All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, LKP <lkp@01.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	wfg@linux.intel.com, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: d1fc031747 ("sched/wait: assert the wait_queue_head lock is .."):  EIP: __wake_up_common
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:57:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171214125731.GA10676@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171213170300.b0bb26900dd00641819b4872@linux-foundation.org>

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 05:03:00PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I'm probably sitting on an older version.  I've dropped
> 
> epoll: use the waitqueue lock to protect ep->wq
> sched/wait: assert the wait_queue_head lock is held in __wake_up_common

Thanks.  I'll send a v3 over the fixed version with the nits pointed
out during review today.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, LKP <lkp@01.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	wfg@linux.intel.com, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: d1fc031747 ("sched/wait: assert the wait_queue_head lock is .."):  EIP: __wake_up_common
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:57:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171214125731.GA10676@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171213170300.b0bb26900dd00641819b4872@linux-foundation.org>

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 05:03:00PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I'm probably sitting on an older version.  I've dropped
> 
> epoll: use the waitqueue lock to protect ep->wq
> sched/wait: assert the wait_queue_head lock is held in __wake_up_common

Thanks.  I'll send a v3 over the fixed version with the nits pointed
out during review today.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: d1fc031747 ("sched/wait: assert the wait_queue_head lock is .."): EIP: __wake_up_common
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:57:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171214125731.GA10676@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171213170300.b0bb26900dd00641819b4872@linux-foundation.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 351 bytes --]

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 05:03:00PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I'm probably sitting on an older version.  I've dropped
> 
> epoll: use the waitqueue lock to protect ep->wq
> sched/wait: assert the wait_queue_head lock is held in __wake_up_common

Thanks.  I'll send a v3 over the fixed version with the nits pointed
out during review today.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-14 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-14  0:50 d1fc031747 ("sched/wait: assert the wait_queue_head lock is .."): EIP: __wake_up_common kernel test robot
2017-12-14  0:50 ` kernel test robot
2017-12-14  1:03 ` Andrew Morton
2017-12-14  1:03   ` Andrew Morton
2017-12-14  1:03   ` Andrew Morton
2017-12-14  4:58   ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-14  4:58     ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-14  4:58     ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-14 12:57   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-12-14 12:57     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-12-14 12:57     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-12-14 12:58   ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-14 12:58     ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-14 12:58     ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-14 13:05     ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-14 13:05       ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-14 13:05       ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-14 13:10     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-12-14 13:10       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-12-14 13:10       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-12-14 14:12       ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-14 14:12         ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-14 14:12         ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171214125731.GA10676@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkp@01.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=wfg@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.