* [PATCH] btrfs-progs: tests: test mkfs.btrfs fails on small backing size thin provision device
@ 2018-04-11 7:03 Su Yue
2018-04-11 7:05 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-04-11 15:41 ` David Sterba
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Su Yue @ 2018-04-11 7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: suy.fnst
This tests is most similar to xfstests generic/405.
It calls device mapper to create a thin provision device with small
backing size and big virtual size. mkfs.btrfs should fail on such
devices.
This test should pass after commit e805b143a4fe
("btrfs-progs: mkfs: return nozero value on thin provisioned device").
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
.../test.sh | 93 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 93 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh
diff --git a/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh b/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..f2e044da5d17
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+# mkfs.btrfs must failed on a thin provision device with very small
+# backing size and big virtual size.
+
+source "$TEST_TOP/common"
+
+check_prereq mkfs.btrfs
+
+setup_root_helper
+prepare_test_dev
+
+# Backing data dev
+DMTHIN_DATA_NAME="thin-data"
+DMTHIN_DATA_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_DATA_NAME"
+# Backing metadata dev
+DMTHIN_META_NAME="thin-meta"
+DMTHIN_META_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_META_NAME"
+# Backing pool dev (combination of above)
+DMTHIN_POOL_NAME="thin-pool"
+DMTHIN_POOL_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_POOL_NAME"
+# Thin volume
+DMTHIN_VOL_NAME="thin-vol"
+DMTHIN_VOL_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_VOL_NAME"
+
+dmthin_cleanup()
+{
+ # wait for device to be fully settled
+ run_check $SUDO_HELPER udevadm settle
+ run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_VOL_NAME
+ run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_POOL_NAME
+ run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_META_NAME
+ run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_DATA_NAME
+}
+
+sector_size=512 # in bytes
+data_dev_size=$((1 * 1024 * 1024 / $sector_size)) # 1M
+virtual_size=$((1 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 / $sector_size)) # 1T
+cluster_size=1024 # 512k in sectors
+low_water=$((104857600 / $cluster_size/ $sector_size)) # 100M / $cluster_size, in sectors
+
+# Need to make linear metadata and data devs. From kernel docs:
+# As a guide, we suggest you calculate the number of bytes to use in the
+# metadata device as 48 * $data_dev_size / $data_block_size but round it up
+# to 2MB (4096 sectors) if the answer is smaller.
+# So do that:
+meta_dev_size=$((48 * $data_dev_size / $cluster_size))
+if [ "$meta_dev_size" -lt "4096" ]; then
+ meta_dev_size=4096 # 2MB
+fi
+
+meta_dev_offset=0
+total_data_dev_size=$(($meta_dev_offset + $meta_dev_size + $data_dev_size))
+
+run_check truncate -s0 img
+chmod a+w img
+run_check truncate -s"$(($total_data_dev_size * $sector_size))" img
+
+dm_backing_dev=`run_check_stdout $SUDO_HELPER losetup --find --show img`
+
+# Metadata device
+DMTHIN_META_TABLE="0 $meta_dev_size linear $dm_backing_dev $meta_dev_offset"
+run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_META_NAME --table "$DMTHIN_META_TABLE"
+
+# Data device
+data_dev_offset=$((meta_dev_offset + $meta_dev_size))
+DMTHIN_DATA_TABLE="0 $data_dev_size linear $dm_backing_dev $data_dev_offset"
+run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_DATA_NAME --table "$DMTHIN_DATA_TABLE"
+
+# Zap the pool metadata dev
+run_check dd if=/dev/zero of=$DMTHIN_META_DEV bs=4096 count=1
+
+# Thin pool
+# "start length thin-pool metadata_dev data_dev data_block_size low_water_mark"
+DMTHIN_POOL_TABLE="0 $data_dev_size thin-pool $DMTHIN_META_DEV $DMTHIN_DATA_DEV $cluster_size $low_water"
+run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_POOL_NAME --table "$DMTHIN_POOL_TABLE"
+
+# Thin volume
+pool_id=$RANDOM
+run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup message $DMTHIN_POOL_DEV 0 "create_thin $pool_id"
+
+# start length thin pool_dev dev_id [external_origin_dev]
+DMTHIN_VOL_TABLE="0 $virtual_size thin $DMTHIN_POOL_DEV $pool_id"
+run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_VOL_NAME --table "$DMTHIN_VOL_TABLE"
+
+# mkfs.btrfs should fail due to the small backing device
+run_mustfail "should fail for samll backing size thin provision device" \
+ $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/mkfs.btrfs" -f "$@" "$DMTHIN_VOL_DEV"
+
+#cleanup
+dmthin_cleanup
+run_mayfail $SUDO_HELPER losetup -d $dm_backing_dev
+run_check truncate -s0 img
+rm img
--
2.17.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: tests: test mkfs.btrfs fails on small backing size thin provision device 2018-04-11 7:03 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: tests: test mkfs.btrfs fails on small backing size thin provision device Su Yue @ 2018-04-11 7:05 ` Qu Wenruo 2018-04-11 7:28 ` Su Yue 2018-04-11 15:41 ` David Sterba 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Qu Wenruo @ 2018-04-11 7:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Su Yue, linux-btrfs On 2018年04月11日 15:03, Su Yue wrote: > This tests is most similar to xfstests generic/405. > It calls device mapper to create a thin provision device with small > backing size and big virtual size. mkfs.btrfs should fail on such > devices. > > This test should pass after commit e805b143a4fe > ("btrfs-progs: mkfs: return nozero value on thin provisioned device"). > > Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > .../test.sh | 93 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+) > create mode 100755 tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh > > diff --git a/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh b/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh > new file mode 100755 > index 000000000000..f2e044da5d17 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh > @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ > +#!