From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org (open list:DOCUMENTATION) Subject: [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 04/20] lockdep: Redefine LOCK_*_STATE* bits Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 21:50:54 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180411135110.9217-5-boqun.feng@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20180411135110.9217-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com> There are three types of lock acquisitions: write, non-recursive read and recursive read, among which write locks and non-recursive read locks have no difference from a viewpoint for deadlock detections, because a write acquisition of the corresponding lock on an independent CPU or task makes a non-recursive read lock act as a write lock in the sense of deadlock. So we could treat them as the same type (named as "non-recursive lock") in lockdep. As in the irq lock inversion detection (safe->unsafe deadlock detection), we used to differ write lock with read lock (non-recursive and recursive ones), such a classification could be improved as non-recursive read lock behaves the same as write lock, so this patch redefines the meanings of LOCK_{USED_IN, ENABLED}_STATE*. old: LOCK_* : stands for write lock LOCK_*_READ: stands for read lock(non-recursive and recursive) new: LOCK_* : stands for non-recursive(write lock and non-recursive read lock) LOCK_*_RR: stands for recursive read lock Such a change is needed for a future improvement on recursive read related irq inversion deadlock detection. Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> --- Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt | 6 +++--- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 28 ++++++++++++++-------------- kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h | 16 ++++++++-------- kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c | 12 ++++++------ 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt b/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt index 6bb9e90e2c4f..53ede30ce16d 100644 --- a/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt +++ b/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@ State The validator tracks lock-class usage history into 4n + 1 separate state bits: - 'ever held in STATE context' -- 'ever held as readlock in STATE context' +- 'ever held as recursive readlock in STATE context' - 'ever held with STATE enabled' -- 'ever held as readlock with STATE enabled' +- 'ever held as recurisve readlock with STATE enabled' Where STATE can be either one of (kernel/locking/lockdep_states.h) - hardirq @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ locking error messages, inside curlies. A contrived example: (&sio_locks[i].lock){-.-...}, at: [<c02867fd>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24 -The bit position indicates STATE, STATE-read, for each of the states listed +The bit position indicates STATE, STATE-RR, for each of the states listed above, and the character displayed in each indicates: '.' acquired while irqs disabled and not in irq context diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index f39a071ef0a8..14af2327b52a 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -448,10 +448,10 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct lockdep_stats, lockdep_stats); */ #define __USAGE(__STATE) \ - [LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE] = "IN-"__stringify(__STATE)"-W", \ - [LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE] = __stringify(__STATE)"-ON-W", \ - [LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE##_READ] = "IN-"__stringify(__STATE)"-R",\ - [LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE##_READ] = __stringify(__STATE)"-ON-R", + [LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE] = "IN-"__stringify(__STATE), \ + [LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE] = __stringify(__STATE)"-ON", \ + [LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE##_RR] = "IN-"__stringify(__STATE)"-RR", \ + [LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE##_RR] = __stringify(__STATE)"-ON-RR", static const char *usage_str[] = { @@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ void get_usage_chars(struct lock_class *class, char usage[LOCK_USAGE_CHARS]) #define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \ usage[i++] = get_usage_char(class, LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE); \ - usage[i++] = get_usage_char(class, LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE##_READ); + usage[i++] = get_usage_char(class, LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE##_RR); #include "lockdep_states.h" #undef LOCKDEP_STATE @@ -1645,7 +1645,7 @@ static const char *state_names[] = { static const char *state_rnames[] = { #define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \ - __stringify(__STATE)"-READ", + __stringify(__STATE)"-RR", #include "lockdep_states.h" #undef LOCKDEP_STATE }; @@ -3039,14 +3039,14 @@ static int mark_irqflags(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *hlock) * mark the lock as used in these contexts: */ if (!hlock->trylock) { - if (hlock->read) { + if (hlock->read == 2) { if (curr->hardirq_context) if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, - LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ)) + LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_RR)) return 0; if (curr->softirq_context) if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, - LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ)) + LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_RR)) return 0; } else { if (curr->hardirq_context) @@ -3058,13 +3058,13 @@ static int mark_irqflags(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *hlock) } } if (!hlock->hardirqs_off) { - if (hlock->read) { + if (hlock->read == 2) { if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, - LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ)) + LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_RR)) return 0; if (curr->softirqs_enabled) if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, - LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_READ)) + LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_RR)) return 0; } else { if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, @@ -3170,9 +3170,9 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, switch (new_bit) { #define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \ case LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE: \ - case LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE##_READ: \ + case LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE##_RR: \ case LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE: \ - case LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE##_READ: + case LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE##_RR: #include "lockdep_states.h" #undef LOCKDEP_STATE ret = mark_lock_irq(curr, this, new_bit); diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h b/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h index d459d624ba2a..93002d337936 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ enum lock_usage_bit { #define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \ LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE, \ - LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE##_READ, \ + LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE##_RR, \ LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE, \ - LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE##_READ, + LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE##_RR, #include "lockdep_states.h" #undef LOCKDEP_STATE LOCK_USED, @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@ enum lock_usage_bit { enum { #define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \ __LOCKF(USED_IN_##__STATE) \ - __LOCKF(USED_IN_##__STATE##_READ) \ + __LOCKF(USED_IN_##__STATE##_RR) \ __LOCKF(ENABLED_##__STATE) \ - __LOCKF(ENABLED_##__STATE##_READ) + __LOCKF(ENABLED_##__STATE##_RR) #include "lockdep_states.h" #undef LOCKDEP_STATE __LOCKF(USED) @@ -41,10 +41,10 @@ enum { #define LOCKF_ENABLED_IRQ (LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ | LOCKF_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ) #define LOCKF_USED_IN_IRQ (LOCKF_USED_IN_HARDIRQ | LOCKF_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ) -#define LOCKF_ENABLED_IRQ_READ \ - (LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ | LOCKF_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_READ) -#define LOCKF_USED_IN_IRQ_READ \ - (LOCKF_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ | LOCKF_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ) +#define LOCKF_ENABLED_IRQ_RR \ + (LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_RR | LOCKF_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_RR) +#define LOCKF_USED_IN_IRQ_RR \ + (LOCKF_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_RR | LOCKF_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_RR) /* * CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SMALL is defined for sparc. Sparc requires .text, diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c index ad69bbc9bd28..630a6bc6e24c 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c @@ -252,17 +252,17 @@ static int lockdep_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) nr_hardirq_safe++; if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ) nr_hardirq_unsafe++; - if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED_IN_IRQ_READ) + if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED_IN_IRQ_RR) nr_irq_read_safe++; - if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_IRQ_READ) + if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_IRQ_RR) nr_irq_read_unsafe++; - if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ) + if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_RR) nr_softirq_read_safe++; - if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_READ) + if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_RR) nr_softirq_read_unsafe++; - if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ) + if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_RR) nr_hardirq_read_safe++; - if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ) + if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_RR) nr_hardirq_read_unsafe++; #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING -- 2.16.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org (open list:DOCUMENTATION) Subject: [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 04/20] lockdep: Redefine LOCK_*_STATE* bits Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 21:50:54 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180411135110.9217-5-boqun.feng@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20180411135110.9217-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com> There are three types of lock acquisitions: write, non-recursive read and recursive read, among which write locks and non-recursive read locks have no difference from a viewpoint for deadlock detections, because a write acquisition of the corresponding lock on an independent CPU or task makes a non-recursive read lock act as a write lock in the sense of deadlock. So we could treat them as the same type (named as "non-recursive lock") in lockdep. As in the irq lock inversion detection (safe->unsafe deadlock detection), we used to differ write lock with read lock (non-recursive and recursive ones), such a classification could be improved as non-recursive read lock behaves the same as write lock, so this patch redefines the meanings of LOCK_{USED_IN, ENABLED}_STATE*. old: LOCK_* : stands for write lock LOCK_*_READ: stands for read lock(non-recursive and recursive) new: LOCK_* : stands for non-recursive(write lock and non-recursive read lock) LOCK_*_RR: stands for recursive read lock Such a change is needed for a future improvement on recursive read related irq inversion deadlock detection. Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> --- Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt | 6 +++--- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 28 ++++++++++++++-------------- kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h | 16 ++++++++-------- kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c | 12 ++++++------ 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt b/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt index 6bb9e90e2c4f..53ede30ce16d 100644 --- a/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt +++ b/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@ State The validator tracks lock-class usage history into 4n + 1 separate state bits: - 'ever held in STATE context' -- 'ever held as readlock in STATE context' +- 'ever held as recursive readlock in STATE context' - 'ever held with STATE enabled' -- 'ever held as readlock with STATE enabled' +- 'ever held as recurisve readlock with STATE enabled' Where STATE can be either one of (kernel/locking/lockdep_states.h) - hardirq @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ locking error messages, inside curlies. A contrived example: (&sio_locks[i].lock){-.