* [PATCH] RFT: Do we detect WA_TAIL?
@ 2018-08-15 11:13 Chris Wilson
2018-08-15 12:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-08-15 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 3f90c74038ef..fff2fbb6bac5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@
/* Typical size of the average request (2 pipecontrols and a MI_BB) */
#define EXECLISTS_REQUEST_SIZE 64 /* bytes */
-#define WA_TAIL_DWORDS 2
+#define WA_TAIL_DWORDS 0
#define WA_TAIL_BYTES (sizeof(u32) * WA_TAIL_DWORDS)
static int execlists_context_deferred_alloc(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
@@ -2195,8 +2195,10 @@ static int gen8_emit_flush_render(struct i915_request *request,
static void gen8_emit_wa_tail(struct i915_request *request, u32 *cs)
{
/* Ensure there's always at least one preemption point per-request. */
- *cs++ = MI_ARB_CHECK;
- *cs++ = MI_NOOP;
+ if (WA_TAIL_DWORDS) {
+ *cs++ = MI_ARB_CHECK;
+ *cs++ = MI_NOOP;
+ }
request->wa_tail = intel_ring_offset(request, cs);
}
--
2.18.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for RFT: Do we detect WA_TAIL?
2018-08-15 11:13 [PATCH] RFT: Do we detect WA_TAIL? Chris Wilson
@ 2018-08-15 12:02 ` Patchwork
2018-08-15 12:19 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-08-15 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: RFT: Do we detect WA_TAIL?
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48247/
State : warning
== Summary ==
$ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
ea2011cc92cd RFT: Do we detect WA_TAIL?
-:32: ERROR:MISSING_SIGN_OFF: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)
total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 20 lines checked
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for RFT: Do we detect WA_TAIL?
2018-08-15 11:13 [PATCH] RFT: Do we detect WA_TAIL? Chris Wilson
2018-08-15 12:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
@ 2018-08-15 12:19 ` Patchwork
2018-08-15 12:23 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2018-08-15 14:36 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-08-15 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: RFT: Do we detect WA_TAIL?
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48247/
State : success
== Summary ==
= CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4671 -> Patchwork_9949 =
== Summary - SUCCESS ==
No regressions found.
External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/48247/revisions/1/mbox/
== Known issues ==
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_9949 that come from known issues:
=== IGT changes ===
==== Issues hit ====
igt@drv_selftest@live_hangcheck:
fi-bxt-dsi: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL (fdo#106560)
==== Possible fixes ====
igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic:
fi-hsw-peppy: DMESG-FAIL (fdo#102614) -> PASS
fdo#102614 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102614
fdo#106560 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106560
== Participating hosts (53 -> 48) ==
Missing (5): fi-ctg-p8600 fi-ilk-m540 fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-hsw-4200u
== Build changes ==
* Linux: CI_DRM_4671 -> Patchwork_9949
CI_DRM_4671: 77a98fa3e9b6eb29d513b1666ecddfdcfc424e86 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_4598: 9c0f04355107a8693650b16756b6343a78501138 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_9949: ea2011cc92cd73536c59ac9392cfe108e10b13a8 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
ea2011cc92cd RFT: Do we detect WA_TAIL?
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_9949/issues.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] RFT: Do we detect WA_TAIL?
2018-08-15 11:13 [PATCH] RFT: Do we detect WA_TAIL? Chris Wilson
2018-08-15 12:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2018-08-15 12:19 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
@ 2018-08-15 12:23 ` Chris Wilson
2018-08-15 12:24 ` Chris Wilson
2018-08-15 14:36 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-08-15 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-08-15 12:13:51)
The answer is no. So either our wait-for-ack is the ultimate panacea, or
we just don't have the right pattern to trigger the bug.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] RFT: Do we detect WA_TAIL?
2018-08-15 12:23 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
@ 2018-08-15 12:24 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2018-08-15 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-08-15 13:23:12)
> Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-08-15 12:13:51)
>
> The answer is no. So either our wait-for-ack is the ultimate panacea, or
> we just don't have the right pattern to trigger the bug.
Fwiw, the small batch sizes for gem_concurrent_blit were good at hitting
it on bdw/skl.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for RFT: Do we detect WA_TAIL?
2018-08-15 11:13 [PATCH] RFT: Do we detect WA_TAIL? Chris Wilson
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2018-08-15 12:23 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
@ 2018-08-15 14:36 ` Patchwork
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-08-15 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: RFT: Do we detect WA_TAIL?
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/48247/
State : success
== Summary ==
= CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4671_full -> Patchwork_9949_full =
== Summary - SUCCESS ==
No regressions found.
== Known issues ==
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_9949_full that come from known issues:
=== IGT changes ===
==== Issues hit ====
igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-y:
shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#103166)
igt@perf@polling:
shard-hsw: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#102252)
==== Possible fixes ====
igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible:
shard-glk: FAIL (fdo#105363) -> PASS
fdo#102252 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102252
fdo#103166 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103166
fdo#105363 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105363
== Participating hosts (5 -> 5) ==
No changes in participating hosts
== Build changes ==
* Linux: CI_DRM_4671 -> Patchwork_9949
CI_DRM_4671: 77a98fa3e9b6eb29d513b1666ecddfdcfc424e86 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_4598: 9c0f04355107a8693650b16756b6343a78501138 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_9949: ea2011cc92cd73536c59ac9392cfe108e10b13a8 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_9949/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-08-15 14:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-08-15 11:13 [PATCH] RFT: Do we detect WA_TAIL? Chris Wilson
2018-08-15 12:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2018-08-15 12:19 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-08-15 12:23 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2018-08-15 12:24 ` Chris Wilson
2018-08-15 14:36 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.