/bin/bash > +# mkfs.btrfs must failed on a thin provision device with very small > +# backing size and big virtual size. > + > +source "$TEST_TOP/common" > + > +check_prereq mkfs.btrfs > + > +setup_root_helper > +prepare_test_dev > + > +# Backing data dev > +DMTHIN_DATA_NAME="thin-data" > +DMTHIN_DATA_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_DATA_NAME" > +# Backing metadata dev > +DMTHIN_META_NAME="thin-meta" > +DMTHIN_META_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_META_NAME" > +# Backing pool dev (combination of above) > +DMTHIN_POOL_NAME="thin-pool" > +DMTHIN_POOL_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_POOL_NAME" > +# Thin volume > +DMTHIN_VOL_NAME="thin-vol" > +DMTHIN_VOL_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_VOL_NAME" > + > +dmthin_cleanup() > +{ > + # wait for device to be fully settled > + run_check $SUDO_HELPER udevadm settle > + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_VOL_NAME > + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_POOL_NAME > + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_META_NAME > + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_DATA_NAME > +} > + > +sector_size=512 # in bytes > +data_dev_size=$((1 * 1024 * 1024 / $sector_size)) # 1M > +virtual_size=$((1 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 / $sector_size)) # 1T > +cluster_size=1024 # 512k in sectors > +low_water=$((104857600 / $cluster_size/ $sector_size)) # 100M / $cluster_size, in sectors > + > +# Need to make linear metadata and data devs. From kernel docs: > +# As a guide, we suggest you calculate the number of bytes to use in the > +# metadata device as 48 * $data_dev_size / $data_block_size but round it up > +# to 2MB (4096 sectors) if the answer is smaller. > +# So do that: > +meta_dev_size=$((48 * $data_dev_size / $cluster_size)) > +if [ "$meta_dev_size" -lt "4096" ]; then > + meta_dev_size=4096 # 2MB > +fi > + > +meta_dev_offset=0 > +total_data_dev_size=$(($meta_dev_offset + $meta_dev_size + $data_dev_size)) > + > +run_check truncate -s0 img > +chmod a+w img > +run_check truncate -s"$(($total_data_dev_size * $sector_size))" img > + > +dm_backing_dev=`run_check_stdout $SUDO_HELPER losetup --find --show img` > + > +# Metadata device > +DMTHIN_META_TABLE="0 $meta_dev_size linear $dm_backing_dev $meta_dev_offset" > +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_META_NAME --table "$DMTHIN_META_TABLE" What about using lvm other than plain dmsetup to create thin provision devices? IIRC this should be much easier to implement, without all the linear target hassles. Thanks, Qu > + > +# Data device > +data_dev_offset=$((meta_dev_offset + $meta_dev_size)) > +DMTHIN_DATA_TABLE="0 $data_dev_size linear $dm_backing_dev $data_dev_offset" > +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_DATA_NAME --table "$DMTHIN_DATA_TABLE" > + > +# Zap the pool metadata dev > +run_check dd if=/dev/zero of=$DMTHIN_META_DEV bs=4096 count=1 > + > +# Thin pool > +# "start length thin-pool metadata_dev data_dev data_block_size low_water_mark" > +DMTHIN_POOL_TABLE="0 $data_dev_size thin-pool $DMTHIN_META_DEV $DMTHIN_DATA_DEV $cluster_size $low_water" > +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_POOL_NAME --table "$DMTHIN_POOL_TABLE" > + > +# Thin volume > +pool_id=$RANDOM > +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup message $DMTHIN_POOL_DEV 0 "create_thin $pool_id" > + > +# start length thin pool_dev dev_id [external_origin_dev] > +DMTHIN_VOL_TABLE="0 $virtual_size thin $DMTHIN_POOL_DEV $pool_id" > +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_VOL_NAME --table "$DMTHIN_VOL_TABLE" > + > +# mkfs.btrfs should fail due to the small backing device > +run_mustfail "should fail for samll backing size thin provision device" \ > + $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/mkfs.btrfs" -f "$@" "$DMTHIN_VOL_DEV" > + > +#cleanup > +dmthin_cleanup > +run_mayfail $SUDO_HELPER losetup -d $dm_backing_dev > +run_check truncate -s0 img > +rm img > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: tests: test mkfs.btrfs fails on small backing size thin provision device 2018-04-11 7:05 ` Qu Wenruo @ 2018-04-11 7:28 ` Su Yue 2018-04-11 7:29 ` Qu Wenruo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Su Yue @ 2018-04-11 7:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Qu Wenruo, linux-btrfs On 04/11/2018 03:05 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > On 2018年04月11日 15:03, Su Yue wrote: >> This tests is most similar to xfstests generic/405. >> It calls device mapper to create a thin provision device with small >> backing size and big virtual size. mkfs.btrfs should fail on such >> devices. >> >> This test should pass after commit e805b143a4fe >> ("btrfs-progs: mkfs: return nozero value on thin provisioned device"). >> >> Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> >> --- >> .../test.sh | 93 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+) >> create mode 100755 tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh >> >> diff --git a/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh b/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh >> new file mode 100755 >> index 000000000000..f2e044da5d17 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh >> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ >> +#!