[PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Icenowy Zheng]

Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible with
BPi M2 Ultra, so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts,
including:

- 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the bootloader);
- dropped a LED;
- dropped eMMC;
- dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.

Thus we can make the M2 Berry device tree based on the M2 Ultra, rather
than write one from scratch.

Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
---
 .../boot/dts/sun8i-v40-bananapi-m2-berry.dts  | 141 +++---------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-v40-bananapi-m2-berry.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-v40-bananapi-m2-berry.dts
index 35859d8f3267..b740c659e623 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-v40-bananapi-m2-berry.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-v40-bananapi-m2-berry.dts
@@ -40,143 +40,50 @@
  *     OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
  */
 
-/dts-v1/;
-#include "sun8i-r40.dtsi"
-
-#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
+#include "sun8i-r40-bananapi-m2-ultra.dts"
 
 / {
 	model = "Banana Pi M2 Berry";
 	compatible = "sinovoip,bpi-m2-berry", "allwinner,sun8i-r40";
 
-	aliases {
-		serial0 = &uart0;
-	};
-
-	chosen {
-		stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
-	};
-
 	leds {
-		compatible = "gpio-leds";
-
-		pwr-led {
-			label = "bananapi:red:pwr";
-			gpios = <&pio 7 20 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
-			default-state = "on";
-		};
-
-		user-led {
-			label = "bananapi:green:user";
-			gpios = <&pio 7 21 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
-		};
-	};
-
-	reg_vcc5v0: vcc5v0 {
-		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
-		regulator-name = "vcc5v0";
-		regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
-		regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
-		gpio = <&pio 7 23 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* PH23 */
-		enable-active-high;
-	};
-
-	wifi_pwrseq: wifi_pwrseq {
-		compatible = "mmc-pwrseq-simple";
-		reset-gpios = <&pio 6 10 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; /* PG10 WIFI_EN */
+		/* M2 Berry dropped blue LED due to size */
+		/delete-node/ user-led-blue;
 	};
 };
 
 &ehci1 {
 	/* Terminus Tech FE 1.1s 4-port USB 2.0 hub here */
-	status = "okay";
-};
-
-&i2c0 {
-	status = "okay";
-
-	axp22x: pmic@68 {
-		compatible = "x-powers,axp221";
-		reg = <0x34>;
-		interrupt-parent = <&nmi_intc>;
-		interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
-	};
-};
-
-#include "axp22x.dtsi"
-
-&reg_aldo3 {
-	regulator-always-on;
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <2700000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
-	regulator-name = "avcc";
-};
-
-&reg_dcdc1 {
-	regulator-always-on;
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <3000000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <3000000>;
-	regulator-name = "vcc-3v0";
-};
-
-&reg_dcdc2 {
-	regulator-always-on;
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <1300000>;
-	regulator-name = "vdd-cpu";
-};
-
-&reg_dcdc3 {
-	regulator-always-on;
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <1300000>;
-	regulator-name = "vdd-sys";
-};
-
-&reg_dcdc5 {
-	regulator-always-on;
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <1500000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <1500000>;
-	regulator-name = "vcc-dram";
-};
-
-&reg_dldo1 {
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
-	regulator-name = "vcc-wifi-io";
 };
 
-&reg_dldo2 {
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
-	regulator-name = "vcc-wifi";
+&ehci2 {
+	/*
+	 * M2 Berry dropped wiring out USB2, due to all USB port is
+	 * from a hub at USB1.
+	 */
+	status = "disabled";
 };
 
-&mmc0 {
-	vmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;
-	bus-width = <4>;
-	cd-gpios = <&pio 7 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; /* PH13 */
-	status = "okay";
+&mmc2 {
+	/* M2 Berry has no eMMC */
+	status = "disabled";
 };
 
-&mmc1 {
-	pinctrl-names = "default";
-	pinctrl-0 = <&mmc1_pg_pins>;
-	vmmc-supply = <&reg_dldo2>;
-	vqmmc-supply = <&reg_dldo1>;
-	mmc-pwrseq = <&wifi_pwrseq>;
-	bus-width = <4>;
-	non-removable;
-	status = "okay";
+&ohci1 {
+	/*
+	 * M2 Berry have a Hub connected to the USB1 pins, so no USB1.1 device
+	 * can be directly connected to the USB1 port, thus the OHCI controller
+	 * can be disabled.
+	 */
+	status = "disabled";
 };
 
-&uart0 {
-	pinctrl-names = "default";
-	pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_pb_pins>;
-	status = "okay";
+&ohci2 {
+	/* See comments at &ehci2 */
+	status = "disabled";
 };
 
 &usbphy {
-	usb1_vbus-supply = <&reg_vcc5v0>;
-	status = "okay";
+	/* See comments at &ehci2 */
+	/delete-property/ usb2_vbus-supply;
 };
-- 
2.18.0

[PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Icenowy Zheng]

Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible with
BPi M2 Ultra, so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts,
including:

- 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the bootloader);
- dropped a LED;
- dropped eMMC;
- dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.

