[PATCH 4.4-stable 0/6] bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation

[PATCH 4.4-stable 0/6] bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation

[Jiri Slaby]

Hi,

this is a backport of these patches which I did for our kernels:
c237ee5eb33b bpf: add bpf_patch_insn_single helper
3df126f35f88 bpf: don't (ab)use instructions to store state
e245c5c6a565 bpf: move fixup_bpf_calls() function
79741b3bdec0 bpf: refactor fixup_bpf_calls()
8041902dae52 bpf: adjust insn_aux_data when patching insns
b2157399cc98 bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation

I offer it here for use in stable 4.4, if there is no better/simpler
backport available yet.

Alexei Starovoitov (4):
  bpf: move fixup_bpf_calls() function
  bpf: refactor fixup_bpf_calls()
  bpf: adjust insn_aux_data when patching insns
  bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation

Daniel Borkmann (1):
  bpf: add bpf_patch_insn_single helper

Jakub Kicinski (1):
  bpf: don't (ab)use instructions to store state

 include/linux/bpf.h    |   2 +
 include/linux/filter.h |   3 +
 kernel/bpf/arraymap.c  |  24 ++++--
 kernel/bpf/core.c      |  71 ++++++++++++++++
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c   |  54 ------------
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c  | 217 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 6 files changed, 252 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-)

-- 
2.15.1

[PATCH 4.4-stable 1/6] bpf: add bpf_patch_insn_single helper

[Jiri Slaby]

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

commit c237ee5eb33bf19fe0591c04ff8db19da7323a83 upstream.

Move the functionality to patch instructions out of the verifier
code and into the core as the new bpf_patch_insn_single() helper
will be needed later on for blinding as well. No changes in
functionality.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
---
 include/linux/filter.h |  3 +++
 kernel/bpf/core.c      | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c  | 53 +++++++------------------------------
 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index ccb98b459c59..677fa3b42194 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -466,6 +466,9 @@ u64 __bpf_call_base(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5);
 void bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp);
 bool bpf_helper_changes_skb_data(void *func);
 
+struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_single(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off,
+				       const struct bpf_insn *patch, u32 len);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT
 typedef void (*bpf_jit_fill_hole_t)(void *area, unsigned int size);
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 334b1bdd572c..3fd76cf0c21e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -137,6 +137,77 @@ void __bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog *fp)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__bpf_prog_free);
 
+static bool bpf_is_jmp_and_has_target(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
+{
+	return BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP  &&
+	       /* Call and Exit are both special jumps with no
+		* target inside the BPF instruction image.
+		*/
+	       BPF_OP(insn->code) != BPF_CALL &&
+	       BPF_OP(insn->code) != BPF_EXIT;
+}
+
+static void bpf_adj_branches(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 pos, u32 delta)
+{
+	struct bpf_insn *insn = prog->insnsi;
+	u32 i, insn_cnt = prog->len;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
+		if (!bpf_is_jmp_and_has_target(insn))
+			continue;
+
+		/* Adjust offset of jmps if we cross boundaries. */
+		if (i < pos && i + insn->off + 1 > pos)
+			insn->off += delta;
+		else if (i > pos + delta && i + insn->off + 1 <= pos + delta)
+			insn->off -= delta;
+	}
+}
+
+struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_single(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off,
+				       const struct bpf_insn *patch, u32 len)
+{
+	u32 insn_adj_cnt, insn_rest, insn_delta = len - 1;
+	struct bpf_prog *prog_adj;
+
+	/* Since our patchlet doesn't expand the image, we're done. */
+	if (insn_delta == 0) {
+		memcpy(prog->insnsi + off, patch, sizeof(*patch));
+		return prog;
+	}
+
+	insn_adj_cnt = prog->len + insn_delta;
+
+	/* Several new instructions need to be inserted. Make room
+	 * for them. Likely, there's no need for a new allocation as
+	 * last page could have large enough tailroom.
+	 */
+	prog_adj = bpf_prog_realloc(prog, bpf_prog_size(insn_adj_cnt),
+				    GFP_USER);
+	if (!prog_adj)
+		return NULL;
+
+	prog_adj->len = insn_adj_cnt;
+
+	/* Patching happens in 3 steps:
+	 *
+	 * 1) Move over tail of insnsi from next instruction onwards,
+	 *    so we can patch the single target insn with one or more
+	 *    new ones (patching is always from 1 to n insns, n > 0).
+	 * 2) Inject new instructions at the target location.
+	 * 3) Adjust branch offsets if necessary.
+	 */
+	insn_rest = insn_adj_cnt - off - len;
+
+	memmove(prog_adj->insnsi + off + len, prog_adj->insnsi + off + 1,
+		sizeof(*patch) * insn_rest);
+	memcpy(prog_adj->insnsi + off, patch, sizeof(*patch) * len);
+
+	bpf_adj_branches(prog_adj, off, insn_delta);
+
+	return prog_adj;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT
 struct bpf_binary_header *
 bpf_jit_binary_alloc(unsigned int proglen, u8 **image_ptr,
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index eb759f5008b8..261c90233dcd 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2098,26 +2098,6 @@ static void convert_pseudo_ld_imm64(struct verifier_env *env)
 			insn->src_reg = 0;
 }
 
