All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] remoteproc/davinci: use the reset framework
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 21:25:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180731042539.GE5090@builder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180621073706.22812-2-brgl@bgdev.pl>

On Thu 21 Jun 00:37 PDT 2018, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> 
> Switch to using the reset framework instead of handcoded reset routines
> we used so far.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
> Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>

Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

Regards,
Bjorn

> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c
> index b668e32996e2..76c06b70a1c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/bitops.h>
>  #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/reset.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
> @@ -20,8 +21,6 @@
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
>  
> -#include <mach/clock.h>   /* for davinci_clk_reset_assert/deassert() */
> -
>  #include "remoteproc_internal.h"
>  
>  static char *da8xx_fw_name;
> @@ -72,6 +71,7 @@ struct da8xx_rproc {
>  	struct da8xx_rproc_mem *mem;
>  	int num_mems;
>  	struct clk *dsp_clk;
> +	struct reset_control *dsp_reset;
>  	void (*ack_fxn)(struct irq_data *data);
>  	struct irq_data *irq_data;
>  	void __iomem *chipsig;
> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
>  	struct da8xx_rproc *drproc = (struct da8xx_rproc *)rproc->priv;
>  	struct clk *dsp_clk = drproc->dsp_clk;
> +	struct reset_control *dsp_reset = drproc->dsp_reset;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	/* hw requires the start (boot) address be on 1KB boundary */
> @@ -155,7 +156,12 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	davinci_clk_reset_deassert(dsp_clk);
> +	ret = reset_control_deassert(dsp_reset);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "reset_control_deassert() failed: %d\n", ret);
> +		clk_disable_unprepare(dsp_clk);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -163,8 +169,15 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>  static int da8xx_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>  {
>  	struct da8xx_rproc *drproc = rproc->priv;
> +	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = reset_control_assert(drproc->dsp_reset);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "reset_control_assert() failed: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
>  
> -	davinci_clk_reset_assert(drproc->dsp_clk);
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(drproc->dsp_clk);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -232,6 +245,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct resource *bootreg_res;
>  	struct resource *chipsig_res;
>  	struct clk *dsp_clk;
> +	struct reset_control *dsp_reset;
>  	void __iomem *chipsig;
>  	void __iomem *bootreg;
>  	int irq;
> @@ -268,6 +282,15 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return PTR_ERR(dsp_clk);
>  	}
>  
> +	dsp_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(dsp_reset)) {
> +		if (PTR_ERR(dsp_reset) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +			dev_err(dev, "unable to get reset control: %ld\n",
> +				PTR_ERR(dsp_reset));
> +
> +		return PTR_ERR(dsp_reset);
> +	}
> +
>  	if (dev->of_node) {
>  		ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init(dev);
>  		if (ret) {
> @@ -287,6 +310,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	drproc = rproc->priv;
>  	drproc->rproc = rproc;
>  	drproc->dsp_clk = dsp_clk;
> +	drproc->dsp_reset = dsp_reset;
>  	rproc->has_iommu = false;
>  
>  	ret = da8xx_rproc_get_internal_memories(pdev, drproc);
> @@ -309,7 +333,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	 * *not* in reset, but da8xx_rproc_start() needs the DSP to be
>  	 * held in reset at the time it is called.
>  	 */
> -	ret = davinci_clk_reset_assert(drproc->dsp_clk);
> +	ret = reset_control_assert(dsp_reset);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto free_rproc;
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org (Bjorn Andersson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/4] remoteproc/davinci: use the reset framework
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 21:25:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180731042539.GE5090@builder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180621073706.22812-2-brgl@bgdev.pl>

On Thu 21 Jun 00:37 PDT 2018, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> 
> Switch to using the reset framework instead of handcoded reset routines
> we used so far.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
> Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>

Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

Regards,
Bjorn

> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c
> index b668e32996e2..76c06b70a1c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/bitops.h>
>  #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/reset.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
> @@ -20,8 +21,6 @@
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
>  
> -#include <mach/clock.h>   /* for davinci_clk_reset_assert/deassert() */
> -
>  #include "remoteproc_internal.h"
>  
>  static char *da8xx_fw_name;
> @@ -72,6 +71,7 @@ struct da8xx_rproc {
>  	struct da8xx_rproc_mem *mem;
>  	int num_mems;
>  	struct clk *dsp_clk;
> +	struct reset_control *dsp_reset;
>  	void (*ack_fxn)(struct irq_data *data);
>  	struct irq_data *irq_data;
>  	void __iomem *chipsig;
> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
>  	struct da8xx_rproc *drproc = (struct da8xx_rproc *)rproc->priv;
>  	struct clk *dsp_clk = drproc->dsp_clk;
> +	struct reset_control *dsp_reset = drproc->dsp_reset;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	/* hw requires the start (boot) address be on 1KB boundary */
> @@ -155,7 +156,12 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	davinci_clk_reset_deassert(dsp_clk);
> +	ret = reset_control_deassert(dsp_reset);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "reset_control_deassert() failed: %d\n", ret);
> +		clk_disable_unprepare(dsp_clk);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -163,8 +169,15 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>  static int da8xx_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>  {
>  	struct da8xx_rproc *drproc = rproc->priv;
> +	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = reset_control_assert(drproc->dsp_reset);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "reset_control_assert() failed: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
>  
> -	davinci_clk_reset_assert(drproc->dsp_clk);
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(drproc->dsp_clk);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -232,6 +245,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct resource *bootreg_res;
>  	struct resource *chipsig_res;
>  	struct clk *dsp_clk;
> +	struct reset_control *dsp_reset;
>  	void __iomem *chipsig;
>  	void __iomem *bootreg;
>  	int irq;
> @@ -268,6 +282,15 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return PTR_ERR(dsp_clk);
>  	}
>  
> +	dsp_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(dsp_reset)) {
> +		if (PTR_ERR(dsp_reset) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +			dev_err(dev, "unable to get reset control: %ld\n",
> +				PTR_ERR(dsp_reset));
> +
> +		return PTR_ERR(dsp_reset);
> +	}
> +
>  	if (dev->of_node) {
>  		ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init(dev);
>  		if (ret) {
> @@ -287,6 +310,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	drproc = rproc->priv;
>  	drproc->rproc = rproc;
>  	drproc->dsp_clk = dsp_clk;
> +	drproc->dsp_reset = dsp_reset;
>  	rproc->has_iommu = false;
>  
>  	ret = da8xx_rproc_get_internal_memories(pdev, drproc);
> @@ -309,7 +333,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	 * *not* in reset, but da8xx_rproc_start() needs the DSP to be
>  	 * held in reset at the time it is called.
>  	 */
> -	ret = davinci_clk_reset_assert(drproc->dsp_clk);
> +	ret = reset_control_assert(dsp_reset);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto free_rproc;
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-31  4:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-21  7:37 [PATCH v7 0/4] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the reset framework Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-21  7:37 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-21  7:37 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] remoteproc/davinci: use " Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-21  7:37   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-21  7:37   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-07-23  8:03   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-07-23  8:03     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-07-31  4:25   ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2018-07-31  4:25     ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-07-31  7:55     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-07-31  7:55       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-07-31 10:04       ` Sekhar Nori
2018-07-31 10:04         ` Sekhar Nori
2018-07-31 10:04         ` Sekhar Nori
2018-06-21  7:37 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] clk: davinci: kill davinci_clk_reset_assert/deassert() Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-21  7:37   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-07-06 17:54   ` David Lechner
2018-07-06 17:54     ` David Lechner
2018-10-02 15:08     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-10-02 15:08       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-10-02 15:28       ` David Lechner
2018-10-02 15:28         ` David Lechner
2018-10-02 15:54         ` Stephen Boyd
2018-10-02 15:54           ` Stephen Boyd
2018-06-21  7:37 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] ARM: davinci: dts: make psc0 a reset provider Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-21  7:37   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-07-02 11:57   ` Sekhar Nori
2018-07-02 11:57     ` Sekhar Nori
2018-07-02 11:57     ` Sekhar Nori
2018-07-02 11:57     ` Sekhar Nori
2018-06-21  7:37 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] ARM: davinci: dts: add a reset control to the dsp node Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-21  7:37   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-07-02 12:02   ` Sekhar Nori
2018-07-02 12:02     ` Sekhar Nori
2018-07-02 12:02     ` Sekhar Nori
2018-07-02 12:02     ` Sekhar Nori
2018-06-21 10:52 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the reset framework Sekhar Nori
2018-06-21 10:52   ` Sekhar Nori
2018-06-21 10:52   ` Sekhar Nori
2018-06-21 10:52   ` Sekhar Nori
2018-06-21 11:41   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-21 11:41     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-07-02 12:08     ` Sekhar Nori
2018-07-02 12:08       ` Sekhar Nori
2018-07-02 12:08       ` Sekhar Nori
2018-07-02 12:08       ` Sekhar Nori
2018-07-02 15:27       ` David Lechner
2018-07-02 15:27         ` David Lechner
2018-07-03  4:42         ` Sekhar Nori
2018-07-03  4:42           ` Sekhar Nori
2018-07-03  4:42           ` Sekhar Nori
2018-07-03  4:42           ` Sekhar Nori
2018-07-31  4:34       ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-07-31  4:34         ` Bjorn Andersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180731042539.GE5090@builder \
    --to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=david@lechnology.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.