Thus we can make the M2 Berry device tree based on the M2 Ultra, rather
than write one from scratch.

Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy-h8G6r0blFSE@public.gmane.org>
---
 .../boot/dts/sun8i-v40-bananapi-m2-berry.dts  | 141 +++---------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-v40-bananapi-m2-berry.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-v40-bananapi-m2-berry.dts
index 35859d8f3267..b740c659e623 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-v40-bananapi-m2-berry.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-v40-bananapi-m2-berry.dts
@@ -40,143 +40,50 @@
  *     OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
  */
 
-/dts-v1/;
-#include "sun8i-r40.dtsi"
-
-#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
+#include "sun8i-r40-bananapi-m2-ultra.dts"
 
 / {
 	model = "Banana Pi M2 Berry";
 	compatible = "sinovoip,bpi-m2-berry", "allwinner,sun8i-r40";
 
-	aliases {
-		serial0 = &uart0;
-	};
-
-	chosen {
-		stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
-	};
-
 	leds {
-		compatible = "gpio-leds";
-
-		pwr-led {
-			label = "bananapi:red:pwr";
-			gpios = <&pio 7 20 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
-			default-state = "on";
-		};
-
-		user-led {
-			label = "bananapi:green:user";
-			gpios = <&pio 7 21 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
-		};
-	};
-
-	reg_vcc5v0: vcc5v0 {
-		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
-		regulator-name = "vcc5v0";
-		regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
-		regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
-		gpio = <&pio 7 23 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* PH23 */
-		enable-active-high;
-	};
-
-	wifi_pwrseq: wifi_pwrseq {
-		compatible = "mmc-pwrseq-simple";
-		reset-gpios = <&pio 6 10 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; /* PG10 WIFI_EN */
+		/* M2 Berry dropped blue LED due to size */
+		/delete-node/ user-led-blue;
 	};
 };
 
 &ehci1 {
 	/* Terminus Tech FE 1.1s 4-port USB 2.0 hub here */
-	status = "okay";
-};
-
-&i2c0 {
-	status = "okay";
-
-	axp22x: pmic@68 {
-		compatible = "x-powers,axp221";
-		reg = <0x34>;
-		interrupt-parent = <&nmi_intc>;
-		interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
-	};
-};
-
-#include "axp22x.dtsi"
-
-&reg_aldo3 {
-	regulator-always-on;
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <2700000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
-	regulator-name = "avcc";
-};
-
-&reg_dcdc1 {
-	regulator-always-on;
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <3000000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <3000000>;
-	regulator-name = "vcc-3v0";
-};
-
-&reg_dcdc2 {
-	regulator-always-on;
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <1300000>;
-	regulator-name = "vdd-cpu";
-};
-
-&reg_dcdc3 {
-	regulator-always-on;
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <1300000>;
-	regulator-name = "vdd-sys";
-};
-
-&reg_dcdc5 {
-	regulator-always-on;
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <1500000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <1500000>;
-	regulator-name = "vcc-dram";
-};
-
-&reg_dldo1 {
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
-	regulator-name = "vcc-wifi-io";
 };
 
-&reg_dldo2 {
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
-	regulator-name = "vcc-wifi";
+&ehci2 {
+	/*
+	 * M2 Berry dropped wiring out USB2, due to all USB port is
+	 * from a hub at USB1.
+	 */
+	status = "disabled";
 };
 
-&mmc0 {
-	vmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;
-	bus-width = <4>;
-	cd-gpios = <&pio 7 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; /* PH13 */
-	status = "okay";
+&mmc2 {
+	/* M2 Berry has no eMMC */
+	status = "disabled";
 };
 
-&mmc1 {
-	pinctrl-names = "default";
-	pinctrl-0 = <&mmc1_pg_pins>;
-	vmmc-supply = <&reg_dldo2>;
-	vqmmc-supply = <&reg_dldo1>;
-	mmc-pwrseq = <&wifi_pwrseq>;
-	bus-width = <4>;
-	non-removable;
-	status = "okay";
+&ohci1 {
+	/*
+	 * M2 Berry have a Hub connected to the USB1 pins, so no USB1.1 device
+	 * can be directly connected to the USB1 port, thus the OHCI controller
+	 * can be disabled.
+	 */
+	status = "disabled";
 };
 
-&uart0 {
-	pinctrl-names = "default";
-	pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_pb_pins>;
-	status = "okay";
+&ohci2 {
+	/* See comments at &ehci2 */
+	status = "disabled";
 };
 
 &usbphy {
-	usb1_vbus-supply = <&reg_vcc5v0>;
-	status = "okay";
+	/* See comments at &ehci2 */
+	/delete-property/ usb2_vbus-supply;
 };
-- 
2.18.0

[PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Icenowy Zheng]

Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible with
BPi M2 Ultra, so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts,
including:

- 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the bootloader);
- dropped a LED;
- dropped eMMC;
- dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.

