* [CI 3/4] drm/i915/execlists: Refactor out complete_preempt_context()
2018-05-16 15:06 [CI 1/4] drm/i915: Remove tasklet flush before disable Chris Wilson
2018-05-16 15:06 ` [CI 2/4] drm/i915: Only sync tasklets once for recursive reset preparation Chris Wilson
@ 2018-05-16 15:06 ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-16 15:06 ` [CI 4/4] drm/i915: Split execlists/guc reset preparations Chris Wilson
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-05-16 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
As a complement to inject_preempt_context(), follow up with the function
to handle its completion. This will be useful should we wish to extend
the duties of the preempt-context for execlists.
v2: And do the same for the guc.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com> #v1
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 38 ++---------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c | 26 +++++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 23 ++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 9 ++-
5 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 982393907b80..abf661d40641 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -3004,7 +3004,7 @@ i915_gem_find_active_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
struct i915_request *
i915_gem_reset_prepare_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
- struct i915_request *request = NULL;
+ struct i915_request *request;
/*
* During the reset sequence, we must prevent the engine from
@@ -3027,31 +3027,7 @@ i915_gem_reset_prepare_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
*/
kthread_park(engine->breadcrumbs.signaler);
- /*
- * Prevent request submission to the hardware until we have
- * completed the reset in i915_gem_reset_finish(). If a request
- * is completed by one engine, it may then queue a request
- * to a second via its execlists->tasklet *just* as we are
- * calling engine->init_hw() and also writing the ELSP.
- * Turning off the execlists->tasklet until the reset is over
- * prevents the race.
- */
- __tasklet_disable_sync_once(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
-
- /*
- * We're using worker to queue preemption requests from the tasklet in
- * GuC submission mode.
- * Even though tasklet was disabled, we may still have a worker queued.
- * Let's make sure that all workers scheduled before disabling the
- * tasklet are completed before continuing with the reset.
- */
- if (engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq)
- flush_workqueue(engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq);
-
- if (engine->irq_seqno_barrier)
- engine->irq_seqno_barrier(engine);
-
- request = i915_gem_find_active_request(engine);
+ request = engine->reset.prepare(engine);
if (request && request->fence.error == -EIO)
request = ERR_PTR(-EIO); /* Previous reset failed! */
@@ -3202,13 +3178,8 @@ void i915_gem_reset_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
if (request)
request = i915_gem_reset_request(engine, request, stalled);
- if (request) {
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("resetting %s to restart from tail of request 0x%x\n",
- engine->name, request->global_seqno);
- }
-
/* Setup the CS to resume from the breadcrumb of the hung request */
- engine->reset_hw(engine, request);
+ engine->reset.reset(engine, request);
}
void i915_gem_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
@@ -3256,7 +3227,8 @@ void i915_gem_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
void i915_gem_reset_finish_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
- tasklet_enable(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
+ engine->reset.finish(engine);
+
kthread_unpark(engine->breadcrumbs.signaler);
intel_uncore_forcewake_put(engine->i915, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
index 2feb65096966..ca38ac9ff4fa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -623,6 +623,21 @@ static void wait_for_guc_preempt_report(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
report->report_return_status = INTEL_GUC_REPORT_STATUS_UNKNOWN;
}
+static void complete_preempt_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+{
+ struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists = &engine->execlists;
+
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!execlists_is_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT));
+
+ execlists_cancel_port_requests(execlists);
+ execlists_unwind_incomplete_requests(execlists);
+
+ wait_for_guc_preempt_report(engine);
+ intel_write_status_page(engine, I915_GEM_HWS_PREEMPT_INDEX, 0);
+
+ execlists_clear_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
+}
+
/**
* guc_submit() - Submit commands through GuC
* @engine: engine associated with the commands
@@ -793,15 +808,8 @@ static void guc_submission_tasklet(unsigned long data)
if (execlists_is_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT) &&
intel_read_status_page(engine, I915_GEM_HWS_PREEMPT_INDEX) ==
- GUC_PREEMPT_FINISHED) {
- execlists_cancel_port_requests(&engine->execlists);
- execlists_unwind_incomplete_requests(execlists);
-
- wait_for_guc_preempt_report(engine);
-
- execlists_clear_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
- intel_write_status_page(engine, I915_GEM_HWS_PREEMPT_INDEX, 0);
- }
+ GUC_PREEMPT_FINISHED)
+ complete_preempt_context(engine);
if (!execlists_is_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT))
guc_dequeue(engine);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 15434cad5430..67fed98abee7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -552,8 +552,18 @@ static void inject_preempt_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
if (execlists->ctrl_reg)
writel(EL_CTRL_LOAD, execlists->ctrl_reg);
- execlists_clear_active(&engine->execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_HWACK);
- execlists_set_active(&engine->execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
+ execlists_clear_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_HWACK);
+ execlists_set_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
+}
+
+static void complete_preempt_context(struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
+{
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!execlists_is_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT));
+
+ execlists_cancel_port_requests(execlists);
+ execlists_unwind_incomplete_requests(execlists);
+
+ execlists_clear_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
}
static bool __execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
@@ -1063,14 +1073,7 @@ static void execlists_submission_tasklet(unsigned long data)
if (status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_COMPLETE &&
buf[2*head + 1] == execlists->preempt_complete_status) {
GEM_TRACE("%s preempt-idle\n", engine->name);
-
- execlists_cancel_port_requests(execlists);
- execlists_unwind_incomplete_requests(execlists);
-
- GEM_BUG_ON(!execlists_is_active(execlists,
- EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT));
- execlists_clear_active(execlists,
- EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
+ complete_preempt_context(execlists);
continue;
}
@@ -1823,8 +1826,39 @@ static int gen9_init_render_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
return 0;
}
-static void reset_common_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
- struct i915_request *request)
+static struct i915_request *
+execlists_reset_prepare(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+{
+ struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
+
+ GEM_TRACE("%s\n", engine->name);
+
+ /*
+ * Prevent request submission to the hardware until we have
+ * completed the reset in i915_gem_reset_finish(). If a request
+ * is completed by one engine, it may then queue a request
+ * to a second via its execlists->tasklet *just* as we are
+ * calling engine->init_hw() and also writing the ELSP.
+ * Turning off the execlists->tasklet until the reset is over
+ * prevents the race.
+ */
+ __tasklet_disable_sync_once(&execlists->tasklet);
+
+ /*
+ * We're using worker to queue preemption requests from the tasklet in
+ * GuC submission mode.
+ * Even though tasklet was disabled, we may still have a worker queued.
+ * Let's make sure that all workers scheduled before disabling the
+ * tasklet are completed before continuing with the reset.
+ */
+ if (engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq)
+ flush_workqueue(engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq);
+
+ return i915_gem_find_active_request(engine);
+}
+
+static void execlists_reset(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+ struct i915_request *request)
{
struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -1904,6 +1938,13 @@ static void reset_common_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
unwind_wa_tail(request);
}
+static void execlists_reset_finish(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+{
+ tasklet_enable(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
+
+ GEM_TRACE("%s\n", engine->name);
+}
+
static int intel_logical_ring_emit_pdps(struct i915_request *rq)
{
struct i915_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt = rq->ctx->ppgtt;
@@ -2233,7 +2274,10 @@ logical_ring_default_vfuncs(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
/* Default vfuncs which can be overriden by each engine. */
engine->init_hw = gen8_init_common_ring;
- engine->reset_hw = reset_common_ring;
+
+ engine->reset.prepare = execlists_reset_prepare;
+ engine->reset.reset = execlists_reset;
+ engine->reset.finish = execlists_reset_finish;
engine->context_pin = execlists_context_pin;
engine->context_unpin = execlists_context_unpin;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index 8f19349a6055..af5a178366ed 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -531,9 +531,20 @@ static int init_ring_common(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
return ret;
}
-static void reset_ring_common(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
- struct i915_request *request)
+static struct i915_request *reset_prepare(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
+ if (engine->irq_seqno_barrier)
+ engine->irq_seqno_barrier(engine);
+
+ return i915_gem_find_active_request(engine);
+}
+
+static void reset_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+ struct i915_request *request)
+{
+ GEM_TRACE("%s seqno=%x\n",
+ engine->name, request ? request->global_seqno : 0);
+
/*
* RC6 must be prevented until the reset is complete and the engine
* reinitialised. If it occurs in the middle of this sequence, the
@@ -597,6 +608,10 @@ static void reset_ring_common(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
}
}
+static void reset_finish(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+{
+}
+
static int intel_rcs_ctx_init(struct i915_request *rq)
{
int ret;
@@ -2006,7 +2021,9 @@ static void intel_ring_default_vfuncs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
intel_ring_init_semaphores(dev_priv, engine);
engine->init_hw = init_ring_common;
- engine->reset_hw = reset_ring_common;
+ engine->reset.prepare = reset_prepare;
+ engine->reset.reset = reset_ring;
+ engine->reset.finish = reset_finish;
engine->context_pin = intel_ring_context_pin;
engine->context_unpin = intel_ring_context_unpin;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
index 010750e8ee44..1e8bacba7754 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
@@ -423,8 +423,13 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
void (*irq_disable)(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
int (*init_hw)(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
- void (*reset_hw)(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
- struct i915_request *rq);
+
+ struct {
+ struct i915_request *(*prepare)(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
+ void (*reset)(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+ struct i915_request *rq);
+ void (*finish)(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
+ } reset;
void (*park)(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
void (*unpark)(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
--
2.17.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [CI 4/4] drm/i915: Split execlists/guc reset preparations
2018-05-16 15:06 [CI 1/4] drm/i915: Remove tasklet flush before disable Chris Wilson
2018-05-16 15:06 ` [CI 2/4] drm/i915: Only sync tasklets once for recursive reset preparation Chris Wilson
2018-05-16 15:06 ` [CI 3/4] drm/i915/execlists: Refactor out complete_preempt_context() Chris Wilson
@ 2018-05-16 15:06 ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-16 15:47 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [CI,1/4] drm/i915: Remove tasklet flush before disable Patchwork
2018-05-16 22:14 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-05-16 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
In the next patch, we will make the execlists reset prepare callback
take into account preemption by flushing the context-switch handler.
This is not applicable to the GuC submission backend, so split the two
into their own backend callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
CC: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 12 ++------
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
index ca38ac9ff4fa..637e852888ec 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -815,6 +815,37 @@ static void guc_submission_tasklet(unsigned long data)
guc_dequeue(engine);
}
+static struct i915_request *
+guc_reset_prepare(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+{
+ struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
+
+ GEM_TRACE("%s\n", engine->name);
+
+ /*
+ * Prevent request submission to the hardware until we have
+ * completed the reset in i915_gem_reset_finish(). If a request
+ * is completed by one engine, it may then queue a request
+ * to a second via its execlists->tasklet *just* as we are
+ * calling engine->init_hw() and also writing the ELSP.
+ * Turning off the execlists->tasklet until the reset is over
+ * prevents the race.
+ */
+ __tasklet_disable_sync_once(&execlists->tasklet);
+
+ /*
+ * We're using worker to queue preemption requests from the tasklet in
+ * GuC submission mode.
+ * Even though tasklet was disabled, we may still have a worker queued.
+ * Let's make sure that all workers scheduled before disabling the
+ * tasklet are completed before continuing with the reset.
+ */
+ if (engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq)
+ flush_workqueue(engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq);
+
+ return i915_gem_find_active_request(engine);
+}
+
/*
* Everything below here is concerned with setup & teardown, and is
* therefore not part of the somewhat time-critical batch-submission
@@ -1275,6 +1306,9 @@ int intel_guc_submission_enable(struct intel_guc *guc)
&engine->execlists;
execlists->tasklet.func = guc_submission_tasklet;
+
+ engine->reset.prepare = guc_reset_prepare;
+
engine->park = guc_submission_park;
engine->unpark = guc_submission_unpark;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 67fed98abee7..f5d74df0e0d0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1844,16 +1844,6 @@ execlists_reset_prepare(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
*/
__tasklet_disable_sync_once(&execlists->tasklet);
- /*
- * We're using worker to queue preemption requests from the tasklet in
- * GuC submission mode.
- * Even though tasklet was disabled, we may still have a worker queued.
- * Let's make sure that all workers scheduled before disabling the
- * tasklet are completed before continuing with the reset.
- */
- if (engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq)
- flush_workqueue(engine->i915->guc.preempt_wq);
-
return i915_gem_find_active_request(engine);
}
@@ -2255,6 +2245,8 @@ static void execlists_set_default_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
engine->schedule = execlists_schedule;
engine->execlists.tasklet.func = execlists_submission_tasklet;
+ engine->reset.prepare = execlists_reset_prepare;
+
engine->park = NULL;
engine->unpark = NULL;
--
2.17.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread