All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/1] x86: tsc: avoid system instability in hibernation
@ 2018-07-25 18:18 Eduardo Valentin
  2018-07-26  8:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2018-07-27  7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eduardo Valentin @ 2018-07-25 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra
  Cc: Eduardo Valentin, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin,
	Dou Liyang, Len Brown, Rafael J. Wysocki, mike.travis,
	Rajvi Jingar, Pavel Tatashin, Philippe Ombredanne, Kate Stewart,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman, x86, linux-kernel

System instability are seen during resume from hibernation when system
is under heavy CPU load. This is due to the lack of update of sched
clock data, and the scheduler would then think that heavy CPU hog
tasks need more time in CPU, causing the system to freeze
during the unfreezing of tasks. For example, threaded irqs,
and kernel processes servicing network interface may be delayed
for several tens of seconds, causing the system to be unreachable.

Situation like this can be reported by using lockup detectors
such as workqueue lockup detectors:

Message from syslogd@ip-172-31-67-114 at May  7 18:23:21 ...
 kernel:BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 stuck for 57s!

Message from syslogd@ip-172-31-67-114 at May  7 18:23:21 ...
 kernel:BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=1 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 stuck for 57s!

Message from syslogd@ip-172-31-67-114 at May  7 18:23:21 ...
 kernel:BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=3 node=0 flags=0x1 nice=0 stuck for 57s!

Message from syslogd@ip-172-31-67-114 at May  7 18:29:06 ...
 kernel:BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=3 node=0 flags=0x1 nice=0 stuck for 403s!

The fix for this situation is to mark the sched clock as unstable
as early as possible in the resume path, leaving it unstable
for the duration of the resume process. This will force the
scheduler to attempt to align the sched clock across CPUs using
the delta with time of day, updating sched clock data. In a post
hibernation event, we can then mark the sched clock as stable
again, avoiding unnecessary syncs with time of day on systems
in which TSC is reliable.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@amazon.com>
Cc: "mike.travis@hpe.com" <mike.travis@hpe.com>
Cc: Rajvi Jingar <rajvi.jingar@intel.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@amazon.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c       | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/sched/clock.h |  5 +++++
 kernel/sched/clock.c        |  4 ++--
 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
index 8ea117f8142e..f197c9742fef 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
 #include <linux/timex.h>
 #include <linux/static_key.h>
+#include <linux/suspend.h>
 
 #include <asm/hpet.h>
 #include <asm/timer.h>
@@ -1377,3 +1378,31 @@ unsigned long calibrate_delay_is_known(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 #endif
+
+static int tsc_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *notifier,
+			   unsigned long pm_event, void *unused)
+{
+	switch (pm_event) {
+	case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
+		clear_sched_clock_stable();
+		break;
+	case PM_POST_HIBERNATION:
+		/* Set back to the default */
+		if (!check_tsc_unstable())
+			set_sched_clock_stable();
+		break;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+};
+
+static struct notifier_block tsc_pm_notifier_block = {
+	.notifier_call = tsc_pm_notifier,
+};
+
+static int tsc_setup_pm_notifier(void)
+{
+	return register_pm_notifier(&tsc_pm_notifier_block);
+}
+
+subsys_initcall(tsc_setup_pm_notifier);
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/clock.h b/include/linux/sched/clock.h
index 867d588314e0..902654ac5f7e 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/clock.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/clock.h
@@ -32,6 +32,10 @@ static inline void clear_sched_clock_stable(void)
 {
 }
 
+static inline void set_sched_clock_stable(void)
+{
+}
+
 static inline void sched_clock_idle_sleep_event(void)
 {
 }
@@ -51,6 +55,7 @@ static inline u64 local_clock(void)
 }
 #else
 extern int sched_clock_stable(void);
+extern void set_sched_clock_stable(void);
 extern void clear_sched_clock_stable(void);
 
 /*
diff --git a/kernel/sched/clock.c b/kernel/sched/clock.c
index e086babe6c61..8453440e236c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/clock.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/clock.c
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static void __scd_stamp(struct sched_clock_data *scd)
 	scd->tick_raw = sched_clock();
 }
 
-static void __set_sched_clock_stable(void)
+void set_sched_clock_stable(void)
 {
 	struct sched_clock_data *scd;
 
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static int __init sched_clock_init_late(void)
 	smp_mb(); /* matches {set,clear}_sched_clock_stable() */
 
 	if (__sched_clock_stable_early)
-		__set_sched_clock_stable();
+		set_sched_clock_stable();
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.18.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: tsc: avoid system instability in hibernation
  2018-07-25 18:18 [PATCH 1/1] x86: tsc: avoid system instability in hibernation Eduardo Valentin
@ 2018-07-26  8:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2018-07-26 16:00   ` Eduardo Valentin
  2018-07-27  7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2018-07-26  8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eduardo Valentin
  Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin,
	Dou Liyang, Len Brown, Rafael J. Wysocki, mike.travis,
	Rajvi Jingar, Pavel Tatashin, Philippe Ombredanne, Kate Stewart,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman, x86, linux-kernel

Hi Eduardo,

On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 8:18:46 PM CEST Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> System instability are seen during resume from hibernation when system
> is under heavy CPU load. This is due to the lack of update of sched
> clock data, and the scheduler would then think that heavy CPU hog
> tasks need more time in CPU, causing the system to freeze
> during the unfreezing of tasks. For example, threaded irqs,
> and kernel processes servicing network interface may be delayed
> for several tens of seconds, causing the system to be unreachable.
> 
> Situation like this can be reported by using lockup detectors
> such as workqueue lockup detectors:
> 
> Message from syslogd@ip-172-31-67-114 at May  7 18:23:21 ...
>  kernel:BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 stuck for 57s!
> 
> Message from syslogd@ip-172-31-67-114 at May  7 18:23:21 ...
>  kernel:BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=1 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 stuck for 57s!
> 
> Message from syslogd@ip-172-31-67-114 at May  7 18:23:21 ...
>  kernel:BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=3 node=0 flags=0x1 nice=0 stuck for 57s!
> 
> Message from syslogd@ip-172-31-67-114 at May  7 18:29:06 ...
>  kernel:BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=3 node=0 flags=0x1 nice=0 stuck for 403s!
> 
> The fix for this situation is to mark the sched clock as unstable
> as early as possible in the resume path, leaving it unstable
> for the duration of the resume process. This will force the
> scheduler to attempt to align the sched clock across CPUs using
> the delta with time of day, updating sched clock data. In a post
> hibernation event, we can then mark the sched clock as stable
> again, avoiding unnecessary syncs with time of day on systems
> in which TSC is reliable.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@amazon.com>
> Cc: "mike.travis@hpe.com" <mike.travis@hpe.com>
> Cc: Rajvi Jingar <rajvi.jingar@intel.com>
> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
> Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
> Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@amazon.com>

Can you please resend this with a CC to linux-pm?

Cheers,
Rafael


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: tsc: avoid system instability in hibernation
  2018-07-26  8:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2018-07-26 16:00   ` Eduardo Valentin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eduardo Valentin @ 2018-07-26 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Eduardo Valentin, Peter Zijlstra, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
	H. Peter Anvin, Dou Liyang, Len Brown, Rafael J. Wysocki,
	mike.travis, Rajvi Jingar, Pavel Tatashin, Philippe Ombredanne,
	Kate Stewart, Greg Kroah-Hartman, x86, linux-kernel

Hey Rafael,

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:54:06AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi Eduardo,
> 
> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 8:18:46 PM CEST Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> 

> Can you please resend this with a CC to linux-pm?

Sure, resent here:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/26/607
https://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=153262063331515&w=2

I missed it, probably because it did not come from get_maintainers.

> 
> Cheers,
> Rafael
> 
> 

-- 
All the best,
Eduardo Valentin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: tsc: avoid system instability in hibernation
  2018-07-25 18:18 [PATCH 1/1] x86: tsc: avoid system instability in hibernation Eduardo Valentin
  2018-07-26  8:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2018-07-27  7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2018-07-27  7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eduardo Valentin
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Dou Liyang,
	Len Brown, Rafael J. Wysocki, mike.travis, Rajvi Jingar,
	Pavel Tatashin, Philippe Ombredanne, Kate Stewart,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman, x86, linux-kernel

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:18:46AM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> System instability are seen during resume from hibernation when system
> is under heavy CPU load. This is due to the lack of update of sched
> clock data, and the scheduler would then think that heavy CPU hog
> tasks need more time in CPU, causing the system to freeze
> during the unfreezing of tasks. For example, threaded irqs,
> and kernel processes servicing network interface may be delayed
> for several tens of seconds, causing the system to be unreachable.

> +static int tsc_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *notifier,
> +			   unsigned long pm_event, void *unused)
> +{
> +	switch (pm_event) {
> +	case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
> +		clear_sched_clock_stable();
> +		break;
> +	case PM_POST_HIBERNATION:
> +		/* Set back to the default */
> +		if (!check_tsc_unstable())
> +			set_sched_clock_stable();
> +		break;
> +	}

I've not looked at this in detail yet, but this is an absolute no go,
not going to happen, full stop.

If we _ever_ mark the thing unstable, that's it, the end. Allowing it to
go back to stable is a source of utter fail.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-07-27  7:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-07-25 18:18 [PATCH 1/1] x86: tsc: avoid system instability in hibernation Eduardo Valentin
2018-07-26  8:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-26 16:00   ` Eduardo Valentin
2018-07-27  7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.