* [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the request is on the execution queue before being removed
@ 2017-12-22 14:19 Chris Wilson
2017-12-22 14:41 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-12-22 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
We should only attempt to remove requests from the execution queue that
are on the execution queue. These are the requests that have been
assigned a global_seqno, so we can assert that we only attempt to remove
requests with a nonzero global_seqno. Afterwards we assert that we
remove them in order, i.e. the global_seqno matches the engine's seqno,
but that leaves a small loophole for an unattached request on an unused
engine.
We can then make the same assertion on queuing the request to the
execution, it must have a zero global_seqno or else we are queuing the
same request twice.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
index 59f023bb7015..d575109f7a7f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
@@ -479,6 +479,7 @@ void __i915_gem_request_submit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
/* Transfer from per-context onto the global per-engine timeline */
timeline = engine->timeline;
GEM_BUG_ON(timeline == request->timeline);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(request->global_seqno);
seqno = timeline_get_seqno(timeline);
GEM_BUG_ON(!seqno);
@@ -525,6 +526,7 @@ void __i915_gem_request_unsubmit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
/* Only unwind in reverse order, required so that the per-context list
* is kept in seqno/ring order.
*/
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!request->global_seqno);
GEM_BUG_ON(request->global_seqno != engine->timeline->seqno);
engine->timeline->seqno--;
--
2.15.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Assert that the request is on the execution queue before being removed
2017-12-22 14:19 [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the request is on the execution queue before being removed Chris Wilson
@ 2017-12-22 14:41 ` Patchwork
2017-12-22 16:06 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2017-12-22 17:18 ` [PATCH] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-12-22 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Assert that the request is on the execution queue before being removed
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/35723/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 35723v1 drm/i915: Assert that the request is on the execution queue before being removed
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/35723/revisions/1/mbox/
Test debugfs_test:
Subgroup read_all_entries:
pass -> INCOMPLETE (fi-snb-2520m) fdo#103713
fdo#103713 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103713
fi-bdw-5557u total:288 pass:267 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:436s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:288 pass:264 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:437s
fi-blb-e6850 total:288 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:64 time:382s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:288 pass:242 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 time:496s
fi-bwr-2160 total:288 pass:183 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:105 time:276s
fi-bxt-dsi total:288 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30 time:490s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:288 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:485s
fi-byt-j1900 total:288 pass:253 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 time:472s
fi-byt-n2820 total:288 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:467s
fi-elk-e7500 total:224 pass:163 dwarn:15 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:45
fi-gdg-551 total:288 pass:179 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:108 time:263s
fi-glk-1 total:288 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:535s
fi-hsw-4770 total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:403s
fi-hsw-4770r total:288 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:412s
fi-ilk-650 total:288 pass:228 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:428s
fi-ivb-3520m total:288 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:475s
fi-ivb-3770 total:288 pass:255 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:33 time:430s
fi-kbl-7500u total:288 pass:263 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:481s
fi-kbl-7560u total:288 pass:268 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:515s
fi-kbl-7567u total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:470s
fi-kbl-r total:288 pass:260 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:523s
fi-pnv-d510 total:288 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 time:589s
fi-skl-6260u total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:442s
fi-skl-6600u total:288 pass:260 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:528s
fi-skl-6700hq total:288 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:552s
fi-skl-6700k2 total:288 pass:264 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:503s
fi-skl-6770hq total:288 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:493s
fi-skl-gvtdvm total:288 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 time:448s
fi-snb-2520m total:3 pass:2 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:0
fi-snb-2600 total:288 pass:248 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 time:415s
Blacklisted hosts:
fi-cfl-s2 total:288 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:585s
fi-cnl-y total:208 pass:187 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
fi-glk-dsi total:288 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30 time:483s
34783c4253df6206c731735524b0297c6894384b drm-tip: 2017y-12m-22d-12h-46m-57s UTC integration manifest
5c9396e9ac21 drm/i915: Assert that the request is on the execution queue before being removed
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7566/issues.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Assert that the request is on the execution queue before being removed
2017-12-22 14:19 [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the request is on the execution queue before being removed Chris Wilson
2017-12-22 14:41 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2017-12-22 16:06 ` Patchwork
2017-12-22 17:18 ` [PATCH] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-12-22 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Assert that the request is on the execution queue before being removed
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/35723/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Test kms_flip:
Subgroup vblank-vs-modeset-suspend-interruptible:
pass -> FAIL (shard-snb)
skip -> PASS (shard-hsw) fdo#103540
Test gem_softpin:
Subgroup noreloc-s3:
pass -> SKIP (shard-snb) fdo#102365
Test kms_chv_cursor_fail:
Subgroup pipe-c-128x128-top-edge:
incomplete -> PASS (shard-hsw)
Test pm_rpm:
Subgroup system-suspend-execbuf:
skip -> PASS (shard-hsw) fdo#103375
Test perf:
Subgroup polling:
pass -> FAIL (shard-hsw) fdo#102252
Test gem_mmap_wc:
Subgroup set-cache-level:
skip -> PASS (shard-snb)
Test kms_flip_event_leak:
skip -> PASS (shard-snb)
Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
Subgroup fbc-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-blt:
pass -> FAIL (shard-snb) fdo#101623
fdo#103540 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103540
fdo#102365 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102365
fdo#103375 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103375
fdo#102252 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102252
fdo#101623 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101623
shard-hsw total:2712 pass:1535 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:11 skip:1165 time:9272s
shard-snb total:2712 pass:1307 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:12 skip:1392 time:7919s
Blacklisted hosts:
shard-apl total:2712 pass:1687 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:23 skip:1001 time:13808s
shard-kbl total:2712 pass:1795 dwarn:12 dfail:1 fail:24 skip:880 time:11097s
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7566/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the request is on the execution queue before being removed
2017-12-22 14:19 [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the request is on the execution queue before being removed Chris Wilson
2017-12-22 14:41 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-12-22 16:06 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
@ 2017-12-22 17:18 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tvrtko Ursulin @ 2017-12-22 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
On 22/12/2017 14:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
> We should only attempt to remove requests from the execution queue that
> are on the execution queue. These are the requests that have been
> assigned a global_seqno, so we can assert that we only attempt to remove
> requests with a nonzero global_seqno. Afterwards we assert that we
> remove them in order, i.e. the global_seqno matches the engine's seqno,
> but that leaves a small loophole for an unattached request on an unused
> engine.
>
> We can then make the same assertion on queuing the request to the
> execution, it must have a zero global_seqno or else we are queuing the
> same request twice.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> index 59f023bb7015..d575109f7a7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> @@ -479,6 +479,7 @@ void __i915_gem_request_submit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
> /* Transfer from per-context onto the global per-engine timeline */
> timeline = engine->timeline;
> GEM_BUG_ON(timeline == request->timeline);
> + GEM_BUG_ON(request->global_seqno);
>
> seqno = timeline_get_seqno(timeline);
> GEM_BUG_ON(!seqno);
> @@ -525,6 +526,7 @@ void __i915_gem_request_unsubmit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
> /* Only unwind in reverse order, required so that the per-context list
> * is kept in seqno/ring order.
> */
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!request->global_seqno);
> GEM_BUG_ON(request->global_seqno != engine->timeline->seqno);
> engine->timeline->seqno--;
>
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-12-22 17:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-12-22 14:19 [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the request is on the execution queue before being removed Chris Wilson
2017-12-22 14:41 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-12-22 16:06 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2017-12-22 17:18 ` [PATCH] " Tvrtko Ursulin
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.