[PATCH i-g-t v2 1/2] tests/gem_exec_schedule: Add reset on failed preemption test.

[PATCH i-g-t v2 1/2] tests/gem_exec_schedule: Add reset on failed preemption test.

[Antonio Argenziano]

This patch adds a test where a low priority batch is going to be
declared hung while a preemption is pending. The test wants to verify
that a 'hanging' low priority batch will not disrupt the execution of a high
priority context and that the driver does due diligence in managing a
reset while a preemption is pending.

-v2:
	- Use igt_hang_ctx to hang the engine (Chris)
	- Enable/Process engine reset using IGT libs (Chris)
	- Create new subtest_group for the test (Chris)

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@intel.com>
---
 tests/gem_exec_schedule.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/gem_exec_schedule.c b/tests/gem_exec_schedule.c
index a2f4419a..d0f85b3e 100644
--- a/tests/gem_exec_schedule.c
+++ b/tests/gem_exec_schedule.c
@@ -356,13 +356,15 @@ static void promotion(int fd, unsigned ring)
 	munmap(ptr, 4096);
 }
 
-#define NEW_CTX 0x1
+#define NEW_CTX (0x1 << 0)
+#define HANG_LP (0x1 << 1)
 static void preempt(int fd, unsigned ring, unsigned flags)
 {
 	uint32_t result = gem_create(fd, 4096);
 	uint32_t *ptr = gem_mmap__gtt(fd, result, 4096, PROT_READ);
 	igt_spin_t *spin[16];
 	uint32_t ctx[2];
+	igt_hang_t hang;
 
 	ctx[LO] = gem_context_create(fd);
 	gem_context_set_priority(fd, ctx[LO], MIN_PRIO);
@@ -370,6 +372,9 @@ static void preempt(int fd, unsigned ring, unsigned flags)
 	ctx[HI] = gem_context_create(fd);
 	gem_context_set_priority(fd, ctx[HI], MAX_PRIO);
 
+	if (flags & HANG_LP)
+		hang = igt_hang_ctx(fd, ctx[LO], ring, 0, NULL);
+
 	for (int n = 0; n < 16; n++) {
 		if (flags & NEW_CTX) {
 			gem_context_destroy(fd, ctx[LO]);
@@ -389,6 +394,9 @@ static void preempt(int fd, unsigned ring, unsigned flags)
 	for (int n = 0; n < 16; n++)
 		igt_spin_batch_free(fd, spin[n]);
 
+	if (flags & HANG_LP)
+		igt_post_hang_ring(fd, hang);
+
 	gem_context_destroy(fd, ctx[LO]);
 	gem_context_destroy(fd, ctx[HI]);
 
@@ -1023,6 +1031,24 @@ igt_main
 
 					igt_subtest_f("preempt-self-%s", e->name)
 						preempt_self(fd, e->exec_id | e->flags);
+
+					igt_subtest_group {
+						igt_hang_t hang;
+
+						igt_fixture {
+							igt_stop_hang_detector();
+							hang = igt_allow_hang(fd, 0, 0);
+						}
+
+						igt_subtest_f("preempt-hang-%s", e->name) {
+							preempt(fd, e->exec_id | e->flags, NEW_CTX | HANG_LP);
+						}
+
+						igt_fixture {
+							igt_disallow_hang(fd, hang);
+							igt_fork_hang_detector(fd);
+						}
+					}
 				}
 
 				igt_subtest_f("deep-%s", e->name)
-- 
2.14.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH i-g-t v2 2/2] tests/gem_exec_schedule: Add test for resetting preemptive batch

[Antonio Argenziano]

This patch adds a test that will trigger a preemption of a low priority
batch by a 'bad' batch buffer which will hang. The test aims at making
sure that a hanging high priority batch will not disrupt the submission
flow of low priority contexts.

