From: Chris Siebenmann <cks@cs.toronto.edu>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Stan Hu <stanhu@gmail.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, cks@cs.toronto.edu
Subject: Re: Stale data after file is renamed while another process has an open file handle
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 15:06:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180918190606.DA690322584@apps1.cs.toronto.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: bfields's message of Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:33:15 -0400. <20180918183315.GD1218@fieldses.org>
> The ctime changes whenever datat or attributes change. I'm not sure
> whether the ctime of the renamed file is expected to change. The
> ctime of the renamed-over file will change (if for no other reason
> that that it's nlink value changes from 1 to 0).
The ctime of the renamed file is usually expected (and required)
to change (at least on local filesystems). Among other things, this
is how backup programs traditionally detect renamed files during
incremental backups.
Some Linux filesystems have had problems here in the past (changing
ctime on rename is an obscure corner case), but I think all mainstream
ones work right these days.
- cks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-19 0:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-17 20:57 Stale data after file is renamed while another process has an open file handle Stan Hu
2018-09-17 21:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
2018-09-17 21:37 ` Stan Hu
2018-09-17 22:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <CAMBWrQmRtPHOFbiMsz2YAn-yQXCYjRBqq0zLJUB7snPg2MQ+tA@mail.gmail.com>
2018-09-17 22:48 ` Stan Hu
2018-09-18 17:42 ` Stan Hu
2018-09-18 18:33 ` J. Bruce Fields
2018-09-18 19:06 ` Chris Siebenmann [this message]
2018-09-18 19:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2018-09-18 18:19 ` J. Bruce Fields
2018-09-19 17:39 ` Stan Hu
2018-09-19 20:02 ` Bruce Fields
2018-09-20 0:18 ` Bruce Fields
2018-09-20 18:23 ` Stan Hu
2018-09-20 18:39 ` Bruce Fields
2018-09-24 20:34 ` Stan Hu
2018-09-25 18:56 ` Stan Hu
2018-09-25 20:34 ` Bruce Fields
2018-09-25 20:40 ` Stan Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180918190606.DA690322584@apps1.cs.toronto.edu \
--to=cks@cs.toronto.edu \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stanhu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.