-static void adjust_branches(struct bpf_prog *prog, int pos, int delta)
-{
-	struct bpf_insn *insn = prog->insnsi;
-	int insn_cnt = prog->len;
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
-		if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) != BPF_JMP ||
-		    BPF_OP(insn->code) == BPF_CALL ||
-		    BPF_OP(insn->code) == BPF_EXIT)
-			continue;
-
-		/* adjust offset of jmps if necessary */
-		if (i < pos && i + insn->off + 1 > pos)
-			insn->off += delta;
-		else if (i > pos + delta && i + insn->off + 1 <= pos + delta)
-			insn->off -= delta;
-	}
-}
-
 /* convert load instructions that access fields of 'struct __sk_buff'
  * into sequence of instructions that access fields of 'struct sk_buff'
  */
@@ -2127,14 +2107,15 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct verifier_env *env)
 	int insn_cnt = env->prog->len;
 	struct bpf_insn insn_buf[16];
 	struct bpf_prog *new_prog;
-	u32 cnt;
-	int i;
 	enum bpf_access_type type;
+	int i;
 
 	if (!env->prog->aux->ops->convert_ctx_access)
 		return 0;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
+		u32 insn_delta, cnt;
+
 		if (insn->code == (BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W))
 			type = BPF_READ;
 		else if (insn->code == (BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W))
@@ -2156,34 +2137,18 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct verifier_env *env)
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
-		if (cnt == 1) {
-			memcpy(insn, insn_buf, sizeof(*insn));
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		/* several new insns need to be inserted. Make room for them */
-		insn_cnt += cnt - 1;
-		new_prog = bpf_prog_realloc(env->prog,
-					    bpf_prog_size(insn_cnt),
-					    GFP_USER);
+		new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_single(env->prog, i, insn_buf, cnt);
 		if (!new_prog)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
-		new_prog->len = insn_cnt;
-
-		memmove(new_prog->insnsi + i + cnt, new_prog->insns + i + 1,
-			sizeof(*insn) * (insn_cnt - i - cnt));
-
-		/* copy substitute insns in place of load instruction */
-		memcpy(new_prog->insnsi + i, insn_buf, sizeof(*insn) * cnt);
-
-		/* adjust branches in the whole program */
-		adjust_branches(new_prog, i, cnt - 1);
+		insn_delta = cnt - 1;
 
 		/* keep walking new program and skip insns we just inserted */
 		env->prog = new_prog;
-		insn = new_prog->insnsi + i + cnt - 1;
-		i += cnt - 1;
+		insn      = new_prog->insnsi + i + insn_delta;
+
+		insn_cnt += insn_delta;
+		i        += insn_delta;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.15.1

[PATCH 4.4-stable 2/6] bpf: don't (ab)use instructions to store state

[Jiri Slaby]

From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>

commit 3df126f35f88dc76eea33769f85a3c3bb8ce6c6b upstream.

Storing state in reserved fields of instructions makes
it impossible to run verifier on programs already
marked as read-only. Allocate and use an array of
per-instruction state instead.

While touching the error path rename and move existing
jump target.

Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 261c90233dcd..769d2ec44802 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -186,6 +186,10 @@ struct verifier_stack_elem {
 	struct verifier_stack_elem *next;
 };
 
+struct bpf_insn_aux_data {
+	enum bpf_reg_type ptr_type;	/* pointer type for load/store insns */
+};
+
 #define MAX_USED_MAPS 64 /* max number of maps accessed by one eBPF program */
 
 /* single container for all structs
@@ -200,6 +204,7 @@ struct verifier_env {
 	struct bpf_map *used_maps[MAX_USED_MAPS]; /* array of map's used by eBPF program */
 	u32 used_map_cnt;		/* number of used maps */
 	bool allow_ptr_leaks;
+	struct bpf_insn_aux_data *insn_aux_data; /* array of per-insn state */
 };
 
 /* verbose verifier prints what it's seeing
@@ -1784,7 +1789,7 @@ static int do_check(struct verifier_env *env)
 				return err;
 
 		} else if (class == BPF_LDX) {
-			enum bpf_reg_type src_reg_type;
+			enum bpf_reg_type *prev_src_type, src_reg_type;
 
 			/* check for reserved fields is already done */
 
@@ -1813,16 +1818,18 @@ static int do_check(struct verifier_env *env)
 				continue;
 			}
 
-			if (insn->imm == 0) {
+			prev_src_type = &env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].ptr_type;
+
+			if (*prev_src_type == NOT_INIT) {
 				/* saw a valid insn
 				 * dst_reg = *(u32 *)(src_reg + off)
-				 * use reserved 'imm' field to mark this insn
+				 * save type to validate intersecting paths
 				 */
-				insn->imm = src_reg_type;
+				*prev_src_type = src_reg_type;
 
-			} else if (src_reg_type != insn->imm &&
+			} else if (src_reg_type != *prev_src_type &&
 				   (src_reg_type == PTR_TO_CTX ||
-				    insn->imm == PTR_TO_CTX)) {
+				    *prev_src_type == PTR_TO_CTX)) {
 				/* ABuser program is trying to use the same insn
 				 * dst_reg = *(u32*) (src_reg + off)
 				 * with different pointer types:
@@ -1835,7 +1842,7 @@ static int do_check(struct verifier_env *env)
 			}
 