Thus we can make the M2 Berry device tree based on the M2 Ultra, rather
than write one from scratch.

Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
---
 .../boot/dts/sun8i-v40-bananapi-m2-berry.dts  | 141 +++---------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-v40-bananapi-m2-berry.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-v40-bananapi-m2-berry.dts
index 35859d8f3267..b740c659e623 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-v40-bananapi-m2-berry.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-v40-bananapi-m2-berry.dts
@@ -40,143 +40,50 @@
  *     OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
  */
 
-/dts-v1/;
-#include "sun8i-r40.dtsi"
-
-#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
+#include "sun8i-r40-bananapi-m2-ultra.dts"
 
 / {
 	model = "Banana Pi M2 Berry";
 	compatible = "sinovoip,bpi-m2-berry", "allwinner,sun8i-r40";
 
-	aliases {
-		serial0 = &uart0;
-	};
-
-	chosen {
-		stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
-	};
-
 	leds {
-		compatible = "gpio-leds";
-
-		pwr-led {
-			label = "bananapi:red:pwr";
-			gpios = <&pio 7 20 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
-			default-state = "on";
-		};
-
-		user-led {
-			label = "bananapi:green:user";
-			gpios = <&pio 7 21 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
-		};
-	};
-
-	reg_vcc5v0: vcc5v0 {
-		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
-		regulator-name = "vcc5v0";
-		regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
-		regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
-		gpio = <&pio 7 23 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* PH23 */
-		enable-active-high;
-	};
-
-	wifi_pwrseq: wifi_pwrseq {
-		compatible = "mmc-pwrseq-simple";
-		reset-gpios = <&pio 6 10 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; /* PG10 WIFI_EN */
+		/* M2 Berry dropped blue LED due to size */
+		/delete-node/ user-led-blue;
 	};
 };
 
 &ehci1 {
 	/* Terminus Tech FE 1.1s 4-port USB 2.0 hub here */
-	status = "okay";
-};
-
-&i2c0 {
-	status = "okay";
-
-	axp22x: pmic at 68 {
-		compatible = "x-powers,axp221";
-		reg = <0x34>;
-		interrupt-parent = <&nmi_intc>;
-		interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
-	};
-};
-
-#include "axp22x.dtsi"
-
-&reg_aldo3 {
-	regulator-always-on;
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <2700000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
-	regulator-name = "avcc";
-};
-
-&reg_dcdc1 {
-	regulator-always-on;
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <3000000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <3000000>;
-	regulator-name = "vcc-3v0";
-};
-
-&reg_dcdc2 {
-	regulator-always-on;
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <1300000>;
-	regulator-name = "vdd-cpu";
-};
-
-&reg_dcdc3 {
-	regulator-always-on;
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <1300000>;
-	regulator-name = "vdd-sys";
-};
-
-&reg_dcdc5 {
-	regulator-always-on;
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <1500000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <1500000>;
-	regulator-name = "vcc-dram";
-};
-
-&reg_dldo1 {
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
-	regulator-name = "vcc-wifi-io";
 };
 
-&reg_dldo2 {
-	regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
-	regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
-	regulator-name = "vcc-wifi";
+&ehci2 {
+	/*
+	 * M2 Berry dropped wiring out USB2, due to all USB port is
+	 * from a hub at USB1.
+	 */
+	status = "disabled";
 };
 
-&mmc0 {
-	vmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;
-	bus-width = <4>;
-	cd-gpios = <&pio 7 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; /* PH13 */
-	status = "okay";
+&mmc2 {
+	/* M2 Berry has no eMMC */
+	status = "disabled";
 };
 
-&mmc1 {
-	pinctrl-names = "default";
-	pinctrl-0 = <&mmc1_pg_pins>;
-	vmmc-supply = <&reg_dldo2>;
-	vqmmc-supply = <&reg_dldo1>;
-	mmc-pwrseq = <&wifi_pwrseq>;
-	bus-width = <4>;
-	non-removable;
-	status = "okay";
+&ohci1 {
+	/*
+	 * M2 Berry have a Hub connected to the USB1 pins, so no USB1.1 device
+	 * can be directly connected to the USB1 port, thus the OHCI controller
+	 * can be disabled.
+	 */
+	status = "disabled";
 };
 
-&uart0 {
-	pinctrl-names = "default";
-	pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_pb_pins>;
-	status = "okay";
+&ohci2 {
+	/* See comments at &ehci2 */
+	status = "disabled";
 };
 
 &usbphy {
-	usb1_vbus-supply = <&reg_vcc5v0>;
-	status = "okay";
+	/* See comments at &ehci2 */
+	/delete-property/ usb2_vbus-supply;
 };
-- 
2.18.0

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Simon Baatz]

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible with
> BPi M2 Ultra, so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts,
> including:
> 
> - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the bootloader);
> - dropped a LED;
> - dropped eMMC;
> - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.
> 
> Thus we can make the M2 Berry device tree based on the M2 Ultra, rather
> than write one from scratch.

