* [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] python-pycryptodomex: new package
@ 2018-09-22 19:36 Asaf Kahlon
2018-09-22 19:36 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] python-ply: " Asaf Kahlon
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Asaf Kahlon @ 2018-09-22 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Cryptographic library for Python
Signed-off-by: Asaf Kahlon <asafka7@gmail.com>
---
DEVELOPERS | 1 +
package/Config.in | 1 +
package/python-pycryptodomex/Config.in | 6 ++++++
.../python-pycryptodomex/python-pycryptodomex.hash | 5 +++++
.../python-pycryptodomex/python-pycryptodomex.mk | 14 ++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 package/python-pycryptodomex/Config.in
create mode 100644 package/python-pycryptodomex/python-pycryptodomex.hash
create mode 100644 package/python-pycryptodomex/python-pycryptodomex.mk
diff --git a/DEVELOPERS b/DEVELOPERS
index 84129553c5..4c49cc3908 100644
--- a/DEVELOPERS
+++ b/DEVELOPERS
@@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ F: package/python-fire/
F: package/python-jsonmodels/
F: package/python-paramiko/
F: package/python-pyasn1/
+F: package/python-pycryptodomex/
F: package/python-pyroute2/
F: package/python-pytz/
F: package/python-reentry/
diff --git a/package/Config.in b/package/Config.in
index c04645a30b..826182cdb3 100644
--- a/package/Config.in
+++ b/package/Config.in
@@ -922,6 +922,7 @@ menu "External python modules"
source "package/python-pycli/Config.in"
source "package/python-pycparser/Config.in"
source "package/python-pycrypto/Config.in"
+ source "package/python-pycryptodomex/Config.in"
source "package/python-pydal/Config.in"
source "package/python-pyelftools/Config.in"
source "package/python-pyftpdlib/Config.in"
diff --git a/package/python-pycryptodomex/Config.in b/package/python-pycryptodomex/Config.in
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..c7127fee59
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/python-pycryptodomex/Config.in
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+config BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON_PYCRYPTODOMEX
+ bool "python-pycryptodomex"
+ help
+ Cryptographic library for Python.
+
+ http://www.pycryptodome.org
diff --git a/package/python-pycryptodomex/python-pycryptodomex.hash b/package/python-pycryptodomex/python-pycryptodomex.hash
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..3dec1a1442
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/python-pycryptodomex/python-pycryptodomex.hash
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+# md5, sha256 from https://pypi.org/pypi/pycryptodomex/json
+md5 7e1884f55077ed2e48d36565525b1657 pycryptodomex-3.6.6.tar.gz
+sha256 d0d448484e161786922b41e112b5d7cf76ef5f0c725ea5107ef866bb14a38b12 pycryptodomex-3.6.6.tar.gz
+# Locally computed sha256 checksums
+sha256 fc884f6492490d0f227613ee900ff2a27e6879b79ee637c53a4697238bf12970 LICENSE.rst
diff --git a/package/python-pycryptodomex/python-pycryptodomex.mk b/package/python-pycryptodomex/python-pycryptodomex.mk
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..aa1293df6b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/python-pycryptodomex/python-pycryptodomex.mk
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+################################################################################
+#
+# python-pycryptodomex
+#
+################################################################################
+
+PYTHON_PYCRYPTODOMEX_VERSION = 3.6.6
+PYTHON_PYCRYPTODOMEX_SOURCE = pycryptodomex-$(PYTHON_PYCRYPTODOMEX_VERSION).tar.gz
+PYTHON_PYCRYPTODOMEX_SITE = https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/95/10/f3bd758050da1c08ea30c8b4daf9ff895f306b780f07430fcc9b38722e1b
+PYTHON_PYCRYPTODOMEX_SETUP_TYPE = setuptools
+PYTHON_PYCRYPTODOMEX_LICENSE = Apache-2.0
+PYTHON_PYCRYPTODOMEX_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.rst
+
+$(eval $(python-package))
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] python-ply: new package 2018-09-22 19:36 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] python-pycryptodomex: new package Asaf Kahlon @ 2018-09-22 19:36 ` Asaf Kahlon 2018-10-09 19:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2018-09-22 19:36 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] python-pysmi: " Asaf Kahlon ` (3 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Asaf Kahlon @ 2018-09-22 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot No license file was found in the repo and README.md seems to be the closest (license type was mentioned in setup.py). Signed-off-by: Asaf Kahlon <asafka7@gmail.com> --- DEVELOPERS | 1 + package/Config.in | 1 + package/python-ply/Config.in | 6 ++++++ package/python-ply/python-ply.hash | 5 +++++ package/python-ply/python-ply.mk | 14 ++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 27 insertions(+) create mode 100644 package/python-ply/Config.in create mode 100644 package/python-ply/python-ply.hash create mode 100644 package/python-ply/python-ply.mk diff --git a/DEVELOPERS b/DEVELOPERS index 