Re: [PATCH v4 08/18] net: davinci_emac: potentially get the MAC address from MTD

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 05:27:00PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Monday 16 July 2018 02:26 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 16/07/18 09:50, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> >> On Friday 13 July 2018 11:30 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> >>
> >>> We're getting close to rc5 so I'd like to make a case for this series
> >>> again.
> >>>
> >>> I understand that there's more to do than just the changes introduced
> >>> here, but we shouldn't try to fix several problems in many different
> >>> places at once. There's just too many moving pieces. I'd rather start
> >>> merging small improvements right away.
> >>>
> >>> The idea behind this series is to remove (almost) all users of
> >>> at24_platform_data. The davinci_emac patches are there only because we
> >>> need to remove some MAC adress reading stuff from the board files.
> >>> Having this code there and calling it back from EEPROM/MTD drivers is
> >>> already wrong and we should work towards using nvmem for that anyway.
> >>>
> >>> Currently for MTD the nvmem support series seems to be dead and it's
> >>> going to take some time before anything gets upstream.
> >>>
> >>> So I'd like to again ask you to consider picking up the patches from
> >>> this series to your respective trees or at the very least: I'd like to
> >>> ask Srinivas to pick up the nvmem patches and Sekhar to take the
> >>> first, non-controversial batch of davinci platform changes so that
> >>> we'll have less code to carry for the next release.
> >>
> >> I think those are patches 3-7. I can take those if I get an immutable
> >> commit over v4.18-rc1 from Srinivas with patches 1 & 2 applied.
> 
> > nvmem patches go via Greg KH char-misc tree, if it makes things easy I
> > can provide Ack on nvmem patches, so that you can take these patches via
> > your tree?
> > 
> > Let me know.
> 
> I can do that.
> 
> Greg, are you fine with this? It will be great to have your ack for
> patches 1/8 and 2/18.

I'm not the nvmem maintainer :)