Good idea!  I know that Ultra came first and then the cut-down Berry. 
But from a device tree point of view, wouldn't it make more sense to
take M2 Berry as the base and just add the hardware for M2 Ultra?

[PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Simon Baatz]

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible with
> BPi M2 Ultra, so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts,
> including:
> 
> - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the bootloader);
> - dropped a LED;
> - dropped eMMC;
> - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.
> 
> Thus we can make the M2 Berry device tree based on the M2 Ultra, rather
> than write one from scratch.

Good idea!  I know that Ultra came first and then the cut-down Berry. 
But from a device tree point of view, wouldn't it make more sense to
take M2 Berry as the base and just add the hardware for M2 Ultra?

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Maxime Ripard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 830 bytes --]

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible with
> BPi M2 Ultra,

Do you have a reference for this?

> so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts, including:
> 
> - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the bootloader);
> - dropped a LED;
> - dropped eMMC;
> - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.

Is it the exhaustive list?

I'm a bit reluctant to merge that kind of patches usually, since that
would also imply that each time someone will commit something to the
M2-Ultra, it would automatically apply to the M2-Berry, without any
easy way to tell and / or test.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Maxime Ripard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 803 bytes --]

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible with
> BPi M2 Ultra,

Do you have a reference for this?

> so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts, including:
> 
> - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the bootloader);
> - dropped a LED;
> - dropped eMMC;
> - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.

Is it the exhaustive list?

I'm a bit reluctant to merge that kind of patches usually, since that
would also imply that each time someone will commit something to the
M2-Ultra, it would automatically apply to the M2-Berry, without any
easy way to tell and / or test.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

[PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Maxime Ripard]

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible with
> BPi M2 Ultra,

Do you have a reference for this?

> so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts, including:
> 
> - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the bootloader);
> - dropped a LED;
> - dropped eMMC;
> - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.

Is it the exhaustive list?

I'm a bit reluctant to merge that kind of patches usually, since that
would also imply that each time someone will commit something to the
M2-Ultra, it would automatically apply to the M2-Berry, without any
easy way to tell and / or test.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180726/9b74e0d7/attachment.sig>

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Icenowy Zheng]

于 2018年7月26日 GMT+08:00 下午8:41:19, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> 写到:
>On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible
>with
>> BPi M2 Ultra,
>
>Do you have a reference for this?

See [1], it says "BPI-M2U and BPI-M2 Berry share the same image".

[1] http://www.banana-pi.org/download.html

>
>> so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts, including:
>> 
>> - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the bootloader);
>> - dropped a LED;
>> - dropped eMMC;
>> - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.
>
>Is it the exhaustive list?

Sorry, but I forgot one thing -- LiPo battery connector.

The list can be examined with [2], except LED difference.

[2] https://bananapi.gitbooks.io/bpi-m2-ultra-open-source-single-board-computer/content/

>
>I'm a bit reluctant to merge that kind of patches usually, since that
>would also imply that each time someone will commit something to the
>M2-Ultra, it would automatically apply to the M2-Berry, without any
>easy way to tell and / or test.
>
>Maxime

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Icenowy Zheng]

于 2018年7月26日 GMT+08:00 下午8:41:19, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> 写到:
>On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible
>with
>> BPi M2 Ultra,
>
>Do you have a reference for this?

See [1], it says "BPI-M2U and BPI-M2 Berry share the same image".

[1] http://www.banana-pi.org/download.html

>
>> so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts, including:
>> 
>> - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the bootloader);
>> - dropped a LED;
>> - dropped eMMC;
>> - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.
>
>Is it the exhaustive list?

Sorry, but I forgot one thing -- LiPo battery connector.

The list can be examined with [2], except LED difference.

[2] https://bananapi.gitbooks.io/bpi-m2-ultra-open-source-single-board-computer/content/

>
>I'm a bit reluctant to merge that kind of patches usually, since that
>would also imply that each time someone will commit something to the
>M2-Ultra, it would automatically apply to the M2-Berry, without any
>easy way to tell and / or test.
>
>Maxime

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Icenowy Zheng]

? 2018?7?26? GMT+08:00 ??8:41:19, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> ??:
>On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible
>with
>> BPi M2 Ultra,
>
>Do you have a reference for this?

See [1], it says "BPI-M2U and BPI-M2 Berry share the same image".

[1] http://www.banana-pi.org/download.html

>
>> so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts, including:
>> 
>> - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the bootloader);
>> - dropped a LED;
>> - dropped eMMC;
>> - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.
>
>Is it the exhaustive list?

Sorry, but I forgot one thing -- LiPo battery connector.

The list can be examined with [2], except LED difference.

