All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	syzbot
	<syzbot+4684a000d5abdade83fac55b1e7d1f935ef1936e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
	syzbot <syzbot+bf89c128e05dd6c62523@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] block/loop: Serialize ioctl operations.
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 14:31:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180924123108.GD28775@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba535251-c206-6242-3e6d-a4ed825c8114@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>

On Mon 24-09-18 19:29:10, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2018/09/24 7:03, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 09:39:02PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> >> Hello, Ming Lei.
> >>
> >> I'd like to hear your comment on this patch regarding the ordering of
> >> stopping kernel thread.
> >>
> >>   > In order to enforce this strategy, this patch inversed
> >>   > loop_reread_partitions() and loop_unprepare_queue() in loop_clr_fd().
> >>   > I don't know whether it breaks something, but I don't have testcases.
> >>
> >> Until 3.19, kthread_stop(lo->lo_thread) was called before
> >> ioctl_by_bdev(bdev, BLKRRPART, 0) is called.
> >> During 4.0 to 4.3, the loop module was using "kloopd" workqueue.
> >> But since 4.4, loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev) is called before
> >> loop_unprepare_queue(lo) is called. And this patch is trying to change to
> >> call loop_unprepare_queue() before loop_reread_partitions() is called.
> >> Is there some reason we need to preserve current ordering?
> > 
> > IMO, both the two orders are fine, and what matters is that 'lo->lo_state'
> > is updated before loop_reread_partitions(), then any IO from loop_reread_partitions
> > will be failed, so it shouldn't be a big deal wrt. the order between
> > loop_reread_partitions() and loop_unprepare_queue().
> 
> OK. Thank you. Here is v4 patch (only changelog was updated).
> Andrew, can we test this patch in the -mm tree?
> 
> From 2278250ac8c5b912f7eb7af55e36ed40e2f7116b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 18:58:37 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH v4] block/loop: Serialize ioctl operations.
> 
> syzbot is reporting NULL pointer dereference [1] which is caused by
> race condition between ioctl(loop_fd, LOOP_CLR_FD, 0) versus
> ioctl(other_loop_fd, LOOP_SET_FD, loop_fd) due to traversing other
> loop devices without holding corresponding locks.
> 
> syzbot is also reporting circular locking dependency between bdev->bd_mutex
> and lo->lo_ctl_mutex [2] which is caused by calling blkdev_reread_part()
> with lock held.

Thanks for looking into the loop crashes Tetsuo. I was looking into the
loop code and trying to understand how your patch fixes them but I've
failed. Can you please elaborate a bit on how exactly LOOP_CLR_FD and
LOOP_SET_FD race to hit NULL pointer dereference? I don't really see the
code traversing other loop devices as you mention in your changelog so I'm
probably missing something. Thanks.

								Honza

> 
> Since ioctl() request on loop devices is not frequent operation, we don't
> need fine grained locking. Let's use global lock and simplify the locking
> order.
> 
> Strategy is that the global lock is held upon entry of ioctl() request,
> and release it before either starting operations which might deadlock or
> leaving ioctl() request. After the global lock is released, current thread
> no longer uses "struct loop_device" memory because it might be modified
> by next ioctl() request which was waiting for current ioctl() request.
> 
> In order to enforce this strategy, this patch inverted
> loop_reread_partitions() and loop_unprepare_queue() in loop_clr_fd().
> According to Ming Lei, calling loop_unprepare_queue() before
> loop_reread_partitions() (like we did until 3.19) is fine.
> 
> Since this patch serializes using global lock, race bugs should no longer
> exist. Thus, it will be easy to test whether this patch broke something.
> Since syzbot is reporting various bugs [3] where a race in the loop module
> is suspected, let's check whether this patch affects these bugs too.
