Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] Acceptance tests: add quick VNC tests

[Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>]

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:27:46PM -0400, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05/25/2018 01:37 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Thu, 05/24 20:58, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> >> This patch adds a few simple behavior tests for VNC.  These tests
> >> introduce manipulation of the QEMUMachine arguments, by setting
> >> the arguments, instead of adding to the existing ones.
> > 
> > I'm confused by this. The code uses 'add_args', so it does add to the arguments,
> > no?
> > 
> 
> And you should be.  I changed the code to just add args, and forgot to
> update the commit message.  If a better example comes up that requires
> setting arguments, I'll get back to this.
> 
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  tests/acceptance/test_vnc.py | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
> >>  create mode 100644 tests/acceptance/test_vnc.py
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tests/acceptance/test_vnc.py b/tests/acceptance/test_vnc.py
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000000..9d9a35cf55
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/tests/acceptance/test_vnc.py
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
> > 
> > Copyright header is missing here too.
> > 
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> > Fam
> > 
> >> +from avocado_qemu import Test
> >> +
> >> +
> >> +class Vnc(Test):
> > 
> > Should VncTest be a better class name?
> > 
> 
> I'm favoring simpler names.  If you think about the complete test names,
> it's already too verbose IMO: "test_vnc.Vnc.test_no_vnc".
> 
> That's actually an interesting point: how would you feel about dropping
> the "test_" prefix from the file names?

I would like this.  The file is already inside a tests/acceptance
directory.

About the class name, I would be less surprised when reading the
code if it was called "VncTest", but I won't object to "Vnc" if
you prefer it.

-- 
Eduardo