[PATCH 1/3] mfd: ti-lmu: switch to gpiod

[PATCH 1/3] mfd: ti-lmu: switch to gpiod

[Pavel Machek]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2904 bytes --]

Use new descriptor based API instead of the legacy one.
    
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c b/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
index 990437e..e14cb9f 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
-#include <linux/gpio.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
 #include <linux/i2c.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/core.h>
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_device.h>
-#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 
 struct ti_lmu_data {
@@ -32,17 +31,8 @@ struct ti_lmu_data {
 
 static int ti_lmu_enable_hw(struct ti_lmu *lmu, enum ti_lmu_id id)
 {
-	int ret;
-
-	if (gpio_is_valid(lmu->en_gpio)) {
-		ret = devm_gpio_request_one(lmu->dev, lmu->en_gpio,
-					    GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, "lmu_hwen");
-		if (ret) {
-			dev_err(lmu->dev, "Can not request enable GPIO: %d\n",
-				ret);
-			return ret;
-		}
-	}
+	if (lmu->en_gpio)
+		gpiod_set_value(lmu->en_gpio, 1);
 
 	/* Delay about 1ms after HW enable pin control */
 	usleep_range(1000, 1500);
@@ -59,8 +49,8 @@ static int ti_lmu_enable_hw(struct ti_lmu *lmu, enum ti_lmu_id id)
 
 static void ti_lmu_disable_hw(struct ti_lmu *lmu)
 {
-	if (gpio_is_valid(lmu->en_gpio))
-		gpio_set_value(lmu->en_gpio, 0);
+	if (lmu->en_gpio)
+		gpiod_set_value(lmu->en_gpio, 0);
 }
 
 static const struct mfd_cell lm3532_devices[] = {
@@ -204,7 +194,13 @@ static int ti_lmu_probe(struct i2c_client *cl, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 		return PTR_ERR(lmu->regmap);
 
 	/* HW enable pin control and additional power up sequence if required */
-	lmu->en_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(dev->of_node, "enable-gpios", 0);
+	lmu->en_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "enable", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
+	if (IS_ERR(lmu->en_gpio)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(lmu->en_gpio);
+		dev_err(dev, "Can not request enable GPIO: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
 	ret = ti_lmu_enable_hw(lmu, id->driver_data);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/ti-lmu.h b/include/linux/mfd/ti-lmu.h
index 09d5f30..1ef51ed 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/ti-lmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/ti-lmu.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include <linux/gpio.h>
 #include <linux/notifier.h>
 #include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
 
 /* Notifier event */
 #define LMU_EVENT_MONITOR_DONE		0x01
@@ -81,7 +82,7 @@ enum lm363x_regulator_id {
 struct ti_lmu {
 	struct device *dev;
 	struct regmap *regmap;
-	int en_gpio;
+	struct gpio_desc *en_gpio;
 	struct blocking_notifier_head notifier;
 };
 #endif


-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[PATCH 1/3] mfd: ti-lmu: switch to gpiod

[Pavel Machek]

Use new descriptor based API instead of the legacy one.
    
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c b/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
index 990437e..e14cb9f 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
-#include <linux/gpio.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
 #include <linux/i2c.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/core.h>
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_device.h>
-#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 
 struct ti_lmu_data {
@@ -32,17 +31,8 @@ struct ti_lmu_data {
 
 static int ti_lmu_enable_hw(struct ti_lmu *lmu, enum ti_lmu_id id)
 {
-	int ret;
-
-	if (gpio_is_valid(lmu->en_gpio)) {
-		ret = devm_gpio_request_one(lmu->dev, lmu->en_gpio,
-					    GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, "lmu_hwen");
-		if (ret) {
-			dev_err(lmu->dev, "Can not request enable GPIO: %d\n",
-				ret);
-			return ret;
-		}
-	}
+	if (lmu->en_gpio)
+		gpiod_set_value(lmu->en_gpio, 1);
 
 	/* Delay about 1ms after HW enable pin control */
 	usleep_range(1000, 1500);
@@ -59,8 +49,8 @@ static int ti_lmu_enable_hw(struct ti_lmu *lmu, enum ti_lmu_id id)
 
 static void ti_lmu_disable_hw(struct ti_lmu *lmu)
 {
-	if (gpio_is_valid(lmu->en_gpio))
-		gpio_set_value(lmu->en_gpio, 0);
+	if (lmu->en_gpio)
+		gpiod_set_value(lmu->en_gpio, 0);
 }
 
 static const struct mfd_cell lm3532_devices[] = {
@@ -204,7 +194,13 @@ static int ti_lmu_probe(struct i2c_client *cl, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 		return PTR_ERR(lmu->regmap);
 
 	/* HW enable pin control and additional power up sequence if required */
-	lmu->en_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(dev->of_node, "enable-gpios", 0);
+	lmu->en_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "enable", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
+	if (IS_ERR(lmu->en_gpio)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(lmu->en_gpio);
+		dev_err(dev, "Can not request enable GPIO: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
 	ret = ti_lmu_enable_hw(lmu, id->driver_data);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/ti-lmu.h b/include/linux/mfd/ti-lmu.h
index 09d5f30..1ef51ed 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/ti-lmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/ti-lmu.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include <linux/gpio.h>
 #include <linux/notifier.h>
 #include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
 
 /* Notifier event */
 #define LMU_EVENT_MONITOR_DONE		0x01
@@ -81,7 +82,7 @@ enum lm363x_regulator_id {
 struct ti_lmu {
 	struct device *dev;
 	struct regmap *regmap;
-	int en_gpio;
+	struct gpio_desc *en_gpio;
 	struct blocking_notifier_head notifier;
 };
 #endif


-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180911/22c2b6f5/attachment.sig>

[PATCH 2/3] mfd: ti-lmu: use managed resource for everything

[Pavel Machek]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2303 bytes --]

This replaces all remaining unmanaged resources with device
managed ones, so that the remove function is no longer needed.
This makes the code slightly shorter and fixes two problems:
    
 1. The hardware is disabled after the child devices have
    been removed. Previously there was a potential race
    condition.
 2. The hardware is disabled when mfd_add_devices fails
    during probe.
    
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c b/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
index e14cb9f..2ee09d0 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
@@ -47,8 +47,9 @@ static int ti_lmu_enable_hw(struct ti_lmu *lmu, enum ti_lmu_id id)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void ti_lmu_disable_hw(struct ti_lmu *lmu)
+static void ti_lmu_disable_hw(void *data)
 {
+	struct ti_lmu *lmu = data;
 	if (lmu->en_gpio)
 		gpiod_set_value(lmu->en_gpio, 0);
 }
@@ -205,6 +206,10 @@ static int ti_lmu_probe(struct i2c_client *cl, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, ti_lmu_disable_hw, lmu);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	/*
 	 * Fault circuit(open/short) can be detected by ti-lmu-fault-monitor.
 	 * After fault detection is done, some devices should re-initialize
@@ -214,17 +219,8 @@ static int ti_lmu_probe(struct i2c_client *cl, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 
 	i2c_set_clientdata(cl, lmu);
 
-	return mfd_add_devices(lmu->dev, 0, data->cells,
-			       data->num_cells, NULL, 0, NULL);
-}
-
-static int ti_lmu_remove(struct i2c_client *cl)
-{
-	struct ti_lmu *lmu = i2c_get_clientdata(cl);
-
-	ti_lmu_disable_hw(lmu);
-	mfd_remove_devices(lmu->dev);
-	return 0;
+	return devm_mfd_add_devices(lmu->dev, 0, data->cells,
+				    data->num_cells, NULL, 0, NULL);
 }
 
 static const struct i2c_device_id ti_lmu_ids[] = {
@@ -240,7 +236,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ti_lmu_ids);
 
 static struct i2c_driver ti_lmu_driver = {
 	.probe = ti_lmu_probe,
-	.remove = ti_lmu_remove,
 	.driver = {
 		.name = "ti-lmu",
 		.of_match_table = ti_lmu_of_match,

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[PATCH 2/3] mfd: ti-lmu: use managed resource for everything

[Pavel Machek]

This replaces all remaining unmanaged resources with device
managed ones, so that the remove function is no longer needed.
This makes the code slightly shorter and fixes two problems:
    
 1. The hardware is disabled after the child devices have
    been removed. Previously there was a potential race
    condition.
 2. The hardware is disabled when mfd_add_devices fails
    during probe.
    