-...}, at: [<c02867fd>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24 -The bit position indicates STATE, STATE-read, for each of the states listed +The bit position indicates STATE, STATE-RR, for each of the states listed above, and the character displayed in each indicates: '.' acquired while irqs disabled and not in irq context diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index f39a071ef0a8..14af2327b52a 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -448,10 +448,10 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct lockdep_stats, lockdep_stats); */ #define __USAGE(__STATE) \ - [LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE] = "IN-"__stringify(__STATE)"-W", \ - [LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE] = __stringify(__STATE)"-ON-W", \ - [LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE##_READ] = "IN-"__stringify(__STATE)"-R",\ - [LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE##_READ] = __stringify(__STATE)"-ON-R", + [LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE] = "IN-"__stringify(__STATE), \ + [LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE] = __stringify(__STATE)"-ON", \ + [LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE##_RR] = "IN-"__stringify(__STATE)"-RR", \ + [LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE##_RR] = __stringify(__STATE)"-ON-RR", static const char *usage_str[] = { @@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ void get_usage_chars(struct lock_class *class, char usage[LOCK_USAGE_CHARS]) #define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \ usage[i++] = get_usage_char(class, LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE); \ - usage[i++] = get_usage_char(class, LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE##_READ); + usage[i++] = get_usage_char(class, LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE##_RR); #include "lockdep_states.h" #undef LOCKDEP_STATE @@ -1645,7 +1645,7 @@ static const char *state_names[] = { static const char *state_rnames[] = { #define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \ - __stringify(__STATE)"-READ", + __stringify(__STATE)"-RR", #include "lockdep_states.h" #undef LOCKDEP_STATE }; @@ -3039,14 +3039,14 @@ static int mark_irqflags(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *hlock) * mark the lock as used in these contexts: */ if (!hlock->trylock) { - if (hlock->read) { + if (hlock->read == 2) { if (curr->hardirq_context) if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, - LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ)) + LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_RR)) return 0; if (curr->softirq_context) if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, - LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ)) + LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_RR)) return 0; } else { if (curr->hardirq_context) @@ -3058,13 +3058,13 @@ static int mark_irqflags(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *hlock) } } if (!hlock->hardirqs_off) { - if (hlock->read) { + if (hlock->read == 2) { if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, - LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ)) + LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_RR)) return 0; if (curr->softirqs_enabled) if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, - LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_READ)) + LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_RR)) return 0; } else { if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, @@ -3170,9 +3170,9 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, switch (new_bit) { #define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \ case LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE: \ - case LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE##_READ: \ + case LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE##_RR: \ case LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE: \ - case LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE##_READ: + case LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE##_RR: #include "lockdep_states.h" #undef LOCKDEP_STATE ret = mark_lock_irq(curr, this, new_bit); diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h b/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h index d459d624ba2a..93002d337936 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ enum lock_usage_bit { #define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \ LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE, \ - LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE##_READ, \ + LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE##_RR, \ LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE, \ - LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE##_READ, + LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE##_RR, #include "lockdep_states.h" #undef LOCKDEP_STATE LOCK_USED, @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@ enum lock_usage_bit { enum { #define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \ __LOCKF(USED_IN_##__STATE) \ - __LOCKF(USED_IN_##__STATE##_READ) \ + __LOCKF(USED_IN_##__STATE##_RR) \ __LOCKF(ENABLED_##__STATE) \ - __LOCKF(ENABLED_##__STATE##_READ) + __LOCKF(ENABLED_##__STATE##_RR) #include "lockdep_states.h" #undef LOCKDEP_STATE __LOCKF(USED) @@ -41,10 +41,10 @@ enum { #define LOCKF_ENABLED_IRQ (LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ | LOCKF_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ) #define LOCKF_USED_IN_IRQ (LOCKF_USED_IN_HARDIRQ | LOCKF_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ) -#define LOCKF_ENABLED_IRQ_READ \ - (LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ | LOCKF_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_READ) -#define LOCKF_USED_IN_IRQ_READ \ - (LOCKF_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ | LOCKF_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ) +#define LOCKF_ENABLED_IRQ_RR \ + (LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_RR | LOCKF_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_RR) +#define LOCKF_USED_IN_IRQ_RR \ + (LOCKF_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_RR | LOCKF_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_RR) /* * CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SMALL is defined for sparc. Sparc requires .text, diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c index ad69bbc9bd28..630a6bc6e24c 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c @@ -252,17 +252,17 @@ static int lockdep_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) nr_hardirq_safe++; if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ) nr_hardirq_unsafe++; - if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED_IN_IRQ_READ) + if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED_IN_IRQ_RR) nr_irq_read_safe++; - if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_IRQ_READ) + if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_IRQ_RR) nr_irq_read_unsafe++; - if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ) + if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_RR) nr_softirq_read_safe++; - if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_READ) + if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_RR) nr_softirq_read_unsafe++; - if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ) + if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_RR) nr_hardirq_read_safe++; - if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ) + if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_RR) nr_hardirq_read_unsafe++; #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING -- 2.16.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-11 13:47 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-04-11 13:50 [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 00/20] lockdep: Support deadlock detection for recursive read locks Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:50 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 01/20] lockdep/Documention: Recursive read lock detection reasoning Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:50 ` Boqun Feng 2018-04-15 0:38 ` Randy Dunlap 2018-04-15 0:38 ` Randy Dunlap 2018-04-16 6:29 ` Boqun Feng 2018-04-27 13:50 ` Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:50 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 02/20] lockdep: Demagic the return value of BFS Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:50 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 03/20] lockdep: Make __bfs() visit every dependency until a match Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:50 ` Boqun Feng [this message] 2018-04-11 13:50 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 04/20] lockdep: Redefine LOCK_*_STATE* bits Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:50 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 05/20] lockdep: Reduce the size of lock_list::distance Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:50 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 06/20] lockdep: Introduce lock_list::dep Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:50 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 07/20] lockdep: Extend __bfs() to work with multiple types of dependencies Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:50 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 08/20] lockdep: Make __bfs(.match) return bool Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:50 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 09/20] lockdep: Support deadlock detection for recursive read locks in check_noncircular() Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:51 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 10/20] lockdep: Adjust check_redundant() for recursive read change Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:51 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 11/20] lockdep: Fix recursive read lock related safe->unsafe detection Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:51 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 12/20] lockdep: Add recursive read locks into dependency graph Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:51 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 13/20] lockdep/selftest: Add a R-L/L-W test case specific to chain cache behavior Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:51 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 14/20] lockdep: Take read/write status in consideration when generate chainkey Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:51 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 15/20] lockdep/selftest: Unleash irq_read_recursion2 and add more Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:51 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 16/20] lockdep/selftest: Add more recursive read related test cases Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:51 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 17/20] Revert "locking/lockdep/selftests: Fix mixed read-write ABBA tests" Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:51 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 18/20] MAINTAINERS: Add myself as a LOCKING PRIMITIVES reviewer Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:56 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 19/20] rcu: Equip sleepable RCU with lockdep dependency graph checks Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 18:57 ` Paul E. McKenney 2018-04-12 2:12 ` Boqun Feng 2018-04-12 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra 2018-04-13 13:24 ` Boqun Feng 2018-04-11 13:57 ` [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v6 20/20] lockdep/selftest: Add a test case for SRCU Boqun Feng
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20180411135110.9217-5-boqun.feng@gmail.com \ --to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \ --cc=corbet@lwn.net \ --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \ --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.