All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	x86@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
	bhelgaas@google.com, baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com,
	tiwai@suse.de, bp@suse.de, brijesh.singh@amd.com,
	dyoung@redhat.com, bhe@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v3] resource: fix an error which walks through iomem resources
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:52:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180924175241.GO224714@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180921073211.20097-2-lijiang@redhat.com>

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 03:32:09PM +0800, Lianbo Jiang wrote:
> When we walk through iomem resources by calling walk_iomem_res_desc(),
> the values of the function parameter may be modified in the while loop
> of __walk_iomem_res_desc(), which will cause us to not get the desired
> result in some cases.

If I understand correctly, the issue is caused by the interaction
between __walk_iomem_res_desc() and find_next_iomem_res() in this
path:

  __walk_iomem_res_desc
    find_next_iomem_res
      res->flags = p->flags;            # <-- problem

This path is used by the following interfaces, and I think your patch
would fix the issue for them:

  walk_iomem_res_desc()
  walk_system_ram_res()
  walk_mem_res()

However, find_next_iomem_res() is also used directly by
walk_system_ram_range().  I think that path has the same problem, and
your patch does not fix that path.

I have a few more comments related to the existing code that I'll post
soon.

> At present, it only restores the original value of res->end, but it
> doesn't restore the original value of res->flags in the while loop of
> __walk_iomem _res_desc(). Whenever the find_next_iomem_res() finds a
> resource and returns the result, the original values of this resource
> will be modified, which might lead to an error in the next loop. For
> example:
> 
> The original value of resource flags is:
>  res->flags=0x80000200(initial value)
> 
> p->flags   _ 0x81000200 _                _ 0x80000200 _
>           /              \              /              \
> |________|_______A________|____|_....._|______B_________|..........___|
> 0                                                            0xffffffff
>                 (memory address ranges)
> 
> Note: if ((p->flags & res->flags) != res->flags) continue;
> 
> When the resource A is found, the original value of this resource flags
> will be changed to 0x81000200(res->flags=0x81000200), and continue to
> look for the next resource, when the loop reaches resource B, it can not
> get the resource B any more(you can refer to the for loop of find_next
> _iomem_res()), because the value of conditional expression will become
> true and will also jump the resource B.
> 
> In fact, we should get the resource A and B when we walk through the
> whole tree, but it only gets the resource A, the resource B is missed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@redhat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/resource.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
> index 30e1bc68503b..f5d9fc70a04c 100644
> --- a/kernel/resource.c
> +++ b/kernel/resource.c
> @@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(struct resource *res, unsigned long desc,
>  				 int (*func)(struct resource *, void *))
>  {
>  	u64 orig_end = res->end;
> +	u64 orig_flags = res->flags;
>  	int ret = -1;
>  
>  	while ((res->start < res->end) &&
> @@ -385,6 +386,7 @@ static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(struct resource *res, unsigned long desc,
>  
>  		res->start = res->end + 1;
>  		res->end = orig_end;
> +		res->flags = orig_flags;
>  	}
>  
>  	return ret;

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@redhat.com>
Cc: thomas.lendacky@amd.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com, bhe@redhat.com,
	tiwai@suse.de, x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	bhelgaas@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@suse.de,
	dyoung@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v3] resource: fix an error which walks through iomem resources
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:52:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180924175241.GO224714@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180921073211.20097-2-lijiang@redhat.com>

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 03:32:09PM +0800, Lianbo Jiang wrote:
> When we walk through iomem resources by calling walk_iomem_res_desc(),
> the values of the function parameter may be modified in the while loop
> of __walk_iomem_res_desc(), which will cause us to not get the desired
> result in some cases.

If I understand correctly, the issue is caused by the interaction
between __walk_iomem_res_desc() and find_next_iomem_res() in this
path:

  __walk_iomem_res_desc
    find_next_iomem_res
      res->flags = p->flags;            # <-- problem

This path is used by the following interfaces, and I think your patch
would fix the issue for them:

  walk_iomem_res_desc()
  walk_system_ram_res()
  walk_mem_res()

However, find_next_iomem_res() is also used directly by
walk_system_ram_range().  I think that path has the same problem, and
your patch does not fix that path.