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c b/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
index e14cb9f..2ee09d0 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
@@ -47,8 +47,9 @@ static int ti_lmu_enable_hw(struct ti_lmu *lmu, enum ti_lmu_id id)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void ti_lmu_disable_hw(struct ti_lmu *lmu)
+static void ti_lmu_disable_hw(void *data)
 {
+	struct ti_lmu *lmu = data;
 	if (lmu->en_gpio)
 		gpiod_set_value(lmu->en_gpio, 0);
 }
@@ -205,6 +206,10 @@ static int ti_lmu_probe(struct i2c_client *cl, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, ti_lmu_disable_hw, lmu);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	/*
 	 * Fault circuit(open/short) can be detected by ti-lmu-fault-monitor.
 	 * After fault detection is done, some devices should re-initialize
@@ -214,17 +219,8 @@ static int ti_lmu_probe(struct i2c_client *cl, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 
 	i2c_set_clientdata(cl, lmu);
 
-	return mfd_add_devices(lmu->dev, 0, data->cells,
-			       data->num_cells, NULL, 0, NULL);
-}
-
-static int ti_lmu_remove(struct i2c_client *cl)
-{
-	struct ti_lmu *lmu = i2c_get_clientdata(cl);
-
-	ti_lmu_disable_hw(lmu);
-	mfd_remove_devices(lmu->dev);
-	return 0;
+	return devm_mfd_add_devices(lmu->dev, 0, data->cells,
+				    data->num_cells, NULL, 0, NULL);
 }
 
 static const struct i2c_device_id ti_lmu_ids[] = {
@@ -240,7 +236,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ti_lmu_ids);
 
 static struct i2c_driver ti_lmu_driver = {
 	.probe = ti_lmu_probe,
-	.remove = ti_lmu_remove,
 	.driver = {
 		.name = "ti-lmu",
 		.of_match_table = ti_lmu_of_match,

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180911/46051cfa/attachment-0001.sig>

[PATCH 3/3] mfd: ti-lmu: use of_device_get_match_data() helper

[Pavel Machek]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2527 bytes --]

Replace of_match_device() with of_device_get_match_data(), which
slightly decreases lines of code and allows to move the DT table
next to the I2C table.
    
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c b/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
index de76298..ce16c89 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
@@ -142,34 +142,21 @@ TI_LMU_DATA(lm3633, LM3633_MAX_REG);
 TI_LMU_DATA(lm3695, LM3695_MAX_REG);
 TI_LMU_DATA(lm3697, LM3697_MAX_REG);
 
-static const struct of_device_id ti_lmu_of_match[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3532", .data = &lm3532_data },
-	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3631", .data = &lm3631_data },
-	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3632", .data = &lm3632_data },
-	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3633", .data = &lm3633_data },
-	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3695", .data = &lm3695_data },
-	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3697", .data = &lm3697_data },
-	{ }
-};
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ti_lmu_of_match);
-
 static int ti_lmu_probe(struct i2c_client *cl, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &cl->dev;
-	const struct of_device_id *match;
 	const struct ti_lmu_data *data;
 	struct regmap_config regmap_cfg;
 	struct ti_lmu *lmu;
 	int ret;
 
-	match = of_match_device(ti_lmu_of_match, dev);
-	if (!match)
-		return -ENODEV;
 	/*
 	 * Get device specific data from of_match table.
 	 * This data is defined by using TI_LMU_DATA() macro.
 	 */
-	data = (struct ti_lmu_data *)match->data;
+	data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+	if (!data)
+		return -ENODEV;
 
 	lmu = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*lmu), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!lmu)
@@ -217,6 +204,17 @@ static int ti_lmu_probe(struct i2c_client *cl, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 				    data->num_cells, NULL, 0, NULL);
 }
 
+static const struct of_device_id ti_lmu_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3532", .data = &lm3532_data },
+	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3631", .data = &lm3631_data },
+	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3632", .data = &lm3632_data },
+	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3633", .data = &lm3633_data },
+	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3695", .data = &lm3695_data },
+	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3697", .data = &lm3697_data },
+	{ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ti_lmu_of_match);
+
 static const struct i2c_device_id ti_lmu_ids[] = {
 	{ "lm3532", LM3532 },
 	{ "lm3631", LM3631 },


-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[PATCH 3/3] mfd: ti-lmu: use of_device_get_match_data() helper

[Pavel Machek]

Replace of_match_device() with of_device_get_match_data(), which
slightly decreases lines of code and allows to move the DT table
next to the I2C table.
    