-v2:
	- Rename subtest (Chris)
	- Use igt_hang_ctx to hang ring (Chris)
	- Add comment on execution order checks (Chris)

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@intel.com>
---
 tests/gem_exec_schedule.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/gem_exec_schedule.c b/tests/gem_exec_schedule.c
index d0f85b3e..0c2efaa2 100644
--- a/tests/gem_exec_schedule.c
+++ b/tests/gem_exec_schedule.c
@@ -515,6 +515,40 @@ static void preempt_self(int fd, unsigned ring)
 	gem_close(fd, result);
 }
 
+static void preemptive_hang(int fd, unsigned ring)
+{
+	igt_spin_t *spin[16];
+	igt_hang_t hang;
+	uint32_t ctx[2];
+
+	ctx[HI] = gem_context_create(fd);
+	gem_context_set_priority(fd, ctx[HI], MAX_PRIO);
+
+	for (int n = 0; n < 16; n++) {
+		ctx[LO] = gem_context_create(fd);
+		gem_context_set_priority(fd, ctx[LO], MIN_PRIO);
+
+		spin[n] = __igt_spin_batch_new(fd, ctx[LO], ring, 0);
+		igt_debug("spin[%d].handle=%d\n", n, spin[n]->handle);
+
+		gem_context_destroy(fd, ctx[LO]);
+	}
+
+	hang = igt_hang_ctx(fd, ctx[HI], ring, 0, NULL);
+	gem_wait(fd, hang.handle, NULL);
+
+	for (int n = 0; n < 16; n++) {
+		/* Current behavior is to execute requests in order of submission.
+		 * This is subject to change as the scheduler evolve. The test should
+		 * be updated to reflect such changes.
+		 */
+		igt_assert(gem_bo_busy(fd, spin[n]->handle));
+		igt_spin_batch_free(fd, spin[n]);
+	}
+
+	gem_context_destroy(fd, ctx[HI]);
+}
+
 static void deep(int fd, unsigned ring)
 {
 #define XS 8
@@ -1044,6 +1078,9 @@ igt_main
 							preempt(fd, e->exec_id | e->flags, NEW_CTX | HANG_LP);
 						}
 
+						igt_subtest_f("preemptive-hang-%s", e->name)
+							preemptive_hang(fd, e->exec_id | e->flags);
+
 						igt_fixture {
 							igt_disallow_hang(fd, hang);
 							igt_fork_hang_detector(fd);
-- 
2.14.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH i-g-t v2 2/2] tests/gem_exec_schedule: Add test for resetting preemptive batch

[Michał Winiarski]

On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 03:45:41PM -0800, Antonio Argenziano wrote:
> This patch adds a test that will trigger a preemption of a low priority
> batch by a 'bad' batch buffer which will hang. The test aims at making
> sure that a hanging high priority batch will not disrupt the submission
> flow of low priority contexts.
> 
> -v2:
> 	- Rename subtest (Chris)
> 	- Use igt_hang_ctx to hang ring (Chris)
> 	- Add comment on execution order checks (Chris)
> 
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>

> ---
>  tests/gem_exec_schedule.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH i-g-t v2 2/2] tests/gem_exec_schedule: Add test for resetting preemptive batch

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2017-12-04 23:45:41)
> This patch adds a test that will trigger a preemption of a low priority
> batch by a 'bad' batch buffer which will hang. The test aims at making
> sure that a hanging high priority batch will not disrupt the submission
> flow of low priority contexts.
> 
> -v2:
>         - Rename subtest (Chris)
>         - Use igt_hang_ctx to hang ring (Chris)
>         - Add comment on execution order checks (Chris)
> 
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@intel.com>
> ---
> +static void preemptive_hang(int fd, unsigned ring)
> +{
> +       igt_spin_t *spin[16];

Someone is going to shout one day, what is it with the magic number 16?

#define MAX_ELSP_QLEN 16 ? And should be set to some safe number times
the forseeable future.