> 
> [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=f3cfe26e785d85f9ee259f385515291d21bd80a3
> [2] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=bf154052f0eea4bc7712499e4569505907d15889
> [3] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=b3c7e1440aa8ece16bf557dbac427fdff1dad9d6
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+bf89c128e05dd6c62523@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
> Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+4684a000d5abdade83fac55b1e7d1f935ef1936e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> ---
>  drivers/block/loop.c | 231 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  drivers/block/loop.h |   1 -
>  2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index ea9debf..a7058ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -83,11 +83,50 @@
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>  
>  static DEFINE_IDR(loop_index_idr);
> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(loop_index_mutex);
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(loop_mutex);
> +static void *loop_mutex_owner; /* == __mutex_owner(&loop_mutex) */
>  
>  static int max_part;
>  static int part_shift;
>  
> +/*
> + * lock_loop - Lock loop_mutex.
> + */
> +static void lock_loop(void)
> +{
> +	mutex_lock(&loop_mutex);
> +	loop_mutex_owner = current;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * lock_loop_killable - Lock loop_mutex unless killed.
> + */
> +static int lock_loop_killable(void)
> +{
> +	int err = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_mutex);
> +
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +	loop_mutex_owner = current;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * unlock_loop - Unlock loop_mutex as needed.
> + *
> + * Explicitly call this function before calling fput() or blkdev_reread_part()
> + * in order to avoid circular lock dependency. After this function is called,
> + * current thread is no longer allowed to access "struct loop_device" memory,
> + * for another thread would access that memory as soon as loop_mutex is held.
> + */
> +static void unlock_loop(void)
> +{
> +	if (loop_mutex_owner == current) {
> +		loop_mutex_owner = NULL;
> +		mutex_unlock(&loop_mutex);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static int transfer_xor(struct loop_device *lo, int cmd,
>  			struct page *raw_page, unsigned raw_off,
>  			struct page *loop_page, unsigned loop_off,
> @@ -630,7 +669,12 @@ static void loop_reread_partitions(struct loop_device *lo,
>  				   struct block_device *bdev)
>  {
>  	int rc;
> +	/* Save variables which might change after unlock_loop() is called. */
> +	char filename[sizeof(lo->lo_file_name)];
> +	const int num = lo->lo_number;
>  
> +	memmove(filename, lo->lo_file_name, sizeof(filename));
> +	unlock_loop();
>  	/*
>  	 * bd_mutex has been held already in release path, so don't
>  	 * acquire it if this function is called in such case.
> @@ -645,7 +689,7 @@ static void loop_reread_partitions(struct loop_device *lo,
>  		rc = blkdev_reread_part(bdev);
>  	if (rc)
>  		pr_warn("%s: partition scan of loop%d (%s) failed (rc=%d)\n",
> -			__func__, lo->lo_number, lo->lo_file_name, rc);
> +			__func__, num, filename, rc);
>  }
>  
>  static inline int is_loop_device(struct file *file)
> @@ -692,6 +736,7 @@ static int loop_change_fd(struct loop_device *lo, struct block_device *bdev,
>  	struct file	*file, *old_file;
>  	int		error;
>  
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
>  	error = -ENXIO;
>  	if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
>  		goto out;
> @@ -728,12 +773,14 @@ static int loop_change_fd(struct loop_device *lo, struct block_device *bdev,
>  	loop_update_dio(lo);
>  	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
>  
> -	fput(old_file);
>  	if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN)
> -		loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev);
> +		loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev); /* calls unlock_loop() */
> +	unlock_loop();
> +	fput(old_file);
>  	return 0;
>  
>   out_putf:
> +	unlock_loop();
>  	fput(file);
>   out:
>  	return error;
> @@ -911,6 +958,7 @@ static int loop_set_fd(struct loop_device *lo, fmode_t mode,
>  	int		error;
>  	loff_t		size;
>  
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
>  	/* This is safe, since we have a reference from open(). */
>  	__module_get(THIS_MODULE);
>  
> @@ -969,19 +1017,21 @@ static int loop_set_fd(struct loop_device *lo, fmode_t mode,
>  	set_blocksize(bdev, S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode) ?