[2] https://bananapi.gitbooks.io/bpi-m2-ultra-open-source-single-board-computer/content/

>
>I'm a bit reluctant to merge that kind of patches usually, since that
>would also imply that each time someone will commit something to the
>M2-Ultra, it would automatically apply to the M2-Berry, without any
>easy way to tell and / or test.
>
>Maxime

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Maxime Ripard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 842 bytes --]

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 08:47:34PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 
> 
> 于 2018年7月26日 GMT+08:00 下午8:41:19, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> 写到:
> >On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> >> Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible
> >with
> >> BPi M2 Ultra,
> >
> >Do you have a reference for this?
> 
> See [1], it says "BPI-M2U and BPI-M2 Berry share the same image".
> 
> [1] http://www.banana-pi.org/download.html

Debian supports different SoC from different vendor using the same
image, so it's not really a good argument to share the device tree. I
mean, you can even boot an H3 to a shell using an A33 device tree.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Maxime Ripard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1192 bytes --]

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 08:47:34PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 
> 
> 于 2018年7月26日 GMT+08:00 下午8:41:19, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> 写到:
> >On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> >> Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible
> >with
> >> BPi M2 Ultra,
> >
> >Do you have a reference for this?
> 
> See [1], it says "BPI-M2U and BPI-M2 Berry share the same image".
> 
> [1] http://www.banana-pi.org/download.html

Debian supports different SoC from different vendor using the same
image, so it's not really a good argument to share the device tree. I
mean, you can even boot an H3 to a shell using an A33 device tree.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

[PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Maxime Ripard]

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 08:47:34PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 
> 
> ? 2018?7?26? GMT+08:00 ??8:41:19, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> ??:
> >On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> >> Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible
> >with
> >> BPi M2 Ultra,
> >
> >Do you have a reference for this?
> 
> See [1], it says "BPI-M2U and BPI-M2 Berry share the same image".
> 
> [1] http://www.banana-pi.org/download.html

Debian supports different SoC from different vendor using the same
image, so it's not really a good argument to share the device tree. I
mean, you can even boot an H3 to a shell using an A33 device tree.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180726/d89ae51e/attachment.sig>

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Icenowy Zheng]

于 2018年7月26日 GMT+08:00 下午11:24:27, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> 写到:
>On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 08:47:34PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 于 2018年7月26日 GMT+08:00 下午8:41:19, Maxime Ripard
><maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> 写到:
>> >On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> >> Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible
>> >with
>> >> BPi M2 Ultra,
>> >
>> >Do you have a reference for this?
>> 
>> See [1], it says "BPI-M2U and BPI-M2 Berry share the same image".
>> 
>> [1] http://www.banana-pi.org/download.html
>
>Debian supports different SoC from different vendor using the same
>image, so it's not really a good argument to share the device tree. I
>mean, you can even boot an H3 to a shell using an A33 device tree.

Please note that the vendor image is fully functional BSP
image, neither a function limited one nor one without
HW configuration.

>
>Maxime

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Icenowy Zheng]

于 2018年7月26日 GMT+08:00 下午11:24:27, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> 写到:
>On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 08:47:34PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 于 2018年7月26日 GMT+08:00 下午8:41:19, Maxime Ripard
><maxime.ripard-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> 写到:
>> >On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> >> Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible
>> >with
>> >> BPi M2 Ultra,
>> >
>> >Do you have a reference for this?
>> 
>> See [1], it says "BPI-M2U and BPI-M2 Berry share the same image".
>> 
>> [1] http://www.banana-pi.org/download.html
>
>Debian supports different SoC from different vendor using the same
>image, so it's not really a good argument to share the device tree. I
>mean, you can even boot an H3 to a shell using an A33 device tree.

Please note that the vendor image is fully functional BSP
image, neither a function limited one nor one without
HW configuration.

>
>Maxime

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Icenowy Zheng]

? 2018?7?26? GMT+08:00 ??11:24:27, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> ??:
>On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 08:47:34PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> ? 2018?7?26? GMT+08:00 ??8:41:19, Maxime Ripard
><maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> ??:
>> >On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> >> Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible
>> >with
>> >> BPi M2 Ultra,
>> >
>> >Do you have a reference for this?
>> 
>> See [1], it says "BPI-M2U and BPI-M2 Berry share the same image".
>> 
>> [1] http://www.banana-pi.org/download.html
>
>Debian supports different SoC from different vendor using the same
>image, so it's not really a good argument to share the device tree. I
>mean, you can even boot an H3 to a shell using an A33 device tree.

Please note that the vendor image is fully functional BSP
image, neither a function limited one nor one without
HW configuration.

>
>Maxime

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Icenowy Zheng]

在 2018-07-26四的 14:41 +0200，Maxime Ripard写道：
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible
> > with
> > BPi M2 Ultra,
> 
> Do you have a reference for this?
> 
> > so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts, including:
> > 
> > - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the
> > bootloader);
> > - dropped a LED;
> > - dropped eMMC;
> > - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.
> 
> Is it the exhaustive list?