> +       igt_hang_t hang;
> +       uint32_t ctx[2];
> +
> +       ctx[HI] = gem_context_create(fd);
> +       gem_context_set_priority(fd, ctx[HI], MAX_PRIO);
> +
> +       for (int n = 0; n < 16; n++) {
> +               ctx[LO] = gem_context_create(fd);
> +               gem_context_set_priority(fd, ctx[LO], MIN_PRIO);
> +
> +               spin[n] = __igt_spin_batch_new(fd, ctx[LO], ring, 0);
> +               igt_debug("spin[%d].handle=%d\n", n, spin[n]->handle);
> +
> +               gem_context_destroy(fd, ctx[LO]);
> +       }
> +
> +       hang = igt_hang_ctx(fd, ctx[HI], ring, 0, NULL);
> +       gem_wait(fd, hang.handle, NULL);

That should be igt_post_hang_ring(fd, hang);
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH i-g-t v3] tests/gem_exec_schedule: Add test for resetting preemptive batch

[Antonio Argenziano]

This patch adds a test that will trigger a preemption of a low priority
batch by a 'bad' batch buffer which will hang. The test aims at making
sure that a hanging high priority batch will not disrupt the submission
flow of low priority contexts.

-v2:
	- Rename subtest (Chris)
	- Use igt_hang_ctx to hang ring (Chris)
	- Add comment on execution order checks (Chris)

-v3:
	- Use library call to consume hang (Chris)
	- Use a more explicit name for array size (Chris)

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
---
 tests/gem_exec_schedule.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/gem_exec_schedule.c b/tests/gem_exec_schedule.c
index d0f85b3e..8cad15d9 100644
--- a/tests/gem_exec_schedule.c
+++ b/tests/gem_exec_schedule.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
 #define MIN_PRIO LOCAL_I915_CONTEXT_MIN_USER_PRIORITY
 
 #define BUSY_QLEN 8
+#define MAX_ELSP_QLEN 16
 
 IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Check that we can control the order of execution");
 
@@ -362,7 +363,7 @@ static void preempt(int fd, unsigned ring, unsigned flags)
 {
 	uint32_t result = gem_create(fd, 4096);
 	uint32_t *ptr = gem_mmap__gtt(fd, result, 4096, PROT_READ);
-	igt_spin_t *spin[16];
+	igt_spin_t *spin[MAX_ELSP_QLEN];
 	uint32_t ctx[2];
 	igt_hang_t hang;
 
@@ -408,7 +409,7 @@ static void preempt_other(int fd, unsigned ring)
 {
 	uint32_t result = gem_create(fd, 4096);
 	uint32_t *ptr = gem_mmap__gtt(fd, result, 4096, PROT_READ);
-	igt_spin_t *spin[16];
+	igt_spin_t *spin[MAX_ELSP_QLEN];
 	unsigned int other;
 	unsigned int n, i;
 	uint32_t ctx[3];
@@ -466,7 +467,7 @@ static void preempt_self(int fd, unsigned ring)
 {
 	uint32_t result = gem_create(fd, 4096);
 	uint32_t *ptr = gem_mmap__gtt(fd, result, 4096, PROT_READ);
-	igt_spin_t *spin[16];
+	igt_spin_t *spin[MAX_ELSP_QLEN];
 	unsigned int other;
 	unsigned int n, i;
 	uint32_t ctx[3];
@@ -515,6 +516,40 @@ static void preempt_self(int fd, unsigned ring)
 	gem_close(fd, result);
 }
 
