* [PATCH] iio: adc: cpcap: fix incorrect validation
@ 2017-11-12 16:01 Pan Bian
2017-11-12 18:28 ` Sebastian Reichel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pan Bian @ 2017-11-12 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Cameron, Hartmut Knaack, Lars-Peter Clausen,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler, Tony Lindgren, Sebastian Reichel,
Rob Herring
Cc: linux-iio, linux-kernel, Pan Bian
Function platform_get_irq_byname() returns a negative error code on
failure, and a zero or positive number on success. However, in function
cpcap_adc_probe(), positive IRQ numbers are also taken as error cases.
Use "if (ddata->irq < 0)" instead of "if (!ddata->irq)" to validate the
return value of platform_get_irq_byname().
Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@163.com>
---
drivers/iio/adc/cpcap-adc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/cpcap-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/cpcap-adc.c
index 6e419d5..f153e026 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/cpcap-adc.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/cpcap-adc.c
@@ -1012,7 +1012,7 @@ static int cpcap_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, indio_dev);
ddata->irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "adcdone");
- if (!ddata->irq)
+ if (ddata->irq < 0)
return -ENODEV;
error = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, ddata->irq, NULL,
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: cpcap: fix incorrect validation
2017-11-12 16:01 [PATCH] iio: adc: cpcap: fix incorrect validation Pan Bian
@ 2017-11-12 18:28 ` Sebastian Reichel
2017-11-13 18:49 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Reichel @ 2017-11-12 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pan Bian
Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Hartmut Knaack, Lars-Peter Clausen,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler, Tony Lindgren, Rob Herring, linux-iio,
linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1393 bytes --]
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:01:20AM +0800, Pan Bian wrote:
> Function platform_get_irq_byname() returns a negative error code on
> failure, and a zero or positive number on success. However, in function
> cpcap_adc_probe(), positive IRQ numbers are also taken as error cases.
> Use "if (ddata->irq < 0)" instead of "if (!ddata->irq)" to validate the
> return value of platform_get_irq_byname().
>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@163.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
-- Sebastian
> drivers/iio/adc/cpcap-adc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/cpcap-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/cpcap-adc.c
> index 6e419d5..f153e026 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/cpcap-adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/cpcap-adc.c
> @@ -1012,7 +1012,7 @@ static int cpcap_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, indio_dev);
>
> ddata->irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "adcdone");
> - if (!ddata->irq)
> + if (ddata->irq < 0)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> error = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, ddata->irq, NULL,
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: cpcap: fix incorrect validation
2017-11-12 18:28 ` Sebastian Reichel
@ 2017-11-13 18:49 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2017-11-13 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sebastian Reichel
Cc: Pan Bian, Jonathan Cameron, Hartmut Knaack, Lars-Peter Clausen,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler, Rob Herring, linux-iio, linux-kernel
* Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org> [171112 18:30]:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:01:20AM +0800, Pan Bian wrote:
> > Function platform_get_irq_byname() returns a negative error code on
> > failure, and a zero or positive number on success. However, in function
> > cpcap_adc_probe(), positive IRQ numbers are also taken as error cases.
> > Use "if (ddata->irq < 0)" instead of "if (!ddata->irq)" to validate the
> > return value of platform_get_irq_byname().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@163.com>
> > ---
>
> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: cpcap: fix incorrect validation
@ 2017-11-13 18:49 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2017-11-13 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sebastian Reichel
Cc: Pan Bian, Jonathan Cameron, Hartmut Knaack, Lars-Peter Clausen,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler, Rob Herring, linux-iio, linux-kernel
* Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org> [171112 18:30]:
> Hi,
>=20
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:01:20AM +0800, Pan Bian wrote:
> > Function platform_get_irq_byname() returns a negative error code on
> > failure, and a zero or positive number on success. However, in function
> > cpcap_adc_probe(), positive IRQ numbers are also taken as error cases.
> > Use "if (ddata->irq < 0)" instead of "if (!ddata->irq)" to validate the
> > return value of platform_get_irq_byname().
> >=20
> > Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@163.com>
> > ---
>=20
> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: cpcap: fix incorrect validation
2017-11-13 18:49 ` Tony Lindgren
(?)
@ 2017-11-19 11:34 ` Jonathan Cameron
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2017-11-19 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tony Lindgren
Cc: Sebastian Reichel, Pan Bian, Hartmut Knaack, Lars-Peter Clausen,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler, Rob Herring, linux-iio, linux-kernel
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 10:49:03 -0800
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> * Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org> [171112 18:30]:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:01:20AM +0800, Pan Bian wrote:
> > > Function platform_get_irq_byname() returns a negative error code on
> > > failure, and a zero or positive number on success. However, in function
> > > cpcap_adc_probe(), positive IRQ numbers are also taken as error cases.
> > > Use "if (ddata->irq < 0)" instead of "if (!ddata->irq)" to validate the
> > > return value of platform_get_irq_byname().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@163.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
>
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git.
Thanks,
Jonathan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-11-19 11:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-11-12 16:01 [PATCH] iio: adc: cpcap: fix incorrect validation Pan Bian
2017-11-12 18:28 ` Sebastian Reichel
2017-11-13 18:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-11-13 18:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-11-19 11:34 ` Jonathan Cameron
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.