* [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: improve tracepoints for process/hw_id tracking
@ 2017-12-18 12:12 Lionel Landwerlin
2017-12-18 12:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: reorder field in gem_request tracepoints Lionel Landwerlin
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Lionel Landwerlin @ 2017-12-18 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Hi,
These are just a couple of changes to allow process/hw_id correlation
when using i915 perf to monitor the workloads on the GPU.
Cheers,
Lionel Landwerlin (2):
drm/i915: reorder field in gem_request tracepoints
drm/i915/trace: add hw_id to gem requests trace points
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--
2.15.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: reorder field in gem_request tracepoints
2017-12-18 12:12 [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: improve tracepoints for process/hw_id tracking Lionel Landwerlin
@ 2017-12-18 12:12 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2017-12-18 13:32 ` Chris Wilson
2017-12-18 12:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/trace: add hw_id to gem requests trace points Lionel Landwerlin
2017-12-18 12:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: improve tracepoints for process/hw_id tracking Patchwork
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Lionel Landwerlin @ 2017-12-18 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Let's make the order of the fields of the tracepoints involving gem
request match across i915. This makes userspace processing of
tracepoint a bit easier.
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
index 4e76768ffa95..321f74bae0e1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
@@ -641,8 +641,8 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request,
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(u32, dev)
- __field(u32, ctx)
__field(u32, ring)
+ __field(u32, ctx)
__field(u32, seqno)
__field(u32, global)
),
@@ -684,9 +684,9 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request_hw,
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(u32, dev)
__field(u32, ring)
+ __field(u32, ctx)
__field(u32, seqno)
__field(u32, global_seqno)
- __field(u32, ctx)
__field(u32, port)
),
--
2.15.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/trace: add hw_id to gem requests trace points
2017-12-18 12:12 [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: improve tracepoints for process/hw_id tracking Lionel Landwerlin
2017-12-18 12:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: reorder field in gem_request tracepoints Lionel Landwerlin
@ 2017-12-18 12:12 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2017-12-18 13:35 ` Chris Wilson
2017-12-18 12:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: improve tracepoints for process/hw_id tracking Patchwork
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Lionel Landwerlin @ 2017-12-18 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
When monitoring the GPU with i915 perf, reports are tagged with a hw
id. Gem context creation tracepoints already have a hw_id field,
unfortunately you only get this correlation between a process id and a
hw context id once when the context is created. It doesn't help if you
started monitoring after the process was initialized or if the drm fd
was transfered from one process to another.
This change adds the hw_id field to gem requests, so that correlation
can also be done on submission.
v2: Place hw_id at the end of the tracepoint to not disrupt too much
existing tools (Chris)
v3: Reorder hw_id field again (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
index 321f74bae0e1..042c43a4bd59 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
@@ -616,6 +616,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_queue,
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(u32, dev)
+ __field(u32, hw_id)
__field(u32, ring)
__field(u32, ctx)
__field(u32, seqno)
@@ -624,15 +625,16 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_queue,
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->dev = req->i915->drm.primary->index;
+ __entry->hw_id = req->ctx->hw_id;
__entry->ring = req->engine->id;
__entry->ctx = req->fence.context;
__entry->seqno = req->fence.seqno;
__entry->flags = flags;
),
- TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, flags=0x%x",
- __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
- __entry->flags)
+ TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, flags=0x%x",
+ __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->ring, __entry->ctx,
+ __entry->seqno, __entry->flags)
);
DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request,
@@ -641,6 +643,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request,
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(u32, dev)
+ __field(u32, hw_id)
__field(u32, ring)
__field(u32, ctx)
__field(u32, seqno)
@@ -649,15 +652,16 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request,
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->dev = req->i915->drm.primary->index;
+ __entry->hw_id = req->ctx->hw_id;
__entry->ring = req->engine->id;
__entry->ctx = req->fence.context;
__entry->seqno = req->fence.seqno;
__entry->global = req->global_seqno;
),
- TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, global=%u",
- __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
- __entry->global)
+ TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, global=%u",
+ __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->ring, __entry->ctx,
+ __entry->seqno, __entry->global)
);
DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_add,
@@ -683,6 +687,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request_hw,
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(u32, dev)
+ __field(u32, hw_id)
__field(u32, ring)
__field(u32, ctx)
__field(u32, seqno)
@@ -692,6 +697,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request_hw,
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->dev = req->i915->drm.primary->index;
+ __entry->hw_id = req->ctx->hw_id;
