All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>,
	Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>,
	Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: finer-grained lockdep/cross-release completion
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 08:11:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171218071159.GW26573@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171211091928.cpw3srz2rddmruxj@phenom.ffwll.local>

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:19:28AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 11:54:19AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 11:08:49AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > Since -rc1 we're hitting a bunch of lockdep splats using the new
> > > cross-release stuff around the 2 kthread completions. In all cases
> > > they are because totally independent uses of kthread are mixed up by
> > > lockdep into the same locking class, creating artificial deadlocks.
> > > 
> > > Fix this by converting kthread code in the same way as e.g.
> > > alloc_workqueue already works: Use macros for the public api so we can
> > > have a callsite specific lockdep key, then pass that through the
> > > entire callchain. Due to the many entry points this is slightly
> > > tedious.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
> > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > > Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> > > Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> > > References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103950
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> 
> Who's going to pick this up? Ingo, Andrew?

This didn't seem to have made it into -rc4. Anything needed to get it
going?

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: finer-grained lockdep/cross-release completion
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 08:11:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171218071159.GW26573@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171211091928.cpw3srz2rddmruxj@phenom.ffwll.local>

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:19:28AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 11:54:19AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 11:08:49AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > Since -rc1 we're hitting a bunch of lockdep splats using the new
> > > cross-release stuff around the 2 kthread completions. In all cases
> > > they are because totally independent uses of kthread are mixed up by
> > > lockdep into the same locking class, creating artificial deadlocks.
> > > 
> > > Fix this by converting kthread code in the same way as e.g.
> > > alloc_workqueue already works: Use macros for the public api so we can
> > > have a callsite specific lockdep key, then pass that through the
> > > entire callchain. Due to the many entry points this is slightly
> > > tedious.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
> > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > > Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> > > Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> > > References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103950
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> 
> Who's going to pick this up? Ingo, Andrew?

This didn't seem to have made it into -rc4. Anything needed to get it
going?

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-18  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-07 10:08 [PATCH] kthread: finer-grained lockdep/cross-release completion Daniel Vetter
2017-12-07 10:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-12-07 12:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-07 12:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-07 14:58   ` Daniel Vetter
2017-12-07 14:58     ` Daniel Vetter
2017-12-07 19:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-07 19:57       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-07 20:56       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2017-12-07 20:56         ` Daniel Vetter
2017-12-08 10:14         ` [Intel-gfx] " Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-08 10:14           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-08 16:36           ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2017-12-08 16:36             ` Daniel Vetter
2017-12-08 18:40             ` [Intel-gfx] " Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-08 18:40               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-07 12:56 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2017-12-08 10:54 ` [PATCH] " Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-08 10:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-11  9:19   ` Daniel Vetter
2017-12-11  9:19     ` Daniel Vetter
2017-12-18  7:11     ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2017-12-18  7:11       ` Daniel Vetter
2017-12-18 17:42       ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-18 17:42         ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-19  9:59         ` Daniel Vetter
2017-12-19  9:59           ` Daniel Vetter
2017-12-20  1:14           ` Byungchul Park
2017-12-20  1:14             ` Byungchul Park
2018-03-15 10:31             ` Daniel Vetter
2018-03-15 10:31               ` Daniel Vetter
2018-03-15 12:41               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-15 12:41                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-15 23:26                 ` Byungchul Park
2018-10-18  8:56                   ` Daniel Vetter
2018-10-18  8:56                     ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171218071159.GW26573@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marta.lofstedt@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=shli@fb.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.