* [PATCH igt] igt/perf_pmu: Fix 64b printf-isms
@ 2018-02-22 10:33 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-02-22 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: igt-dev
My bad,
perf_pmu.c: In function ‘accuracy’:
perf_pmu.c:1533:4: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Wformat]
perf_pmu.c:1533:4: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Wformat]
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
tests/perf_pmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
index b9c4dd58..3bbb18d2 100644
--- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
@@ -1511,7 +1511,7 @@ accuracy(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
idle_ns += total_idle_ns;
expected = (double)busy_ns / (busy_ns + idle_ns);
- igt_info("%u: busy %luus, idle %luus: %.2f%% (target: %lu%%)\n",
+ igt_info("%u: busy %"PRIu64"us, idle %"PRIu64"us: %.2f%% (target: %lu%%)\n",
pass, busy_ns / 1000, idle_ns / 1000,
100 * expected, target_busy_pct);
write(link[1], &expected, sizeof(expected));
--
2.16.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [igt-dev] [PATCH igt] igt/perf_pmu: Fix 64b printf-isms
@ 2018-02-22 10:33 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-02-22 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: igt-dev, tvrtko.ursulin
My bad,
perf_pmu.c: In function ‘accuracy’:
perf_pmu.c:1533:4: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Wformat]
perf_pmu.c:1533:4: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Wformat]
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
tests/perf_pmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
index b9c4dd58..3bbb18d2 100644
--- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
@@ -1511,7 +1511,7 @@ accuracy(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
idle_ns += total_idle_ns;
expected = (double)busy_ns / (busy_ns + idle_ns);
- igt_info("%u: busy %luus, idle %luus: %.2f%% (target: %lu%%)\n",
+ igt_info("%u: busy %"PRIu64"us, idle %"PRIu64"us: %.2f%% (target: %lu%%)\n",
pass, busy_ns / 1000, idle_ns / 1000,
100 * expected, target_busy_pct);
write(link[1], &expected, sizeof(expected));
--
2.16.1
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH igt] igt/perf_pmu: Fix 64b printf-isms
2018-02-22 10:33 ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
@ 2018-02-22 11:13 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tvrtko Ursulin @ 2018-02-22 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx; +Cc: igt-dev
On 22/02/2018 10:33, Chris Wilson wrote:
> My bad,
>
> perf_pmu.c: In function ‘accuracy’:
> perf_pmu.c:1533:4: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Wformat]
> perf_pmu.c:1533:4: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Wformat]
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> tests/perf_pmu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> index b9c4dd58..3bbb18d2 100644
> --- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
> +++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> @@ -1511,7 +1511,7 @@ accuracy(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
> idle_ns += total_idle_ns;
>
> expected = (double)busy_ns / (busy_ns + idle_ns);
> - igt_info("%u: busy %luus, idle %luus: %.2f%% (target: %lu%%)\n",
> + igt_info("%u: busy %"PRIu64"us, idle %"PRIu64"us: %.2f%% (target: %lu%%)\n",
> pass, busy_ns / 1000, idle_ns / 1000,
> 100 * expected, target_busy_pct);
> write(link[1], &expected, sizeof(expected));
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/perf_pmu: Fix 64b printf-isms
@ 2018-02-22 11:13 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tvrtko Ursulin @ 2018-02-22 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx; +Cc: igt-dev
On 22/02/2018 10:33, Chris Wilson wrote:
> My bad,
>
> perf_pmu.c: In function ‘accuracy’:
> perf_pmu.c:1533:4: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Wformat]
> perf_pmu.c:1533:4: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Wformat]
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> tests/perf_pmu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> index b9c4dd58..3bbb18d2 100644
> --- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
> +++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> @@ -1511,7 +1511,7 @@ accuracy(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
> idle_ns += total_idle_ns;
>
> expected = (double)busy_ns / (busy_ns + idle_ns);
> - igt_info("%u: busy %luus, idle %luus: %.2f%% (target: %lu%%)\n",
> + igt_info("%u: busy %"PRIu64"us, idle %"PRIu64"us: %.2f%% (target: %lu%%)\n",
> pass, busy_ns / 1000, idle_ns / 1000,
> 100 * expected, target_busy_pct);
> write(link[1], &expected, sizeof(expected));
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for igt/perf_pmu: Fix 64b printf-isms
2018-02-22 10:33 ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
(?)
(?)
@ 2018-02-22 13:21 ` Patchwork
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-02-22 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: igt-dev
== Series Details ==
Series: igt/perf_pmu: Fix 64b printf-isms
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/38760/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Series 38760 revision 1 was fully merged or fully failed: no git log
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-02-22 13:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-02-22 10:33 [PATCH igt] igt/perf_pmu: Fix 64b printf-isms Chris Wilson
2018-02-22 10:33 ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
2018-02-22 11:13 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-22 11:13 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-22 13:21 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.