4c49cc3908..03ea952377 100644 --- a/DEVELOPERS +++ b/DEVELOPERS @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ F: package/python-engineio/ F: package/python-fire/ F: package/python-jsonmodels/ F: package/python-paramiko/ +F: package/python-ply/ F: package/python-pyasn1/ F: package/python-pycryptodomex/ F: package/python-pyroute2/ diff --git a/package/Config.in b/package/Config.in index 826182cdb3..cdfdcbe726 100644 --- a/package/Config.in +++ b/package/Config.in @@ -907,6 +907,7 @@ menu "External python modules" source "package/python-pickleshare/Config.in" source "package/python-pillow/Config.in" source "package/python-pip/Config.in" + source "package/python-ply/Config.in" source "package/python-portend/Config.in" source "package/python-posix-ipc/Config.in" source "package/python-priority/Config.in" diff --git a/package/python-ply/Config.in b/package/python-ply/Config.in new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d6d265ad1c --- /dev/null +++ b/package/python-ply/Config.in @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +config BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON_PLY + bool "python-ply" + help + Python Lex & Yacc. + + http://www.dabeaz.com/ply/ diff --git a/package/python-ply/python-ply.hash b/package/python-ply/python-ply.hash new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..1eba3b0ffe --- /dev/null +++ b/package/python-ply/python-ply.hash @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +# md5, sha256 from https://pypi.org/pypi/ply/json +md5 6465f602e656455affcd7c5734c638f8 ply-3.11.tar.gz +sha256 00c7c1aaa88358b9c765b6d3000c6eec0ba42abca5351b095321aef446081da3 ply-3.11.tar.gz +# Locally computed sha256 checksums +sha256 1095b93b81d2043c5c55e0859875b416f75edb6d5eccb4bf2ace1b5445d1c84f README.md diff --git a/package/python-ply/python-ply.mk b/package/python-ply/python-ply.mk new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..bf4c9d6a4f --- /dev/null +++ b/package/python-ply/python-ply.mk @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +################################################################################ +# +# python-ply +# +################################################################################ + +PYTHON_PLY_VERSION = 3.11 +PYTHON_PLY_SOURCE = ply-$(PYTHON_PLY_VERSION).tar.gz +PYTHON_PLY_SITE = https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/e5/69/882ee5c9d017149285cab114ebeab373308ef0f874fcdac9beb90e0ac4da +PYTHON_PLY_SETUP_TYPE = setuptools +PYTHON_PLY_LICENSE = BSD +PYTHON_PLY_LICENSE_FILES = README.md + +$(eval $(python-package)) -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] python-ply: new package 2018-09-22 19:36 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] python-ply: " Asaf Kahlon @ 2018-10-09 19:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2018-10-09 19:39 ` Yegor Yefremov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2018-10-09 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hello, Thanks for this patch. I've applied to master, with one change, see below. On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 22:36:29 +0300, Asaf Kahlon wrote: > +PYTHON_PLY_LICENSE = BSD "BSD" as a value for license is always wrong, because it's not specific enough. We need to know the variant of BSD license being used. Yegor: the scanpypi script needs to be updated to not put "BSD", but something that includes a warning that ensures that the user of scanpypi will know he will have to do additional research to find what is the exact license. I think we discussed this already, but we had some similar discussion on scancpan with Fran?ois, so I'm not sure to remember :) In this case, the license was BSD-3-Clause. Applied with this fixed. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] python-ply: new package 2018-10-09 19:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni @ 2018-10-09 19:39 ` Yegor Yefremov 2018-10-09 19:47 ` Asaf Kahlon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Yegor Yefremov @ 2018-10-09 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 9:27 PM Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > Thanks for this patch. I've applied to master, with one change, see > below. > > On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 22:36:29 +0300, Asaf Kahlon wrote: > > > +PYTHON_PLY_LICENSE = BSD > > "BSD" as a value for license is always wrong, because it's not specific > enough. We need to know the variant of BSD license being used. > > Yegor: the scanpypi script needs to be updated to not put "BSD", but > something that includes a warning that ensures that the user of > scanpypi will know he will have to do additional research to find what > is the exact license. I think we discussed this already, but we had > some similar discussion on scancpan with Fran?ois, so I'm not sure to > remember :) Yes, we have discussed the issue :-) @Asaf have you installed spdx_lookup [1] package? [1] https://pypi.org/project/spdx-lookup/ Yegor > In this case, the license was BSD-3-Clause. Applied with this