>  		      block_size(inode->i_bdev) : PAGE_SIZE);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Grab the block_device to prevent its destruction after we
> +	 * put /dev/loopXX inode. Later in loop_clr_fd() we bdput(bdev).
> +	 */
> +	bdgrab(bdev);
> +
>  	lo->lo_state = Lo_bound;
>  	if (part_shift)
>  		lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN;
>  	if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN)
> -		loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev);
> -
> -	/* Grab the block_device to prevent its destruction after we
> -	 * put /dev/loopXX inode. Later in loop_clr_fd() we bdput(bdev).
> -	 */
> -	bdgrab(bdev);
> +		loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev); /* calls unlock_loop() */
>  	return 0;
>  
>   out_putf:
> +	unlock_loop();
>  	fput(file);
>   out:
>  	/* This is safe: open() is still holding a reference. */
> @@ -1031,7 +1081,9 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
>  	struct file *filp = lo->lo_backing_file;
>  	gfp_t gfp = lo->old_gfp_mask;
>  	struct block_device *bdev = lo->lo_device;
> +	bool reread;
>  
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
>  	if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
>  		return -ENXIO;
>  
> @@ -1047,7 +1099,6 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
>  	 */
>  	if (atomic_read(&lo->lo_refcnt) > 1) {
>  		lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR;
> -		mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1093,20 +1144,14 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
>  	/* This is safe: open() is still holding a reference. */
>  	module_put(THIS_MODULE);
>  	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
> -
> -	if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN && bdev)
> -		loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev);
> +	reread = (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN) && bdev;
>  	lo->lo_flags = 0;
>  	if (!part_shift)
>  		lo->lo_disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
>  	loop_unprepare_queue(lo);
> -	mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> -	/*
> -	 * Need not hold lo_ctl_mutex to fput backing file.
> -	 * Calling fput holding lo_ctl_mutex triggers a circular
> -	 * lock dependency possibility warning as fput can take
> -	 * bd_mutex which is usually taken before lo_ctl_mutex.
> -	 */
> +	if (reread)
> +		loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev); /* calls unlock_loop() */
> +	unlock_loop();
>  	fput(filp);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1196,7 +1241,7 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
>  	     !(lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN)) {
>  		lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN;
>  		lo->lo_disk->flags &= ~GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
> -		loop_reread_partitions(lo, lo->lo_device);
> +		loop_reread_partitions(lo, lo->lo_device); /* calls unlock_loop() */
>  	}
>  
>  	return err;
> @@ -1205,14 +1250,13 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
>  static int
>  loop_get_status(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_info64 *info)
>  {
> -	struct file *file;
> +	struct path path;
>  	struct kstat stat;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
> +	if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
>  		return -ENXIO;
> -	}
>  
>  	memset(info, 0, sizeof(*info));
>  	info->lo_number = lo->lo_number;
> @@ -1229,17 +1273,17 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
>  		       lo->lo_encrypt_key_size);
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Drop lo_ctl_mutex while we call into the filesystem. */
> -	file = get_file(lo->lo_backing_file);
> -	mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> -	ret = vfs_getattr(&file->f_path, &stat, STATX_INO,
> -			  AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT);
> +	/* Drop loop_mutex while we call into the filesystem. */
> +	path = lo->lo_backing_file->f_path;
> +	path_get(&path);
> +	unlock_loop();
> +	ret = vfs_getattr(&path, &stat, STATX_INO, AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT);
>  	if (!ret) {
>  		info->lo_device = huge_encode_dev(stat.dev);
>  		info->lo_inode = stat.ino;
>  		info->lo_rdevice = huge_encode_dev(stat.rdev);
>  	}
> -	fput(file);
> +	path_put(&path);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1301,6 +1345,7 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
>  	struct loop_info info;
>  	struct loop_info64 info64;
>  
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
>  	if (copy_from_user(&info, arg, sizeof (struct loop_info)))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  	loop_info64_from_old(&info, &info64);
> @@ -1312,6 +1357,7 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
>  {
>  	struct loop_info64 info64;
>  
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
>  	if (copy_from_user(&info64, arg, sizeof (struct loop_info64)))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  	return loop_set_status(lo, &info64);
> @@ -1323,10 +1369,8 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
>  	struct loop_info64 info64;
>  	int err;
>  
> -	if (!arg) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +	if (!arg)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
>  	err = loop_get_status(lo, &info64);
>  	if (!err)
>  		err = loop_info64_to_old(&info64, &info);
> @@ -1341,10 +1385,8 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
>  	struct loop_info64 info64;
>  	int err;
>  
> -	if (!arg) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +	if (!arg)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
>  	err = loop_get_status(lo, &info64);
>  	if (!err && copy_to_user(arg, &info64, sizeof(info64)))
>  		err = -EFAULT;
> @@ -1354,6 +1396,7 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
>  
>  static int loop_set_capacity(struct loop_device *lo)
>  {
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
>  	if (unlikely(lo->lo_state != Lo_bound))
>  		return -ENXIO;
>  
> @@ -1363,6 +1406,8 @@ static int loop_set_capacity(struct loop_device *lo)
>  static int loop_set_dio(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned long arg)
>  {
>  	int error = -ENXIO;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
>  	if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
>  		goto out;
>  
> @@ -1376,6 +1421,7 @@ static int loop_set_dio(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned long arg)
>  
>  static int loop_set_block_size(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned long arg)
>  {
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
>  	if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
>  		return -ENXIO;
>  
> @@ -1398,12 +1444,10 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>  	unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>  {
>  	struct loop_device *lo = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
> -	int err;
> +	int err = lock_loop_killable();
>  
> -	err = mutex_lock_killable_nested(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex, 1);
>  	if (err)
> -		goto out_unlocked;
> -
> +		return err;
>  	switch (cmd) {
>  	case LOOP_SET_FD:
>  		err = loop_set_fd(lo, mode, bdev, arg);
> @@ -1412,10 +1456,7 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>  		err = loop_change_fd(lo, bdev, arg);
>  		break;
>  	case LOOP_CLR_FD:
> -		/* loop_clr_fd would have unlocked lo_ctl_mutex on success */
>  		err = loop_clr_fd(lo);
> -		if (!err)
> -			goto out_unlocked;
>  		break;
>  	case LOOP_SET_STATUS:
>  		err = -EPERM;
> @@ -1425,8 +1466,7 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>  		break;
>  	case LOOP_GET_STATUS:
>  		err = loop_get_status_old(lo, (struct loop_info __user *) arg);
> -		/* loop_get_status() unlocks lo_ctl_mutex */
> -		goto out_unlocked;
> +		break;
>  	case LOOP_SET_STATUS64:
>  		err = -EPERM;
>  		if ((mode & FMODE_WRITE) || capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> @@ -1435,8 +1475,7 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>  		break;
>  	case LOOP_GET_STATUS64:
>  		err = loop_get_status64(lo, (struct loop_info64 __user *) arg);
> -		/* loop_get_status() unlocks lo_ctl_mutex */
> -		goto out_unlocked;
> +		break;
>  	case LOOP_SET_CAPACITY:
>  		err = -EPERM;
>  		if ((mode & FMODE_WRITE) || capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> @@ -1455,9 +1494,7 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>  	default:
>  		err = lo->ioctl ? lo->ioctl(lo, cmd, arg) : -EINVAL;
>  	}
