All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] block: remove bio_rewind_iter()
@ 2018-09-05  3:33 Ming Lei
  2018-09-05  3:52 ` Kent Overstreet
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2018-09-05  3:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe
  Cc: linux-block, Ming Lei, Kent Overstreet, Dmitry Monakhov,
	Christoph Hellwig, Hannes Reinecke

It is pointed that bio_rewind_iter() is one very bad API[1]:

1) bio size may not be restored after rewinding

2) it causes some bogus change, such as 5151842b9d8732 (block: reset
bi_iter.bi_done after splitting bio)

3) rewinding really makes things complicated wrt. bio splitting

4) unnecessary updating of .bi_done in fast path

[1] https://marc.info/?t=153549924200005&r=1&w=2

So this patch takes Kent's suggestion to restore one bio into its original
state via saving bio iterator(struct bvec_iter) in bio_integrity_prep(),
given now bio_rewind_iter() is only used by bio integrity code.

Suggested-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/bio-integrity.c | 10 +++-------
 block/bio.c           |  1 -
 include/linux/bio.h   | 22 ++++------------------
 include/linux/bvec.h  |  3 ---
 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bio-integrity.c b/block/bio-integrity.c
index 67b5fb861a51..839c332069a9 100644
--- a/block/bio-integrity.c
+++ b/block/bio-integrity.c
@@ -306,6 +306,8 @@ bool bio_integrity_prep(struct bio *bio)
 	if (bio_data_dir(bio) == WRITE) {
 		bio_integrity_process(bio, &bio->bi_iter,
 				      bi->profile->generate_fn);
+	} else {
+		bip->bio_iter = bio->bi_iter;
 	}
 	return true;
 
@@ -331,19 +333,13 @@ static void bio_integrity_verify_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 		container_of(work, struct bio_integrity_payload, bip_work);
 	struct bio *bio = bip->bip_bio;
 	struct blk_integrity *bi = blk_get_integrity(bio->bi_disk);
-	struct bvec_iter iter = bio->bi_iter;
 
 	/*
 	 * At the moment verify is called bio's iterator was advanced
 	 * during split and completion, we need to rewind iterator to
 	 * it's original position.
 	 */
-	if (bio_rewind_iter(bio, &iter, iter.bi_done)) {
-		bio->bi_status = bio_integrity_process(bio, &iter,
-						       bi->profile->verify_fn);
-	} else {
-		bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
-	}
+	bio->bi_status = bio_integrity_process(bio, &bip->bio_iter, bi->profile->verify_fn);
 
 	bio_integrity_free(bio);
 	bio_endio(bio);
diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
index b12966e415d3..cc57cbbebbfd 100644
--- a/block/bio.c
+++ b/block/bio.c
@@ -1807,7 +1807,6 @@ struct bio *bio_split(struct bio *bio, int sectors,
 		bio_integrity_trim(split);
 
 	bio_advance(bio, split->bi_iter.bi_size);
-	bio->bi_iter.bi_done = 0;
 
 	if (bio_flagged(bio, BIO_TRACE_COMPLETION))
 		bio_set_flag(split, BIO_TRACE_COMPLETION);
diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
index 51371740d2a8..14b4fa266357 100644
--- a/include/linux/bio.h
+++ b/include/linux/bio.h
@@ -170,27 +170,11 @@ static inline void bio_advance_iter(struct bio *bio, struct bvec_iter *iter,
 {
 	iter->bi_sector += bytes >> 9;
 
-	if (bio_no_advance_iter(bio)) {
+	if (bio_no_advance_iter(bio))
 		iter->bi_size -= bytes;
-		iter->bi_done += bytes;
-	} else {
+	else
 		bvec_iter_advance(bio->bi_io_vec, iter, bytes);
 		/* TODO: It is reasonable to complete bio with error here. */
-	}
-}
-
-static inline bool bio_rewind_iter(struct bio *bio, struct bvec_iter *iter,
-		unsigned int bytes)
-{
-	iter->bi_sector -= bytes >> 9;
-
-	if (bio_no_advance_iter(bio)) {
-		iter->bi_size += bytes;
-		iter->bi_done -= bytes;
-		return true;
-	}
-
-	return bvec_iter_rewind(bio->bi_io_vec, iter, bytes);
 }
 
 #define __bio_for_each_segment(bvl, bio, iter, start)			\
@@ -353,6 +337,8 @@ struct bio_integrity_payload {
 	unsigned short		bip_max_vcnt;	/* integrity bio_vec slots */
 	unsigned short		bip_flags;	/* control flags */
 
+	struct bvec_iter	bio_iter;	/* for rewinding parent bio */
+
 	struct work_struct	bip_work;	/* I/O completion */
 
 	struct bio_vec		*bip_vec;
diff --git a/include/linux/bvec.h b/include/linux/bvec.h
index fe7a22dd133b..02c73c6aa805 100644
--- a/include/linux/bvec.h
+++ b/include/linux/bvec.h
@@ -40,8 +40,6 @@ struct bvec_iter {
 
 	unsigned int		bi_idx;		/* current index into bvl_vec */
 
-	unsigned int            bi_done;	/* number of bytes completed */
-
 	unsigned int            bi_bvec_done;	/* number of bytes completed in
 						   current bvec */
 };
@@ -85,7 +83,6 @@ static inline bool bvec_iter_advance(const struct bio_vec *bv,
 		bytes -= len;
 		iter->bi_size -= len;
 		iter->bi_bvec_done += len;
-		iter->bi_done += len;
 
 		if (iter->bi_bvec_done == __bvec_iter_bvec(bv, *iter)->bv_len) {
 			iter->bi_bvec_done = 0;
-- 
2.9.5

