From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, pasha.tatashin@oracle.com,
steven.sistare@oracle.com, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, alexander.duyck@gmail.com,
tobin@apporbit.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 1/1] drivers core: multi-threading device shutdown
Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 09:56:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201805060956.WLlHt6Gx%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180505154040.28614-2-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Hi Pavel,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on driver-core/driver-core-testing]
[also build test WARNING on v4.17-rc3 next-20180504]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Pavel-Tatashin/multi-threading-device-shutdown/20180506-035150
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/base/core.c:2877:25: sparse: symbol 'device_root_tasks_done' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/base/core.c:62:5: sparse: context imbalance in 'device_links_read_lock' - wrong count at exit
drivers/base/core.c:67:6: sparse: context imbalance in 'device_links_read_unlock' - unexpected unlock
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 1/1] drivers core: multi-threading device shutdown
Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 09:56:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201805060956.WLlHt6Gx%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180505154040.28614-2-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Hi Pavel,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on driver-core/driver-core-testing]
[also build test WARNING on v4.17-rc3 next-20180504]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Pavel-Tatashin/multi-threading-device-shutdown/20180506-035150
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/base/core.c:2877:25: sparse: symbol 'device_root_tasks_done' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/base/core.c:62:5: sparse: context imbalance in 'device_links_read_lock' - wrong count at exit
drivers/base/core.c:67:6: sparse: context imbalance in 'device_links_read_unlock' - unexpected unlock
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-06 1:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-05 15:40 [PATCH v2 0/1] multi-threading device shutdown Pavel Tatashin
2018-05-05 15:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Pavel Tatashin
2018-05-05 15:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] drivers core: " Pavel Tatashin
2018-05-05 15:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Pavel Tatashin
2018-05-06 1:56 ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2018-05-06 1:56 ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-06 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH] drivers core: device_root_tasks_done can be static kbuild test robot
2018-05-06 1:56 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " kbuild test robot
2018-05-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] drivers core: multi-threading device shutdown Pavel Machek
2018-05-23 10:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Pavel Machek
2018-05-23 11:31 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-05-23 11:31 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Pavel Tatashin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201805060956.WLlHt6Gx%fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
--cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
--cc=tobin@apporbit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.