 		} else if (class == BPF_STX) {
-			enum bpf_reg_type dst_reg_type;
+			enum bpf_reg_type *prev_dst_type, dst_reg_type;
 
 			if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_XADD) {
 				err = check_xadd(env, insn);
@@ -1863,11 +1870,13 @@ static int do_check(struct verifier_env *env)
 			if (err)
 				return err;
 
-			if (insn->imm == 0) {
-				insn->imm = dst_reg_type;
-			} else if (dst_reg_type != insn->imm &&
+			prev_dst_type = &env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].ptr_type;
+
+			if (*prev_dst_type == NOT_INIT) {
+				*prev_dst_type = dst_reg_type;
+			} else if (dst_reg_type != *prev_dst_type &&
 				   (dst_reg_type == PTR_TO_CTX ||
-				    insn->imm == PTR_TO_CTX)) {
+				    *prev_dst_type == PTR_TO_CTX)) {
 				verbose("same insn cannot be used with different pointers\n");
 				return -EINVAL;
 			}
@@ -2104,17 +2113,17 @@ static void convert_pseudo_ld_imm64(struct verifier_env *env)
 static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct verifier_env *env)
 {
 	struct bpf_insn *insn = env->prog->insnsi;
-	int insn_cnt = env->prog->len;
+	const int insn_cnt = env->prog->len;
 	struct bpf_insn insn_buf[16];
 	struct bpf_prog *new_prog;
 	enum bpf_access_type type;
-	int i;
+	int i, delta = 0;
 
 	if (!env->prog->aux->ops->convert_ctx_access)
 		return 0;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
-		u32 insn_delta, cnt;
+		u32 cnt;
 
 		if (insn->code == (BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W))
 			type = BPF_READ;
@@ -2123,11 +2132,8 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct verifier_env *env)
 		else
 			continue;
 
-		if (insn->imm != PTR_TO_CTX) {
-			/* clear internal mark */
-			insn->imm = 0;
+		if (env->insn_aux_data[i].ptr_type != PTR_TO_CTX)
 			continue;
-		}
 
 		cnt = env->prog->aux->ops->
 			convert_ctx_access(type, insn->dst_reg, insn->src_reg,
@@ -2137,18 +2143,16 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct verifier_env *env)
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
-		new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_single(env->prog, i, insn_buf, cnt);
+		new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_single(env->prog, i + delta, insn_buf,
+						 cnt);
 		if (!new_prog)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
-		insn_delta = cnt - 1;
+		delta += cnt - 1;
 
 		/* keep walking new program and skip insns we just inserted */
 		env->prog = new_prog;
-		insn      = new_prog->insnsi + i + insn_delta;
-
-		insn_cnt += insn_delta;
-		i        += insn_delta;
+		insn      = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -2192,6 +2196,11 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr)
 	if (!env)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	env->insn_aux_data = vzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) *
+				     (*prog)->len);
+	ret = -ENOMEM;
+	if (!env->insn_aux_data)
+		goto err_free_env;
 	env->prog = *prog;
 
 	/* grab the mutex to protect few globals used by verifier */
@@ -2210,12 +2219,12 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr)
 		/* log_* values have to be sane */
 		if (log_size < 128 || log_size > UINT_MAX >> 8 ||
 		    log_level == 0 || log_ubuf == NULL)
-			goto free_env;
+			goto err_unlock;
 
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		log_buf = vmalloc(log_size);
 		if (!log_buf)
-			goto free_env;
+			goto err_unlock;
 	} else {
 		log_level = 0;
 	}
@@ -2284,14 +2293,16 @@ skip_full_check:
 free_log_buf:
 	if (log_level)
 		vfree(log_buf);
-free_env:
 	if (!env->prog->aux->used_maps)
 		/* if we didn't copy map pointers into bpf_prog_info, release
 		 * them now. Otherwise free_bpf_prog_info() will release them.
 		 */
 		release_maps(env);
 	*prog = env->prog;
-	kfree(env);
+err_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&bpf_verifier_lock);
+	vfree(env->insn_aux_data);
+err_free_env:
+	kfree(env);
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.15.1

[PATCH 4.4-stable 3/6] bpf: move fixup_bpf_calls() function

[Jiri Slaby]

From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>

commit e245c5c6a5656e4d61aa7bb08e9694fd6e5b2b9d upstream.

no functional change.
move fixup_bpf_calls() to verifier.c
it's being refactored in the next patch

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
---
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c  | 54 --------------------------------------------------
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 4e32cc94edd9..424accd20c2d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -447,57 +447,6 @@ void bpf_register_prog_type(struct bpf_prog_type_list *tl)
 	list_add(&tl->list_node, &bpf_prog_types);
 }
 