I have asked Mikey from Sinovoip, and he has agreed this.

Here's a list provided by him, which covers some things I forgot:
- 2GiB -> 1GiB
- no eMMC
- no onboard microphone
- no IR
- no charging (and power jack to USB)
- USB change
- one less LED

Should I add this to the device tree's comment?

> 
> I'm a bit reluctant to merge that kind of patches usually, since that
> would also imply that each time someone will commit something to the
> M2-Ultra, it would automatically apply to the M2-Berry, without any
> easy way to tell and / or test.
> 
> Maxime
> 
> -- 
> Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
> 

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Icenowy Zheng]

? 2018-07-26?? 14:41 +0200?Maxime Ripard???
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible
> > with
> > BPi M2 Ultra,
> 
> Do you have a reference for this?
> 
> > so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts, including:
> > 
> > - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the
> > bootloader);
> > - dropped a LED;
> > - dropped eMMC;
> > - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.
> 
> Is it the exhaustive list?

I have asked Mikey from Sinovoip, and he has agreed this.

Here's a list provided by him, which covers some things I forgot:
- 2GiB -> 1GiB
- no eMMC
- no onboard microphone
- no IR
- no charging (and power jack to USB)
- USB change
- one less LED

Should I add this to the device tree's comment?

> 
> I'm a bit reluctant to merge that kind of patches usually, since that
> would also imply that each time someone will commit something to the
> M2-Ultra, it would automatically apply to the M2-Berry, without any
> easy way to tell and / or test.
> 
> Maxime
> 
> -- 
> Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
> 

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Maxime Ripard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1444 bytes --]

Hi!

On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 06:36:56PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 在 2018-07-26四的 14:41 +0200，Maxime Ripard写道：
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > > Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible
> > > with
> > > BPi M2 Ultra,
> > 
> > Do you have a reference for this?
> > 
> > > so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts, including:
> > > 
> > > - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the
> > > bootloader);
> > > - dropped a LED;
> > > - dropped eMMC;
> > > - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.
> > 
> > Is it the exhaustive list?
> 
> I have asked Mikey from Sinovoip, and he has agreed this.
> 
> Here's a list provided by him, which covers some things I forgot:
> - 2GiB -> 1GiB
> - no eMMC
> - no onboard microphone
> - no IR
> - no charging (and power jack to USB)
> - USB change
> - one less LED
> 
> Should I add this to the device tree's comment?

Not really, because...

> > 
> > I'm a bit reluctant to merge that kind of patches usually, since that
> > would also imply that each time someone will commit something to the
> > M2-Ultra, it would automatically apply to the M2-Berry, without any
> > easy way to tell and / or test.

... this still applies.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Maxime Ripard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1766 bytes --]

Hi!

On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 06:36:56PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 在 2018-07-26四的 14:41 +0200，Maxime Ripard写道：
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > > Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible
> > > with
> > > BPi M2 Ultra,
> > 
> > Do you have a reference for this?
> > 
> > > so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts, including:
> > > 
> > > - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the
> > > bootloader);
> > > - dropped a LED;
> > > - dropped eMMC;
> > > - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.
> > 
> > Is it the exhaustive list?
> 
> I have asked Mikey from Sinovoip, and he has agreed this.
> 
> Here's a list provided by him, which covers some things I forgot:
> - 2GiB -> 1GiB
> - no eMMC
> - no onboard microphone
> - no IR
> - no charging (and power jack to USB)
> - USB change
> - one less LED
> 
> Should I add this to the device tree's comment?

Not really, because...

> > 
> > I'm a bit reluctant to merge that kind of patches usually, since that
> > would also imply that each time someone will commit something to the
> > M2-Ultra, it would automatically apply to the M2-Berry, without any
> > easy way to tell and / or test.

... this still applies.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Maxime Ripard]

Hi!

On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 06:36:56PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> ? 2018-07-26?? 14:41 +0200?Maxime Ripard???
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > > Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software compatible
> > > with
> > > BPi M2 Ultra,
> > 
> > Do you have a reference for this?
> > 
> > > so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts, including:
> > > 
> > > - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the
> > > bootloader);
> > > - dropped a LED;
> > > - dropped eMMC;
> > > - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.
> > 
> > Is it the exhaustive list?
> 
> I have asked Mikey from Sinovoip, and he has agreed this.
> 
> Here's a list provided by him, which covers some things I forgot:
> - 2GiB -> 1GiB
> - no eMMC
> - no onboard microphone
> - no IR
> - no charging (and power jack to USB)
> - USB change
> - one less LED
> 
> Should I add this to the device tree's comment?

Not really, because...

> > 
> > I'm a bit reluctant to merge that kind of patches usually, since that
> > would also imply that each time someone will commit something to the
> > M2-Ultra, it would automatically apply to the M2-Berry, without any
> > easy way to tell and / or test.

