From: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<broonie@kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, <mm-commits@vger.kernel.org>,
<sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>,
Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>
Subject: Re: mmotm 2018-02-21-14-48 uploaded (mm/page_alloc.c on UML)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:08:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180222130814.GA30385@vmlxhi-102.adit-jv.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180222125955.GD30681@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 01:59:55PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 22-02-18 11:38:32, Eugeniu Rosca wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> > Please, let me know if any action is expected from my end.
>
> I do not thing anything is really needed right now. If you have a strong
> opinion about the solution (ifdef vs. noop stub) then speak up.
No different preference on my side. I was more thinking if you are going
to amend the patch or create a fix on top of it. Since it didn't reach
mainline, it makes sense to amend it. If you can do it without the
intervention of the author, that's also fine for me.
> > Thank you for your support and sorry for the ifdef troubles.
>
> No troubles at all. It was me who pushed you this direction...
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
Thanks,
Eugeniu.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<broonie@kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, <mm-commits@vger.kernel.org>,
<sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>,
Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>
Subject: Re: mmotm 2018-02-21-14-48 uploaded (mm/page_alloc.c on UML)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:08:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180222130814.GA30385@vmlxhi-102.adit-jv.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180222125955.GD30681@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 01:59:55PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 22-02-18 11:38:32, Eugeniu Rosca wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> > Please, let me know if any action is expected from my end.
>
> I do not thing anything is really needed right now. If you have a strong
> opinion about the solution (ifdef vs. noop stub) then speak up.
No different preference on my side. I was more thinking if you are going
to amend the patch or create a fix on top of it. Since it didn't reach
mainline, it makes sense to amend it. If you can do it without the
intervention of the author, that's also fine for me.
> > Thank you for your support and sorry for the ifdef troubles.
>
> No troubles at all. It was me who pushed you this direction...
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
Thanks,
Eugeniu.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, broonie@kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>,
Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>
Subject: Re: mmotm 2018-02-21-14-48 uploaded (mm/page_alloc.c on UML)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:08:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180222130814.GA30385@vmlxhi-102.adit-jv.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180222125955.GD30681@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 01:59:55PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 22-02-18 11:38:32, Eugeniu Rosca wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> > Please, let me know if any action is expected from my end.
>
> I do not thing anything is really needed right now. If you have a strong
> opinion about the solution (ifdef vs. noop stub) then speak up.
No different preference on my side. I was more thinking if you are going
to amend the patch or create a fix on top of it. Since it didn't reach
mainline, it makes sense to amend it. If you can do it without the
intervention of the author, that's also fine for me.
> > Thank you for your support and sorry for the ifdef troubles.
>
> No troubles at all. It was me who pushed you this direction...
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
Thanks,
Eugeniu.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-22 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-21 22:48 mmotm 2018-02-21-14-48 uploaded akpm
2018-02-21 22:48 ` akpm
2018-02-21 23:58 ` mmotm 2018-02-21-14-48 uploaded (mm/page_alloc.c on UML) Randy Dunlap
2018-02-21 23:58 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-02-22 7:20 ` Michal Hocko
2018-02-22 7:20 ` Michal Hocko
2018-02-22 10:38 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2018-02-22 10:38 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2018-02-22 10:38 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2018-02-22 12:59 ` Michal Hocko
2018-02-22 12:59 ` Michal Hocko
2018-02-22 13:08 ` Eugeniu Rosca [this message]
2018-02-22 13:08 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2018-02-22 13:08 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2018-02-22 13:26 ` Michal Hocko
2018-02-22 13:26 ` Michal Hocko
2018-02-25 0:50 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2018-02-25 0:50 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2018-02-25 0:50 ` Eugeniu Rosca
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180222130814.GA30385@vmlxhi-102.adit-jv.com \
--to=erosca@de.adit-jv.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.