All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] device core: Add flag to autoremove device link on supplier unbind
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 13:32:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180704113214.GB30967@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2991909.NMIP74eIIJ@aspire.rjw.lan>

On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 12:44:20PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 4, 2018 9:16:20 AM CEST Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > Adding Ulf and Marek.
> > 
> > On 6/27/2018 6:20 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > > Add a flag to autoremove the device links on supplier driver
> > > unbind. This obviates the need to explicitly delete the link
> > > in the remove path.
> > > We remove these links only when the supplier's link to its
> > > consumers has gone to DL_STATE_SUPPLIER_UNBIND state.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
> > > Suggested-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> > > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> > > Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
> > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> > > Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
> > > ---
> > 
> > Hi Rafael, et al.
> > 
> > Gentle ping.
> > Do you have comments on this series. I would really like to conclude these
> > device link additions sooner, and get things moving on the long awaited
> > arm-smmu clock/runtime support series.
> > 
> > Thanks again for reviewing these patches.
> 
> They are fine by me.
> 
> I can queue them up for 4.19 if no one has objections (Greg in
> particular).

No objection from me!

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] device core: Add flag to autoremove device link on supplier unbind
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 13:32:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180704113214.GB30967@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2991909.NMIP74eIIJ@aspire.rjw.lan>

On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 12:44:20PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 4, 2018 9:16:20 AM CEST Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > Adding Ulf and Marek.
> > 
> > On 6/27/2018 6:20 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > > Add a flag to autoremove the device links on supplier driver
> > > unbind. This obviates the need to explicitly delete the link
> > > in the remove path.
> > > We remove these links only when the supplier's link to its
> > > consumers has gone to DL_STATE_SUPPLIER_UNBIND state.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
> > > Suggested-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> > > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> > > Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
> > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> > > Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
> > > ---
> > 
> > Hi Rafael, et al.
> > 
> > Gentle ping.
> > Do you have comments on this series. I would really like to conclude these
> > device link additions sooner, and get things moving on the long awaited
> > arm-smmu clock/runtime support series.
> > 
> > Thanks again for reviewing these patches.
> 
> They are fine by me.
> 
> I can queue them up for 4.19 if no one has objections (Greg in
> particular).

No objection from me!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg Kroah-Hartman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] device core: Add flag to autoremove device link on supplier unbind
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 13:32:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180704113214.GB30967@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2991909.NMIP74eIIJ@aspire.rjw.lan>

On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 12:44:20PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 4, 2018 9:16:20 AM CEST Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > Adding Ulf and Marek.
> > 
> > On 6/27/2018 6:20 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > > Add a flag to autoremove the device links on supplier driver
> > > unbind. This obviates the need to explicitly delete the link
> > > in the remove path.
> > > We remove these links only when the supplier's link to its
> > > consumers has gone to DL_STATE_SUPPLIER_UNBIND state.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
> > > Suggested-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> > > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> > > Cc: linux-doc at vger.kernel.org
> > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > > Cc: linux-pm at vger.kernel.org
> > > Cc: linux-arm-msm at vger.kernel.org
> > > ---
> > 
> > Hi Rafael, et al.
> > 
> > Gentle ping.
> > Do you have comments on this series. I would really like to conclude these
> > device link additions sooner, and get things moving on the long awaited
> > arm-smmu clock/runtime support series.
> > 
> > Thanks again for reviewing these patches.
> 
> They are fine by me.
> 
> I can queue them up for 4.19 if no one has objections (Greg in
> particular).

No objection from me!

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-04 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-27 12:50 [PATCH 1/2] device core: Rename flag AUTOREMOVE to AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER Vivek Gautam
2018-06-27 12:50 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-06-27 12:50 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-06-27 12:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] device core: Add flag to autoremove device link on supplier unbind Vivek Gautam
2018-06-27 12:50   ` Vivek Gautam
2018-06-27 12:50   ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-04  7:16   ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-04  7:16     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-04  7:16     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-04 10:44     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-04 10:44       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-04 10:44       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-04 11:19       ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-04 11:19         ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-04 11:19         ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-04 11:32       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2018-07-04 11:32         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-07-04 11:32         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-07-04 18:09       ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-04 18:09         ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-04 18:09         ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-04 23:19         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-04 23:19           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-04 23:19           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-05  4:28           ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-05  4:28             ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-05  4:28             ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-11  9:46             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-11  9:46               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-11  9:46               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-04 12:55   ` Ulf Hansson
2018-07-04 12:55     ` Ulf Hansson
2018-07-04 12:55     ` Ulf Hansson
2018-07-04 12:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] device core: Rename flag AUTOREMOVE to AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER Ulf Hansson
2018-07-04 12:55   ` Ulf Hansson
2018-07-04 12:55   ` Ulf Hansson
2018-07-04 17:37   ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-04 17:37     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-04 17:37     ` Vivek Gautam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180704113214.GB30967@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.