> s390/cio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> s390/scsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>>
>> Are all of these expected to land for -rc1? (Would it help to carry
>> them in the timer tree?) I've got tree-wide changes ready to go once
>> all these conversions have landed.
>
> These patches are parked on a private branches. The features branch
> on s390/linux is the one that is used for -next AND for the upstream
> merge. And since I do not want to rebase that branch the timer_setup
> patches are not in -next as well.
>
> Four of you patches are safe with me, the s390/scsi patch is in
> Steffens patch queue. All good I would say.
Hi,
I saw s390 get merged for -rc1, but none of these timer_setup()
conversions were included. Given the possible short merge window,
what's the state of these? I can't do the bulk API changes at the end
of -rc1 without the s390 timer patches. Anything I can help with?
Thanks!
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
2017-11-16 7:58 ` Kees Cook
@ 2017-11-16 8:03 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2017-11-16 8:03 ` Kees Cook
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Martin Schwidefsky @ 2017-11-16 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kees Cook
Cc: Heiko Carstens, Harald Freudenberger, linux-s390, LKML, Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 23:58:44 -0800
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
> <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:36:53 -0700
> > Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
> >> <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 03:27:37 -0700
> >> > Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> >> >> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> >> >> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
> >> >>
> >> >> Cc: Harald Freudenberger <freude@de.ibm.com>
> >> >> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> >> >> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> >> >> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c | 10 +++++-----
> >> >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h | 2 +-
> >> >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c | 2 +-
> >> >> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > Parked for the second part of the s390 updates for the next merge window.
> >> > Thanks.
> >>
> >> Thanks for getting these staged. I just wanted to check with you,
> >> since I don't see these in -next anywhere yet:
> >>
> >> s390: qdio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> >> s390/sclp: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> >> s390/cio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> >> s390/scsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> >> s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> >>
> >> Are all of these expected to land for -rc1? (Would it help to carry
> >> them in the timer tree?) I've got tree-wide changes ready to go once
> >> all these conversions have landed.
> >
> > These patches are parked on a private branches. The features branch
> > on s390/linux is the one that is used for -next AND for the upstream
> > merge. And since I do not want to rebase that branch the timer_setup
> > patches are not in -next as well.
> >
> > Four of you patches are safe with me, the s390/scsi patch is in
> > Steffens patch queue. All good I would say.
>
> Hi,
>
> I saw s390 get merged for -rc1, but none of these timer_setup()
> conversions were included. Given the possible short merge window,
> what's the state of these? I can't do the bulk API changes at the end
> of -rc1 without the s390 timer patches. Anything I can help with?
The remaining timer_setup changes are on the features branch of s390/linux,
I plan to send a please-pull request be the end of the week.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
2017-11-16 8:03 ` Martin Schwidefsky
@ 2017-11-16 8:03 ` Kees Cook
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2017-11-16 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Schwidefsky
Cc: Heiko Carstens, Harald Freudenberger, linux-s390, LKML, Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Martin Schwidefsky
<schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 23:58:44 -0800
> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
>> <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:36:53 -0700
>> > Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
>> >> <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 03:27:37 -0700
>> >> > Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
>> >> >> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
>> >> >> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Cc: Harald Freudenberger <freude@de.ibm.com>
>> >> >> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
>> >> >> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
>> >> >> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
>> >> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>> >> >> ---
>> >> >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c | 10 +++++-----
>> >> >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h | 2 +-
>> >> >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c | 2 +-
>> >> >> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> >> >
>> >> > Parked for the second part of the s390 updates for the next merge window.
>> >> > Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for getting these staged. I just wanted to check with you,
>> >> since I don't see these in -next anywhere yet:
>> >>
>> >> s390: qdio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> >> s390/sclp: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> >> s390/cio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> >> s390/scsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> >> s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> >>
>> >> Are all of these expected to land for -rc1? (Would it help to carry
>> >> them in the timer tree?) I've got tree-wide changes ready to go once
>> >> all these conversions have landed.
>> >
>> > These patches are parked on a private branches. The features branch
>> > on s390/linux is the one that is used for -next AND for the upstream
>> > merge. And since I do not want to rebase that branch the timer_setup
>> > patches are not in -next as well.
>> >
>> > Four of you patches are safe with me, the s390/scsi patch is in
>> > Steffens patch queue. All good I would say.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I saw s390 get merged for -rc1, but none of these timer_setup()
>> conversions were included. Given the possible short merge window,
>> what's the state of these? I can't do the bulk API changes at the end
>> of -rc1 without the s390 timer patches. Anything I can help with?
>
> The remaining timer_setup changes are on the features branch of s390/linux,
> I plan to send a please-pull request be the end of the week.
Okay, thanks! Sorry for all my nail-biting. :)
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-11-16 8:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-10-25 10:27 [PATCH] s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup() Kees Cook
2017-10-26 6:38 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2017-11-02 23:36 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-03 6:29 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2017-11-03 20:36 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-16 7:58 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-16 8:03 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2017-11-16 8:03 ` Kees Cook
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.