All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/x86: clarify that there is no buffer overflow on sscanf usage
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 21:59:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180211205924.GA23210@light.dominikbrodowski.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180211182428.e7isprkt6hbuq3dk@gmail.com>


Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>

---

> Yeah, probably - but still, this connection and the sscanf() guarantee is not 
> obvious at first sight, so please improve this to derive from the same value 
> (define a LINE_MAX size or such), plus maybe add a comment to the sscanf() line 
> that this is safe because strlen(name) >= strlen(line).

Sounds reasonable. Patch (which applies on top of the five patches for
selftests/x86 I sent out earlier today) is attached.

Thanks,
	Dominik

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vdso.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vdso.c
index 558c8207e7b9..7ade625f10ed 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vdso.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vdso.c
@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
 # endif
 #endif
 
+/* max length of lines in /proc/self/maps - anything longer is skipped here */
+#define MAPS_LINE_LEN 128
+
 int nerrs = 0;
 
 typedef long (*getcpu_t)(unsigned *, unsigned *, void *);
@@ -37,17 +40,19 @@ static void *vsyscall_getcpu(void)
 {
 #ifdef __x86_64__
 	FILE *maps;
-	char line[128];
+	char line[MAPS_LINE_LEN];
 	bool found = false;
 
 	maps = fopen("/proc/self/maps", "r");
 	if (!maps) /* might still be present, but ignore it here, as we test vDSO not vsyscall */
 		return NULL;
 
-	while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), maps)) {
+	while (fgets(line, MAPS_LINE_LEN, maps)) {
 		char r, x;
 		void *start, *end;
-		char name[128];
+		char name[MAPS_LINE_LEN];
+
+		/* sscanf is safe here as strlen(name) >= strlen(line) */
 		if (sscanf(line, "%p-%p %c-%cp %*x %*x:%*x %*u %s",
 			   &start, &end, &r, &x, name) != 5)
 			continue;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
index 7a744fa7b786..ee92e4727f18 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
@@ -33,6 +33,9 @@
 # endif
 #endif
 
+/* max length of lines in /proc/self/maps - anything longer is skipped here */
+#define MAPS_LINE_LEN 128
+
 static void sethandler(int sig, void (*handler)(int, siginfo_t *, void *),
 		       int flags)
 {
@@ -98,7 +101,7 @@ static int init_vsys(void)
 #ifdef __x86_64__
 	int nerrs = 0;
 	FILE *maps;
-	char line[128];
+	char line[MAPS_LINE_LEN];
 	bool found = false;
 
 	maps = fopen("/proc/self/maps", "r");
@@ -108,10 +111,12 @@ static int init_vsys(void)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), maps)) {
+	while (fgets(line, MAPS_LINE_LEN, maps)) {
 		char r, x;
 		void *start, *end;
-		char name[128];
+		char name[MAPS_LINE_LEN];
+
+		/* sscanf is safe here as strlen(name) >= strlen(line) */
 		if (sscanf(line, "%p-%p %c-%cp %*x %*x:%*x %*u %s",
 			   &start, &end, &r, &x, name) != 5)
 			continue;

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linux at dominikbrodowski.net (Dominik Brodowski)
Subject: [Linux-kselftest-mirror] [PATCH] selftests/x86: clarify that there is no buffer overflow on sscanf usage
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 21:59:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180211205924.GA23210@light.dominikbrodowski.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180211182428.e7isprkt6hbuq3dk@gmail.com>


Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo at kernel.org>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto at kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux at dominikbrodowski.net>

---

> Yeah, probably - but still, this connection and the sscanf() guarantee is not 
> obvious at first sight, so please improve this to derive from the same value 
> (define a LINE_MAX size or such), plus maybe add a comment to the sscanf() line 
> that this is safe because strlen(name) >= strlen(line).

Sounds reasonable. Patch (which applies on top of the five patches for
selftests/x86 I sent out earlier today) is attached.

