All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	chris@zankel.net, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	green.hu@gmail.com, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	gxt@pku.edu.cn, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	jejb@parisc-linux.org, jonas@southpole.se,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	lftan@altera.com, msalter@redhat.com,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	mattst88@gmail.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	monstr@monstr.eu, palmer@sifive.com, paul.burton@mips.com,
	rkuo@codeaurora.org, richard@nod.at, dalias@libc.org,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	fancer.lancer@gmail.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	vgupta@synopsys.com, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org, nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/30] mm: remove CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 18:31:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180926183152.GA4597@rapoport-lnx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UdP=78RsWHMxFu4PD8a3AhA3eNcG68Z_9aGY0vhOKf7xA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 09:58:41AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:11 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > All architecures use memblock for early memory management. There is no need
> > for the CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK configuration option.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > index 5169205..4ae91fc 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
> >  #define _LINUX_MEMBLOCK_H
> >  #ifdef __KERNEL__
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
> >  /*
> >   * Logical memory blocks.
> >   *
> > @@ -460,7 +459,6 @@ static inline phys_addr_t memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align)
> >  {
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK */
> >
> >  #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> 
> There was an #else above this section and I believe it and the code
> after it needs to be stripped as well.

Right, I've already sent the fix [1] and it's in mmots.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/9/19/416

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	chris@zankel.net, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	green.hu@gmail.com, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	gxt@pku.edu.cn, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	jejb@parisc-linux.org, jonas@southpole.se,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	lftan@altera.com, msalter@redhat.com,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	mattst88@gmail.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	monstr@monstr.eu, palmer@sifive.com, paul.burton@mips.com,
	rkuo@codeaurora.org, richard@nod.at, dalias@libc.org,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	fancer.lancer@gmail.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/30] mm: remove CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:31:53 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180926183152.GA4597@rapoport-lnx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UdP=78RsWHMxFu4PD8a3AhA3eNcG68Z_9aGY0vhOKf7xA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 09:58:41AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:11 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > All architecures use memblock for early memory management. There is no need
> > for the CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK configuration option.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > index 5169205..4ae91fc 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
> >  #define _LINUX_MEMBLOCK_H
> >  #ifdef __KERNEL__
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
> >  /*
> >   * Logical memory blocks.
> >   *
> > @@ -460,7 +459,6 @@ static inline phys_addr_t memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align)
> >  {
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK */
> >
> >  #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> 
> There was an #else above this section and I believe it and the code
> after it needs to be stripped as well.

Right, I've already sent the fix [1] and it's in mmots.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/9/19/416

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	chris@zankel.net, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	green.hu@gmail.com, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	gxt@pku.edu.cn, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	jejb@parisc-linux.org, jonas@southpole.se,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	lftan@altera.com, msalter@redhat.com,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	mattst88@gmail.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	monstr@monstr.eu, palmer@sifive.com, paul.burton@mips.com,
	rkuo@codeaurora.org, richard@nod.at, dalias@libc.org,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	fancer.lancer@gmail.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	vgupta@synopsys.com, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" 
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org, nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/30] mm: remove CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:31:53 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180926183152.GA4597@rapoport-lnx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UdP=78RsWHMxFu4PD8a3AhA3eNcG68Z_9aGY0vhOKf7xA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 09:58:41AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:11 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > All architecures use memblock for early memory management. There is no need
> > for the CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK configuration option.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > index 5169205..4ae91fc 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
> >  #define _LINUX_MEMBLOCK_H
> >  #ifdef __KERNEL__
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
> >  /*
> >   * Logical memory blocks.
> >   *
> > @@ -460,7 +459,6 @@ static inline phys_addr_t memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align)
> >  {
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK */
> >
> >  #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> 
> There was an #else above this section and I believe it and the code
> after it needs to be stripped as well.

Right, I've already sent the fix [1] and it's in mmots.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/9/19/416

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	chris@zankel.net, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	green.hu@gmail.com, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	gxt@pku.edu.cn, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	jejb@parisc-linux.org, jonas@southpole.se,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	lftan@altera.com, msalter@redhat.com,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	mattst88@gmail.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	monstr@monstr.eu, palmer@sifive.com, paul.burton@mips.com,
	rkuo@codeaurora.org, richard@nod.at, dalias@libc.org,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	fancer.lancer@gmail.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	vgupta@synopsys.com, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org, nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/30] mm: remove CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:31:53 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180926183152.GA4597@rapoport-lnx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UdP=78RsWHMxFu4PD8a3AhA3eNcG68Z_9aGY0vhOKf7xA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 09:58:41AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:11 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > All architecures use memblock for early memory management. There is no need
> > for the CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK configuration option.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > index 5169205..4ae91fc 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
> >  #define _LINUX_MEMBLOCK_H
> >  #ifdef __KERNEL__
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
> >  /*
> >   * Logical memory blocks.
> >   *
> > @@ -460,7 +459,6 @@ static inline phys_addr_t memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align)
> >  {
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK */
> >
> >  #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> 
> There was an #else above this section and I believe it and the code
> after it needs to be stripped as well.