... this still applies.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180820/31fb9ebc/attachment-0001.sig>

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Icenowy Zheng]

于 2018年8月20日 GMT+08:00 下午8:00:46, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> 写到:
>Hi!
>
>On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 06:36:56PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> 在 2018-07-26四的 14:41 +0200，Maxime Ripard写道：
>> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> > > Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software
>compatible
>> > > with
>> > > BPi M2 Ultra,
>> > 
>> > Do you have a reference for this?
>> > 
>> > > so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts, including:
>> > > 
>> > > - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the
>> > > bootloader);
>> > > - dropped a LED;
>> > > - dropped eMMC;
>> > > - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.
>> > 
>> > Is it the exhaustive list?
>> 
>> I have asked Mikey from Sinovoip, and he has agreed this.
>> 
>> Here's a list provided by him, which covers some things I forgot:
>> - 2GiB -> 1GiB
>> - no eMMC
>> - no onboard microphone
>> - no IR
>> - no charging (and power jack to USB)
>> - USB change
>> - one less LED
>> 
>> Should I add this to the device tree's comment?
>
>Not really, because...
>
>> > 
>> > I'm a bit reluctant to merge that kind of patches usually, since
>that
>> > would also imply that each time someone will commit something to
>the
>> > M2-Ultra, it would automatically apply to the M2-Berry, without any
>> > easy way to tell and / or test.
>
>... this still applies.

But I think few developers will have both boards at the same time.

>
>Maxime

Re: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Icenowy Zheng]

于 2018年8月20日 GMT+08:00 下午8:00:46, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> 写到:
>Hi!
>
>On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 06:36:56PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> 在 2018-07-26四的 14:41 +0200，Maxime Ripard写道：
>> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> > > Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software
>compatible
>> > > with
>> > > BPi M2 Ultra,
>> > 
>> > Do you have a reference for this?
>> > 
>> > > so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts, including:
>> > > 
>> > > - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the
>> > > bootloader);
>> > > - dropped a LED;
>> > > - dropped eMMC;
>> > > - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.
>> > 
>> > Is it the exhaustive list?
>> 
>> I have asked Mikey from Sinovoip, and he has agreed this.
>> 
>> Here's a list provided by him, which covers some things I forgot:
>> - 2GiB -> 1GiB
>> - no eMMC
>> - no onboard microphone
>> - no IR
>> - no charging (and power jack to USB)
>> - USB change
>> - one less LED
>> 
>> Should I add this to the device tree's comment?
>
>Not really, because...
>
>> > 
>> > I'm a bit reluctant to merge that kind of patches usually, since
>that
>> > would also imply that each time someone will commit something to
>the
>> > M2-Ultra, it would automatically apply to the M2-Berry, without any
>> > easy way to tell and / or test.
>
>... this still applies.

But I think few developers will have both boards at the same time.

>
>Maxime

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Icenowy Zheng]

? 2018?8?20? GMT+08:00 ??8:00:46, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> ??:
>Hi!
>
>On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 06:36:56PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> ? 2018-07-26?? 14:41 +0200?Maxime Ripard???
>> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> > > Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software
>compatible
>> > > with
>> > > BPi M2 Ultra,
>> > 
>> > Do you have a reference for this?
>> > 
>> > > so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts, including:
>> > > 
>> > > - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the
>> > > bootloader);
>> > > - dropped a LED;
>> > > - dropped eMMC;
>> > > - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.
>> > 
>> > Is it the exhaustive list?
>> 
>> I have asked Mikey from Sinovoip, and he has agreed this.
>> 
>> Here's a list provided by him, which covers some things I forgot:
>> - 2GiB -> 1GiB
>> - no eMMC
>> - no onboard microphone
>> - no IR
>> - no charging (and power jack to USB)
>> - USB change
>> - one less LED
>> 
>> Should I add this to the device tree's comment?
>
>Not really, because...
>
>> > 
>> > I'm a bit reluctant to merge that kind of patches usually, since
>that
>> > would also imply that each time someone will commit something to
>the
>> > M2-Ultra, it would automatically apply to the M2-Berry, without any
>> > easy way to tell and / or test.
>
>... this still applies.

But I think few developers will have both boards at the same time.