-/* fixup insn->imm field of bpf_call instructions:
- * if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem)
- *      insn->imm = bpf_map_lookup_elem - __bpf_call_base;
- * else if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem)
- *      insn->imm = bpf_map_update_elem - __bpf_call_base;
- * else ...
- *
- * this function is called after eBPF program passed verification
- */
-static void fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_prog *prog)
-{
-	const struct bpf_func_proto *fn;
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) {
-		struct bpf_insn *insn = &prog->insnsi[i];
-
-		if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL)) {
-			/* we reach here when program has bpf_call instructions
-			 * and it passed bpf_check(), means that
-			 * ops->get_func_proto must have been supplied, check it
-			 */
-			BUG_ON(!prog->aux->ops->get_func_proto);
-
-			if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_route_realm)
-				prog->dst_needed = 1;
-			if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32)
-				bpf_user_rnd_init_once();
-			if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_tail_call) {
-				/* mark bpf_tail_call as different opcode
-				 * to avoid conditional branch in
-				 * interpeter for every normal call
-				 * and to prevent accidental JITing by
-				 * JIT compiler that doesn't support
-				 * bpf_tail_call yet
-				 */
-				insn->imm = 0;
-				insn->code |= BPF_X;
-				continue;
-			}
-
-			fn = prog->aux->ops->get_func_proto(insn->imm);
-			/* all functions that have prototype and verifier allowed
-			 * programs to call them, must be real in-kernel functions
-			 */
-			BUG_ON(!fn->func);
-			insn->imm = fn->func - __bpf_call_base;
-		}
-	}
-}
-
 /* drop refcnt on maps used by eBPF program and free auxilary data */
 static void free_used_maps(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
 {
@@ -680,9 +629,6 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto free_used_maps;
 
-	/* fixup BPF_CALL->imm field */
-	fixup_bpf_calls(prog);
-
 	/* eBPF program is ready to be JITed */
 	err = bpf_prog_select_runtime(prog);
 	if (err < 0)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 769d2ec44802..198737d36754 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2158,6 +2158,58 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct verifier_env *env)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/* fixup insn->imm field of bpf_call instructions:
+ * if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem)
+ *      insn->imm = bpf_map_lookup_elem - __bpf_call_base;
+ * else if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem)
+ *      insn->imm = bpf_map_update_elem - __bpf_call_base;
+ * else ...
+ *
+ * this function is called after eBPF program passed verification
+ */
+static void fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+	const struct bpf_func_proto *fn;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) {
+		struct bpf_insn *insn = &prog->insnsi[i];
+
+		if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL)) {
+			/* we reach here when program has bpf_call instructions
+			 * and it passed bpf_check(), means that
+			 * ops->get_func_proto must have been supplied, check it
+			 */
+			BUG_ON(!prog->aux->ops->get_func_proto);
+
+			if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_route_realm)
+				prog->dst_needed = 1;
+			if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32)
+				bpf_user_rnd_init_once();
+			if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_tail_call) {
+				/* mark bpf_tail_call as different opcode
+				 * to avoid conditional branch in
+				 * interpeter for every normal call
+				 * and to prevent accidental JITing by
+				 * JIT compiler that doesn't support
+				 * bpf_tail_call yet
+				 */
+				insn->imm = 0;
+				insn->code |= BPF_X;
+				continue;
+			}
+
+			fn = prog->aux->ops->get_func_proto(insn->imm);
+			/* all functions that have prototype and verifier allowed
+			 * programs to call them, must be real in-kernel functions
+			 */
+			BUG_ON(!fn->func);
+			insn->imm = fn->func - __bpf_call_base;
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+
 static void free_states(struct verifier_env *env)
 {
 	struct verifier_state_list *sl, *sln;
@@ -2256,6 +2308,9 @@ skip_full_check:
 		/* program is valid, convert *(u32*)(ctx + off) accesses */
 		ret = convert_ctx_accesses(env);
 
+	if (ret == 0)
+		fixup_bpf_calls(env->prog);
+
 	if (log_level && log_len >= log_size - 1) {
 		BUG_ON(log_len >= log_size);
 		/* verifier log exceeded user supplied buffer */
-- 
2.15.1

[PATCH 4.4-stable 4/6] bpf: refactor fixup_bpf_calls()

[Jiri Slaby]

From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>

commit 79741b3bdec01a8628368fbcfccc7d189ed606cb upstream.

reduce indent and make it iterate over instructions similar to
convert_ctx_accesses(). Also convert hard BUG_ON into soft verifier error.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 198737d36754..47bb3eee950c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2158,57 +2158,51 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct verifier_env *env)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/* fixup insn->imm field of bpf_call instructions:
- * if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem)
- *      insn->imm = bpf_map_lookup_elem - __bpf_call_base;
- * else if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem)
- *      insn->imm = bpf_map_update_elem - __bpf_call_base;
- * else ...
+/* fixup insn->imm field of bpf_call instructions
  *
  * this function is called after eBPF program passed verification
  */
-static void fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct verifier_env *env)
 {
+	struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog;
+	struct bpf_insn *insn = prog->insnsi;
 	const struct bpf_func_proto *fn;
+	const int insn_cnt = prog->len;
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) {
-		struct bpf_insn *insn = &prog->insnsi[i];
+	for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
+		if (insn->code != (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL))
+			continue;
 