/bin/bash >> +# mkfs.btrfs must failed on a thin provision device with very small >> +# backing size and big virtual size. >> + >> +source "$TEST_TOP/common" >> + >> +check_prereq mkfs.btrfs >> + >> +setup_root_helper >> +prepare_test_dev >> + >> +# Backing data dev >> +DMTHIN_DATA_NAME="thin-data" >> +DMTHIN_DATA_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_DATA_NAME" >> +# Backing metadata dev >> +DMTHIN_META_NAME="thin-meta" >> +DMTHIN_META_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_META_NAME" >> +# Backing pool dev (combination of above) >> +DMTHIN_POOL_NAME="thin-pool" >> +DMTHIN_POOL_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_POOL_NAME" >> +# Thin volume >> +DMTHIN_VOL_NAME="thin-vol" >> +DMTHIN_VOL_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_VOL_NAME" >> + >> +dmthin_cleanup() >> +{ >> + # wait for device to be fully settled >> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER udevadm settle >> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_VOL_NAME >> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_POOL_NAME >> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_META_NAME >> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_DATA_NAME >> +} >> + >> +sector_size=512 # in bytes >> +data_dev_size=$((1 * 1024 * 1024 / $sector_size)) # 1M >> +virtual_size=$((1 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 / $sector_size)) # 1T >> +cluster_size=1024 # 512k in sectors >> +low_water=$((104857600 / $cluster_size/ $sector_size)) # 100M / $cluster_size, in sectors >> + >> +# Need to make linear metadata and data devs. From kernel docs: >> +# As a guide, we suggest you calculate the number of bytes to use in the >> +# metadata device as 48 * $data_dev_size / $data_block_size but round it up >> +# to 2MB (4096 sectors) if the answer is smaller. >> +# So do that: >> +meta_dev_size=$((48 * $data_dev_size / $cluster_size)) >> +if [ "$meta_dev_size" -lt "4096" ]; then >> + meta_dev_size=4096 # 2MB >> +fi >> + >> +meta_dev_offset=0 >> +total_data_dev_size=$(($meta_dev_offset + $meta_dev_size + $data_dev_size)) >> + >> +run_check truncate -s0 img >> +chmod a+w img >> +run_check truncate -s"$(($total_data_dev_size * $sector_size))" img >> + >> +dm_backing_dev=`run_check_stdout $SUDO_HELPER losetup --find --show img` >> + >> +# Metadata device >> +DMTHIN_META_TABLE="0 $meta_dev_size linear $dm_backing_dev $meta_dev_offset" >> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_META_NAME --table "$DMTHIN_META_TABLE" > > What about using lvm other than plain dmsetup to create thin provision > devices? > IIRC this should be much easier to implement, without all the linear > target hassles. Yes, doing it by LVM is more convenient. However, LVM seems too abstract and it's never used in btrfs-progs. I have no idea whether LVM other tools should be used or not. Thanks, Su > > Thanks, > Qu > >> + >> +# Data device >> +data_dev_offset=$((meta_dev_offset + $meta_dev_size)) >> +DMTHIN_DATA_TABLE="0 $data_dev_size linear $dm_backing_dev $data_dev_offset" >> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_DATA_NAME --table "$DMTHIN_DATA_TABLE" >> + >> +# Zap the pool metadata dev >> +run_check dd if=/dev/zero of=$DMTHIN_META_DEV bs=4096 count=1 >> + >> +# Thin pool >> +# "start length thin-pool metadata_dev data_dev data_block_size low_water_mark" >> +DMTHIN_POOL_TABLE="0 $data_dev_size thin-pool $DMTHIN_META_DEV $DMTHIN_DATA_DEV $cluster_size $low_water" >> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_POOL_NAME --table "$DMTHIN_POOL_TABLE" >> + >> +# Thin volume >> +pool_id=$RANDOM >> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup message $DMTHIN_POOL_DEV 0 "create_thin $pool_id" >> + >> +# start length thin pool_dev dev_id [external_origin_dev] >> +DMTHIN_VOL_TABLE="0 $virtual_size thin $DMTHIN_POOL_DEV $pool_id" >> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_VOL_NAME --table "$DMTHIN_VOL_TABLE" >> + >> +# mkfs.btrfs should fail due to the small backing device >> +run_mustfail "should fail for samll backing size thin provision device" \ >> + $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/mkfs.btrfs" -f "$@" "$DMTHIN_VOL_DEV" >> + >> +#cleanup >> +dmthin_cleanup >> +run_mayfail $SUDO_HELPER losetup -d $dm_backing_dev >> +run_check truncate -s0 img >> +rm img >> > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: tests: test mkfs.btrfs fails on small backing size thin provision device 2018-04-11 7:28 ` Su Yue @ 2018-04-11 7:29 ` Qu Wenruo 2018-04-11 7:37 ` Nikolay Borisov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Qu Wenruo @ 2018-04-11 7:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Su Yue, linux-btrfs On 2018年04月11日 15:28, Su Yue wrote: > > > On 04/11/2018 03:05 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote: >> >> >> On 2018年04月11日 15:03, Su Yue wrote: >>> This tests is most similar to xfstests generic/405. >>> It calls device mapper to create a thin provision device with small >>> backing size and big virtual size. mkfs.btrfs should fail on such >>> devices. >>> >>> This test should pass after commit e805b143a4fe >>> ("btrfs-progs: mkfs: return nozero value on thin provisioned device"). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> >>> --- >>> .../test.sh | 93 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100755 >>> tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh >>> >>> diff --git >>> a/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh >>> b/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh >>> new file mode 100755 >>> index 000000000000..f2e044da5d17 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ >>> b/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh >>> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ >>> +#!/bin/bash >>> +# mkfs.btrfs must failed on a thin provision device with very small >>> +# backing size and big virtual size. >>> + >>> +source "$TEST_TOP/common" >>> + >>> +check_prereq mkfs.btrfs >>> + >>> +setup_root_helper >>> +prepare_test_dev >>> + >>> +# Backing data dev >>> +DMTHIN_DATA_NAME="thin-data" >>> +DMTHIN_DATA_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_DATA_NAME" >>> +# Backing metadata dev >>> +DMTHIN_META_NAME="thin-meta" >>> +DMTHIN_META_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_META_NAME" >>> +# Backing pool dev (combination of above) >>> +DMTHIN_POOL_NAME="thin-pool" >>> +DMTHIN_POOL_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_POOL_NAME" >>> +# Thin volume >>> +DMTHIN_VOL_NAME="thin-vol" >>> +DMTHIN_VOL_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_VOL_NAME" >>> + >>> +dmthin_cleanup() >>> +{ >>> + # wait for device to be fully settled >>> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER udevadm settle >>> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_VOL_NAME >>> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_POOL_NAME >>> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_META_NAME >>> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_DATA_NAME >>> +} >>> + >>> +sector_size=512 # in bytes >>> +data_dev_size=$((1 * 1024 * 1024 / $sector_size)) # 1M >>> +virtual_size=$((1 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 / $sector_size)) # 1T >>> +cluster_size=1024 # 512k in sectors >>> +low_water=$((104857600 / $cluster_size/ $sector_size)) # 100M / >>> $cluster_size, in sectors >>> + >>> +# Need to make linear metadata and data devs. From kernel docs: >>> +# As a guide, we suggest you calculate the number of bytes to use in >>> the >>> +# metadata device as 48 * $data_dev_size / $data_block_size but >>> round it up >>> +# to 2MB (4096 sectors) if the answer is smaller. >>> +# So do that: >>> +meta_dev_size=$((48 * $data_dev_size / $cluster_size)) >>> +if [ "$meta_dev_size" -lt "4096" ]; then >>> + meta_dev_size=4096 # 2MB >>> +fi >>> + >>> +meta_dev_offset=0 >>> +total_data_dev_size=$(($meta_dev_offset + $meta_dev_size + >>> $data_dev_size)) >>> + >>> +run_check truncate -s0 img >>> +chmod a+w img >>> +run_check truncate -s"$(($total_data_dev_size * $sector_size))" img >>> + >>> +dm_backing_dev=`run_check_stdout $SUDO_HELPER losetup --find --show >>> img` >>> + >>> +# Metadata device >>> +DMTHIN_META_TABLE="0 $meta_dev_size linear $dm_backing_dev >>> $meta_dev_offset" >>> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_META_NAME --table >>> "$DMTHIN_META_TABLE" >> >> What about using lvm other than plain dmsetup to create thin provision >> devices? >> IIRC this should be much easier to implement, without all the linear >> target hassles. > > Yes, doing it by LVM is more convenient. > However, LVM seems too abstract and it's never used in btrfs-progs. > > I have no idea whether LVM other tools should be used or not. We have check_global_prereq(), so it's no a problem to use external tools. Thanks, Qu > > Thanks, > Su > >> >> Thanks, >> Qu >> >>> + >>> +# Data device >>> +data_dev_offset=$((meta_dev_offset + $meta_dev_size)) >>> +DMTHIN_DATA_TABLE="0 $data_dev_size linear $dm_backing_dev >>> $data_dev_offset" >>> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_DATA_NAME --table >>> "$DMTHIN_DATA_TABLE" >>> + >>> +# Zap the pool metadata dev >>> +run_check dd if=/dev/zero of=$DMTHIN_META_DEV bs=4096 count=1 >>> + >>> +# Thin pool >>> +# "start length thin-pool metadata_dev data_dev data_block_size >>> low_water_mark" >>> +DMTHIN_POOL_TABLE="0 $data_dev_size thin-pool $DMTHIN_META_DEV >>> $DMTHIN_DATA_DEV $cluster_size $low_water" >>> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_POOL_NAME --table >>> "$DMTHIN_POOL_TABLE" >>> + >>> +# Thin volume >>> +pool_id=$RANDOM >>> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup message $DMTHIN_POOL_DEV 0 >>> "create_thin $pool_id" >>> + >>> +# start length thin pool_dev dev_id [external_origin_dev] >>> +DMTHIN_VOL_TABLE="0 $virtual_size thin $DMTHIN_POOL_DEV $pool_id" >>> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_VOL_NAME --table >>> "$DMTHIN_VOL_TABLE" >>> + >>> +# mkfs.btrfs should fail due to the small backing device >>> +run_mustfail "should fail for samll backing size thin provision >>> device" \ >>> + $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/mkfs.btrfs" -f "$@" "$DMTHIN_VOL_DEV" >>> + >>> +#cleanup >>> +dmthin_cleanup >>> +run_mayfail $SUDO_HELPER losetup -d $dm_backing_dev >>> +run_check truncate -s0 img >>> +rm img >>> >> >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: tests: test mkfs.btrfs fails on small backing size thin provision device 2018-04-11 7:29 ` Qu Wenruo @ 2018-04-11 7:37 ` Nikolay Borisov 2018-04-11 7:47 ` Qu Wenruo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Nikolay Borisov @ 2018-04-11 7:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Qu Wenruo, Su Yue, linux-btrfs On 11.04.2018 10:29, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > On 2018年04月11日 15:28, Su Yue wrote: >> >> >> On 04/11/2018 03:05 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2018年04月11日 15:03, Su Yue wrote: >>>> This tests is most similar to xfstests generic/405. >>>> It calls device mapper to create a thin provision device with small >>>> backing size and big virtual size. mkfs.btrfs should fail on such >>>> devices. >>>> >>>> This test should pass after commit e805b143a4fe >>>> ("btrfs-progs: mkfs: return nozero value on thin provisioned device"). >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> >>>> --- >>>> .../test.sh | 93 +++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+) >>>> create mode 100755 >>>> tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh >>>> >>>> diff --git >>>> a/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh >>>> b/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh >>>> new file mode 100755 >>>> index 000000000000..f2e044da5d17 >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ >>>> b/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ >>>> +#!/bin/bash >>>> +# mkfs.btrfs must failed on a thin provision device with very small >>>> +# backing size and big virtual size. >>>> + >>>> +source "$TEST_TOP/common" >>>> + >>>> +check_prereq mkfs.btrfs >>>> + >>>> +setup_root_helper >>>> +prepare_test_dev >>>> + >>>> +# Backing data dev >>>> +DMTHIN_DATA_NAME="thin-data" >>>> +DMTHIN_DATA_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_DATA_NAME" >>>> +# Backing metadata dev >>>> +DMTHIN_META_NAME="thin-meta" >>>> +DMTHIN_META_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_META_NAME" >>>> +# Backing pool dev (combination of above) >>>> +DMTHIN_POOL_NAME="thin-pool" >>>> +DMTHIN_POOL_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_POOL_NAME" >>>> +# Thin volume >>>> +DMTHIN_VOL_NAME="thin-vol" >>>> +DMTHIN_VOL_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_VOL_NAME" >>>> + >>>> +dmthin_cleanup() >>>> +{ >>>> + # wait for device to be fully settled >>>> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER udevadm settle >>>> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_VOL_NAME >>>> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_POOL_NAME >>>> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_META_NAME >>>> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_DATA_NAME >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +sector_size=512 # in bytes >>>> +data_dev_size=$((1 * 1024 * 1024 / $sector_size)) # 1M >>>> +virtual_size=$((1 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 / $sector_size)) # 1T >>>> +cluster_size=1024 # 512k in sectors >>>> +low_water=$((104857600 / $cluster_size/ $sector_size)) # 100M / >>>> $cluster_size, in sectors >>>> + >>>> +# Need to make linear metadata and data devs. From kernel docs: >>>> +# As a guide, we suggest you calculate the number of bytes to use in >>>> the >>>> +# metadata device as 48 * $data_dev_size / $data_block_size but >>>> round it up >>>> +# to 2MB (4096 sectors) if the answer is smaller. >>>> +# So do that: >>>> +meta_dev_size=$((48 * $data_dev_size / $cluster_size)) >>>> +if [ "$meta_dev_size" -lt "4096" ]; then >>>> + meta_dev_size=4096 # 2MB >>>> +fi >>>> + >>>> +meta_dev_offset=0 >>>> +total_data_dev_size=$(($meta_dev_offset + $meta_dev_size + >>>> $data_dev_size)) >>>> + >>>> +run_check truncate -s0 img >>>> +chmod a+w img >>>> +run_check truncate -s"$(($total_data_dev_size * $sector_size))" img >>>> + >>>> +dm_backing_dev=`run_check_stdout $SUDO_HELPER losetup --find --show >>>> img` >>>> + >>>> +# Metadata device >>>> +DMTHIN_META_TABLE="0 $meta_dev_size linear $dm_backing_dev >>>> $meta_dev_offset" >>>> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_META_NAME --table >>>> "$DMTHIN_META_TABLE" >>> >>> What about using lvm other than plain dmsetup to create thin provision >>> devices? >>> IIRC this should be much easier to implement, without all the linear >>> target hassles. >> >> Yes, doing it by LVM is more convenient. >> However, LVM seems too abstract and it's never used in btrfs-progs. >> >> I have no idea whether LVM other tools should be used or not. > > We have check_global_prereq(), so it's no a problem to use external tools. IMHO it's a good idea to keep requirements to the bare minimum. While LVM will indeed be more user (in this case developer) friendly, I think it's abstracting too much. So I'd rather stick with plain dm-setup. > > Thanks, > Qu > >> >> Thanks, >> Su >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Qu >>> >>>> + >>>> +# Data device >>>> +data_dev_offset=$((meta_dev_offset + $meta_dev_size)) >>>> +DMTHIN_DATA_TABLE="0 $data_dev_size linear $dm_backing_dev >>>> $data_dev_offset" >>>> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_DATA_NAME --table >>>> "$DMTHIN_DATA_TABLE" >>>> + >>>> +# Zap the pool metadata dev >>>> +run_check dd if=/dev/zero of=$DMTHIN_META_DEV bs=4096 count=1 >>>> + >>>> +# Thin pool >>>> +# "start length thin-pool metadata_dev data_dev data_block_size >>>> low_water_mark" >>>> +DMTHIN_POOL_TABLE="0 $data_dev_size thin-pool $DMTHIN_META_DEV >>>> $DMTHIN_DATA_DEV $cluster_size $low_water" >>>> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_POOL_NAME --table >>>> "$DMTHIN_POOL_TABLE" >>>> + >>>> +# Thin volume >>>> +pool_id=$RANDOM >>>> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup message $DMTHIN_POOL_DEV 0 >>>> "create_thin $pool_id" >>>> + >>>> +# start length thin pool_dev dev_id [external_origin_dev] >>>> +DMTHIN_VOL_TABLE="0 $virtual_size thin $DMTHIN_POOL_DEV $pool_id" >>>> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_VOL_NAME --table >>>> "$DMTHIN_VOL_TABLE" >>>> + >>>> +# mkfs.btrfs should fail due to the small backing device >>>> +run_mustfail "should fail for samll backing size thin provision >>>> device" \ >>>> + $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/mkfs.btrfs" -f "$@" "$DMTHIN_VOL_DEV" >>>> + >>>> +#cleanup >>>> +dmthin_cleanup >>>> +run_mayfail $SUDO_HELPER losetup -d $dm_backing_dev >>>> +run_check truncate -s0 img >>>> +rm img >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: tests: test mkfs.btrfs fails on small backing size thin provision device 2018-04-11 7:37 ` Nikolay Borisov @ 2018-04-11 7:47 ` Qu Wenruo 2018-04-11 15:36 ` David Sterba 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Qu Wenruo @ 2018-04-11 7:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nikolay Borisov, Su Yue, linux-btrfs On 2018年04月11日 15:37, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 11.04.2018 10:29, Qu Wenruo wrote: >> >> >> On 2018年04月11日 15:28, Su Yue wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 04/11/2018 03:05 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2018年04月11日 15:03, Su Yue wrote: >>>>> This tests is most similar to xfstests generic/405. >>>>> It calls device mapper to create a thin provision device with small >>>>> backing size and big virtual size. mkfs.btrfs should fail on such >>>>> devices. >>>>> >>>>> This test should pass after commit e805b143a4fe >>>>> ("btrfs-progs: mkfs: return nozero value on thin provisioned device"). >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> .../test.sh | 93 +++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+) >>>>> create mode 100755 >>>>> tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh >>>>> >>>>> diff --git >>>>> a/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh >>>>> b/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh >>>>> new file mode 100755 >>>>> index 000000000000..f2e044da5d17 >>>>> --- /dev/null >>>>> +++ >>>>> b/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ >>>>> +#!