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c b/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
index de76298..ce16c89 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
@@ -142,34 +142,21 @@ TI_LMU_DATA(lm3633, LM3633_MAX_REG);
 TI_LMU_DATA(lm3695, LM3695_MAX_REG);
 TI_LMU_DATA(lm3697, LM3697_MAX_REG);
 
-static const struct of_device_id ti_lmu_of_match[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3532", .data = &lm3532_data },
-	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3631", .data = &lm3631_data },
-	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3632", .data = &lm3632_data },
-	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3633", .data = &lm3633_data },
-	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3695", .data = &lm3695_data },
-	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3697", .data = &lm3697_data },
-	{ }
-};
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ti_lmu_of_match);
-
 static int ti_lmu_probe(struct i2c_client *cl, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &cl->dev;
-	const struct of_device_id *match;
 	const struct ti_lmu_data *data;
 	struct regmap_config regmap_cfg;
 	struct ti_lmu *lmu;
 	int ret;
 
-	match = of_match_device(ti_lmu_of_match, dev);
-	if (!match)
-		return -ENODEV;
 	/*
 	 * Get device specific data from of_match table.
 	 * This data is defined by using TI_LMU_DATA() macro.
 	 */
-	data = (struct ti_lmu_data *)match->data;
+	data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+	if (!data)
+		return -ENODEV;
 
 	lmu = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*lmu), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!lmu)
@@ -217,6 +204,17 @@ static int ti_lmu_probe(struct i2c_client *cl, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 				    data->num_cells, NULL, 0, NULL);
 }
 
+static const struct of_device_id ti_lmu_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3532", .data = &lm3532_data },
+	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3631", .data = &lm3631_data },
+	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3632", .data = &lm3632_data },
+	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3633", .data = &lm3633_data },
+	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3695", .data = &lm3695_data },
+	{ .compatible = "ti,lm3697", .data = &lm3697_data },
+	{ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ti_lmu_of_match);
+
 static const struct i2c_device_id ti_lmu_ids[] = {
 	{ "lm3532", LM3532 },
 	{ "lm3631", LM3631 },


-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180911/a58e887f/attachment.sig>

Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: ti-lmu: switch to gpiod

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 11 Sep 2018, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Use new descriptor based API instead of the legacy one.
>     
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

[PATCH 1/3] mfd: ti-lmu: switch to gpiod

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 11 Sep 2018, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Use new descriptor based API instead of the legacy one.
>     
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Lee Jones [???]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: ti-lmu: use managed resource for everything

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 11 Sep 2018, Pavel Machek wrote:

> This replaces all remaining unmanaged resources with device
> managed ones, so that the remove function is no longer needed.
> This makes the code slightly shorter and fixes two problems:
>     
>  1. The hardware is disabled after the child devices have
>     been removed. Previously there was a potential race
>     condition.
>  2. The hardware is disabled when mfd_add_devices fails
>     during probe.
>     
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

[PATCH 2/3] mfd: ti-lmu: use managed resource for everything

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 11 Sep 2018, Pavel Machek wrote:

> This replaces all remaining unmanaged resources with device
> managed ones, so that the remove function is no longer needed.
> This makes the code slightly shorter and fixes two problems:
>     
>  1. The hardware is disabled after the child devices have
>     been removed. Previously there was a potential race
>     condition.
>  2. The hardware is disabled when mfd_add_devices fails
>     during probe.
>     
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Lee Jones [???]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: ti-lmu: use of_device_get_match_data() helper

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 11 Sep 2018, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Replace of_match_device() with of_device_get_match_data(), which
> slightly decreases lines of code and allows to move the DT table
> next to the I2C table.
>     
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

Not sure how you're sending these patches, but for future reference
`git send-email` is usually preferred.

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

[PATCH 3/3] mfd: ti-lmu: use of_device_get_match_data() helper

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 11 Sep 2018, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Replace of_match_device() with of_device_get_match_data(), which
> slightly decreases lines of code and allows to move the DT table
> next to the I2C table.
>     
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

Not sure how you're sending these patches, but for future reference
`git send-email` is usually preferred.

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Lee Jones [???]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog