From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Prakash, Prashanth" <pprakash@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
"4.14+" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][for 4.17-rc3] cpufreq / CPPC: Set platform specific transition_delay_us
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:22:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180427045248.sugty3eng7o5bgbv@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <04fdd4d1-fd78-f6c9-4852-45a0c6235e7f@codeaurora.org>
On 26-04-18, 09:50, Prakash, Prashanth wrote:
> On second thoughts, If we have a scenario where we have a platform on which the
> "implementor" matches a case statement, but the "part_num" does not have a
> corresponding case statement. In this case we would need multiple levels of default,
> so I think the current implementation is simpler.�
You already have multiple level of switches, multiple level of
defaults shouldn't make it any worse :)
--
viresh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Prakash, Prashanth" <pprakash@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
"4.14+" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][for 4.17-rc3] cpufreq / CPPC: Set platform specific transition_delay_us
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:22:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180427045248.sugty3eng7o5bgbv@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <04fdd4d1-fd78-f6c9-4852-45a0c6235e7f@codeaurora.org>
On 26-04-18, 09:50, Prakash, Prashanth wrote:
> On second thoughts, If we have a scenario where we have a platform on which the
> "implementor" matches a case statement, but the "part_num" does not have a
> corresponding case statement. In this case we would need multiple levels of default,
> so I think the current implementation is simpler.
You already have multiple level of switches, multiple level of
defaults shouldn't make it any worse :)
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-27 4:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-25 16:26 [PATCH v2][for 4.17-rc3] cpufreq / CPPC: Set platform specific transition_delay_us Prashanth Prakash
2018-04-26 5:25 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-04-26 15:29 ` Prakash, Prashanth
2018-04-26 15:29 ` Prakash, Prashanth
2018-04-26 15:50 ` Prakash, Prashanth
2018-04-27 4:52 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2018-04-27 4:52 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180427045248.sugty3eng7o5bgbv@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pprakash@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.