All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] intro: Polish a sentence for MIPS graphs
@ 2018-03-11 12:52 SeongJae Park
  2018-03-12  2:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2018-03-11 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulmck; +Cc: perfbook, SeongJae Park

This commit polishes a sentence for MIPS graphs, which is updated by
commit "cpu: Update MIPS graphs, adding past five years of CPUs"
(71d8328f3d18).  The sentence is saying that the updated graph is
showing past three decades, though it is now showing past forty years
and the sentence also says so at last.  This commit polishes the
sentence to say about the fourty years.

Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>
---
 intro/intro.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/intro/intro.tex b/intro/intro.tex
index a4ec3a8..2f5679d 100644
--- a/intro/intro.tex
+++ b/intro/intro.tex
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ The CSIRAC and the Z80 are two points in a long-term trend, as can be
 seen in
 Figure~\ref{fig:intro:MIPS per Die for Intel CPUs}.
 This figure plots an approximation to computational power per die
-over the past three decades, showing an impressive six-order-of-magnitude
+over the past four decades, showing an impressive six-order-of-magnitude
 increase over a period of forty years.
 Note that the advent of multicore CPUs has permitted this increase to
 continue apace despite the clock-frequency wall encountered in 2003,
-- 
2.10.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] intro: Polish a sentence for MIPS graphs
  2018-03-11 12:52 [PATCH] intro: Polish a sentence for MIPS graphs SeongJae Park
@ 2018-03-12  2:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2018-03-12  2:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: SeongJae Park; +Cc: perfbook

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 09:52:41PM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote:
> This commit polishes a sentence for MIPS graphs, which is updated by
> commit "cpu: Update MIPS graphs, adding past five years of CPUs"
> (71d8328f3d18).  The sentence is saying that the updated graph is
> showing past three decades, though it is now showing past forty years
> and the sentence also says so at last.  This commit polishes the
> sentence to say about the fourty years.
> 
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>

Good catch, applied, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  intro/intro.tex | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/intro/intro.tex b/intro/intro.tex
> index a4ec3a8..2f5679d 100644
> --- a/intro/intro.tex
> +++ b/intro/intro.tex
> @@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ The CSIRAC and the Z80 are two points in a long-term trend, as can be
>  seen in
>  Figure~\ref{fig:intro:MIPS per Die for Intel CPUs}.
>  This figure plots an approximation to computational power per die
> -over the past three decades, showing an impressive six-order-of-magnitude
> +over the past four decades, showing an impressive six-order-of-magnitude
>  increase over a period of forty years.
>  Note that the advent of multicore CPUs has permitted this increase to
>  continue apace despite the clock-frequency wall encountered in 2003,
> -- 
> 2.10.0
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-03-12  2:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-03-11 12:52 [PATCH] intro: Polish a sentence for MIPS graphs SeongJae Park
2018-03-12  2:10 ` Paul E. McKenney

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.