Right, I've already sent the fix [1] and it's in mmots.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/9/19/416

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Mike Rapoport)
To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/30] mm: remove CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:31:53 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180926183152.GA4597@rapoport-lnx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UdP=78RsWHMxFu4PD8a3AhA3eNcG68Z_9aGY0vhOKf7xA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 09:58:41AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:11 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > All architecures use memblock for early memory management. There is no need
> > for the CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK configuration option.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > index 5169205..4ae91fc 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
> >  #define _LINUX_MEMBLOCK_H
> >  #ifdef __KERNEL__
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
> >  /*
> >   * Logical memory blocks.
> >   *
> > @@ -460,7 +459,6 @@ static inline phys_addr_t memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align)
> >  {
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK */
> >
> >  #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> 
> There was an #else above this section and I believe it and the code
> after it needs to be stripped as well.

Right, I've already sent the fix [1] and it's in mmots.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/9/19/416

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	palmer@sifive.com,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	dalias@libc.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	jonas@southpole.se, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, jejb@parisc-linux.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	msalter@redhat.com, mattst88@gmail.com,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org,
	green.hu@gmail.com, nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	gxt@pku.edu.cn, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	chris@zankel.net, monstr@monstr.eu,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	fancer.lancer@gmail.com, rkuo@codeaurora.org,
	paul.burton@mips.com, vgupta@synopsys.com, richard@nod.at,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	lftan@altera.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC \(32-BIT AND 64-BIT\)"
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/30] mm: remove CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:31:53 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180926183152.GA4597@rapoport-lnx> (raw)
Message-ID: <20180926183153.IehX2rO0idkg3g0ZGYCbrkpL-8I97zifaKjW4lJdtLs@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UdP=78RsWHMxFu4PD8a3AhA3eNcG68Z_9aGY0vhOKf7xA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 09:58:41AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:11 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > All architecures use memblock for early memory management. There is no need
> > for the CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK configuration option.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > index 5169205..4ae91fc 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
> >  #define _LINUX_MEMBLOCK_H
> >  #ifdef __KERNEL__
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
> >  /*
> >   * Logical memory blocks.
> >   *
> > @@ -460,7 +459,6 @@ static inline phys_addr_t memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align)
> >  {
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK */
> >
> >  #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> 
> There was an #else above this section and I believe it and the code
> after it needs to be stripped as well.

Right, I've already sent the fix [1] and it's in mmots.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/9/19/416

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Mike Rapoport)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/30] mm: remove CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:31:53 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180926183152.GA4597@rapoport-lnx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UdP=78RsWHMxFu4PD8a3AhA3eNcG68Z_9aGY0vhOKf7xA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018@09:58:41AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018@5:11 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > All architecures use memblock for early memory management. There is no need
> > for the CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK configuration option.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > index 5169205..4ae91fc 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
> >  #define _LINUX_MEMBLOCK_H
> >  #ifdef __KERNEL__
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
> >  /*
> >   * Logical memory blocks.
> >   *
> > @@ -460,7 +459,6 @@ static inline phys_addr_t memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align)
> >  {
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK */
> >
> >  #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> 
> There was an #else above this section and I believe it and the code
> after it needs to be stripped as well.

Right, I've already sent the fix [1] and it's in mmots.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/9/19/416

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
Subject: [OpenRISC] [PATCH 03/30] mm: remove CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:31:53 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180926183152.GA4597@rapoport-lnx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UdP=78RsWHMxFu4PD8a3AhA3eNcG68Z_9aGY0vhOKf7xA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 09:58:41AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:11 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > All architecures use memblock for early memory management. There is no need
> > for the CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK configuration option.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > index 5169205..4ae91fc 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
> >  #define _LINUX_MEMBLOCK_H
> >  #ifdef __KERNEL__
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
> >  /*
> >   * Logical memory blocks.
> >   *
> > @@ -460,7 +459,6 @@ static inline phys_addr_t memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align)
> >  {
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK */
> >
> >  #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> 
> There was an #else above this section and I believe it and the code
> after it needs to be stripped as well.

Right, I've already sent the fix [1] and it's in mmots.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/9/19/416