-		if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL)) {
-			/* we reach here when program has bpf_call instructions
-			 * and it passed bpf_check(), means that
-			 * ops->get_func_proto must have been supplied, check it
+		if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_route_realm)
+			prog->dst_needed = 1;
+		if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32)
+			bpf_user_rnd_init_once();
+		if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_tail_call) {
+			/* mark bpf_tail_call as different opcode to avoid
+			 * conditional branch in the interpeter for every normal
+			 * call and to prevent accidental JITing by JIT compiler
+			 * that doesn't support bpf_tail_call yet
 			 */
-			BUG_ON(!prog->aux->ops->get_func_proto);
-
-			if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_route_realm)
-				prog->dst_needed = 1;
-			if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32)
-				bpf_user_rnd_init_once();
-			if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_tail_call) {
-				/* mark bpf_tail_call as different opcode
-				 * to avoid conditional branch in
-				 * interpeter for every normal call
-				 * and to prevent accidental JITing by
-				 * JIT compiler that doesn't support
-				 * bpf_tail_call yet
-				 */
-				insn->imm = 0;
-				insn->code |= BPF_X;
-				continue;
-			}
+			insn->imm = 0;
+			insn->code |= BPF_X;
+			continue;
+		}
 
-			fn = prog->aux->ops->get_func_proto(insn->imm);
-			/* all functions that have prototype and verifier allowed
-			 * programs to call them, must be real in-kernel functions
-			 */
-			BUG_ON(!fn->func);
-			insn->imm = fn->func - __bpf_call_base;
+		fn = prog->aux->ops->get_func_proto(insn->imm);
+		/* all functions that have prototype and verifier allowed
+		 * programs to call them, must be real in-kernel functions
+		 */
+		if (!fn->func) {
+			verbose("kernel subsystem misconfigured func %d\n",
+				insn->imm);
+			return -EFAULT;
 		}
+		insn->imm = fn->func - __bpf_call_base;
 	}
-}
 
+	return 0;
+}
 
 static void free_states(struct verifier_env *env)
 {
@@ -2309,7 +2303,7 @@ skip_full_check:
 		ret = convert_ctx_accesses(env);
 
 	if (ret == 0)
-		fixup_bpf_calls(env->prog);
+		ret = fixup_bpf_calls(env);
 
 	if (log_level && log_len >= log_size - 1) {
 		BUG_ON(log_len >= log_size);
-- 
2.15.1

[PATCH 4.4-stable 5/6] bpf: adjust insn_aux_data when patching insns

[Jiri Slaby]

From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>

commit 8041902dae5299c1f194ba42d14383f734631009 upstream.

convert_ctx_accesses() replaces single bpf instruction with a set of
instructions. Adjust corresponding insn_aux_data while patching.
It's needed to make sure subsequent 'for(all insn)' loops
have matching insn and insn_aux_data.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 47bb3eee950c..bb4b5405d1a5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2107,6 +2107,41 @@ static void convert_pseudo_ld_imm64(struct verifier_env *env)
 			insn->src_reg = 0;
 }
 
+/* single env->prog->insni[off] instruction was replaced with the range
+ * insni[off, off + cnt).  Adjust corresponding insn_aux_data by copying
+ * [0, off) and [off, end) to new locations, so the patched range stays zero
+ */
+static int adjust_insn_aux_data(struct verifier_env *env, u32 prog_len,
+				u32 off, u32 cnt)
+{
+	struct bpf_insn_aux_data *new_data, *old_data = env->insn_aux_data;
+
+	if (cnt == 1)
+		return 0;
+	new_data = vzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * prog_len);
+	if (!new_data)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	memcpy(new_data, old_data, sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * off);
+	memcpy(new_data + off + cnt - 1, old_data + off,
+	       sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * (prog_len - off - cnt + 1));
+	env->insn_aux_data = new_data;
+	vfree(old_data);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_data(struct verifier_env *env, u32 off,
+					    const struct bpf_insn *patch, u32 len)
+{
+	struct bpf_prog *new_prog;
+
+	new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_single(env->prog, off, patch, len);
+	if (!new_prog)
+		return NULL;
+	if (adjust_insn_aux_data(env, new_prog->len, off, len))
+		return NULL;
+	return new_prog;
+}
+
 /* convert load instructions that access fields of 'struct __sk_buff'
  * into sequence of instructions that access fields of 'struct sk_buff'
  */
@@ -2132,7 +2167,7 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct verifier_env *env)
 		else
 			continue;
 
-		if (env->insn_aux_data[i].ptr_type != PTR_TO_CTX)
+		if (env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].ptr_type != PTR_TO_CTX)
 			continue;
 
 		cnt = env->prog->aux->ops->
@@ -2143,8 +2178,7 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct verifier_env *env)
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
-		new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_single(env->prog, i + delta, insn_buf,
-						 cnt);
+		new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
 		if (!new_prog)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
2.15.1

[PATCH 4.4-stable 6/6] bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation

[Jiri Slaby]

From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

commit b2157399cc9898260d6031c5bfe45fe137c1fbe7 upstream.

Under speculation, CPUs may mis-predict branches in bounds checks. Thus,
memory accesses under a bounds check may be speculated even if the
bounds check fails, providing a primitive for building a side channel.

To avoid leaking kernel data round up array-based maps and mask the index
after bounds check, so speculated load with out of bounds index will load
either valid value from the array or zero from the padded area.

Unconditionally mask index for all array types even when max_entries
are not rounded to power of 2 for root user.
When map is created by unpriv user generate a sequence of bpf insns
that includes AND operation to make sure that JITed code includes
the same 'index & index_mask' operation.

If prog_array map is created by unpriv user replace
  bpf_tail_call(ctx, map, index);
with
  if (index >= max_entries) {
    index &= map->index_mask;
    bpf_tail_call(ctx, map, index);
  }
(along with roundup to power 2) to prevent out-of-bounds speculation.
There is secondary redundant 'if (index >= max_entries)' in the interpreter
and in all JITs, but they can be optimized later if necessary.

