All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>,
	Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>,
	linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: [4/5] EDAC, dsm_edac: Wrap ACPI DSM methods for address translation
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:31:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181004093101.GF1864@zn.tnic> (raw)

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:22:25AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> The plan going forward is that EDAC drivers can be much smaller. They
> just need to discover memory controller and DIMM topology and register
> a handler on the mce_decode_chain.  All the work in turning system
> addresses into DIMM addresses can be handled by a call to the BIOS
> (which knows how to do this, and the people writing it have resources
> to validate on way more configurations than I can).

So this sounds like drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c which you guys did. Is
that thing being abandoned now too, for yet another thing?

And that extlog thing is under drivers/acpi/. So even if the DSM stuff
is *maybe* going to be part of the ACPI spec, I believe drivers/acpi/ is
where it should go. As in: preparing to become part of ACPI :-)

But, there's another aspect: is this DSM interface going to be used only
by EDAC or some other subsystems? (It seems so.)

Because if it is going to be used by EDAC only and EDAC drivers will
reg/unreg with it, then I guess making it part of the EDAC core, would
probably be more fitting. Something like drivers/edac/dsm.c and then you
don't have to have another module which needs to sync with the *actual*
EDAC module...

Practically, this is going to be enabled on 99.9% of the boxes so making
it part of the core is, I guess, just as well.

             reply	other threads:[~2018-10-04  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-04  9:31 Borislav Petkov [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-10-09 18:33 [4/5] EDAC, dsm_edac: Wrap ACPI DSM methods for address translation Luck, Tony
2018-10-09 18:29 Luck, Tony
2018-10-09 16:17 Borislav Petkov
2018-10-09 15:29 Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-09 15:25 Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-09 15:22 Luck, Tony
2018-10-09 15:14 Borislav Petkov
2018-10-09 11:43 Qiuxu Zhuo
2018-10-09 10:28 Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-08 16:57 Luck, Tony
2018-10-06 20:44 Borislav Petkov
2018-10-05 22:25 Luck, Tony
2018-10-03 17:58 Luck, Tony
2018-09-26 18:22 Luck, Tony
2018-09-26 17:33 Borislav Petkov
2018-09-24 20:16 Luck, Tony

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181004093101.GF1864@zn.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=aris@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@s-opensource.com \
    --cc=qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.