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-26 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 300+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-14 12:10 [PATCH 00/30] mm: remove bootmem allocator Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 01/30] mips: switch to NO_BOOTMEM Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 02/30] mm: remove CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26  9:22   ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:22     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:22     ` [OpenRISC] " Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:22     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:22     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:22     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:22     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:22     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26 11:48     ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 11:48       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 11:48       ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 11:48       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 11:48       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 11:48       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 11:48       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 11:48       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 03/30] mm: remove CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26  9:24   ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:24     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:24     ` [OpenRISC] " Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:24     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:24     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:24     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:24     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:24     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26 11:54     ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 11:54       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 11:54       ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 11:54       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 11:54       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 11:54       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 11:54       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 11:54       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 16:58   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-09-26 16:58     ` [OpenRISC] " Alexander Duyck
2018-09-26 16:58     ` Alexander Duyck
2018-09-26 16:58     ` Alexander Duyck
2018-09-26 16:58     ` Alexander Duyck
2018-09-26 16:58     ` Alexander Duyck
2018-09-26 16:58     ` Alexander Duyck
2018-09-26 16:58     ` Alexander Duyck
2018-09-26 18:31     ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2018-09-26 18:31       ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 18:31       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 18:31       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 18:31       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 18:31       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 18:31       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 18:31       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-27  0:34       ` Alexander Duyck
2018-09-27  0:34         ` [OpenRISC] " Alexander Duyck
2018-09-27  0:34         ` Alexander Duyck
2018-09-27  0:34         ` Alexander Duyck
2018-09-27  0:34         ` Alexander Duyck
2018-09-27  0:34         ` Alexander Duyck
2018-09-27  0:34         ` Alexander Duyck
2018-09-27  0:34         ` Alexander Duyck
2018-09-27  4:50         ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-27  4:50           ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-27  4:50           ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-27  4:50           ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-27  4:50           ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-27  4:50           ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-27  4:50           ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-27  4:50           ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 04/30] mm: remove bootmem allocator implementation Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 05/30] mm: nobootmem: remove dead code Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26  9:25   ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:25     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:25     ` [OpenRISC] " Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:25     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:25     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:25     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:25     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:25     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 06/30] memblock: rename memblock_alloc{_nid, _try_nid} to memblock_phys_alloc* Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [PATCH 06/30] memblock: rename memblock_alloc{_nid,_try_nid} " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 07/30] memblock: remove _virt from APIs returning virtual address Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26  9:27   ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:27     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:27     ` [OpenRISC] " Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:27     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:27     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:27     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:27     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:27     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 08/30] memblock: replace alloc_bootmem_align with memblock_alloc Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 09/30] memblock: replace alloc_bootmem_low with memblock_alloc_low Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 10/30] memblock: replace __alloc_bootmem_node_nopanic with memblock_alloc_try_nid_nopanic Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 11/30] memblock: replace alloc_bootmem_pages_nopanic with memblock_alloc_nopanic Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 12/30] memblock: replace alloc_bootmem_low with memblock_alloc_low Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 13/30] memblock: replace __alloc_bootmem_nopanic with memblock_alloc_from_nopanic Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 14/30] memblock: add align parameter to memblock_alloc_node() Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26  9:31   ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:31     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:31     ` [OpenRISC] " Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:31     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:31     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:31     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:31     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:31     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:36     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:36       ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:36       ` [OpenRISC] " Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:36       ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:36       ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:36       ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:36       ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:36       ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26 13:43       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 13:43         ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 13:43         ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 13:43         ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 13:43         ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 13:43         ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 13:43         ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 13:43         ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26 14:23         ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26 14:23           ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26 14:23           ` [OpenRISC] " Michal Hocko
2018-09-26 14:23           ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26 14:23           ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26 14:23           ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26 14:23           ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26 14:23           ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 15/30] memblock: replace alloc_bootmem_pages_node with memblock_alloc_node Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 16/30] memblock: replace __alloc_bootmem_node with appropriate memblock_ API Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26  9:37   ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:37     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:37     ` [OpenRISC] " Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:37     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:37     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:37     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:37     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:37     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 17/30] memblock: replace alloc_bootmem_node with memblock_alloc_node Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 18/30] memblock: replace alloc_bootmem_low_pages with memblock_alloc_low Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 19/30] memblock: replace alloc_bootmem_pages with memblock_alloc Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 20/30] memblock: replace __alloc_bootmem with memblock_alloc_from Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 21/30] memblock: replace alloc_bootmem with memblock_alloc Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26  9:38   ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:38     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:38     ` [OpenRISC] " Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:38     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:38     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:38     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:38     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:38     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 22/30] mm: nobootmem: remove bootmem allocation APIs Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 23/30] memblock: replace free_bootmem{_node} with memblock_free Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 24/30] memblock: replace free_bootmem_late with memblock_free_late Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 25/30] memblock: rename free_all_bootmem to memblock_free_all Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 26/30] memblock: rename __free_pages_bootmem to memblock_free_pages Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 27/30] mm: remove nobootmem Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 28/30] memblock: replace BOOTMEM_ALLOC_* with MEMBLOCK variants Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 29/30] mm: remove include/linux/bootmem.h Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26  9:38   ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:38     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:38     ` [OpenRISC] " Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:38     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:38     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:38     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:38     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:38     ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-14 12:10 ` [PATCH 30/30] docs/boot-time-mm: remove bootmem documentation Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` [OpenRISC] " Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-14 12:10   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-26  9:41 ` [PATCH 00/30] mm: remove bootmem allocator Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:41   ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:41   ` [OpenRISC] " Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:41   ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:41   ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:41   ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:41   ` Michal Hocko
2018-09-26  9:41   ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180926183152.GA4597@rapoport-lnx \
    --to=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chris@zankel.net \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=green.hu@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gxt@pku.edu.cn \
    --cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=jonas@southpole.se \
    --cc=lftan@altera.com \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org \
    --cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org \
    --cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
    --cc=palmer@sifive.com \
    --cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=rkuo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp \
    --cc=vgupta@synopsys.com \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.