[PATCH v4 2/8] openrisc: Set CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER

All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
To: linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	jonas@southpole.se, stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi,
	shorne@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/8] openrisc: Set CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:19:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180327161911.14086-3-palmer@sifive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180327161911.14086-1-palmer@sifive.com>

arm has an optional MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER, which openrisc copied but didn't
make optional.  I'm converting this to generic code, but in order to
ensure everything stays bisectable I want this defined on openrisc for
now.  This will go away by the end of the patch set.

Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
---
 arch/openrisc/Kconfig | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/openrisc/Kconfig b/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
index 339df7324e9c..9ecad05bfc73 100644
--- a/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ config OPENRISC
 	select GENERIC_STRNLEN_USER
 	select GENERIC_SMP_IDLE_THREAD
 	select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA
+	select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
 	select HAVE_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW
 	select OR1K_PIC
 	select CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS if !OPENRISC_HAVE_INST_FF1
@@ -68,6 +69,9 @@ config STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
 config LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
 	def_bool  y
 
+config MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
+	def_bool y
+
 source "init/Kconfig"
 
 source "kernel/Kconfig.freezer"
-- 
2.16.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)

From: palmer@sifive.com (Palmer Dabbelt)
To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/8] openrisc: Set CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:19:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180327161911.14086-3-palmer@sifive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180327161911.14086-1-palmer@sifive.com>

arm has an optional MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER, which openrisc copied but didn't
make optional.  I'm converting this to generic code, but in order to
ensure everything stays bisectable I want this defined on openrisc for
now.  This will go away by the end of the patch set.

Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
---
 arch/openrisc/Kconfig | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/openrisc/Kconfig b/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
index 339df7324e9c..9ecad05bfc73 100644
--- a/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ config OPENRISC
 	select GENERIC_STRNLEN_USER
 	select GENERIC_SMP_IDLE_THREAD
 	select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA
+	select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
 	select HAVE_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW
 	select OR1K_PIC
 	select CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS if !OPENRISC_HAVE_INST_FF1
@@ -68,6 +69,9 @@ config STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
 config LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
 	def_bool  y
 
+config MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
+	def_bool y
+
 source "init/Kconfig"
 
 source "kernel/Kconfig.freezer"
-- 
2.16.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)

From: palmer@sifive.com (Palmer Dabbelt)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/8] openrisc: Set CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:19:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180327161911.14086-3-palmer@sifive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180327161911.14086-1-palmer@sifive.com>

arm has an optional MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER, which openrisc copied but didn't
make optional.  I'm converting this to generic code, but in order to
ensure everything stays bisectable I want this defined on openrisc for
now.  This will go away by the end of the patch set.

Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
---
 arch/openrisc/Kconfig | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/openrisc/Kconfig b/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
index 339df7324e9c..9ecad05bfc73 100644
--- a/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ config OPENRISC
 	select GENERIC_STRNLEN_USER
 	select GENERIC_SMP_IDLE_THREAD
 	select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA
+	select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
 	select HAVE_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW
 	select OR1K_PIC
 	select CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS if !OPENRISC_HAVE_INST_FF1
@@ -68,6 +69,9 @@ config STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
 config LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
 	def_bool  y
 
+config MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
+	def_bool y
+
 source "init/Kconfig"
 
 source "kernel/Kconfig.freezer"
-- 
2.16.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)

From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
To: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
Subject: [OpenRISC] [PATCH v4 2/8] openrisc: Set CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:19:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180327161911.14086-3-palmer@sifive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180327161911.14086-1-palmer@sifive.com>

arm has an optional MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER, which openrisc copied but didn't
make optional.  I'm converting this to generic code, but in order to
ensure everything stays bisectable I want this defined on openrisc for
now.  This will go away by the end of the patch set.

Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
---
 arch/openrisc/Kconfig | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/openrisc/Kconfig b/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
index 339df7324e9c..9ecad05bfc73 100644
--- a/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ config OPENRISC
 	select GENERIC_STRNLEN_USER
 	select GENERIC_SMP_IDLE_THREAD
 	select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA
+	select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
 	select HAVE_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW
 	select OR1K_PIC
 	select CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS if !OPENRISC_HAVE_INST_FF1
@@ -68,6 +69,9 @@ config STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
 config LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
 	def_bool  y
 
+config MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
+	def_bool y
+
 source "init/Kconfig"
 
 source "kernel/Kconfig.freezer"
-- 
2.16.1

next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-27 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-27 16:19 Make set_handle_irq and handle_arch_irq generic, v4 Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19 ` [OpenRISC] " Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] arm64: Set CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` [OpenRISC] " Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19 ` Palmer Dabbelt [this message]
2018-03-27 16:19   ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH v4 2/8] openrisc: " Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-29  5:01   ` Stafford Horne
2018-03-29  5:01     ` [OpenRISC] " Stafford Horne
2018-03-29  5:01     ` Stafford Horne
2018-03-29  5:01     ` Stafford Horne
2018-03-27 16:19 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] irq: Add CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` [OpenRISC] " Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] RISC-V: Move to the new GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER handler Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` [OpenRISC] " Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] arm: Convert to GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` [OpenRISC] " Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] arm64: Use the new GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` [OpenRISC] " Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] openrisc: " Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` [OpenRISC] " Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] irq: Remove MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER as it's now obselete Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` [OpenRISC] " Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-27 16:19   ` Palmer Dabbelt

find likely ancestor, descendant, or conflicting patches for this message:
dfblob:339df7324e9 dfblob:339df7324e9 dfblob:339df7324e9
dfblob:339df7324e9 dfblob:9ecad05bfc7 dfblob:9ecad05bfc7
dfblob:9ecad05bfc7 dfblob:9ecad05bfc7
	(help)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180327161911.14086-3-palmer@sifive.com \
    --to=palmer@sifive.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jonas@southpole.se \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
    --cc=shorne@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.