__entry->ring = req->engine->id;
__entry->ctx = req->fence.context;
__entry->seqno = req->fence.seqno;
@@ -699,10 +705,10 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request_hw,
__entry->port = port;
),
- TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, global=%u, port=%u",
- __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->ctx,
- __entry->seqno, __entry->global_seqno,
- __entry->port)
+ TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, global=%u, port=%u",
+ __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->ring,
+ __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
+ __entry->global_seqno, __entry->port)
);
DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_hw, i915_gem_request_in,
--
2.15.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: improve tracepoints for process/hw_id tracking
2017-12-18 12:12 [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: improve tracepoints for process/hw_id tracking Lionel Landwerlin
2017-12-18 12:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: reorder field in gem_request tracepoints Lionel Landwerlin
2017-12-18 12:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/trace: add hw_id to gem requests trace points Lionel Landwerlin
@ 2017-12-18 12:52 ` Patchwork
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-12-18 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lionel Landwerlin; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: improve tracepoints for process/hw_id tracking
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/35506/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 35506v1 drm/i915: improve tracepoints for process/hw_id tracking
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/35506/revisions/1/mbox/
Test gem_exec_reloc:
Subgroup basic-gtt-cpu:
pass -> INCOMPLETE (fi-byt-j1900) fdo#102657
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (fi-kbl-r) fdo#104172
Test kms_psr_sink_crc:
Subgroup psr_basic:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (fi-skl-6700hq) fdo#101144
fdo#102657 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102657
fdo#104172 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104172
fdo#101144 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101144
fi-bdw-5557u total:288 pass:267 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:432s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:288 pass:264 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:441s
fi-blb-e6850 total:288 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:64 time:384s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:288 pass:242 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 time:497s
fi-bwr-2160 total:288 pass:183 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:105 time:275s
fi-bxt-dsi total:288 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30 time:490s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:288 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:501s
fi-byt-j1900 total:74 pass:64 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:9
fi-byt-n2820 total:288 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:469s
fi-elk-e7500 total:224 pass:163 dwarn:15 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:45
fi-gdg-551 total:288 pass:179 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:108 time:262s
fi-glk-1 total:288 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:529s
fi-hsw-4770 total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:403s
fi-hsw-4770r total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:415s
fi-ilk-650 total:288 pass:228 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:383s
fi-ivb-3520m total:288 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:480s
fi-ivb-3770 total:288 pass:255 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:33 time:425s
fi-kbl-7500u total:288 pass:263 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:479s
fi-kbl-7560u total:288 pass:268 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:511s
fi-kbl-7567u total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:463s
fi-kbl-r total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:526s
fi-pnv-d510 total:288 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 time:582s
fi-skl-6260u total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:444s
fi-skl-6600u total:288 pass:260 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:530s
fi-skl-6700hq total:288 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:552s
fi-skl-6700k2 total:288 pass:264 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:506s
fi-skl-6770hq total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:489s
fi-skl-gvtdvm total:288 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 time:448s
fi-snb-2520m total:288 pass:248 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 time:544s
fi-snb-2600 total:288 pass:248 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 time:410s
Blacklisted hosts:
fi-cfl-s2 total:288 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:599s
fi-cnl-y total:288 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:614s
fi-glk-dsi total:132 pass:65 dwarn:0 dfail:1 fail:0 skip:65
bf5cdf9e055a88559a6fc707b6e89e88077a2124 drm-tip: 2017y-12m-18d-11h-53m-39s UTC integration manifest
e3fedfb57294 drm/i915/trace: add hw_id to gem requests trace points
294ba5538aec drm/i915: reorder field in gem_request tracepoints
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7524/issues.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: reorder field in gem_request tracepoints
2017-12-18 12:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: reorder field in gem_request tracepoints Lionel Landwerlin
@ 2017-12-18 13:32 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-12-18 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lionel Landwerlin, intel-gfx
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2017-12-18 12:12:47)
> Let's make the order of the fields of the tracepoints involving gem
> request match across i915. This makes userspace processing of
> tracepoint a bit easier.