> -	mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> -
> -out_unlocked:
> +	unlock_loop();
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1558,6 +1595,7 @@ struct compat_loop_info {
>  	struct loop_info64 info64;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
>  	ret = loop_info64_from_compat(arg, &info64);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
> @@ -1571,10 +1609,9 @@ struct compat_loop_info {
>  	struct loop_info64 info64;
>  	int err;
>  
> -	if (!arg) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
> +	if (!arg)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
>  	err = loop_get_status(lo, &info64);
>  	if (!err)
>  		err = loop_info64_to_compat(&info64, arg);
> @@ -1589,20 +1626,16 @@ static int lo_compat_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>  
>  	switch(cmd) {
>  	case LOOP_SET_STATUS:
> -		err = mutex_lock_killable(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> -		if (!err) {
> +		err = lock_loop_killable();
> +		if (!err)
>  			err = loop_set_status_compat(lo,
>  						     (const struct compat_loop_info __user *)arg);
> -			mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> -		}
>  		break;
>  	case LOOP_GET_STATUS:
> -		err = mutex_lock_killable(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> -		if (!err) {
> +		err = lock_loop_killable();
> +		if (!err)
>  			err = loop_get_status_compat(lo,
>  						     (struct compat_loop_info __user *)arg);
> -			/* loop_get_status() unlocks lo_ctl_mutex */
> -		}
>  		break;
>  	case LOOP_SET_CAPACITY:
>  	case LOOP_CLR_FD:
> @@ -1619,6 +1652,7 @@ static int lo_compat_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>  		err = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
>  		break;
>  	}
> +	unlock_loop();
>  	return err;
>  }
>  #endif
> @@ -1626,37 +1660,30 @@ static int lo_compat_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>  static int lo_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
>  {
>  	struct loop_device *lo;
> -	int err = 0;
> +	int err = lock_loop_killable();
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
>  	lo = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
> -	if (!lo) {
> +	if (!lo)
>  		err = -ENXIO;
> -		goto out;
> -	}
> -
> -	atomic_inc(&lo->lo_refcnt);
> -out:
> -	mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
> +	else
> +		atomic_inc(&lo->lo_refcnt);
> +	unlock_loop();
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
>  static void __lo_release(struct loop_device *lo)
>  {
> -	int err;
> -
>  	if (atomic_dec_return(&lo->lo_refcnt))
>  		return;
> -
> -	mutex_lock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
>  	if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR) {
>  		/*
>  		 * In autoclear mode, stop the loop thread
>  		 * and remove configuration after last close.
>  		 */
> -		err = loop_clr_fd(lo);
> -		if (!err)
> -			return;
> +		loop_clr_fd(lo);
>  	} else if (lo->lo_state == Lo_bound) {
>  		/*
>  		 * Otherwise keep thread (if running) and config,
> @@ -1665,15 +1692,13 @@ static void __lo_release(struct loop_device *lo)
>  		blk_mq_freeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
>  		blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
>  	}
> -
> -	mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
>  }
>  
>  static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
>  {
> -	mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
> +	lock_loop();
>  	__lo_release(disk->private_data);
> -	mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
> +	unlock_loop();
>  }
>  
>  static const struct block_device_operations lo_fops = {
> @@ -1712,10 +1737,8 @@ static int unregister_transfer_cb(int id, void *ptr, void *data)
>  	struct loop_device *lo = ptr;
>  	struct loop_func_table *xfer = data;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
>  	if (lo->lo_encryption == xfer)
>  		loop_release_xfer(lo);
> -	mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1727,8 +1750,14 @@ int loop_unregister_transfer(int number)
>  	if (n == 0 || n >= MAX_LO_CRYPT || (xfer = xfer_funcs[n]) == NULL)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * cleanup_cryptoloop() cannot handle errors because it is called
> +	 * from module_exit(). Thus, don't give up upon SIGKILL here.