fixed. > > Thanks! > > Thomas > -- > Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] python-ply: new package 2018-10-09 19:39 ` Yegor Yefremov @ 2018-10-09 19:47 ` Asaf Kahlon 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Asaf Kahlon @ 2018-10-09 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hello, On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 10:39 PM Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@googlemail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 9:27 PM Thomas Petazzoni > <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Thanks for this patch. I've applied to master, with one change, see > > below. > > > > On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 22:36:29 +0300, Asaf Kahlon wrote: > > > > > +PYTHON_PLY_LICENSE = BSD > > > > "BSD" as a value for license is always wrong, because it's not specific > > enough. We need to know the variant of BSD license being used. > > > > Yegor: the scanpypi script needs to be updated to not put "BSD", but > > something that includes a warning that ensures that the user of > > scanpypi will know he will have to do additional research to find what > > is the exact license. I think we discussed this already, but we had > > some similar discussion on scancpan with Fran?ois, so I'm not sure to > > remember :) > > Yes, we have discussed the issue :-) > > @Asaf have you installed spdx_lookup [1] package? I'm not 100% sure, but if I remember correctly, I have. > > [1] https://pypi.org/project/spdx-lookup/ > > Yegor > > > In this case, the license was BSD-3-Clause. Applied with this fixed. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Thomas > > -- > > Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin > > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > > https://bootlin.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] python-pysmi: new package 2018-09-22 19:36 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] python-pycryptodomex: new package Asaf Kahlon 2018-09-22 19:36 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] python-ply: " Asaf Kahlon @ 2018-09-22 19:36 ` Asaf Kahlon 2018-10-09 19:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2018-09-22 19:36 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] python-pysnmp: bump to version 4.4.6 Asaf Kahlon ` (2 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Asaf Kahlon @ 2018-09-22 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot SNMP SMI/MIB Parser. Signed-off-by: Asaf Kahlon <asafka7@gmail.com> --- DEVELOPERS | 1 + package/Config.in | 1 + package/python-pysmi/Config.in | 7 +++++++ package/python-pysmi/python-pysmi.hash | 5 +++++ package/python-pysmi/python-pysmi.mk | 14 ++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 28 insertions(+) create mode 100644 package/python-pysmi/Config.in create mode 100644 package/python-pysmi/python-pysmi.hash create mode 100644 package/python-pysmi/python-pysmi.mk diff --git a/DEVELOPERS b/DEVELOPERS index 03ea952377..451fa59ac5 100644 --- a/DEVELOPERS +++ b/DEVELOPERS @@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ F: package/python-ply/ F: package/python-pyasn1/ F: package/python-pycryptodomex/ F: package/python-pyroute2/ +F: package/python-pysmi/ F: package/python-pytz/ F: package/python-reentry/ F: package/python-subprocess32/ diff --git a/package/Config.in b/package/Config.in index cdfdcbe726..5bb16a12c8 100644 --- a/package/Config.in +++ b/package/Config.in @@ -948,6 +948,7 @@ menu "External python modules" source "package/python-pyroute2/Config.in" source "package/python-pysendfile/Config.in" source "package/python-pysmb/Config.in" + source "package/python-pysmi/Config.in" source "package/python-pysnmp/Config.in" source "package/python-pysnmp-apps/Config.in" source "package/python-pysnmp-mibs/Config.in" diff --git a/package/python-pysmi/Config.in b/package/python-pysmi/Config.in new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..2e4453d886 --- /dev/null +++ b/package/python-pysmi/Config.in @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +config BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON_PYSMI + bool "python-pysmi" + select BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON_PLY # runtime + help + SNMP SMI/MIB Parser. + + https://github.com/etingof/pysmi diff --git a/package/python-pysmi/python-pysmi.hash b/package/python-pysmi/python-pysmi.hash new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..f3ca8a9e6a --- /dev/null +++ b/package/python-pysmi/python-pysmi.hash @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +# md5, sha256 from https://pypi.org/pypi/pysmi/json +md5 3293518c06b90bb45856cb0e0deb71d1 pysmi-0.3.1.tar.gz +sha256 b1746f559b0d3dbaa6b7993936f215617271efde022dc3eb3166fd62380d8887 pysmi-0.3.1.tar.gz +# Locally computed sha256 checksums +sha256 ac2f8f67cae76e36a25496fbdf3293dd14b3d6db63f1ce4242ae9dd4fb7b90fd LICENSE.rst diff --git a/package/python-pysmi/python-pysmi.mk b/package/python-pysmi/python-pysmi.mk new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..3aa4f76474 --- /dev/null +++ b/package/python-pysmi/python-pysmi.mk @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +################################################################################ +# +# python-pysmi +# +################################################################################ + +PYTHON_PYSMI_VERSION = 0.3.1 +PYTHON_PYSMI_SOURCE = pysmi-$(PYTHON_PYSMI_VERSION).tar.gz +PYTHON_PYSMI_SITE = https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/8f/14/68331f94a5cd94e00ff064c9a790e6d7b0a0ade8c66deafa543398ca72ee +PYTHON_PYSMI_SETUP_TYPE = setuptools +PYTHON_PYSMI_LICENSE = BSD-2-Clause +PYTHON_PYSMI_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.rst + +$(eval $(python-package)) -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] python-pysmi: new package 2018-09-22 19:36 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] python-pysmi: " Asaf Kahlon @ 2018-10-09 19:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2018-10-09 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hello, On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 22:36:30 +0300, Asaf Kahlon wrote: > SNMP SMI/MIB Parser. > > Signed-off-by: Asaf Kahlon <asafka7@gmail.com> > --- > DEVELOPERS | 1 + > package/Config.in | 1 + > package/python-pysmi/Config.in | 7 +++++++ > package/python-pysmi/python-pysmi.hash | 5 +++++ > package/python-pysmi/python-pysmi.mk | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 28 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 package/python-pysmi/Config.in > create mode 100644 package/python-pysmi/python-pysmi.hash > create mode 100644 package/python-pysmi/python-pysmi.mk Applied to master, thanks. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] python-pysnmp: bump to version 4.4.6 2018-09-22 19:36 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] python-pycryptodomex: new package Asaf Kahlon 2018-09-22 19:36 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] python-ply: " Asaf Kahlon 2018-09-22 19:36 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] python-pysmi: " Asaf Kahlon @ 2018-09-22 19:36 ` Asaf Kahlon 2018-10-09 19:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2018-10-10 12:29 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2018-10-09 13:56 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] python-pycryptodomex: new package Thomas Petazzoni 2018-10-10 12:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni 4 siblings, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Asaf Kahlon @ 2018-09-22 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Update dependencies. License was renamed to LICENSE.rst (no content changed). Add hash for license. Fixes: http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/9b3/9b3bcd761aa35d9fdf4acc05258cc87e8c36fb14/ Signed-off-by: Asaf Kahlon <asafka7@gmail.com> --- package/python-pysnmp/Config.in | 9 +++------ package/python-pysnmp/python-pysnmp.hash | 8 +++++--- package/python-pysnmp/python-pysnmp.mk | 8 +++----- 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/package/python-pysnmp/Config.in b/package/python-pysnmp/Config.in index c7cdf3892d..a034b16852 100644 --- a/package/python-pysnmp/Config.in +++ b/package/python-pysnmp/Config.in @@ -1,13 +1,10 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON_PYSNMP bool "python-pysnmp" - depends on BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP # pyasn - select BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON_PYASN - select BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON_PYCRYPTO + select BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON_PYSMI # runtime + select BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON_PYCRYPTODOMEX # runtime + select BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON_PYASN1 # runtime help PySNMP is a cross-platform, pure-Python SNMP engine implementation. http://pysnmp.sf.net - -comment "python-pysnmp needs a toolchain w/ C++" - depends on !BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP diff --git a/package/python-pysnmp/python-pysnmp.hash b/package/python-pysnmp/python-pysnmp.hash index 7ecbf4c480..bb5fc24834 100644 --- a/package/python-pysnmp/python-pysnmp.hash +++ b/package/python-pysnmp/python-pysnmp.hash @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ -# md5 from https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pysnmp/json, sha256 locally computed -md5 cc0838cdf3f2d34539f478942f648384 pysnmp-4.3.3.tar.gz -sha256 c837d35cbb2c1e067b7b8ed752d962481ef8d7ff11e4cdd8bfb0840c4a786318 pysnmp-4.3.3.tar.gz +# md5, sha256 from https://pypi.org/pypi/pysnmp/json +md5 9eaed18907d9b15828f138471b187e8f pysnmp-4.4.6.tar.gz +sha256 e34ffa0dce5f69adabd478ff76c3e1b08e32ebb0767df8b178d0704f4a1ac406 pysnmp-4.4.6.tar.gz +# Locally computed sha256 checksums +sha256 4781cdf5b05a40b8c36f2e71e248dac621762bc8e8482fa5fddab5053e2cdace LICENSE.rst diff --git a/package/python-pysnmp/python-pysnmp.mk b/package/python-pysnmp/python-pysnmp.mk index 2721ba8a7b..0a916119df 100644 --- a/package/python-pysnmp/python-pysnmp.mk +++ b/package/python-pysnmp/python-pysnmp.mk @@ -4,14 +4,12 @@ # ################################################################################ -PYTHON_PYSNMP_VERSION = 4.3.3 +PYTHON_PYSNMP_VERSION = 4.4.6 PYTHON_PYSNMP_SOURCE = pysnmp-$(PYTHON_PYSNMP_VERSION).tar.gz -PYTHON_PYSNMP_SITE = https://pypi.python.org/packages/47/b5/c65b9b6fcc36d3f4caca30d3314920f1ca75f5ceecc1f6ae2538ede24511 +PYTHON_PYSNMP_SITE = https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/8b/66/96a49bf1d64ad1e005a8455644523b7e09663a405eb20a4599fb219e4c95 PYTHON_PYSNMP_SETUP_TYPE = setuptools PYTHON_PYSNMP_LICENSE = BSD-3-Clause -PYTHON_PYSNMP_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.txt - -PYTHON_PYSNMP_DEPENDENCIES = python-pyasn python-pycrypto +PYTHON_PYSNMP_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.rst $(eval $(python-package)) -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] python-pysnmp: bump to version 4.4.6 2018-09-22 19:36 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] python-pysnmp: bump to version 4.4.6 Asaf Kahlon @ 2018-10-09 19:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2018-10-09 19:54 ` Asaf Kahlon 2018-10-10 12:29 ` Thomas Petazzoni 1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2018-10-09 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hello, On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 22:36:31 +0300, Asaf Kahlon wrote: > Update dependencies. > License was renamed to LICENSE.rst (no content changed). > Add hash for license. > > Fixes: > http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/9b3/9b3bcd761aa35d9fdf4acc05258cc87e8c36fb14/ > > Signed-off-by: Asaf Kahlon <asafka7@gmail.com> This looks good, but we need to solve the python-cryptodomex licensing question before this patch can be applied. > -PYTHON_PYSNMP_VERSION = 4.3.3 > +PYTHON_PYSNMP_VERSION = 4.4.6 > PYTHON_PYSNMP_SOURCE = pysnmp-$(PYTHON_PYSNMP_VERSION).tar.gz > -PYTHON_PYSNMP_SITE = https://pypi.python.org/packages/47/b5/c65b9b6fcc36d3f4caca30d3314920f1ca75f5ceecc1f6ae2538ede24511 > +PYTHON_PYSNMP_SITE = https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/8b/66/96a49bf1d64ad1e005a8455644523b7e09663a405eb20a4599fb219e4c95 > PYTHON_PYSNMP_SETUP_TYPE = setuptools > > PYTHON_PYSNMP_LICENSE = BSD-3-Clause > -PYTHON_PYSNMP_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.txt > - > -PYTHON_PYSNMP_DEPENDENCIES = python-pyasn python-pycrypto So these were build time dependencies, and now there are no build time dependencies anymore ? Or was it a bug to list them as build time dependencies ? Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] python-pysnmp: bump to version 4.4.6 2018-10-09 19:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni @ 2018-10-09 19:54 ` Asaf Kahlon 2018-10-09 20:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Asaf Kahlon @ 2018-10-09 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hello, On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 10:37 PM Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 22:36:31 +0300, Asaf Kahlon wrote: > > Update dependencies. > > License was renamed to LICENSE.rst (no content changed). > > Add hash for license. > > > > Fixes: > > http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/9b3/9b3bcd761aa35d9fdf4acc05258cc87e8c36fb14/ > > > > Signed-off-by: Asaf Kahlon <asafka7@gmail.com> > > This looks good, but we need to solve the python-cryptodomex licensing > question before this patch can be applied. > > > > -PYTHON_PYSNMP_VERSION = 4.3.3 > > +PYTHON_PYSNMP_VERSION = 4.4.6 > > PYTHON_PYSNMP_SOURCE = pysnmp-$(PYTHON_PYSNMP_VERSION).tar.gz > > -PYTHON_PYSNMP_SITE = https://pypi.python.org/packages/47/b5/c65b9b6fcc36d3f4caca30d3314920f1ca75f5ceecc1f6ae2538ede24511 > > +PYTHON_PYSNMP_SITE = https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/8b/66/96a49bf1d64ad1e005a8455644523b7e09663a405eb20a4599fb219e4c95 > > PYTHON_PYSNMP_SETUP_TYPE = setuptools > > > > PYTHON_PYSNMP_LICENSE = BSD-3-Clause > > -PYTHON_PYSNMP_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.txt > > - > > -PYTHON_PYSNMP_DEPENDENCIES = python-pyasn python-pycrypto > > So these were build time dependencies, and now there are no build time > dependencies anymore ? Or was it a bug to list them as build time > dependencies ? > These packages were not needed as runtime dependencies at all. When updating the package dependencies, I also validated that python-pysnmp can be built without them. > Best regards, > > Thomas > -- > Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] python-pysnmp: bump to version 4.4.6 2018-10-09 19:54 ` Asaf Kahlon @ 2018-10-09 20:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2018-10-10 3:37 ` Asaf Kahlon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2018-10-09 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hello, On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 22:54:06 +0300, Asaf Kahlon wrote: > > > -PYTHON_PYSNMP_VERSION = 4.3.3 > > > +PYTHON_PYSNMP_VERSION = 4.4.6 > > > PYTHON_PYSNMP_SOURCE = pysnmp-$(PYTHON_PYSNMP_VERSION).tar.gz > > > -PYTHON_PYSNMP_SITE = https://pypi.python.org/packages/47/b5/c65b9b6fcc36d3f4caca30d3314920f1ca75f5ceecc1f6ae2538ede24511 > > > +PYTHON_PYSNMP_SITE = https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/8b/66/96a49bf1d64ad1e005a8455644523b7e09663a405eb20a4599fb219e4c95 > > > PYTHON_PYSNMP_SETUP_TYPE = setuptools > > > > > > PYTHON_PYSNMP_LICENSE = BSD-3-Clause > > > -PYTHON_PYSNMP_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.txt > > > - > > > -PYTHON_PYSNMP_DEPENDENCIES = python-pyasn python-pycrypto > > > > So these were build time dependencies, and now there are no build time > > dependencies anymore ? Or was it a bug to list them as build time > > dependencies ? > > > These packages were not needed as runtime dependencies at all. As *runtime* dependencies, or *build time* dependencies? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] python-pysnmp: bump to version 4.4.6 2018-10-09 20:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni @ 2018-10-10 3:37 ` Asaf Kahlon 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Asaf Kahlon @ 2018-10-10 3:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot On Tue, Oct 9, 2018, 23:00 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 22:54:06 +0300, Asaf Kahlon wrote: > > > > > -PYTHON_PYSNMP_VERSION = 4.3.3 > > > > +PYTHON_PYSNMP_VERSION = 4.4.6 > > > > PYTHON_PYSNMP_SOURCE = pysnmp-$(PYTHON_PYSNMP_VERSION).tar.gz > > > > -PYTHON_PYSNMP_SITE = > https://pypi.python.org/packages/47/b5/c65b9b6fcc36d3f4caca30d3314920f1ca75f5ceecc1f6ae2538ede24511 > > > > +PYTHON_PYSNMP_SITE = > https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/8b/66/96a49bf1d64ad1e005a8455644523b7e09663a405eb20a4599fb219e4c95 > > > > PYTHON_PYSNMP_SETUP_TYPE = setuptools > > > > > > > > PYTHON_PYSNMP_LICENSE = BSD-3-Clause > > > > -PYTHON_PYSNMP_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.txt > > > > - > > > > -PYTHON_PYSNMP_DEPENDENCIES = python-pyasn python-pycrypto > > > > > > So these were build time dependencies, and now there are no build time > > > dependencies anymore ? Or was it a bug to list them as build time > > > dependencies ? > > > > > These packages were not needed as runtime dependencies at all. > > As *runtime* dependencies, or *build time* dependencies? > Oh sorry, they are not needed as build time dependencies, of course. > > Thomas > -- > Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20181010/a552ad20/attachment.html> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] python-pysnmp: bump to version 4.4.6 2018-09-22 19:36 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] python-pysnmp: bump to version 4.4.6 Asaf Kahlon 2018-10-09 19:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni @ 2018-10-10 12:29 ` Thomas Petazzoni 1 sibling, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2018-10-10 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hello, On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 22:36:31 +0300, Asaf Kahlon wrote: > Update dependencies. > License was renamed to LICENSE.rst (no content changed). > Add hash for license. > > Fixes: > http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/9b3/9b3bcd761aa35d9fdf4acc05258cc87e8c36fb14/ > > Signed-off-by: Asaf Kahlon <asafka7@gmail.com> > --- > package/python-pysnmp/Config.in | 9 +++------ > package/python-pysnmp/python-pysnmp.hash | 8 +++++--- > package/python-pysnmp/python-pysnmp.mk | 8 +++----- > 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) Applied to master, thanks. Hopefully this is the last package that was causing issues with Python 3.7.0. In any case, thanks a lot for all your work in relation to the Python 3.7.0 update, it was much appreciated. Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] python-pycryptodomex: new package 2018-09-22 19:36 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] python-pycryptodomex: new package Asaf Kahlon ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2018-09-22 19:36 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] python-pysnmp: bump to version 4.4.6 Asaf Kahlon @ 2018-10-09 13:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2018-10-09 20:19 ` Yann E. MORIN 2018-10-10 12:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni 4 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2018-10-09 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hello, On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 22:36:28 +0300, Asaf Kahlon wrote: > Cryptographic library for Python > > Signed-off-by: Asaf Kahlon <asafka7@gmail.com> Let's add some license experts in the loop. > +PYTHON_PYCRYPTODOMEX_LICENSE = Apache-2.0 I am not sure this is an accurate description of the license terms. Reading https://pycryptodome.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/license.html (which is the same as the LICENSE.rst you use as a license file), it says: """ The source code in PyCryptodome is partially in the public domain and partially released under the BSD 2-Clause license. """ There is also the text of the Apache 2.0 license, but it doesn't say to which part of the code it applies. And there is a special constraint for the OCB cipher, that it cannot be used for military purposes. I am not sure how Debian accepts that, but they do accept it: https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/p/pycryptodome/pycryptodome_3.6.1-2_copyright. Yann, Arnout, I'm interested by your opinion on this package. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] python-pycryptodomex: new package 2018-10-09 13:56 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] python-pycryptodomex: new package Thomas Petazzoni @ 2018-10-09 20:19 ` Yann E. MORIN 2018-10-10 21:13 ` Arnout Vandecappelle 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Yann E. MORIN @ 2018-10-09 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Thomas, Asaf, All, On 2018-10-09 15:56 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly: > On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 22:36:28 +0300, Asaf Kahlon wrote: > > Cryptographic library for Python > > +PYTHON_PYCRYPTODOMEX_LICENSE = Apache-2.0 > > I am not sure this is an accurate description of the license terms. > Reading https://pycryptodome.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/license.html > (which is the same as the LICENSE.rst you use as a license file), it > says: > > """ > The source code in PyCryptodome is partially in the public domain and > partially released under the BSD 2-Clause license. > """ > > There is also the text of the Apache 2.0 license, but it doesn't say to > which part of the code it applies. It states: Apache 2.0 license (Wycheproof) And by grepping the source tree, it seems that 'Wycheproof' is the slef-test test harness, as we can only find it in lib/Crypto/SelfTest/ and in setup.py, supposedly to ignore warnign from said test harness, and to list it as the data to package. So, I think we can ignore the Apache-2.0 license, as it does not cover stuff that goes on the target. > And there is a special constraint for the OCB cipher, that it cannot be > used for military purposes. I am not sure how Debian accepts that, but > they do accept it: > https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/p/pycryptodome/pycryptodome_3.6.1-2_copyright. In fact, there are 3 licenses under which OCB is made available; http://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaway/ocb/license.htm * License 1 ? License for Open-Source Software Implementations of OCB (Jan 9, 2013) * License 2 ? General License for Non-Military Software Implementations OCB (Jan 10, 2013). * License 3 ? Patent License for OpenSSL (Nov 13, 2013). As far as I understand the licensing terms, OCB is available udner any license to the choosing of the user of OCB. The pycryptodome developpers have not choosen a license, and instead decided to propagate that choice down to the user of pycryptodome. > Yann, Arnout, I'm interested by your opinion on this package. So, I would state something like: PYTHON_PYCRYPTODOMEX_LICENSE = \ BSD-2c, \ Public Domain (pycrypto original code), \ OCB license (OCB cypher) Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] python-pycryptodomex: new package 2018-10-09 20:19 ` Yann E. MORIN @ 2018-10-10 21:13 ` Arnout Vandecappelle 2018-10-11 6:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Arnout Vandecappelle @ 2018-10-10 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot On 9/10/18 22:19, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > Thomas, Asaf, All, > > On 2018-10-09 15:56 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly: >> On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 22:36:28 +0300, Asaf Kahlon wrote: >>> Cryptographic library for Python >>> +PYTHON_PYCRYPTODOMEX_LICENSE = Apache-2.0 >> >> I am not sure this is an accurate description of the license terms. >> Reading https://pycryptodome.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/license.html >> (which is the same as the LICENSE.rst you use as a license file), it >> says: >> >> """ >> The source code in PyCryptodome is partially in the public domain and >> partially released under the BSD 2-Clause license. >> """ >> >> There is also the text of the Apache 2.0 license, but it doesn't say to >> which part of the code it applies. > > It states: Apache 2.0 license (Wycheproof) > And by grepping the source tree, it seems that 'Wycheproof' is the > slef-test test harness, as we can only find it in lib/Crypto/SelfTest/ > and in setup.py, supposedly to ignore warnign from said test harness, and > to list it as the data to package. > > So, I think we can ignore the Apache-2.0 license, as it does not cover > stuff that goes on the target. Ack that. Si Apache-2.0 is definitely wrong. >> And there is a special constraint for the OCB cipher, that it cannot be >> used for military purposes. I am not sure how Debian accepts that, but >> they do accept it: >> https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/p/pycryptodome/pycryptodome_3.6.1-2_copyright. > > In fact, there are 3 licenses under which OCB is made available; > http://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaway/ocb/license.htm > > * License 1 ? License for Open-Source Software Implementations of OCB > (Jan 9, 2013) > > * License 2 ? General License for Non-Military Software Implementations > OCB (Jan 10, 2013). > > * License 3 ? Patent License for OpenSSL (Nov 13, 2013). Note that all three of them are *patent* licenses. That's why Debian doesn't make a problem of it. Debian only uses license 1. The OCB *code* is all under BSD-2-Clause, as far as I can see. There are actually 2 implementations: one in python that does not come from pycrypto AFAICS, and one from libtom. > > As far as I understand the licensing terms, OCB is available udner any > license to the choosing of the user of OCB. The pycryptodome developpers > have not choosen a license, and instead decided to propagate that choice > down to the user of pycryptodome. Ack. > >> Yann, Arnout, I'm interested by your opinion on this package. > > So, I would state something like: > > PYTHON_PYCRYPTODOMEX_LICENSE = \ > BSD-2c, \ BSD-2-Clause > Public Domain (pycrypto original code), \ > OCB license (OCB cypher) I would clarify this as "OCB patent license". The (OCB cypher) is not really useful IMO. Anyway OCB is not a cipher, it's a mode. In terms of license files, in addition to LICENSE.rst, I think we also need Doc/LEGAL/COPYRIGHT.pycrypto Regards, Arnout > > Regards, > Yann E. MORIN. > -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] python-pycryptodomex: new package 2018-10-10 21:13 ` Arnout Vandecappelle @ 2018-10-11 6:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2018-10-11 6:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hello, On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 23:13:40 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > >> Yann, Arnout, I'm interested by your opinion on this package. > > > > So, I would state something like: > > > > PYTHON_PYCRYPTODOMEX_LICENSE = \ > > BSD-2c, \ > > BSD-2-Clause I fixed that when applying. > > Public Domain (pycrypto original code), \ > > OCB license (OCB cypher) > > I would clarify this as "OCB patent license". The (OCB cypher) is not really > useful IMO. Anyway OCB is not a cipher, it's a mode. > > In terms of license files, in addition to LICENSE.rst, I think we also need > Doc/LEGAL/COPYRIGHT.pycrypto Asaf, could you send a follow-up patch fixing this, according to Arnout comments ? Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] python-pycryptodomex: new package 2018-09-22 19:36 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] python-pycryptodomex: new package Asaf Kahlon ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2018-10-09 13:56 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] python-pycryptodomex: new package Thomas Petazzoni @ 2018-10-10 12:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni 4 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2018-10-10 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hello, On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 22:36:28 +0300, Asaf Kahlon wrote: > Cryptographic library for Python > > Signed-off-by: Asaf Kahlon <asafka7@gmail.com> > --- > DEVELOPERS | 1 + > package/Config.in | 1 + > package/python-pycryptodomex/Config.in | 6 ++++++ > .../python-pycryptodomex/python-pycryptodomex.hash | 5 +++++ > .../python-pycryptodomex/python-pycryptodomex.mk | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 27 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 package/python-pycryptodomex/Config.in > create mode 100644 package/python-pycryptodomex/python-pycryptodomex.hash > create mode 100644 package/python-pycryptodomex/python-pycryptodomex.mk Applied to master with the license information fixed, as per the discussion with Yann. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-10-11 6:54 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-09-22 19:36 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] python-pycryptodomex: new package Asaf Kahlon 2018-09-22 19:36 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] python-ply: " Asaf Kahlon 2018-10-09 19:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2018-10-09 19:39 ` Yegor Yefremov 2018-10-09 19:47 ` Asaf Kahlon 2018-09-22 19:36 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] python-pysmi: " Asaf Kahlon 2018-10-09 19:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2018-09-22 19:36 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] python-pysnmp: bump to version 4.4.6 Asaf Kahlon 2018-10-09 19:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2018-10-09 19:54 ` Asaf Kahlon 2018-10-09 20:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2018-10-10 3:37 ` Asaf Kahlon 2018-10-10 12:29 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2018-10-09 13:56 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] python-pycryptodomex: new package Thomas Petazzoni 2018-10-09 20:19 ` Yann E. MORIN 2018-10-10 21:13 ` Arnout Vandecappelle 2018-10-11 6:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2018-10-10 12:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.