* [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Your build results for 2018-09-14 [not found] ` <CAGrGpJDdVmD6PkhrZJgpTJut7vdvbxhS0m5Tg2DXPJZS90Vv6g@mail.gmail.com> @ 2018-10-06 7:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2018-10-06 22:26 ` Peter Thompson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2018-10-06 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hello, On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 14:59:36 -0600, Peter Thompson wrote: > Sorry I am so slow getting back. I was on holidays most of Sept. No problem. > This problem (AFAIK) is the Buildroot configure which is failing is trying > to build both SDL and SDL2 which are two incompatible versions of the same > thing. > 881 BR2_PACKAGE_SDL=y > 904 BR2_PACKAGE_SDL2=y > > What is being attempted to be configured and built here would never work > (in my opinion). > > We could try to automate buildroot so only one or the other is selectable. > It would mean adding "depends on !BR2_PACKAGE_SDL2" and "depends on > !BR2_PACKAGE_SDL" to each of the packages Config.in. I don't see any actual error in the autobuild report at http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/552817141d7eb0c5037114a4bc7d2d76de871285 that you're replying to. Also, I believe SDL and SDL2 libraries have different names, so they can co-exist in the same system. Hence, it doesn't seem like there is a good reason to make them mutually exclusive. Could you explain what in the autobuild report above makes you think it is a SDL/SDL2 conflict ? Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Your build results for 2018-09-14 2018-10-06 7:39 ` [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Your build results for 2018-09-14 Thomas Petazzoni @ 2018-10-06 22:26 ` Peter Thompson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Peter Thompson @ 2018-10-06 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Ok, I'll take a look. On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 1:39 AM Thomas Petazzoni < thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 14:59:36 -0600, Peter Thompson wrote: > > > Sorry I am so slow getting back. I was on holidays most of Sept. > > No problem. > > > This problem (AFAIK) is the Buildroot configure which is failing is > trying > > to build both SDL and SDL2 which are two incompatible versions of the > same > > thing. > > 881 BR2_PACKAGE_SDL=y > > 904 BR2_PACKAGE_SDL2=y > > > > What is being attempted to be configured and built here would never work > > (in my opinion). > > > > We could try to automate buildroot so only one or the other is > selectable. > > It would mean adding "depends on !BR2_PACKAGE_SDL2" and "depends on > > !BR2_PACKAGE_SDL" to each of the packages Config.in. > > I don't see any actual error in the autobuild report at > > http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/552817141d7eb0c5037114a4bc7d2d76de871285 > that you're replying to. > > Also, I believe SDL and SDL2 libraries have different names, so they > can co-exist in the same system. Hence, it doesn't seem like there is a > good reason to make them mutually exclusive. > > Could you explain what in the autobuild report above makes you think it > is a SDL/SDL2 conflict ? > > Thanks, > > Thomas > -- > Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20181006/15fb5528/attachment.html> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20180915060039.36CDD207B0@mail.bootlin.com>]
[parent not found: <CALURroTZCjCkEw5-CjQDLju74tZqO2nkcPuT0KwG0UVq7YBEAA@mail.gmail.com>]
* [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Your build results for 2018-09-14 [not found] ` <CALURroTZCjCkEw5-CjQDLju74tZqO2nkcPuT0KwG0UVq7YBEAA@mail.gmail.com> @ 2018-09-18 7:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2018-09-18 7:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hello, Adding Buildroot mailing list in Cc. On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 08:57:06 -0700, Christopher McCrory wrote: > > arc | perl-data-uuid-1.221 | > > http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/c5ba7b0727131220b60a4dc78fc7491dd4f7af9e > > aarch64 | perl-data-uuid-1.221 | > > http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/5dd93ef9f5146227b8233ada260d5945aa8632d0 > > x86_64 | perl-io-socket-multicast-1.12 | > > http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/824119c86a1ddcbad39d4d4e9fe61eba20a55f3f > > I did a build with one of these configs and couldn't reproduce the error. > IIRC, There was a patch to perl to fix these. yes? > Yes, these issues were fixed by https://git.buildroot.org/buildroot/commit/package/pkg-perl.mk?id=45076af4930fda83c8898254de2d7c5fe3c15911 If you see any of those issues after commit 45076af4930fda83c8898254de2d7c5fe3c15911, then we have a separate problem that needs to be investigated. Best regards, Thomas Petazzoni -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-10-06 22:26 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <20180915060039.533E3207D4@mail.bootlin.com> [not found] ` <CAGrGpJDdVmD6PkhrZJgpTJut7vdvbxhS0m5Tg2DXPJZS90Vv6g@mail.gmail.com> 2018-10-06 7:39 ` [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Your build results for 2018-09-14 Thomas Petazzoni 2018-10-06 22:26 ` Peter Thompson [not found] <20180915060039.36CDD207B0@mail.bootlin.com> [not found] ` <CALURroTZCjCkEw5-CjQDLju74tZqO2nkcPuT0KwG0UVq7YBEAA@mail.gmail.com> 2018-09-18 7:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.