/bin/bash >>>>> +# mkfs.btrfs must failed on a thin provision device with very small >>>>> +# backing size and big virtual size. >>>>> + >>>>> +source "$TEST_TOP/common" >>>>> + >>>>> +check_prereq mkfs.btrfs >>>>> + >>>>> +setup_root_helper >>>>> +prepare_test_dev >>>>> + >>>>> +# Backing data dev >>>>> +DMTHIN_DATA_NAME="thin-data" >>>>> +DMTHIN_DATA_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_DATA_NAME" >>>>> +# Backing metadata dev >>>>> +DMTHIN_META_NAME="thin-meta" >>>>> +DMTHIN_META_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_META_NAME" >>>>> +# Backing pool dev (combination of above) >>>>> +DMTHIN_POOL_NAME="thin-pool" >>>>> +DMTHIN_POOL_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_POOL_NAME" >>>>> +# Thin volume >>>>> +DMTHIN_VOL_NAME="thin-vol" >>>>> +DMTHIN_VOL_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_VOL_NAME" >>>>> + >>>>> +dmthin_cleanup() >>>>> +{ >>>>> + # wait for device to be fully settled >>>>> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER udevadm settle >>>>> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_VOL_NAME >>>>> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_POOL_NAME >>>>> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_META_NAME >>>>> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_DATA_NAME >>>>> +} >>>>> + >>>>> +sector_size=512 # in bytes >>>>> +data_dev_size=$((1 * 1024 * 1024 / $sector_size)) # 1M >>>>> +virtual_size=$((1 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 / $sector_size)) # 1T >>>>> +cluster_size=1024 # 512k in sectors >>>>> +low_water=$((104857600 / $cluster_size/ $sector_size)) # 100M / >>>>> $cluster_size, in sectors >>>>> + >>>>> +# Need to make linear metadata and data devs. From kernel docs: >>>>> +# As a guide, we suggest you calculate the number of bytes to use in >>>>> the >>>>> +# metadata device as 48 * $data_dev_size / $data_block_size but >>>>> round it up >>>>> +# to 2MB (4096 sectors) if the answer is smaller. >>>>> +# So do that: >>>>> +meta_dev_size=$((48 * $data_dev_size / $cluster_size)) >>>>> +if [ "$meta_dev_size" -lt "4096" ]; then >>>>> + meta_dev_size=4096 # 2MB >>>>> +fi >>>>> + >>>>> +meta_dev_offset=0 >>>>> +total_data_dev_size=$(($meta_dev_offset + $meta_dev_size + >>>>> $data_dev_size)) >>>>> + >>>>> +run_check truncate -s0 img >>>>> +chmod a+w img >>>>> +run_check truncate -s"$(($total_data_dev_size * $sector_size))" img >>>>> + >>>>> +dm_backing_dev=`run_check_stdout $SUDO_HELPER losetup --find --show >>>>> img` >>>>> + >>>>> +# Metadata device >>>>> +DMTHIN_META_TABLE="0 $meta_dev_size linear $dm_backing_dev >>>>> $meta_dev_offset" >>>>> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_META_NAME --table >>>>> "$DMTHIN_META_TABLE" >>>> >>>> What about using lvm other than plain dmsetup to create thin provision >>>> devices? >>>> IIRC this should be much easier to implement, without all the linear >>>> target hassles. >>> >>> Yes, doing it by LVM is more convenient. >>> However, LVM seems too abstract and it's never used in btrfs-progs. >>> >>> I have no idea whether LVM other tools should be used or not. >> >> We have check_global_prereq(), so it's no a problem to use external tools. > > IMHO it's a good idea to keep requirements to the bare minimum. While > LVM will indeed be more user (in this case developer) friendly, I think > it's abstracting too much. So I'd rather stick with plain dm-setup. Well, when we using device mappers, we're already introducing a lot of requirement, like kernel dm targets. IMHO, if we can make test case shorter, it would help both test case developer and later developer who exposes problem on this test case. So I still prefer to use LVM to make test case smaller and easier to understand. (even this means extra infrastructures) Thanks, Qu > > >> >> Thanks, >> Qu >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Su >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Qu >>>> >>>>> + >>>>> +# Data device >>>>> +data_dev_offset=$((meta_dev_offset + $meta_dev_size)) >>>>> +DMTHIN_DATA_TABLE="0 $data_dev_size linear $dm_backing_dev >>>>> $data_dev_offset" >>>>> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_DATA_NAME --table >>>>> "$DMTHIN_DATA_TABLE" >>>>> + >>>>> +# Zap the pool metadata dev >>>>> +run_check dd if=/dev/zero of=$DMTHIN_META_DEV bs=4096 count=1 >>>>> + >>>>> +# Thin pool >>>>> +# "start length thin-pool metadata_dev data_dev data_block_size >>>>> low_water_mark" >>>>> +DMTHIN_POOL_TABLE="0 $data_dev_size thin-pool $DMTHIN_META_DEV >>>>> $DMTHIN_DATA_DEV $cluster_size $low_water" >>>>> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_POOL_NAME --table >>>>> "$DMTHIN_POOL_TABLE" >>>>> + >>>>> +# Thin volume >>>>> +pool_id=$RANDOM >>>>> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup message $DMTHIN_POOL_DEV 0 >>>>> "create_thin $pool_id" >>>>> + >>>>> +# start length thin pool_dev dev_id [external_origin_dev] >>>>> +DMTHIN_VOL_TABLE="0 $virtual_size thin $DMTHIN_POOL_DEV $pool_id" >>>>> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_VOL_NAME --table >>>>> "$DMTHIN_VOL_TABLE" >>>>> + >>>>> +# mkfs.btrfs should fail due to the small backing device >>>>> +run_mustfail "should fail for samll backing size thin provision >>>>> device" \ >>>>> + $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/mkfs.btrfs" -f "$@" "$DMTHIN_VOL_DEV" >>>>> + >>>>> +#cleanup >>>>> +dmthin_cleanup >>>>> +run_mayfail $SUDO_HELPER losetup -d $dm_backing_dev >>>>> +run_check truncate -s0 img >>>>> +rm img >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: tests: test mkfs.btrfs fails on small backing size thin provision device 2018-04-11 7:47 ` Qu Wenruo @ 2018-04-11 15:36 ` David Sterba 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: David Sterba @ 2018-04-11 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Qu Wenruo; +Cc: Nikolay Borisov, Su Yue, linux-btrfs On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:47:35PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > >>>> What about using lvm other than plain dmsetup to create thin provision > >>>> devices? > >>>> IIRC this should be much easier to implement, without all the linear > >>>> target hassles. > >>> > >>> Yes, doing it by LVM is more convenient. > >>> However, LVM seems too abstract and it's never used in btrfs-progs. > >>> > >>> I have no idea whether LVM other tools should be used or not. > >> > >> We have check_global_prereq(), so it's no a problem to use external tools. > > > > IMHO it's a good idea to keep requirements to the bare minimum. While > > LVM will indeed be more user (in this case developer) friendly, I think > > it's abstracting too much. So I'd rather stick with plain dm-setup. > > Well, when we using device mappers, we're already introducing a lot of > requirement, like kernel dm targets. > > IMHO, if we can make test case shorter, it would help both test case > developer and later developer who exposes problem on this test case. > So I still prefer to use LVM to make test case smaller and easier to > understand. (even this means extra infrastructures) I think using dmsetup is still ok, the complexity can be factored out to helpers if we need that again. We already use dmsetup so there's no change necessary in the testing environment. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: tests: test mkfs.btrfs fails on small backing size thin provision device 2018-04-11 7:03 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: tests: test mkfs.btrfs fails on small backing size thin provision device Su Yue 2018-04-11 7:05 ` Qu Wenruo @ 2018-04-11 15:41 ` David Sterba 2018-04-12 1:11 ` Su Yue 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: David Sterba @ 2018-04-11 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Su Yue; +Cc: linux-btrfs On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:03:30PM +0800, Su Yue wrote: > This tests is most similar to xfstests generic/405. > It calls device mapper to create a thin provision device with small > backing size and big virtual size. mkfs.btrfs should fail on such > devices. > > This test should pass after commit e805b143a4fe > ("btrfs-progs: mkfs: return nozero value on thin provisioned device"). > > Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Thanks, test looks good overall, a few comments below. > --- > .../test.sh | 93 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+) > create mode 100755 tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh > > diff --git a/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh b/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh > new file mode 100755 > index 000000000000..f2e044da5d17 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh > @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ > +#!/bin/bash > +# mkfs.btrfs must failed on a thin provision device with very small > +# backing size and big virtual size. > + > +source "$TEST_TOP/common" > + > +check_prereq mkfs.btrfs > + > +setup_root_helper > +prepare_test_dev > + > +# Backing data dev > +DMTHIN_DATA_NAME="thin-data" Please add some prefix to avoid any collisions, eg. 'btrfs-progs-thin-data'. It's easier to spot in logs or device listings if eg. the test fails and the device needs to be removed manually. > +DMTHIN_DATA_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_DATA_NAME" > +# Backing metadata dev > +DMTHIN_META_NAME="thin-meta" > +DMTHIN_META_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_META_NAME" > +# Backing pool dev (combination of above) > +DMTHIN_POOL_NAME="thin-pool" > +DMTHIN_POOL_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_POOL_NAME" > +# Thin volume > +DMTHIN_VOL_NAME="thin-vol" > +DMTHIN_VOL_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_VOL_NAME" > + > +dmthin_cleanup() > +{ > + # wait for device to be fully settled > + run_check $SUDO_HELPER udevadm settle > + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_VOL_NAME > + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_POOL_NAME > + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_META_NAME > + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_DATA_NAME Missing quotes around the DMTHIN_* variables. > +} > + > +sector_size=512 # in bytes > +data_dev_size=$((1 * 1024 * 1024 / $sector_size)) # 1M > +virtual_size=$((1 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 / $sector_size)) # 1T > +cluster_size=1024 # 512k in sectors > +low_water=$((104857600 / $cluster_size/ $sector_size)) # 100M / $cluster_size, in sectors > + > +# Need to make linear metadata and data devs. From kernel docs: > +# As a guide, we suggest you calculate the number of bytes to use in the > +# metadata device as 48 * $data_dev_size / $data_block_size but round it up > +# to 2MB (4096 sectors) if the answer is smaller. > +# So do that: > +meta_dev_size=$((48 * $data_dev_size / $cluster_size)) > +if [ "$meta_dev_size" -lt "4096" ]; then > + meta_dev_size=4096 # 2MB > +fi > + > +meta_dev_offset=0 > +total_data_dev_size=$(($meta_dev_offset + $meta_dev_size + $data_dev_size)) > + > +run_check truncate -s0 img > +chmod a+w img > +run_check truncate -s"$(($total_data_dev_size * $sector_size))" img > + > +dm_backing_dev=`run_check_stdout $SUDO_HELPER losetup --find --show img` > + > +# Metadata device > +DMTHIN_META_TABLE="0 $meta_dev_size linear $dm_backing_dev $meta_dev_offset" > +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_META_NAME --table "$DMTHIN_META_TABLE" > + > +# Data device > +data_dev_offset=$((meta_dev_offset + $meta_dev_size)) > +DMTHIN_DATA_TABLE="0 $data_dev_size linear $dm_backing_dev $data_dev_offset" > +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_DATA_NAME --table "$DMTHIN_DATA_TABLE" > + > +# Zap the pool metadata dev > +run_check dd if=/dev/zero of=$DMTHIN_META_DEV bs=4096 count=1 > + > +# Thin pool > +# "start length thin-pool metadata_dev data_dev data_block_size low_water_mark" > +DMTHIN_POOL_TABLE="0 $data_dev_size thin-pool $DMTHIN_META_DEV $DMTHIN_DATA_DEV $cluster_size $low_water" > +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_POOL_NAME --table "$DMTHIN_POOL_TABLE" > + > +# Thin volume > +pool_id=$RANDOM > +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup message $DMTHIN_POOL_DEV 0 "create_thin $pool_id" > + > +# start length thin pool_dev dev_id [external_origin_dev] > +DMTHIN_VOL_TABLE="0 $virtual_size thin $DMTHIN_POOL_DEV $pool_id" > +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_VOL_NAME --table "$DMTHIN_VOL_TABLE" > + > +# mkfs.btrfs should fail due to the small backing device > +run_mustfail "should fail for samll backing size thin provision device" \ > + $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/mkfs.btrfs" -f "$@" "$DMTHIN_VOL_DEV" What does $@ mean here? This would pass arguments from the script itself, but we don't pass any. > + > +#cleanup > +dmthin_cleanup > +run_mayfail $SUDO_HELPER losetup -d $dm_backing_dev > +run_check truncate -s0 img > +rm img ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: tests: test mkfs.btrfs fails on small backing size thin provision device 