>
> Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
We could argue for days upon the preferred ordering of ctx/ring/seqno,
but I think the best compromise is indeed hw_id/ring/ctx/seqno.
I couldn't see any remaining inconsistencies,
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/trace: add hw_id to gem requests trace points
2017-12-18 12:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/trace: add hw_id to gem requests trace points Lionel Landwerlin
@ 2017-12-18 13:35 ` Chris Wilson
2017-12-18 14:17 ` Lionel Landwerlin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-12-18 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lionel Landwerlin, intel-gfx
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2017-12-18 12:12:48)
> When monitoring the GPU with i915 perf, reports are tagged with a hw
> id. Gem context creation tracepoints already have a hw_id field,
> unfortunately you only get this correlation between a process id and a
> hw context id once when the context is created. It doesn't help if you
> started monitoring after the process was initialized or if the drm fd
> was transfered from one process to another.
>
> This change adds the hw_id field to gem requests, so that correlation
> can also be done on submission.
>
> v2: Place hw_id at the end of the tracepoint to not disrupt too much
> existing tools (Chris)
>
> v3: Reorder hw_id field again (Chris)
>
> Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
> index 321f74bae0e1..042c43a4bd59 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
> @@ -616,6 +616,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_queue,
>
> TP_STRUCT__entry(
> __field(u32, dev)
> + __field(u32, hw_id)
> __field(u32, ring)
> __field(u32, ctx)
> __field(u32, seqno)
> @@ -624,15 +625,16 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_queue,
>
> TP_fast_assign(
> __entry->dev = req->i915->drm.primary->index;
> + __entry->hw_id = req->ctx->hw_id;
> __entry->ring = req->engine->id;
> __entry->ctx = req->fence.context;
> __entry->seqno = req->fence.seqno;
> __entry->flags = flags;
> ),
>
> - TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, flags=0x%x",
> - __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
> - __entry->flags)
> + TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, flags=0x%x",
> + __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->ring, __entry->ctx,
> + __entry->seqno, __entry->flags)
> );
>
> DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request,
> @@ -641,6 +643,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request,
>
> TP_STRUCT__entry(
> __field(u32, dev)
> + __field(u32, hw_id)
> __field(u32, ring)
> __field(u32, ctx)
> __field(u32, seqno)
> @@ -649,15 +652,16 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request,
>
> TP_fast_assign(
> __entry->dev = req->i915->drm.primary->index;
> + __entry->hw_id = req->ctx->hw_id;
> __entry->ring = req->engine->id;
> __entry->ctx = req->fence.context;
> __entry->seqno = req->fence.seqno;
> __entry->global = req->global_seqno;
> ),
>
> - TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, global=%u",
> - __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
> - __entry->global)
> + TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, global=%u",
> + __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->ring, __entry->ctx,
> + __entry->seqno, __entry->global)
> );
>
> DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_add,
> @@ -683,6 +687,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request_hw,
>
> TP_STRUCT__entry(
> __field(u32, dev)
> + __field(u32, hw_id)
> __field(u32, ring)
> __field(u32, ctx)
> __field(u32, seqno)
> @@ -692,6 +697,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request_hw,
>
> TP_fast_assign(
> __entry->dev = req->i915->drm.primary->index;
> + __entry->hw_id = req->ctx->hw_id;
> __entry->ring = req->engine->id;
> __entry->ctx = req->fence.context;
> __entry->seqno = req->fence.seqno;
> @@ -699,10 +705,10 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request_hw,
> __entry->port = port;
> ),
>
> - TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, global=%u, port=%u",
> - __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->ctx,
> - __entry->seqno, __entry->global_seqno,
> - __entry->port)
> + TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, global=%u, port=%u",
> + __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->ring,
> + __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
> + __entry->global_seqno, __entry->port)
> );
Missed i915_gem_request_wait_begin?
