From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> To: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>, Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, graeme.gregory@linaro.org, mark.salter@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] acpi, spcr: Make SPCR avialable to other architectures Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 15:49:43 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20171214154943.GA29588@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <6541a055-bfd4-daa7-5b91-38384bd65c3f@codeaurora.org> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 08:08:08AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote: > On 12/14/17 4:30 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > >>I didn't want to put any ACPI code in amba-pl011.c, so putting it in spcr.c > >>made the most sense. I agree the global variable is ugly. If you have a > >>better idea, I'm all ears. > > >I told you my idea. It could have been made easier by reusing the > >ACPI_DECLARE_PROBE_ENTRY() mechanism. > > Sorry, I don't mean to be difficult, but when did you tell *me* this idea of > yours? I don't see any email from you to me that mentions I said that IMO it would have been better if the quirk was managed in amba-pl011.c - you had your reasons not to do it, end of the story. > ACPI_DECLARE_PROBE_ENTRY(). I've never even heard of that macro before. > Please note that I'm not the original author of this code. It is what it is, let's move on, we will keep this in mind if a similar quirk is required. Thanks, Lorenzo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] acpi, spcr: Make SPCR avialable to other architectures Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 15:49:43 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20171214154943.GA29588@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <6541a055-bfd4-daa7-5b91-38384bd65c3f@codeaurora.org> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 08:08:08AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote: > On 12/14/17 4:30 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > >>I didn't want to put any ACPI code in amba-pl011.c, so putting it in spcr.c > >>made the most sense. I agree the global variable is ugly. If you have a > >>better idea, I'm all ears. > > >I told you my idea. It could have been made easier by reusing the > >ACPI_DECLARE_PROBE_ENTRY() mechanism. > > Sorry, I don't mean to be difficult, but when did you tell *me* this idea of > yours? I don't see any email from you to me that mentions I said that IMO it would have been better if the quirk was managed in amba-pl011.c - you had your reasons not to do it, end of the story. > ACPI_DECLARE_PROBE_ENTRY(). I've never even heard of that macro before. > Please note that I'm not the original author of this code. It is what it is, let's move on, we will keep this in mind if a similar quirk is required. Thanks, Lorenzo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-14 15:49 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-12-11 15:50 [PATCH v2 0/2] acpi, x86: Add SPCR table support Prarit Bhargava 2017-12-11 15:50 ` Prarit Bhargava 2017-12-11 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] acpi, spcr: Make SPCR avialable to other architectures Prarit Bhargava 2017-12-11 15:50 ` Prarit Bhargava 2017-12-13 0:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2017-12-13 0:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2017-12-13 10:08 ` Will Deacon 2017-12-13 10:08 ` Will Deacon 2017-12-13 12:45 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2017-12-13 12:45 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2017-12-13 21:11 ` Timur Tabi 2017-12-13 21:11 ` Timur Tabi 2017-12-14 10:30 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2017-12-14 10:30 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2017-12-14 14:08 ` Timur Tabi 2017-12-14 14:08 ` Timur Tabi 2017-12-14 15:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message] 2017-12-14 15:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2018-01-08 12:46 ` Prarit Bhargava 2018-01-08 12:46 ` Prarit Bhargava 2017-12-11 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] acpi, x86: Use SPCR table for earlycon on x86 Prarit Bhargava 2017-12-11 15:50 ` Prarit Bhargava 2017-12-11 15:50 ` Prarit Bhargava 2017-12-12 10:41 ` Ingo Molnar 2017-12-12 10:41 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20171214154943.GA29588@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com \ --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \ --cc=bhsharma@redhat.com \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=corbet@lwn.net \ --cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \ --cc=hpa@zytor.com \ --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \ --cc=mark.salter@redhat.com \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=prarit@redhat.com \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=timur@codeaurora.org \ --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.