[PATCH] linux/kernel.h: Fix minor type in comment

[PATCH] linux/kernel.h: Fix minor type in comment

[Yuval Shaia]

Signed-off-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@oracle.com>
---
 include/linux/kernel.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
index ce51455e2adf..a5b4ba3bdb61 100644
--- a/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ do {									\
  * your code. (Extra memory is used for special buffers that are
  * allocated when trace_printk() is used.)
  *
- * A little optization trick is done here. If there's only one
+ * A little optimization trick is done here. If there's only one
  * argument, there's no need to scan the string for printf formats.
  * The trace_puts() will suffice. But how can we take advantage of
  * using trace_puts() when trace_printk() has only one argument?
-- 
2.14.3

Re: [PATCH] linux/kernel.h: Fix minor type in comment

[Ingo Molnar]

* Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@oracle.com> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@oracle.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/kernel.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> index ce51455e2adf..a5b4ba3bdb61 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ do {									\
>   * your code. (Extra memory is used for special buffers that are
>   * allocated when trace_printk() is used.)
>   *
> - * A little optization trick is done here. If there's only one
> + * A little optimization trick is done here. If there's only one
>   * argument, there's no need to scan the string for printf formats.
>   * The trace_puts() will suffice. But how can we take advantage of
>   * using trace_puts() when trace_printk() has only one argument?

Please also fix the typo in the title ;-)

Thanks,

	Ingo

Re: [PATCH] linux/kernel.h: Fix minor type in comment

[Yuval Shaia]

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 09:06:26AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@oracle.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/kernel.h | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > index ce51455e2adf..a5b4ba3bdb61 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ do {									\
> >   * your code. (Extra memory is used for special buffers that are
> >   * allocated when trace_printk() is used.)
> >   *
> > - * A little optization trick is done here. If there's only one
> > + * A little optimization trick is done here. If there's only one
> >   * argument, there's no need to scan the string for printf formats.
> >   * The trace_puts() will suffice. But how can we take advantage of
> >   * using trace_puts() when trace_printk() has only one argument?
> 
> Please also fix the typo in the title ;-)

Sorry, fixed that but forgot to amend :)

Will post v2 in few seconds.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo