[Buildroot] [PATCH] netcat-openbsd: add source and license hashes

[Buildroot] [PATCH] netcat-openbsd: add source and license hashes

[Gaël PORTAY]

Signed-off-by: Ga?l PORTAY <gael.portay@savoirfairelinux.com>
---
Hi,

Hashes have been locally computed.

Regards,
Gael

 package/netcat-openbsd/netcat-openbsd.hash | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 package/netcat-openbsd/netcat-openbsd.hash

diff --git a/package/netcat-openbsd/netcat-openbsd.hash b/package/netcat-openbsd/netcat-openbsd.hash
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..58f229517e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/netcat-openbsd/netcat-openbsd.hash
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+# Locally calculated from download
+sha256 f587c02139aedb0bae12fdaef94f8c00649a0b4d603b5a22612e42cb317ba7cf netcat-openbsd-debian_1.178-3.tar.gz
+sha256 e2e86d58c38f044a49f51e45515747585db58a2305419c73323eaad88fcaef5c debian/copyright
-- 
2.15.0

[Buildroot] [PATCH] netcat-openbsd: add source and license hashes

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Hello,

On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 20:54:58 -0500, Ga?l PORTAY wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ga?l PORTAY <gael.portay@savoirfairelinux.com>
> ---
> Hi,

Applied to next, thanks.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[Buildroot] [PATCH] netcat-openbsd: add source and license hashes

[Gaël PORTAY]

Hi Thomas,

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 09:32:42PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 20:54:58 -0500, Ga?l PORTAY wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Ga?l PORTAY <gael.portay@savoirfairelinux.com>
> > ---
> > Hi,
> 
> Applied to next, thanks.
> 
> Thomas
> -- 
> Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
> http://free-electrons.com

Thanks,
Gael

[Buildroot] [PATCH] netcat-openbsd: add source and license hashes

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Hello,

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 16:07:34 -0500, Ga?l PORTAY wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 09:32:42PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 20:54:58 -0500, Ga?l PORTAY wrote:  
> > > Signed-off-by: Ga?l PORTAY <gael.portay@savoirfairelinux.com>
> > > ---
> > > Hi,  
> > 
> > Applied to next, thanks.
> > 
> > Thomas
> > -- 
> > Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
> > Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
> > http://free-electrons.com  
> 
> Thanks,

Thanks a lot for your "thanks", but it's not really needed to thank
back the maintainers when they merge a patch. We already have three
e-mails per patches on the list:

 - One with the patch itself

 - One sent by Git when the commit is merged/pushed

 - One sent by the maintainer to notify the author that the patch was
   merged.

I don't think it's really useful to add a fourth patch with the
contributor thanking the maintainer.

Just pay a beer to one of the maintainers the next time you see him :-)

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com