>
>Maxime

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Maxime Ripard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2040 bytes --]

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 08:06:21PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 
> 
> 于 2018年8月20日 GMT+08:00 下午8:00:46, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> 写到:
> >Hi!
> >
> >On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 06:36:56PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> >> 在 2018-07-26四的 14:41 +0200，Maxime Ripard写道：
> >> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> >> > > Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software
> >compatible
> >> > > with
> >> > > BPi M2 Ultra,
> >> > 
> >> > Do you have a reference for this?
> >> > 
> >> > > so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts, including:
> >> > > 
> >> > > - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the
> >> > > bootloader);
> >> > > - dropped a LED;
> >> > > - dropped eMMC;
> >> > > - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.
> >> > 
> >> > Is it the exhaustive list?
> >> 
> >> I have asked Mikey from Sinovoip, and he has agreed this.
> >> 
> >> Here's a list provided by him, which covers some things I forgot:
> >> - 2GiB -> 1GiB
> >> - no eMMC
> >> - no onboard microphone
> >> - no IR
> >> - no charging (and power jack to USB)
> >> - USB change
> >> - one less LED
> >> 
> >> Should I add this to the device tree's comment?
> >
> >Not really, because...
> >
> >> > 
> >> > I'm a bit reluctant to merge that kind of patches usually, since
> >that
> >> > would also imply that each time someone will commit something to
> >the
> >> > M2-Ultra, it would automatically apply to the M2-Berry, without any
> >> > easy way to tell and / or test.
> >
> >... this still applies.
> 
> But I think few developers will have both boards at the same time.

Which is only making it worse, because then someone with only the BPI
m2-ultra, when changing the DT, will not be able to tell that:

 - it's applied to the M2-Berry too,
 - if it works on the M2-Berry.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Maxime Ripard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2390 bytes --]

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 08:06:21PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 
> 
> 于 2018年8月20日 GMT+08:00 下午8:00:46, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> 写到:
> >Hi!
> >
> >On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 06:36:56PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> >> 在 2018-07-26四的 14:41 +0200，Maxime Ripard写道：
> >> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> >> > > Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software
> >compatible
> >> > > with
> >> > > BPi M2 Ultra,
> >> > 
> >> > Do you have a reference for this?
> >> > 
> >> > > so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts, including:
> >> > > 
> >> > > - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the
> >> > > bootloader);
> >> > > - dropped a LED;
> >> > > - dropped eMMC;
> >> > > - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.
> >> > 
> >> > Is it the exhaustive list?
> >> 
> >> I have asked Mikey from Sinovoip, and he has agreed this.
> >> 
> >> Here's a list provided by him, which covers some things I forgot:
> >> - 2GiB -> 1GiB
> >> - no eMMC
> >> - no onboard microphone
> >> - no IR
> >> - no charging (and power jack to USB)
> >> - USB change
> >> - one less LED
> >> 
> >> Should I add this to the device tree's comment?
> >
> >Not really, because...
> >
> >> > 
> >> > I'm a bit reluctant to merge that kind of patches usually, since
> >that
> >> > would also imply that each time someone will commit something to
> >the
> >> > M2-Ultra, it would automatically apply to the M2-Berry, without any
> >> > easy way to tell and / or test.
> >
> >... this still applies.
> 
> But I think few developers will have both boards at the same time.

Which is only making it worse, because then someone with only the BPI
m2-ultra, when changing the DT, will not be able to tell that:

 - it's applied to the M2-Berry too,
 - if it works on the M2-Berry.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: r40/v40: rewrite BPi M2 Berry DTS to rebase on M2 Ultra

[Maxime Ripard]

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 08:06:21PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 
> 
> ? 2018?8?20? GMT+08:00 ??8:00:46, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> ??:
> >Hi!
> >
> >On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 06:36:56PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> >> ? 2018-07-26?? 14:41 +0200?Maxime Ripard???
> >> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:36:55AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> >> > > Banana Pi designs the BPi M2 Berry board to be software
> >compatible
> >> > > with
> >> > > BPi M2 Ultra,
> >> > 
> >> > Do you have a reference for this?
> >> > 
> >> > > so it's based on M2 Ultra with some function cuts, including:
> >> > > 
> >> > > - 2048MiB DRAM -> 1024MiB (this should be proceed by the
> >> > > bootloader);
> >> > > - dropped a LED;
> >> > > - dropped eMMC;
> >> > > - dropped USB2 and connect USB1 to a 4-port HUB.
> >> > 
> >> > Is it the exhaustive list?
> >> 
> >> I have asked Mikey from Sinovoip, and he has agreed this.
> >> 
> >> Here's a list provided by him, which covers some things I forgot:
> >> - 2GiB -> 1GiB
> >> - no eMMC
> >> - no onboard microphone
> >> - no IR
> >> - no charging (and power jack to USB)
> >> - USB change
> >> - one less LED
> >> 
> >> Should I add this to the device tree's comment?
> >
> >Not really, because...
> >
> >> > 
> >> > I'm a bit reluctant to merge that kind of patches usually, since
> >that
> >> > would also imply that each time someone will commit something to
> >the
> >> > M2-Ultra, it would automatically apply to the M2-Berry, without any
> >> > easy way to tell and / or test.
> >
> >... this still applies.
> 
> But I think few developers will have both boards at the same time.

Which is only making it worse, because then someone with only the BPI
m2-ultra, when changing the DT, will not be able to tell that:

 - it's applied to the M2-Berry too,
 - if it works on the M2-Berry.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180820/1abba8a9/attachment-0001.sig>