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/trace: add hw_id to gem requests trace points
2017-12-18 13:35 ` Chris Wilson
@ 2017-12-18 14:17 ` Lionel Landwerlin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Lionel Landwerlin @ 2017-12-18 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
On 18/12/17 13:35, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2017-12-18 12:12:48)
>> When monitoring the GPU with i915 perf, reports are tagged with a hw
>> id. Gem context creation tracepoints already have a hw_id field,
>> unfortunately you only get this correlation between a process id and a
>> hw context id once when the context is created. It doesn't help if you
>> started monitoring after the process was initialized or if the drm fd
>> was transfered from one process to another.
>>
>> This change adds the hw_id field to gem requests, so that correlation
>> can also be done on submission.
>>
>> v2: Place hw_id at the end of the tracepoint to not disrupt too much
>> existing tools (Chris)
>>
>> v3: Reorder hw_id field again (Chris)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
>> index 321f74bae0e1..042c43a4bd59 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
>> @@ -616,6 +616,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_queue,
>>
>> TP_STRUCT__entry(
>> __field(u32, dev)
>> + __field(u32, hw_id)
>> __field(u32, ring)
>> __field(u32, ctx)
>> __field(u32, seqno)
>> @@ -624,15 +625,16 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_queue,
>>
>> TP_fast_assign(
>> __entry->dev = req->i915->drm.primary->index;
>> + __entry->hw_id = req->ctx->hw_id;
>> __entry->ring = req->engine->id;
>> __entry->ctx = req->fence.context;
>> __entry->seqno = req->fence.seqno;
>> __entry->flags = flags;
>> ),
>>
>> - TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, flags=0x%x",
>> - __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
>> - __entry->flags)
>> + TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, flags=0x%x",
>> + __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->ring, __entry->ctx,
>> + __entry->seqno, __entry->flags)
>> );
>>
>> DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request,
>> @@ -641,6 +643,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request,
>>
>> TP_STRUCT__entry(
>> __field(u32, dev)
>> + __field(u32, hw_id)
>> __field(u32, ring)
>> __field(u32, ctx)
>> __field(u32, seqno)
>> @@ -649,15 +652,16 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request,
>>
>> TP_fast_assign(
>> __entry->dev = req->i915->drm.primary->index;
>> + __entry->hw_id = req->ctx->hw_id;
>> __entry->ring = req->engine->id;
>> __entry->ctx = req->fence.context;
>> __entry->seqno = req->fence.seqno;
>> __entry->global = req->global_seqno;
>> ),
>>
>> - TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, global=%u",
>> - __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
>> - __entry->global)
>> + TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, global=%u",
>> + __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->ring, __entry->ctx,
>> + __entry->seqno, __entry->global)
>> );
>>
>> DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_add,
>> @@ -683,6 +687,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request_hw,
>>
>> TP_STRUCT__entry(
>> __field(u32, dev)
>> + __field(u32, hw_id)
>> __field(u32, ring)
>> __field(u32, ctx)
>> __field(u32, seqno)
>> @@ -692,6 +697,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request_hw,
>>
>> TP_fast_assign(
>> __entry->dev = req->i915->drm.primary->index;
>> + __entry->hw_id = req->ctx->hw_id;
>> __entry->ring = req->engine->id;
>> __entry->ctx = req->fence.context;
>> __entry->seqno = req->fence.seqno;
>> @@ -699,10 +705,10 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request_hw,
>> __entry->port = port;
>> ),
>>
>> - TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, global=%u, port=%u",
>> - __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->ctx,
>> - __entry->seqno, __entry->global_seqno,
>> - __entry->port)
>> + TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, ring=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, global=%u, port=%u",
>> + __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->ring,
>> + __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
>> + __entry->global_seqno, __entry->port)
>> );
> Missed i915_gem_request_wait_begin?
> -Chris
>
Indeed, apologies :|
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-12-18 14:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-12-18 12:12 [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: improve tracepoints for process/hw_id tracking Lionel Landwerlin
2017-12-18 12:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: reorder field in gem_request tracepoints Lionel Landwerlin
2017-12-18 13:32 ` Chris Wilson
2017-12-18 12:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/trace: add hw_id to gem requests trace points Lionel Landwerlin
2017-12-18 13:35 ` Chris Wilson
2017-12-18 14:17 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2017-12-18 12:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: improve tracepoints for process/hw_id tracking Patchwork
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.