From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: "Bernhard M. Wiedemann" <bwiedemann@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: Do not insert timestamps in efi files
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:04:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181024130435.lbw2le7rnulqmzep@zion.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a88f5cb-8f0a-9974-8e84-990045cb8726@suse.de>
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 02:49:49PM +0200, Bernhard M. Wiedemann wrote:
> On 24/10/2018 10.16, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > This change is fine in principle, but do all i386pep compatible versions
> > of LD support this parameter?
>
> It seems, it was added in 2014 to GNU binutils when the default was
> reversed to be unreproducible:
> https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=eeb14e5a5b378450ca2ed139e76f317f491f4613
I think adding this unconditionally will break older ld? Keep in mind
that our supported binutils dates back to 2005.
Either some sort of filtering is required or we bump the required
binutils version. For the former route see ld-ver-build-id in
Config.mk.
Wei.
>
> Don't know about other ld implementations.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-24 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-24 8:03 [PATCH] x86/efi: Do not insert timestamps in efi files Bernhard M. Wiedemann
2018-10-24 8:16 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-10-24 12:49 ` Bernhard M. Wiedemann
2018-10-24 13:04 ` Wei Liu [this message]
2018-10-24 13:45 ` Bernhard M. Wiedemann
2018-10-25 8:02 ` Wei Liu
[not found] ` <108D0A7C020000E4CA4B4E14@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com>
[not found] ` <74F2501302000079CA4B4E14@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com>
2018-10-25 12:35 ` Jan Beulich
2018-10-25 14:00 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-10-25 14:08 ` Jan Beulich
2018-10-26 11:11 ` Bernhard M. Wiedemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181024130435.lbw2le7rnulqmzep@zion.uk.xensource.com \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bwiedemann@suse.de \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.