+static void preemptive_hang(int fd, unsigned ring)
+{
+	igt_spin_t *spin[MAX_ELSP_QLEN];
+	igt_hang_t hang;
+	uint32_t ctx[2];
+
+	ctx[HI] = gem_context_create(fd);
+	gem_context_set_priority(fd, ctx[HI], MAX_PRIO);
+
+	for (int n = 0; n < 16; n++) {
+		ctx[LO] = gem_context_create(fd);
+		gem_context_set_priority(fd, ctx[LO], MIN_PRIO);
+
+		spin[n] = __igt_spin_batch_new(fd, ctx[LO], ring, 0);
+		igt_debug("spin[%d].handle=%d\n", n, spin[n]->handle);
+
+		gem_context_destroy(fd, ctx[LO]);
+	}
+
+	hang = igt_hang_ctx(fd, ctx[HI], ring, 0, NULL);
+	igt_post_hang_ring(fd, hang);
+
+	for (int n = 0; n < 16; n++) {
+		/* Current behavior is to execute requests in order of submission.
+		 * This is subject to change as the scheduler evolve. The test should
+		 * be updated to reflect such changes.
+		 */
+		igt_assert(gem_bo_busy(fd, spin[n]->handle));
+		igt_spin_batch_free(fd, spin[n]);
+	}
+
+	gem_context_destroy(fd, ctx[HI]);
+}
+
 static void deep(int fd, unsigned ring)
 {
 #define XS 8
@@ -1044,6 +1079,9 @@ igt_main
 							preempt(fd, e->exec_id | e->flags, NEW_CTX | HANG_LP);
 						}
 
+						igt_subtest_f("preemptive-hang-%s", e->name)
+							preemptive_hang(fd, e->exec_id | e->flags);
+
 						igt_fixture {
 							igt_disallow_hang(fd, hang);
 							igt_fork_hang_detector(fd);
-- 
2.14.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] tests/gem_exec_schedule: Add reset on failed preemption test.

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: series starting with [v2,1/2] tests/gem_exec_schedule: Add reset on failed preemption test.
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/34874/
State : success

== Summary ==

IGT patchset tested on top of latest successful build
88b01d822be1e9ab429ef1085f6754a47dae3487 igt/pm_rc6_residency: Measure residency after checking for applicability

with latest DRM-Tip kernel build CI_DRM_3452
cee3f135bf4e drm-tip: 2017y-12m-04d-21h-06m-29s UTC integration manifest

Testlist changes:
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-blt
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd1
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd2
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-render
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-vebox
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-hang-blt
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-hang-bsd
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-hang-bsd1
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-hang-bsd2
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-hang-render
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-hang-vebox

Test debugfs_test:
        Subgroup read_all_entries:
                dmesg-fail -> DMESG-WARN (fi-elk-e7500) fdo#103989

fdo#103989 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103989

fi-bdw-5557u     total:288  pass:267  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21  time:443s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm    total:288  pass:264  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:450s
fi-blb-e6850     total:288  pass:223  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:64  time:383s
fi-bsw-n3050     total:288  pass:242  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:46  time:522s
fi-bwr-2160      total:288  pass:183  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:105 time:282s
fi-bxt-dsi       total:288  pass:258  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:30  time:506s
fi-bxt-j4205     total:288  pass:259  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:512s
fi-byt-j1900     total:288  pass:253  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35  time:496s
fi-byt-n2820     total:288  pass:249  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:39  time:478s
fi-elk-e7500     total:224  pass:163  dwarn:15  dfail:0   fail:0   skip:45 
fi-gdg-551       total:288  pass:178  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:108 time:277s
fi-glk-1         total:288  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:543s
fi-hsw-4770      total:288  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:375s
fi-hsw-4770r     total:288  pass:224  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:64  time:261s
fi-ilk-650       total:288  pass:228  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:60  time:399s
fi-ivb-3520m     total:288  pass:259  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:484s
fi-ivb-3770      total:288  pass:259  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:450s
fi-kbl-7500u     total:288  pass:263  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:488s
fi-kbl-7560u     total:288  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:19  time:532s
fi-kbl-7567u     total:288  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:478s
fi-kbl-r         total:288  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:536s
fi-skl-6260u     total:288  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:455s
fi-skl-6600u     total:288  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:541s
fi-skl-6700hq    total:288  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:568s
fi-skl-6700k     total:288  pass:264  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:524s
fi-skl-6770hq    total:288  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:499s
fi-skl-gvtdvm    total:288  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23  time:450s
fi-snb-2520m     total:288  pass:249  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:39  time:549s
fi-snb-2600      total:288  pass:248  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:40  time:421s
Blacklisted hosts:
fi-cfl-s2        total:288  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:604s
fi-cnl-y         total:288  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:625s
fi-glk-dsi       total:288  pass:257  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:30  time:485s