Thanks,
	Dominik

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vdso.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vdso.c
index 558c8207e7b9..7ade625f10ed 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vdso.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vdso.c
@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
 # endif
 #endif
 
+/* max length of lines in /proc/self/maps - anything longer is skipped here */
+#define MAPS_LINE_LEN 128
+
 int nerrs = 0;
 
 typedef long (*getcpu_t)(unsigned *, unsigned *, void *);
@@ -37,17 +40,19 @@ static void *vsyscall_getcpu(void)
 {
 #ifdef __x86_64__
 	FILE *maps;
-	char line[128];
+	char line[MAPS_LINE_LEN];
 	bool found = false;
 
 	maps = fopen("/proc/self/maps", "r");
 	if (!maps) /* might still be present, but ignore it here, as we test vDSO not vsyscall */
 		return NULL;
 
-	while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), maps)) {
+	while (fgets(line, MAPS_LINE_LEN, maps)) {
 		char r, x;
 		void *start, *end;
-		char name[128];
+		char name[MAPS_LINE_LEN];
+
+		/* sscanf is safe here as strlen(name) >= strlen(line) */
 		if (sscanf(line, "%p-%p %c-%cp %*x %*x:%*x %*u %s",
 			   &start, &end, &r, &x, name) != 5)
 			continue;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
index 7a744fa7b786..ee92e4727f18 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
@@ -33,6 +33,9 @@
 # endif
 #endif
 
+/* max length of lines in /proc/self/maps - anything longer is skipped here */
+#define MAPS_LINE_LEN 128
+
 static void sethandler(int sig, void (*handler)(int, siginfo_t *, void *),
 		       int flags)
 {
@@ -98,7 +101,7 @@ static int init_vsys(void)
 #ifdef __x86_64__
 	int nerrs = 0;
 	FILE *maps;
-	char line[128];
+	char line[MAPS_LINE_LEN];
 	bool found = false;
 
 	maps = fopen("/proc/self/maps", "r");
@@ -108,10 +111,12 @@ static int init_vsys(void)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), maps)) {
+	while (fgets(line, MAPS_LINE_LEN, maps)) {
 		char r, x;
 		void *start, *end;
-		char name[128];
+		char name[MAPS_LINE_LEN];
+
+		/* sscanf is safe here as strlen(name) >= strlen(line) */
 		if (sscanf(line, "%p-%p %c-%cp %*x %*x:%*x %*u %s",
 			   &start, &end, &r, &x, name) != 5)
 			continue;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linux@dominikbrodowski.net (Dominik Brodowski)
Subject: [Linux-kselftest-mirror] [PATCH] selftests/x86: clarify that there is no buffer overflow on sscanf usage
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 21:59:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180211205924.GA23210@light.dominikbrodowski.net> (raw)
Message-ID: <20180211205924._GWkVLtMs5VzuiOKEjnEvKdm-qIbzhpvdcJD6LQgvHw@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180211182428.e7isprkt6hbuq3dk@gmail.com>


Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo at kernel.org>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto at kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux at dominikbrodowski.net>

---

> Yeah, probably - but still, this connection and the sscanf() guarantee is not 
> obvious at first sight, so please improve this to derive from the same value 
> (define a LINE_MAX size or such), plus maybe add a comment to the sscanf() line 
> that this is safe because strlen(name) >= strlen(line).

Sounds reasonable. Patch (which applies on top of the five patches for
selftests/x86 I sent out earlier today) is attached.

Thanks,
	Dominik

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vdso.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vdso.c
index 558c8207e7b9..7ade625f10ed 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vdso.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vdso.c
@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
 # endif
 #endif
 
+/* max length of lines in /proc/self/maps - anything longer is skipped here */
+#define MAPS_LINE_LEN 128
+
 int nerrs = 0;
 
 typedef long (*getcpu_t)(unsigned *, unsigned *, void *);
@@ -37,17 +40,19 @@ static void *vsyscall_getcpu(void)
 {
 #ifdef __x86_64__
 	FILE *maps;
-	char line[128];
+	char line[MAPS_LINE_LEN];
 	bool found = false;
 
 	maps = fopen("/proc/self/maps", "r");
 	if (!maps) /* might still be present, but ignore it here, as we test vDSO not vsyscall */
 		return NULL;
 
-	while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), maps)) {
+	while (fgets(line, MAPS_LINE_LEN, maps)) {
 		char r, x;
 		void *start, *end;
-		char name[128];
+		char name[MAPS_LINE_LEN];
+
+		/* sscanf is safe here as strlen(name) >= strlen(line) */
 		if (sscanf(line, "%p-%p %c-%cp %*x %*x:%*x %*u %s",
 			   &start, &end, &r, &x, name) != 5)
 			continue;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
index 7a744fa7b786..ee92e4727f18 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall.c
@@ -33,6 +33,9 @@
 # endif
 #endif
 