I have a few more comments related to the existing code that I'll post
soon.

> At present, it only restores the original value of res->end, but it
> doesn't restore the original value of res->flags in the while loop of
> __walk_iomem _res_desc(). Whenever the find_next_iomem_res() finds a
> resource and returns the result, the original values of this resource
> will be modified, which might lead to an error in the next loop. For
> example:
> 
> The original value of resource flags is:
>  res->flags=0x80000200(initial value)
> 
> p->flags   _ 0x81000200 _                _ 0x80000200 _
>           /              \              /              \
> |________|_______A________|____|_....._|______B_________|..........___|
> 0                                                            0xffffffff
>                 (memory address ranges)
> 
> Note: if ((p->flags & res->flags) != res->flags) continue;
> 
> When the resource A is found, the original value of this resource flags
> will be changed to 0x81000200(res->flags=0x81000200), and continue to
> look for the next resource, when the loop reaches resource B, it can not
> get the resource B any more(you can refer to the for loop of find_next
> _iomem_res()), because the value of conditional expression will become
> true and will also jump the resource B.
> 
> In fact, we should get the resource A and B when we walk through the
> whole tree, but it only gets the resource A, the resource B is missed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@redhat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/resource.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
> index 30e1bc68503b..f5d9fc70a04c 100644
> --- a/kernel/resource.c
> +++ b/kernel/resource.c
> @@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(struct resource *res, unsigned long desc,
>  				 int (*func)(struct resource *, void *))
>  {
>  	u64 orig_end = res->end;
> +	u64 orig_flags = res->flags;
>  	int ret = -1;
>  
>  	while ((res->start < res->end) &&
> @@ -385,6 +386,7 @@ static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(struct resource *res, unsigned long desc,
>  
>  		res->start = res->end + 1;
>  		res->end = orig_end;
> +		res->flags = orig_flags;
>  	}
>  
>  	return ret;

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-24 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-21  7:32 [PATCH 0/3 v3] add reserved e820 ranges to the kdump kernel e820 table Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-21  7:32 ` Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-21  7:32 ` [PATCH 1/3 v3] resource: fix an error which walks through iomem resources Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-21  7:32   ` Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-24 17:52   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2018-09-24 17:52     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-25  7:08     ` lijiang
2018-09-25  7:08       ` lijiang
2018-09-24 22:14   ` [PATCH 0/3] find_next_iomem_res() fixes Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:14     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:14     ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/kexec: Correct KEXEC_BACKUP_SRC_END off-by-one error Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:14       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:14     ` [PATCH 2/3] resource: Include resource end in walk_*() interfaces Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:14       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:15     ` [PATCH 3/3] resource: Fix find_next_iomem_res() iteration issue Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:15       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-25  8:58       ` Baoquan He
2018-09-25  8:58         ` Baoquan He
2018-09-25 11:20         ` Baoquan He
2018-09-25 11:20           ` Baoquan He
2018-09-27  5:27       ` lijiang
2018-09-27  5:27         ` lijiang
2018-09-27 14:03         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-27 14:03           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-28  5:09           ` lijiang
2018-09-28  5:09             ` lijiang
2018-09-28 13:10           ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-28 13:10             ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-26  9:22     ` [PATCH 0/3] find_next_iomem_res() fixes lijiang
2018-09-26  9:22       ` lijiang
2018-09-26 13:36       ` lijiang
2018-09-26 13:36         ` lijiang
2018-09-21  7:32 ` [PATCH 2/3 v3] x86/kexec_file: add e820 entry in case e820 type string matches to io resource name Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-21  7:32   ` Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-21  7:32 ` [PATCH 3/3 v3] x86/kexec_file: add reserved e820 ranges to kdump kernel e820 table Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-21  7:32   ` Lianbo Jiang
2018-10-16  2:56 ` [PATCH 0/3 v3] add reserved e820 ranges to the " Dave Young
2018-10-16  2:56   ` Dave Young
2018-10-16  3:45   ` lijiang
2018-10-16  3:45     ` lijiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180924175241.GO224714@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lijiang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.