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_595/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] tests/gem_exec_schedule: Add reset on failed preemption test.

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: series starting with [v2,1/2] tests/gem_exec_schedule: Add reset on failed preemption test.
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/34874/
State : success

== Summary ==

Test kms_setmode:
        Subgroup basic:
                pass       -> FAIL       (shard-hsw) fdo#99912
Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
        Subgroup fbc-rgb101010-draw-render:
                pass       -> DMESG-FAIL (shard-hsw) fdo#103167

fdo#99912 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912
fdo#103167 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103167

shard-hsw        total:2691 pass:1535 dwarn:1   dfail:1   fail:10  skip:1144 time:9519s
shard-snb        total:2691 pass:1308 dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:12  skip:1370 time:8104s
Blacklisted hosts:
shard-apl        total:2691 pass:1687 dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:22  skip:981 time:13783s
shard-kbl        total:2691 pass:1807 dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:23  skip:860 time:11053s

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_595/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH i-g-t v2 1/2] tests/gem_exec_schedule: Add reset on failed preemption test.

[Michał Winiarski]

On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 03:45:40PM -0800, Antonio Argenziano wrote:
> This patch adds a test where a low priority batch is going to be
> declared hung while a preemption is pending. The test wants to verify
> that a 'hanging' low priority batch will not disrupt the execution of a high
> priority context and that the driver does due diligence in managing a
> reset while a preemption is pending.
> 
> -v2:
> 	- Use igt_hang_ctx to hang the engine (Chris)
> 	- Enable/Process engine reset using IGT libs (Chris)
> 	- Create new subtest_group for the test (Chris)
> 
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>

-Michał

> ---
>  tests/gem_exec_schedule.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] tests/gem_exec_schedule: Add reset on failed preemption test. (rev2)

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: series starting with [v2,1/2] tests/gem_exec_schedule: Add reset on failed preemption test. (rev2)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/34874/
State : success

== Summary ==

IGT patchset tested on top of latest successful build
37339e7171ee0bd6b45abf8cfef593ed9d8bf750 lib: Print other clients when DRM_SET_MASTER fails

with latest DRM-Tip kernel build CI_DRM_3487
06dd422e3209 drm-tip: 2017y-12m-08d-21h-06m-35s UTC integration manifest

Testlist changes:
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-blt
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd1
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd2
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-render
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-vebox
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-hang-blt
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-hang-bsd
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-hang-bsd1
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-hang-bsd2
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-hang-render
+igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-hang-vebox

Test debugfs_test:
        Subgroup read_all_entries:
                dmesg-warn -> DMESG-FAIL (fi-elk-e7500) fdo#103989
Test gem_mmap_gtt:
        Subgroup basic-small-bo-tiledx:
                pass       -> FAIL       (fi-gdg-551) fdo#102575
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
        Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
                dmesg-warn -> PASS       (fi-kbl-r) fdo#104172
        Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
                incomplete -> PASS       (fi-snb-2520m) fdo#103713

fdo#103989 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103989
fdo#102575 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102575
fdo#104172 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104172
fdo#103713 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103713