Other array-like maps (cpumap, devmap, sockmap, perf_event_array, cgroup_array)
cannot be used by unpriv, so no changes there.

That fixes bpf side of "Variant 1: bounds check bypass (CVE-2017-5753)" on
all architectures with and without JIT.

v2->v3:
Daniel noticed that attack potentially can be crafted via syscall commands
without loading the program, so add masking to those paths as well.

[js] backport -- no percpu arrays etc.; idx in check_call; map_ptr in struct
     bpf_insn_aux_data

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h   |  2 ++
 kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 4f6d29c8e3d8..f2157159b26f 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct bpf_map {
 	u32 value_size;
 	u32 max_entries;
 	u32 pages;
+	bool unpriv_array;
 	struct user_struct *user;
 	const struct bpf_map_ops *ops;
 	struct work_struct work;
@@ -141,6 +142,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
 struct bpf_array {
 	struct bpf_map map;
 	u32 elem_size;
+	u32 index_mask;
 	/* 'ownership' of prog_array is claimed by the first program that
 	 * is going to use this map or by the first program which FD is stored
 	 * in the map to make sure that all callers and callees have the same
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
index b0799bced518..56f8a8306a49 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
@@ -20,8 +20,9 @@
 /* Called from syscall */
 static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
+	u32 elem_size, array_size, index_mask, max_entries;
+	bool unpriv = !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
 	struct bpf_array *array;
-	u32 elem_size, array_size;
 
 	/* check sanity of attributes */
 	if (attr->max_entries == 0 || attr->key_size != 4 ||
@@ -36,12 +37,21 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 
 	elem_size = round_up(attr->value_size, 8);
 
+	max_entries = attr->max_entries;
+	index_mask = roundup_pow_of_two(max_entries) - 1;
+
+	if (unpriv)
+		/* round up array size to nearest power of 2,
+		 * since cpu will speculate within index_mask limits
+		 */
+		max_entries = index_mask + 1;
+
 	/* check round_up into zero and u32 overflow */
 	if (elem_size == 0 ||
-	    attr->max_entries > (U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(*array)) / elem_size)
+	    max_entries > (U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(*array)) / elem_size)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
-	array_size = sizeof(*array) + attr->max_entries * elem_size;
+	array_size = sizeof(*array) + max_entries * elem_size;
 
 	/* allocate all map elements and zero-initialize them */
 	array = kzalloc(array_size, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
@@ -50,6 +60,8 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 		if (!array)
 			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	}
+	array->index_mask = index_mask;
+	array->map.unpriv_array = unpriv;
 
 	/* copy mandatory map attributes */
 	array->map.key_size = attr->key_size;
@@ -70,7 +82,7 @@ static void *array_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
 	if (index >= array->map.max_entries)
 		return NULL;
 
-	return array->value + array->elem_size * index;
+	return array->value + array->elem_size * (index & array->index_mask);
 }
 
 /* Called from syscall */
@@ -111,7 +123,9 @@ static int array_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
 		/* all elements already exist */
 		return -EEXIST;
 
-	memcpy(array->value + array->elem_size * index, value, map->value_size);
+	memcpy(array->value +
+	       array->elem_size * (index & array->index_mask),
+	       value, map->value_size);
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index bb4b5405d1a5..014c2d759916 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -187,7 +187,10 @@ struct verifier_stack_elem {
 };
 
 struct bpf_insn_aux_data {
-	enum bpf_reg_type ptr_type;	/* pointer type for load/store insns */
+	union {
+		enum bpf_reg_type ptr_type;	/* pointer type for load/store insns */
+		struct bpf_map *map_ptr;	/* pointer for call insn into lookup_elem */
+	};
 };
 
 #define MAX_USED_MAPS 64 /* max number of maps accessed by one eBPF program */
@@ -950,7 +953,7 @@ error:
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
-static int check_call(struct verifier_env *env, int func_id)
+static int check_call(struct verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx)
 {
 	struct verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state;
 	const struct bpf_func_proto *fn = NULL;
@@ -986,6 +989,13 @@ static int check_call(struct verifier_env *env, int func_id)
 	err = check_func_arg(env, BPF_REG_2, fn->arg2_type, &map);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
+	if (func_id == BPF_FUNC_tail_call) {
+		if (map == NULL) {
+			verbose("verifier bug\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+		env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].map_ptr = map;
+	}
 	err = check_func_arg(env, BPF_REG_3, fn->arg3_type, &map);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
@@ -1911,7 +1921,7 @@ static int do_check(struct verifier_env *env)
 					return -EINVAL;
 				}
 
-				err = check_call(env, insn->imm);
+				err = check_call(env, insn->imm, insn_idx);
 				if (err)
 					return err;
 
@@ -2202,7 +2212,10 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct verifier_env *env)
 	struct bpf_insn *insn = prog->insnsi;
 	const struct bpf_func_proto *fn;
 	const int insn_cnt = prog->len;
-	int i;
+	struct bpf_insn insn_buf[16];
+	struct bpf_prog *new_prog;
+	struct bpf_map *map_ptr;
+	int i, cnt, delta = 0;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
 		if (insn->code != (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL))
@@ -2220,6 +2233,31 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct verifier_env *env)
 			 */
 			insn->imm = 0;
 			insn->code |= BPF_X;
+
+			/* instead of changing every JIT dealing with tail_call
+			 * emit two extra insns:
+			 * if (index >= max_entries) goto out;
+			 * index &= array->index_mask;
+			 * to avoid out-of-bounds cpu speculation
+			 */
+			map_ptr = env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].map_ptr;
+			if (!map_ptr->unpriv_array)
+				continue;
+			insn_buf[0] = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_3,
+						  map_ptr->max_entries, 2);
+			insn_buf[1] = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_3,
+						    container_of(map_ptr,
+								 struct bpf_array,
+								 map)->index_mask);
+			insn_buf[2] = *insn;
+			cnt = 3;
+			new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
+			if (!new_prog)
+				return -ENOMEM;
+
+			delta    += cnt - 1;
+			env->prog = prog = new_prog;
+			insn      = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta;
 			continue;
 		}
 
-- 
2.15.1

Re: [PATCH 4.4-stable 6/6] bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation

[Eric Dumazet]

On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 17:17 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> 
> commit b2157399cc9898260d6031c5bfe45fe137c1fbe7 upstream.
> 
> Under speculation, CPUs may mis-predict branches in bounds checks. Thus,
> memory accesses under a bounds check may be speculated even if the
> bounds check fails, providing a primitive for building a side channel.
> 

Make sure to also backport

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git/commit/?id=
bbeb6e4323dad9b5e0ee9f60c223dd532e2403b1

Re: [PATCH 4.4-stable 0/6] bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation

[Daniel Borkmann]

Hi Jiri,

On 01/12/2018 05:17 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> this is a backport of these patches which I did for our kernels:

Thanks for doing! One comment below:

> c237ee5eb33b bpf: add bpf_patch_insn_single helper
> 3df126f35f88 bpf: don't (ab)use instructions to store state
> e245c5c6a565 bpf: move fixup_bpf_calls() function
> 79741b3bdec0 bpf: refactor fixup_bpf_calls()
> 8041902dae52 bpf: adjust insn_aux_data when patching insns
> b2157399cc98 bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation
> 
> I offer it here for use in stable 4.4, if there is no better/simpler
> backport available yet.
> 
> Alexei Starovoitov (4):
>   bpf: move fixup_bpf_calls() function
>   bpf: refactor fixup_bpf_calls()
>   bpf: adjust insn_aux_data when patching insns
>   bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation

Please note that this still needs a fix [0] in addition. It's in
bpf tree [1] and we'll get this out today to DaveM as a pull-req
today, and hopefully it wouldn't take too long to land in Linus'
tree from there again, sorry for the inconvenience. Once that
landed we can move this into 4.4.

  [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git/commit/?id=bbeb6e4323dad9b5e0ee9f60c223dd532e2403b1
  [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git/

> Daniel Borkmann (1):
>   bpf: add bpf_patch_insn_single helper
> 
> Jakub Kicinski (1):
>   bpf: don't (ab)use instructions to store state
> 
>  include/linux/bpf.h    |   2 +
>  include/linux/filter.h |   3 +
>  kernel/bpf/arraymap.c  |  24 ++++--
>  kernel/bpf/core.c      |  71 ++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c   |  54 ------------
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c  | 217 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  6 files changed, 252 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-)

[PATCH 4.4-stable 7/7] bpf, array: fix overflow in max_entries and undefined behavior in index_mask

[Jiri Slaby]

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

commit bbeb6e4323dad9b5e0ee9f60c223dd532e2403b1 upstream.

syzkaller tried to alloc a map with 0xfffffffd entries out of a userns,
and thus unprivileged. With the recently added logic in b2157399cc98
("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") we round this up to the next
power of two value for max_entries for unprivileged such that we can
apply proper masking into potentially zeroed out map slots.

However, this will generate an index_mask of 0xffffffff, and therefore
a + 1 will let this overflow into new max_entries of 0. This will pass
allocation, etc, and later on map access we still enforce on the original
attr->max_entries value which was 0xfffffffd, therefore triggering GPF
all over the place. Thus bail out on overflow in such case.

Moreover, on 32 bit archs roundup_pow_of_two() can also not be used,
since fls_long(max_entries - 1) can result in 32 and 1UL << 32 in 32 bit
space is undefined. Therefore, do this by hand in a 64 bit variable.

This fixes all the issues triggered by syzkaller's reproducers.

Fixes: b2157399cc98 ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation")
Reported-by: syzbot+b0efb8e572d01bce1ae0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+6c15e9744f75f2364773@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d2f5524fb46fd3b312ee@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+61d23c95395cc90dbc2b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+0d363c942452cca68c01@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
---
 kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
index 56f8a8306a49..3608fa1aec8a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	u32 elem_size, array_size, index_mask, max_entries;
 	bool unpriv = !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
 	struct bpf_array *array;
+	u64 mask64;
 
 	/* check sanity of attributes */
 	if (attr->max_entries == 0 || attr->key_size != 4 ||
@@ -38,13 +39,25 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	elem_size = round_up(attr->value_size, 8);
 
 	max_entries = attr->max_entries;
-	index_mask = roundup_pow_of_two(max_entries) - 1;
 