> +	 */
> +	lock_loop();
>  	xfer_funcs[n] = NULL;
>  	idr_for_each(&loop_index_idr, &unregister_transfer_cb, xfer);
> +	unlock_loop();
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1896,7 +1925,6 @@ static int loop_add(struct loop_device **l, int i)
>  	if (!part_shift)
>  		disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
>  	disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_EXT_DEVT;
> -	mutex_init(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
>  	atomic_set(&lo->lo_refcnt, 0);
>  	lo->lo_number		= i;
>  	spin_lock_init(&lo->lo_lock);
> @@ -1972,20 +2000,19 @@ static int loop_lookup(struct loop_device **l, int i)
>  static struct kobject *loop_probe(dev_t dev, int *part, void *data)
>  {
>  	struct loop_device *lo;
> -	struct kobject *kobj;
> -	int err;
> +	struct kobject *kobj = NULL;
> +	int err = lock_loop_killable();
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
> +	*part = 0;
> +	if (err)
> +		return NULL;
>  	err = loop_lookup(&lo, MINOR(dev) >> part_shift);
>  	if (err < 0)
>  		err = loop_add(&lo, MINOR(dev) >> part_shift);
> -	if (err < 0)
> -		kobj = NULL;
> -	else
> +	if (err >= 0)
>  		kobj = get_disk_and_module(lo->lo_disk);
> -	mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
> +	unlock_loop();
>  
> -	*part = 0;
>  	return kobj;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1993,9 +2020,11 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>  			       unsigned long parm)
>  {
>  	struct loop_device *lo;
> -	int ret = -ENOSYS;
> +	int ret = lock_loop_killable();
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +	ret = -ENOSYS;
>  	switch (cmd) {
>  	case LOOP_CTL_ADD:
>  		ret = loop_lookup(&lo, parm);
> @@ -2009,21 +2038,17 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>  		ret = loop_lookup(&lo, parm);
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			break;
> -		ret = mutex_lock_killable(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
>  		if (ret)
>  			break;
>  		if (lo->lo_state != Lo_unbound) {
>  			ret = -EBUSY;
> -			mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
>  			break;
>  		}
>  		if (atomic_read(&lo->lo_refcnt) > 0) {
>  			ret = -EBUSY;
> -			mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
>  			break;
>  		}
>  		lo->lo_disk->private_data = NULL;
> -		mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
>  		idr_remove(&loop_index_idr, lo->lo_number);
>  		loop_remove(lo);
>  		break;
> @@ -2033,7 +2058,7 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>  			break;
>  		ret = loop_add(&lo, -1);
>  	}
> -	mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
> +	unlock_loop();
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -2117,10 +2142,10 @@ static int __init loop_init(void)
>  				  THIS_MODULE, loop_probe, NULL, NULL);
>  
>  	/* pre-create number of devices given by config or max_loop */
> -	mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
> +	lock_loop();
>  	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
>  		loop_add(&lo, i);
> -	mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
> +	unlock_loop();
>  
>  	printk(KERN_INFO "loop: module loaded\n");
>  	return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.h b/drivers/block/loop.h
> index 4d42c7a..af75a5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.h
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.h
> @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ struct loop_device {
>  
>  	spinlock_t		lo_lock;
>  	int			lo_state;
> -	struct mutex		lo_ctl_mutex;
>  	struct kthread_worker	worker;
>  	struct task_struct	*worker_task;
>  	bool			use_dio;
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-24 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-15 10:58 [PATCH v3 (resend)] block/loop: Serialize ioctl operations Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-15 10:58 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-22 12:39 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-22 12:39   ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-23 22:03   ` Ming Lei
2018-09-23 22:03     ` Ming Lei
2018-09-24 10:29     ` [PATCH v4] " Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-24 10:29       ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-24 12:31       ` Jan Kara [this message]
2018-09-24 12:31         ` Jan Kara
2018-09-24 13:05         ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-24 13:05           ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-24 16:31           ` Jan Kara
2018-09-24 16:31             ` Jan Kara
2018-09-24 18:47       ` Jan Kara
2018-09-24 18:47         ` Jan Kara
2018-09-24 21:06         ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-24 21:06           ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-25  8:06           ` Jan Kara
2018-09-25  8:06             ` Jan Kara
2018-09-25  9:57             ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-25  9:57               ` Tetsuo Handa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180924123108.GD28775@quack2.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=syzbot+4684a000d5abdade83fac55b1e7d1f935ef1936e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzbot+bf89c128e05dd6c62523@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.