All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: mhocko@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"open list:GENERIC INCLUDE/ASM HEADER FILES" 
	<linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: why do we still need bootmem allocator?
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 18:58:12 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180627155811.GA19182@rapoport-lnx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_Jsq+evsgh9Qi6FfG4vUZWtpC0UrFjTWSrzukMxY==TD_mrg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 07:58:19AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 4:11 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:09:41AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 8:08 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I am wondering why do we still keep mm/bootmem.c when most architectures
> > > > already moved to nobootmem. Is there any fundamental reason why others
> > > > cannot or this is just a matter of work?
> > >
> > > Just because no one has done the work. I did a couple of arches
> > > recently (sh, microblaze, and h8300) mainly because I broke them with
> > > some DT changes.
> >
> > I have a patch for alpha nearly ready.
> > That leaves m68k and ia64
> 
> And c6x, hexagon, mips, nios2, unicore32. Those are all the platforms
> which don't select NO_BOOTMEM.

Yeah, you are right. I've somehow excluded those that HAVE_MEMBLOCK...
 
> Rob
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-27 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-25 14:07 why do we still need bootmem allocator? Michal Hocko
2018-06-25 16:09 ` Rob Herring
2018-06-25 18:03   ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-27 10:11   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-06-27 10:40     ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-27 13:58     ` Rob Herring
2018-06-27 13:58       ` Rob Herring
2018-06-27 15:58       ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2018-06-27 15:58         ` Mike Rapoport
2018-06-27 11:26   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-06-27 13:33     ` Rob Herring
2018-06-27 13:33       ` Rob Herring
2018-06-27 16:02       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-06-27 16:02         ` Mike Rapoport
2018-07-01 12:22         ` h8300: BUG: Bad page state in process swapper (was: Re: why do we still need bootmem allocator?) Mike Rapoport
2018-07-01 12:22           ` Mike Rapoport
2018-07-02  6:09           ` Yoshinori Sato
2018-07-02  6:09             ` Yoshinori Sato
2018-07-12 14:40           ` Yoshinori Sato
2018-07-12 14:40             ` Yoshinori Sato

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180627155811.GA19182@rapoport-lnx \
    --to=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.