-	if (unpriv)
+	/* On 32 bit archs roundup_pow_of_two() with max_entries that has
+	 * upper most bit set in u32 space is undefined behavior due to
+	 * resulting 1U << 32, so do it manually here in u64 space.
+	 */
+	mask64 = fls_long(max_entries - 1);
+	mask64 = 1ULL << mask64;
+	mask64 -= 1;
+
+	index_mask = mask64;
+	if (unpriv) {
 		/* round up array size to nearest power of 2,
 		 * since cpu will speculate within index_mask limits
 		 */
 		max_entries = index_mask + 1;
+		/* Check for overflows. */
+		if (max_entries < attr->max_entries)
+			return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
+	}
 
 	/* check round_up into zero and u32 overflow */
 	if (elem_size == 0 ||
-- 
2.15.1

Patch "bpf, array: fix overflow in max_entries and undefined behavior in index_mask" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree

[gregkh]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    bpf, array: fix overflow in max_entries and undefined behavior in index_mask

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     bpf-array-fix-overflow-in-max_entries-and-undefined-behavior-in-index_mask.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From jslaby@suse.cz  Sat Jan 13 16:20:05 2018
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:58:05 +0100
Subject: bpf, array: fix overflow in max_entries and undefined behavior in index_mask
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Message-ID: <20180112165805.10791-1-jslaby@suse.cz>

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

commit bbeb6e4323dad9b5e0ee9f60c223dd532e2403b1 upstream.

syzkaller tried to alloc a map with 0xfffffffd entries out of a userns,
and thus unprivileged. With the recently added logic in b2157399cc98
("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") we round this up to the next
power of two value for max_entries for unprivileged such that we can
apply proper masking into potentially zeroed out map slots.

However, this will generate an index_mask of 0xffffffff, and therefore
a + 1 will let this overflow into new max_entries of 0. This will pass
allocation, etc, and later on map access we still enforce on the original
attr->max_entries value which was 0xfffffffd, therefore triggering GPF
all over the place. Thus bail out on overflow in such case.

Moreover, on 32 bit archs roundup_pow_of_two() can also not be used,
since fls_long(max_entries - 1) can result in 32 and 1UL << 32 in 32 bit
space is undefined. Therefore, do this by hand in a 64 bit variable.

This fixes all the issues triggered by syzkaller's reproducers.

Fixes: b2157399cc98 ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation")
Reported-by: syzbot+b0efb8e572d01bce1ae0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+6c15e9744f75f2364773@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d2f5524fb46fd3b312ee@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+61d23c95395cc90dbc2b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+0d363c942452cca68c01@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/arraymap.c |   17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(u
 	u32 elem_size, array_size, index_mask, max_entries;
 	bool unpriv = !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
 	struct bpf_array *array;
+	u64 mask64;
 
 	/* check sanity of attributes */
 	if (attr->max_entries == 0 || attr->key_size != 4 ||
@@ -38,13 +39,25 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(u
 	elem_size = round_up(attr->value_size, 8);
 
 	max_entries = attr->max_entries;
-	index_mask = roundup_pow_of_two(max_entries) - 1;
 
-	if (unpriv)
+	/* On 32 bit archs roundup_pow_of_two() with max_entries that has
+	 * upper most bit set in u32 space is undefined behavior due to
+	 * resulting 1U << 32, so do it manually here in u64 space.
+	 */
+	mask64 = fls_long(max_entries - 1);
+	mask64 = 1ULL << mask64;
+	mask64 -= 1;
+
+	index_mask = mask64;
+	if (unpriv) {
 		/* round up array size to nearest power of 2,
 		 * since cpu will speculate within index_mask limits
 		 */
 		max_entries = index_mask + 1;
+		/* Check for overflows. */
+		if (max_entries < attr->max_entries)
+			return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
+	}
 
 	/* check round_up into zero and u32 overflow */
 	if (elem_size == 0 ||


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jslaby@suse.cz are

queue-4.4/bpf-adjust-insn_aux_data-when-patching-insns.patch
queue-4.4/hwrng-core-sleep-interruptible-in-read.patch
queue-4.4/bpf-refactor-fixup_bpf_calls.patch
queue-4.4/bpf-array-fix-overflow-in-max_entries-and-undefined-behavior-in-index_mask.patch
queue-4.4/bpf-don-t-ab-use-instructions-to-store-state.patch
queue-4.4/bpf-prevent-out-of-bounds-speculation.patch
queue-4.4/bpf-add-bpf_patch_insn_single-helper.patch
queue-4.4/bpf-move-fixup_bpf_calls-function.patch

Re: [PATCH 4.4-stable 0/6] bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 05:17:15PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> this is a backport of these patches which I did for our kernels:
> c237ee5eb33b bpf: add bpf_patch_insn_single helper
> 3df126f35f88 bpf: don't (ab)use instructions to store state
> e245c5c6a565 bpf: move fixup_bpf_calls() function
> 79741b3bdec0 bpf: refactor fixup_bpf_calls()
> 8041902dae52 bpf: adjust insn_aux_data when patching insns
> b2157399cc98 bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation
> 
> I offer it here for use in stable 4.4, if there is no better/simpler
> backport available yet.

Thanks for all of these, now queued up.

I've also attempted a backport for 4.9, and also for 4.14 and queued
them up.  I'll go run the selftests to see how well that actually worked
or not...

greg k-h