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] block: remove bio_rewind_iter()
  2018-09-05  3:33 [PATCH] block: remove bio_rewind_iter() Ming Lei
@ 2018-09-05  3:52 ` Kent Overstreet
  2018-09-05 13:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kent Overstreet @ 2018-09-05  3:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ming Lei
  Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-block, Dmitry Monakhov, Christoph Hellwig,
	Hannes Reinecke

Thanks for doing this, Ming

On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 11:33:35AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> It is pointed that bio_rewind_iter() is one very bad API[1]:
> 
> 1) bio size may not be restored after rewinding
> 
> 2) it causes some bogus change, such as 5151842b9d8732 (block: reset
> bi_iter.bi_done after splitting bio)
> 
> 3) rewinding really makes things complicated wrt. bio splitting
> 
> 4) unnecessary updating of .bi_done in fast path
> 
> [1] https://marc.info/?t=153549924200005&r=1&w=2
> 
> So this patch takes Kent's suggestion to restore one bio into its original
> state via saving bio iterator(struct bvec_iter) in bio_integrity_prep(),
> given now bio_rewind_iter() is only used by bio integrity code.
> 
> Suggested-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
> Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] block: remove bio_rewind_iter()
  2018-09-05  3:33 [PATCH] block: remove bio_rewind_iter() Ming Lei
  2018-09-05  3:52 ` Kent Overstreet
@ 2018-09-05 13:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2018-09-05 21:46 ` Jens Axboe
  2018-09-15  7:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2018-09-05 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ming Lei
  Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-block, Kent Overstreet, Dmitry Monakhov,
	Christoph Hellwig, Hannes Reinecke

> +	bio->bi_status = bio_integrity_process(bio, &bip->bio_iter, bi->profile->verify_fn);

Please split the overly long line.

Otherwise this looks fine:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] block: remove bio_rewind_iter()
  2018-09-05  3:33 [PATCH] block: remove bio_rewind_iter() Ming Lei
  2018-09-05  3:52 ` Kent Overstreet
  2018-09-05 13:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2018-09-05 21:46 ` Jens Axboe
  2018-09-15  7:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2018-09-05 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ming Lei
  Cc: linux-block, Kent Overstreet, Dmitry Monakhov, Christoph Hellwig,
	Hannes Reinecke

On 9/4/18 9:33 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> It is pointed that bio_rewind_iter() is one very bad API[1]:
> 
> 1) bio size may not be restored after rewinding
> 
> 2) it causes some bogus change, such as 5151842b9d8732 (block: reset
> bi_iter.bi_done after splitting bio)
> 
> 3) rewinding really makes things complicated wrt. bio splitting
> 
> 4) unnecessary updating of .bi_done in fast path
> 
> [1] https://marc.info/?t=153549924200005&r=1&w=2
> 
> So this patch takes Kent's suggestion to restore one bio into its original
> state via saving bio iterator(struct bvec_iter) in bio_integrity_prep(),
> given now bio_rewind_iter() is only used by bio integrity code.

Applied, thanks Ming.

-- 
Jens Axboe

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] block: remove bio_rewind_iter()
  2018-09-05  3:33 [PATCH] block: remove bio_rewind_iter() Ming Lei
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-09-05 21:46 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2018-09-15  7:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2018-09-15 14:41   ` Jens Axboe
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2018-09-15  7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ming Lei
  Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-block, Kent Overstreet, Dmitry Monakhov,
	Christoph Hellwig, Hannes Reinecke

On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 11:33:35AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> It is pointed that bio_rewind_iter() is one very bad API[1]:
> 
> 1) bio size may not be restored after rewinding
> 
> 2) it causes some bogus change, such as 5151842b9d8732 (block: reset
> bi_iter.bi_done after splitting bio)
> 
> 3) rewinding really makes things complicated wrt. bio splitting
> 
> 4) unnecessary updating of .bi_done in fast path
> 
> [1] https://marc.info/?t=153549924200005&r=1&w=2

Based on that this is a bug fix and should go to 4.19 instead of 4.20
as it is queued up right now..

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] block: remove bio_rewind_iter()
  2018-09-15  7:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2018-09-15 14:41   ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2018-09-15 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig, Ming Lei
  Cc: linux-block, Kent Overstreet, Dmitry Monakhov, Christoph Hellwig,
	Hannes Reinecke

On 9/15/18 1:03 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 11:33:35AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> It is pointed that bio_rewind_iter() is one very bad API[1]:
>>
>> 1) bio size may not be restored after rewinding
>>
>> 2) it causes some bogus change, such as 5151842b9d8732 (block: reset
>> bi_iter.bi_done after splitting bio)
>>
>> 3) rewinding really makes things complicated wrt. bio splitting
>>
>> 4) unnecessary updating of .bi_done in fast path
>>
>> [1] https://marc.info/?t=153549924200005&r=1&w=2
> 
> Based on that this is a bug fix and should go to 4.19 instead of 4.20
> as it is queued up right now..

It's not a new issue (in fact not even close, we're about a year back),
hence not a strong reason to shove it into 4.19 vs 4.20. I'm fine
with subsequently marking it for stable.

-- 
Jens Axboe

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-09-15 14:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-09-05  3:33 [PATCH] block: remove bio_rewind_iter() Ming Lei
2018-09-05  3:52 ` Kent Overstreet
2018-09-05 13:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-05 21:46 ` Jens Axboe
2018-09-15  7:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-15 14:41   ` Jens Axboe

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.