+/* max length of lines in /proc/self/maps - anything longer is skipped here */
+#define MAPS_LINE_LEN 128
+
 static void sethandler(int sig, void (*handler)(int, siginfo_t *, void *),
 		       int flags)
 {
@@ -98,7 +101,7 @@ static int init_vsys(void)
 #ifdef __x86_64__
 	int nerrs = 0;
 	FILE *maps;
-	char line[128];
+	char line[MAPS_LINE_LEN];
 	bool found = false;
 
 	maps = fopen("/proc/self/maps", "r");
@@ -108,10 +111,12 @@ static int init_vsys(void)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), maps)) {
+	while (fgets(line, MAPS_LINE_LEN, maps)) {
 		char r, x;
 		void *start, *end;
-		char name[128];
+		char name[MAPS_LINE_LEN];
+
+		/* sscanf is safe here as strlen(name) >= strlen(line) */
 		if (sscanf(line, "%p-%p %c-%cp %*x %*x:%*x %*u %s",
 			   &start, &end, &r, &x, name) != 5)
 			continue;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-11 21:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-11 11:10 [PATCH 0/5] selftests/x86: fixes for !CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION and vsyscall=none Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10 ` [Linux-kselftest-mirror] " Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10 ` linux
2018-02-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 1/5] selftests/x86: 5lvl test has been moved Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10   ` [Linux-kselftest-mirror] " Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10   ` linux
2018-02-11 12:13   ` [tip:x86/urgent] selftests/x86: Fix build bug caused by the 5lvl test which has been moved to the VM directory tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-13  9:05   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 2/5] selftests/x86: fix vDSO selftest segfault for vsyscall=none Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10   ` [Linux-kselftest-mirror] " Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10   ` linux
2018-02-11 11:21   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-11 11:21     ` [Linux-kselftest-mirror] " Ingo Molnar
2018-02-11 11:21     ` mingo
2018-02-11 12:17     ` Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 12:17       ` [Linux-kselftest-mirror] " Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 12:17       ` linux
2018-02-11 13:00       ` Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 13:00         ` [Linux-kselftest-mirror] " Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 13:00         ` linux
2018-02-11 18:24         ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-11 18:24           ` [Linux-kselftest-mirror] " Ingo Molnar
2018-02-11 18:24           ` mingo
2018-02-11 20:59           ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2018-02-11 20:59             ` [Linux-kselftest-mirror] [PATCH] selftests/x86: clarify that there is no buffer overflow on sscanf usage Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 20:59             ` linux
2018-02-12 17:58             ` Shuah Khan
2018-02-12 17:58               ` [Linux-kselftest-mirror] " Shuah Khan
2018-02-12 17:58               ` shuah
2018-02-13  9:04             ` [tip:x86/pti] selftests/x86: Clean up and document sscanf() usage tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-13  9:04   ` [tip:x86/pti] selftests/x86: Fix vDSO selftest segfault for vsyscall=none tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 3/5] selftests/x86: do not rely on int $0x80 in test_mremap_vdso.c Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10   ` [Linux-kselftest-mirror] " Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10   ` linux
2018-02-11 12:13   ` [tip:x86/urgent] selftests/x86: Do not rely on "int $0x80" " tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-13  9:06   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 4/5] selftests/x86: do not rely on int $0x80 in single_step_syscall.c Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10   ` [Linux-kselftest-mirror] " Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10   ` linux
2018-02-11 12:14   ` [tip:x86/urgent] selftests/x86: Do not rely on "int $0x80" " tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-13  9:06   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2018-02-15  0:25   ` tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests/x86: disable tests requiring 32bit support on pure 64bit systems Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10   ` [Linux-kselftest-mirror] " Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-11 11:10   ` linux
2018-02-11 12:14   ` [tip:x86/urgent] selftests/x86: Disable tests requiring 32-bit support on pure 64-bit systems tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-13  9:07   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2018-02-15  0:25   ` tip-bot for Dominik Brodowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180211205924.GA23210@light.dominikbrodowski.net \
    --to=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.