All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: fix packet leaking in dual_mac mode
Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 12:41:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180501174122.11323-1-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> (raw)

In dual_mac mode packets arrived on one port should not be forwarded by
switch hw to another port. Only Linux Host can forward packets between
ports. The below test case (reported in [1]) shows that packet arrived on
one port can be leaked to anoter (reproducible with dual port evms):
 - connect port 1 (eth0) to linux Host 0 and run tcpdump or Wireshark
 - connect port 2 (eth1) to linux Host 1 with vlan 1 configured
 - ping <IPx> from Host 1 through vlan 1 interface.
ARP packets will be seen on Host 0.

Issue happens because dual_mac mode is implemnted using two vlans: 1 (Port
1+Port 0) and 2 (Port 2+Port 0), so there are vlan records created for for
each vlan. By default, the ALE will find valid vlan record in its table
when vlan 1 tagged packet arrived on Port 2 and so forwards packet to all
ports which are vlan 1 members (like Port.

To avoid such behaviorr the ALE VLAN ID Ingress Check need to be enabled
for each external CPSW port (ALE_PORTCTLn.VID_INGRESS_CHECK) so ALE will
drop ingress packets if Rx port is not VLAN member.

Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
index 5047f4b..46500a2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
@@ -1340,6 +1340,8 @@ static inline void cpsw_add_dual_emac_def_ale_entries(
 	cpsw_ale_add_ucast(cpsw->ale, priv->mac_addr,
 			   HOST_PORT_NUM, ALE_VLAN |
 			   ALE_SECURE, slave->port_vlan);
+	cpsw_ale_control_set(cpsw->ale, slave_port,
+			     ALE_PORT_DROP_UNKNOWN_VLAN, 1);
 }
 
 static void soft_reset_slave(struct cpsw_slave *slave)
-- 
2.10.5

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: fix packet leaking in dual_mac mode
Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 12:41:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180501174122.11323-1-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> (raw)

In dual_mac mode packets arrived on one port should not be forwarded by
switch hw to another port. Only Linux Host can forward packets between
ports. The below test case (reported in [1]) shows that packet arrived on
one port can be leaked to anoter (reproducible with dual port evms):
 - connect port 1 (eth0) to linux Host 0 and run tcpdump or Wireshark
 - connect port 2 (eth1) to linux Host 1 with vlan 1 configured
 - ping <IPx> from Host 1 through vlan 1 interface.
ARP packets will be seen on Host 0.

Issue happens because dual_mac mode is implemnted using two vlans: 1 (Port
1+Port 0) and 2 (Port 2+Port 0), so there are vlan records created for for
each vlan. By default, the ALE will find valid vlan record in its table
when vlan 1 tagged packet arrived on Port 2 and so forwards packet to all
ports which are vlan 1 members (like Port.

To avoid such behaviorr the ALE VLAN ID Ingress Check need to be enabled
for each external CPSW port (ALE_PORTCTLn.VID_INGRESS_CHECK) so ALE will
drop ingress packets if Rx port is not VLAN member.

Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
index 5047f4b..46500a2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
@@ -1340,6 +1340,8 @@ static inline void cpsw_add_dual_emac_def_ale_entries(
 	cpsw_ale_add_ucast(cpsw->ale, priv->mac_addr,
 			   HOST_PORT_NUM, ALE_VLAN |
 			   ALE_SECURE, slave->port_vlan);
+	cpsw_ale_control_set(cpsw->ale, slave_port,
+			     ALE_PORT_DROP_UNKNOWN_VLAN, 1);
 }
 
 static void soft_reset_slave(struct cpsw_slave *slave)
-- 
2.10.5

             reply	other threads:[~2018-05-01 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-01 17:41 Grygorii Strashko [this message]
2018-05-01 17:41 ` [PATCH] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: fix packet leaking in dual_mac mode Grygorii Strashko
2018-05-02 15:08 ` David Miller
2018-05-17 17:48   ` Naresh Kamboju
2018-05-17 19:10     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-05-18 16:37       ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-05-18 16:37         ` Grygorii Strashko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180501174122.11323-1-grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --to=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.