From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> To: David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org> Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 06:02:58 +0900 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180501210258.GG2714@sirena.org.uk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <f98416ac-230c-0362-ed50-a7f92ff283d7@codeaurora.org> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 786 bytes --] On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:04:56PM -0700, David Collins wrote: > > Using -EAGAIN for "I can't ever read the configuration from this > > regulator" doesn't seem right - it's not like any number of retries > > will ever manage to read the value back. > In this case, the _regulator_get_voltage() call can succeed, but only > after a voltage is explicitly requested from the framework side. The ... > Do you still have reservations about using -EAGAIN for this purpose? If > so, which error code would you suggest using? Yes, that's clearly a problem - -EAGAIN is more for situations where you can just immediately retry like signal interruptions. If the caller repetedly sits and tries to read the voltage it'll never succeed unless something else comes along and sets something. [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 06:02:58 +0900 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180501210258.GG2714@sirena.org.uk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <f98416ac-230c-0362-ed50-a7f92ff283d7@codeaurora.org> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:04:56PM -0700, David Collins wrote: > > Using -EAGAIN for "I can't ever read the configuration from this > > regulator" doesn't seem right - it's not like any number of retries > > will ever manage to read the value back. > In this case, the _regulator_get_voltage() call can succeed, but only > after a voltage is explicitly requested from the framework side. The ... > Do you still have reservations about using -EAGAIN for this purpose? If > so, which error code would you suggest using? Yes, that's clearly a problem - -EAGAIN is more for situations where you can just immediately retry like signal interruptions. If the caller repetedly sits and tries to read the voltage it'll never succeed unless something else comes along and sets something. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180502/c3175675/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-01 21:02 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-04-14 2:50 [PATCH v2 0/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver David Collins 2018-04-14 2:50 ` David Collins 2018-04-14 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings David Collins 2018-04-14 2:50 ` David Collins 2018-04-14 2:50 ` David Collins 2018-04-16 20:57 ` Rob Herring 2018-04-16 20:57 ` Rob Herring 2018-04-16 22:06 ` David Collins 2018-04-16 22:06 ` David Collins 2018-04-17 20:06 ` Doug Anderson 2018-04-17 20:06 ` Doug Anderson 2018-04-18 21:44 ` David Collins 2018-04-18 21:44 ` David Collins 2018-05-02 16:37 ` Doug Anderson 2018-05-02 16:37 ` Doug Anderson 2018-05-03 0:13 ` David Collins 2018-05-03 0:13 ` David Collins 2018-05-03 15:01 ` Doug Anderson 2018-05-03 15:01 ` Doug Anderson 2018-04-14 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver David Collins 2018-04-14 2:50 ` David Collins 2018-04-17 18:23 ` [v2,2/2] " Matthias Kaehlcke 2018-04-17 18:23 ` Matthias Kaehlcke 2018-04-17 19:15 ` David Collins 2018-04-17 19:15 ` David Collins 2018-04-17 19:47 ` Matthias Kaehlcke 2018-04-17 19:47 ` Matthias Kaehlcke 2018-04-18 21:34 ` David Collins 2018-04-18 21:34 ` David Collins 2018-04-18 17:02 ` Mark Brown 2018-04-18 17:02 ` Mark Brown 2018-04-17 20:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] " Doug Anderson 2018-04-17 20:02 ` Doug Anderson 2018-04-18 23:30 ` David Collins 2018-04-18 23:30 ` David Collins 2018-04-19 6:04 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-04-19 6:04 ` Stephen Boyd 2018-04-19 16:16 ` Doug Anderson 2018-04-19 16:16 ` Doug Anderson 2018-04-20 22:08 ` David Collins 2018-04-20 22:08 ` David Collins 2018-04-24 17:45 ` Mark Brown 2018-04-24 17:45 ` Mark Brown 2018-04-24 21:09 ` David Collins 2018-04-24 21:09 ` David Collins 2018-04-25 10:31 ` Mark Brown 2018-04-25 10:31 ` Mark Brown 2018-04-25 21:04 ` David Collins 2018-04-25 21:04 ` David Collins 2018-05-01 21:02 ` Mark Brown [this message] 2018-05-01 21:02 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20180501210258.GG2714@sirena.org.uk \ --to=broonie@kernel.org \ --cc=collinsd@codeaurora.org \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=dianders@chromium.org \ --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=mka@chromium.org \ --cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.