* Re: new KVM branch for linux-next
[not found] <60545562-09bf-77bd-53f2-786508bdc53e@redhat.com>
@ 2017-11-27 21:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-28 8:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-12-06 8:31 ` Christian Borntraeger
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2017-11-27 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini
Cc: Radim Krčmář, Marcelo Tosatti, Gleb Natapov, KVM
Hi Paolo,
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 17:44:24 +0100 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> could you please add refs/heads/master of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git to linux-next, right
> before the existing refs/heads/linux-next tree?
Added from today with you and the KVM mailing list as contacts.
Can you tell me what this tree is for? Will it only contain bug fixes
for he current release?
BTW, the contacts for the "kvm" tree are Marcelo Tosatti
<mtosatti@redhat.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, KVM
<kvm@vger.kernel.org> - are they all still appropriate?
Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next. As
you may know, this is not a judgement of your code. The purpose of
linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window.
You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
been:
* submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
Signed-off-by,
* posted to the relevant mailing list,
* reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
* successfully unit tested, and
* destined for the current or next Linux merge window.
Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
sfr@canb.auug.org.au
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: new KVM branch for linux-next
2017-11-27 21:24 ` new KVM branch for linux-next Stephen Rothwell
@ 2017-11-28 8:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-11-28 22:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-06 8:31 ` Christian Borntraeger
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2017-11-28 8:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Radim Krčmář, Marcelo Tosatti, Gleb Natapov, KVM
On 27/11/2017 22:24, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 17:44:24 +0100 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> could you please add refs/heads/master of
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git to linux-next, right
>> before the existing refs/heads/linux-next tree?
>
> Added from today with you and the KVM mailing list as contacts.
> Can you tell me what this tree is for? Will it only contain bug fixes
> for he current release?
Correct.
> BTW, the contacts for the "kvm" tree are Marcelo Tosatti
> <mtosatti@redhat.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, KVM
> <kvm@vger.kernel.org> - are they all still appropriate?
No, please replace with:
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
for both kvm.git trees.
Thanks,
Paolo
> Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next. As
> you may know, this is not a judgement of your code. The purpose of
> linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
> conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window.
>
> You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
> been:
> * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
> Signed-off-by,
> * posted to the relevant mailing list,
> * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
> * successfully unit tested, and
> * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.
>
> Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
> to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: new KVM branch for linux-next
2017-11-28 8:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2017-11-28 22:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2017-11-28 22:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini
Cc: Radim Krčmář, Marcelo Tosatti, Gleb Natapov, KVM
Hi Paolo,
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:57:54 +0100 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 27/11/2017 22:24, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Added from today with you and the KVM mailing list as contacts.
> > Can you tell me what this tree is for? Will it only contain bug fixes
> > for he current release?
>
> Correct.
OK, so I have renamed teh tree to kvm-fixes and moved it up to be with
the other fixes trees (which I merge first).
> No, please replace with:
>
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Done.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: new KVM branch for linux-next
2017-11-27 21:24 ` new KVM branch for linux-next Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-28 8:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2017-12-06 8:31 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-12-06 22:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2017-12-06 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell, Cornelia Huck
Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Radim Krčmář, KVM, linux-s390
Stephen,
when we are at it: can you also add branch master of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git
(probably after the kvm/master thing)
A good name might be kvms390-fixes
This will contain fixes for kvm on s390 targeted for the current release.
Usually this branch will be merged in Paolos kvm/master which will
then go to Linus
As contact please use
"Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>"
"Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>"
kvm@vger.kernel.org
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Thanks a lot
Christian
On 11/27/2017 10:24 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 17:44:24 +0100 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> could you please add refs/heads/master of
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git to linux-next, right
>> before the existing refs/heads/linux-next tree?
>
> Added from today with you and the KVM mailing list as contacts.
>
> Can you tell me what this tree is for? Will it only contain bug fixes
> for he current release?
>
> BTW, the contacts for the "kvm" tree are Marcelo Tosatti
> <mtosatti@redhat.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, KVM
> <kvm@vger.kernel.org> - are they all still appropriate?
>
> Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next. As
> you may know, this is not a judgement of your code. The purpose of
> linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
> conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window.
>
> You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
> been:
> * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
> Signed-off-by,
> * posted to the relevant mailing list,
> * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
> * successfully unit tested, and
> * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.
>
> Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
> to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: new KVM branch for linux-next
2017-12-06 8:31 ` Christian Borntraeger
@ 2017-12-06 22:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2017-12-06 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Borntraeger
Cc: Cornelia Huck, Paolo Bonzini, Radim Krčmář,
KVM, linux-s390
Hi Christian,
On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:31:16 +0100 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> when we are at it: can you also add branch master of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git
>
> (probably after the kvm/master thing)
>
> A good name might be kvms390-fixes
>
> This will contain fixes for kvm on s390 targeted for the current release.
> Usually this branch will be merged in Paolos kvm/master which will
> then go to Linus
>
> As contact please use
> "Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>"
> "Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>"
> kvm@vger.kernel.org
> linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Added from today.
Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next. As
you may know, this is not a judgement of your code. The purpose of
linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window.
You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
been:
* submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
Signed-off-by,
* posted to the relevant mailing list,
* reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
* successfully unit tested, and
* destined for the current or next Linux merge window.
Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
sfr@canb.auug.org.au
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-12-06 22:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <60545562-09bf-77bd-53f2-786508bdc53e@redhat.com>
2017-11-27 21:24 ` new KVM branch for linux-next Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-28 8:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-11-28 22:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-06 8:31 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-12-06 22:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.