2018-04-11 15:41 ` David Sterba @ 2018-04-12 1:11 ` Su Yue 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Su Yue @ 2018-04-12 1:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dsterba, linux-btrfs On 04/11/2018 11:41 PM, David Sterba wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:03:30PM +0800, Su Yue wrote: >> This tests is most similar to xfstests generic/405. >> It calls device mapper to create a thin provision device with small >> backing size and big virtual size. mkfs.btrfs should fail on such >> devices. >> >> This test should pass after commit e805b143a4fe >> ("btrfs-progs: mkfs: return nozero value on thin provisioned device"). >> >> Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > > Thanks, test looks good overall, a few comments below. > Thanks, V2 has been sent. >> --- >> .../test.sh | 93 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+) >> create mode 100755 tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh >> >> diff --git a/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh b/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh >> new file mode 100755 >> index 000000000000..f2e044da5d17 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/tests/mkfs-tests/017-small-backing-size-thin-provision-device/test.sh >> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ >> +#!/bin/bash >> +# mkfs.btrfs must failed on a thin provision device with very small >> +# backing size and big virtual size. >> + >> +source "$TEST_TOP/common" >> + >> +check_prereq mkfs.btrfs >> + >> +setup_root_helper >> +prepare_test_dev >> + >> +# Backing data dev >> +DMTHIN_DATA_NAME="thin-data" > > Please add some prefix to avoid any collisions, eg. > 'btrfs-progs-thin-data'. It's easier to spot in logs or device listings > if eg. the test fails and the device needs to be removed manually. > >> +DMTHIN_DATA_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_DATA_NAME" >> +# Backing metadata dev >> +DMTHIN_META_NAME="thin-meta" >> +DMTHIN_META_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_META_NAME" >> +# Backing pool dev (combination of above) >> +DMTHIN_POOL_NAME="thin-pool" >> +DMTHIN_POOL_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_POOL_NAME" >> +# Thin volume >> +DMTHIN_VOL_NAME="thin-vol" >> +DMTHIN_VOL_DEV="/dev/mapper/$DMTHIN_VOL_NAME" >> + >> +dmthin_cleanup() >> +{ >> + # wait for device to be fully settled >> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER udevadm settle >> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_VOL_NAME >> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_POOL_NAME >> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_META_NAME >> + run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup remove $DMTHIN_DATA_NAME > > Missing quotes around the DMTHIN_* variables. > >> +} >> + >> +sector_size=512 # in bytes >> +data_dev_size=$((1 * 1024 * 1024 / $sector_size)) # 1M >> +virtual_size=$((1 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 / $sector_size)) # 1T >> +cluster_size=1024 # 512k in sectors >> +low_water=$((104857600 / $cluster_size/ $sector_size)) # 100M / $cluster_size, in sectors >> + >> +# Need to make linear metadata and data devs. From kernel docs: >> +# As a guide, we suggest you calculate the number of bytes to use in the >> +# metadata device as 48 * $data_dev_size / $data_block_size but round it up >> +# to 2MB (4096 sectors) if the answer is smaller. >> +# So do that: >> +meta_dev_size=$((48 * $data_dev_size / $cluster_size)) >> +if [ "$meta_dev_size" -lt "4096" ]; then >> + meta_dev_size=4096 # 2MB >> +fi >> + >> +meta_dev_offset=0 >> +total_data_dev_size=$(($meta_dev_offset + $meta_dev_size + $data_dev_size)) >> + >> +run_check truncate -s0 img >> +chmod a+w img >> +run_check truncate -s"$(($total_data_dev_size * $sector_size))" img >> + >> +dm_backing_dev=`run_check_stdout $SUDO_HELPER losetup --find --show img` >> + >> +# Metadata device >> +DMTHIN_META_TABLE="0 $meta_dev_size linear $dm_backing_dev $meta_dev_offset" >> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_META_NAME --table "$DMTHIN_META_TABLE" >> + >> +# Data device >> +data_dev_offset=$((meta_dev_offset + $meta_dev_size)) >> +DMTHIN_DATA_TABLE="0 $data_dev_size linear $dm_backing_dev $data_dev_offset" >> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_DATA_NAME --table "$DMTHIN_DATA_TABLE" >> + >> +# Zap the pool metadata dev >> +run_check dd if=/dev/zero of=$DMTHIN_META_DEV bs=4096 count=1 >> + >> +# Thin pool >> +# "start length thin-pool metadata_dev data_dev data_block_size low_water_mark" >> +DMTHIN_POOL_TABLE="0 $data_dev_size thin-pool $DMTHIN_META_DEV $DMTHIN_DATA_DEV $cluster_size $low_water" >> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_POOL_NAME --table "$DMTHIN_POOL_TABLE" >> + >> +# Thin volume >> +pool_id=$RANDOM >> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup message $DMTHIN_POOL_DEV 0 "create_thin $pool_id" >> + >> +# start length thin pool_dev dev_id [external_origin_dev] >> +DMTHIN_VOL_TABLE="0 $virtual_size thin $DMTHIN_POOL_DEV $pool_id" >> +run_check $SUDO_HELPER dmsetup create $DMTHIN_VOL_NAME --table "$DMTHIN_VOL_TABLE" >> + >> +# mkfs.btrfs should fail due to the small backing device >> +run_mustfail "should fail for samll backing size thin provision device" \ >> + $SUDO_HELPER "$TOP/mkfs.btrfs" -f "$@" "$DMTHIN_VOL_DEV" > > What does $@ mean here? This would pass arguments from the script > itself, but we don't pass any. > >> + >> +#cleanup >> +dmthin_cleanup >> +run_mayfail $SUDO_HELPER losetup -d $dm_backing_dev >> +run_check truncate -s0 img >> +rm img > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-04-12 1:05 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-04-11 7:03 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: tests: test mkfs.btrfs fails on small backing size thin provision device Su Yue 2018-04-11 7:05 ` Qu Wenruo 2018-04-11 7:28 ` Su Yue 2018-04-11 7:29 ` Qu Wenruo 2018-04-11 7:37 ` Nikolay Borisov 2018-04-11 7:47 ` Qu Wenruo 2018-04-11 15:36 ` David Sterba 2018-04-11 15:41 ` David Sterba 2018-04-12 1:11 ` Su Yue
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.