fi-bdw-5557u     total:288  pass:267  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21  time:444s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm    total:288  pass:264  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:445s
fi-blb-e6850     total:288  pass:223  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:64  time:389s
fi-bsw-n3050     total:288  pass:242  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:46  time:522s
fi-bwr-2160      total:288  pass:183  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:105 time:282s
fi-bxt-dsi       total:288  pass:258  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:30  time:512s
fi-bxt-j4205     total:288  pass:259  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:506s
fi-byt-j1900     total:288  pass:253  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35  time:497s
fi-byt-n2820     total:288  pass:249  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:39  time:487s
fi-elk-e7500     total:224  pass:163  dwarn:14  dfail:1   fail:0   skip:45 
fi-gdg-551       total:288  pass:178  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:108 time:272s
fi-hsw-4770      total:288  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:402s
fi-hsw-4770r     total:288  pass:224  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:64  time:261s
fi-ilk-650       total:288  pass:228  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:60  time:395s
fi-ivb-3520m     total:288  pass:259  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:486s
fi-ivb-3770      total:288  pass:259  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:455s
fi-kbl-7500u     total:288  pass:263  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:491s
fi-kbl-7560u     total:288  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:19  time:528s
fi-kbl-7567u     total:288  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:478s
fi-kbl-r         total:288  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:537s
fi-pnv-d510      total:288  pass:222  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:65  time:598s
fi-skl-6260u     total:288  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:456s
fi-skl-6600u     total:288  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:542s
fi-skl-6700hq    total:288  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:566s
fi-skl-6700k     total:288  pass:264  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:526s
fi-skl-6770hq    total:288  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:500s
fi-skl-gvtdvm    total:288  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23  time:452s
fi-snb-2520m     total:288  pass:249  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:39  time:552s
fi-snb-2600      total:288  pass:248  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:40  time:422s
Blacklisted hosts:
fi-cfl-s2        total:288  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:616s
fi-cnl-y         total:288  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:651s
fi-glk-dsi       total:288  pass:258  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:30  time:501s

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_637/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] tests/gem_exec_schedule: Add reset on failed preemption test. (rev2)

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: series starting with [v2,1/2] tests/gem_exec_schedule: Add reset on failed preemption test. (rev2)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/34874/
State : success

== Summary ==

Test kms_flip:
        Subgroup vblank-vs-suspend-interruptible:
                pass       -> INCOMPLETE (shard-hsw) fdo#100368
Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
        Subgroup fbc-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-blt:
                pass       -> FAIL       (shard-snb) fdo#101623 +1
Test gem_tiled_swapping:
        Subgroup non-threaded:
                incomplete -> PASS       (shard-snb) fdo#104009
Test drv_selftest:
        Subgroup live_hangcheck:
                incomplete -> PASS       (shard-snb) fdo#103880

fdo#100368 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368
fdo#101623 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101623
fdo#104009 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104009
fdo#103880 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103880

shard-hsw        total:2653 pass:1509 dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:10  skip:1132 time:9157s
shard-snb        total:2692 pass:1309 dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:12  skip:1370 time:8145s
Blacklisted hosts:
shard-apl        total:2692 pass:1687 dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:23  skip:981 time:13906s
shard-kbl        total:2692 pass:1811 dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:23  skip:857 time:11178s

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_637/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] tests/gem_exec_schedule: Add reset on failed preemption test. (rev2)

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Patchwork (2017-12-09 00:50:11)
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: series starting with [v2,1/2] tests/gem_exec_schedule: Add reset on failed preemption test. (rev2)
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/34874/
> State : success
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> Test kms_flip:
>         Subgroup vblank-vs-suspend-interruptible:
>                 pass       -> INCOMPLETE (shard-hsw) fdo#100368
> Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
>         Subgroup fbc-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-blt:
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (shard-snb) fdo#101623 +1
> Test gem_tiled_swapping:
>         Subgroup non-threaded:
>                 incomplete -> PASS       (shard-snb) fdo#104009
> Test drv_selftest:
>         Subgroup live_hangcheck:
>                 incomplete -> PASS       (shard-snb) fdo#103880

And pushed.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx