From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> To: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp@chromium.org> Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] virtio_blk: add discard and write zeroes support Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 09:08:38 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20181026080838.GB4234@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20181012210628.226361-1-dverkamp@chromium.org> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1271 bytes --] On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 02:06:28PM -0700, Daniel Verkamp wrote: > + range[n].flags = cpu_to_le32(flags); > + range[n].num_sectors = cpu_to_le32(num_sectors); > + range[n].sector = cpu_to_le64(sector); ... > +/* Discard/write zeroes range for each request. */ > +struct virtio_blk_discard_write_zeroes { > + /* discard/write zeroes start sector */ > + __virtio64 sector; > + /* number of discard/write zeroes sectors */ > + __virtio32 num_sectors; > + /* flags for this range */ > + __virtio32 flags; cpu_to_le32() is being used on __virtio32 fields instead of cpu_to_virtio32(). From include/uapi/linux/virtio_types.h: /* * __virtio{16,32,64} have the following meaning: * - __u{16,32,64} for virtio devices in legacy mode, accessed in native endian * - __le{16,32,64} for standard-compliant virtio devices */ From the VIRTIO specification: struct virtio_blk_discard_write_zeroes { le64 sector; le32 num_sectors; struct { le32 unmap:1; le32 reserved:31; } flags; }; Since the VIRTIO spec says these fields are little-endian, I think these fields should be declared just __u32 and __u64 instead of __virtio32 and __virtio64. Stefan [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> To: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp@chromium.org> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] virtio_blk: add discard and write zeroes support Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 09:08:38 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20181026080838.GB4234@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20181012210628.226361-1-dverkamp@chromium.org> [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1271 bytes --] On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 02:06:28PM -0700, Daniel Verkamp wrote: > + range[n].flags = cpu_to_le32(flags); > + range[n].num_sectors = cpu_to_le32(num_sectors); > + range[n].sector = cpu_to_le64(sector); ... > +/* Discard/write zeroes range for each request. */ > +struct virtio_blk_discard_write_zeroes { > + /* discard/write zeroes start sector */ > + __virtio64 sector; > + /* number of discard/write zeroes sectors */ > + __virtio32 num_sectors; > + /* flags for this range */ > + __virtio32 flags; cpu_to_le32() is being used on __virtio32 fields instead of cpu_to_virtio32(). From include/uapi/linux/virtio_types.h: /* * __virtio{16,32,64} have the following meaning: * - __u{16,32,64} for virtio devices in legacy mode, accessed in native endian * - __le{16,32,64} for standard-compliant virtio devices */ From the VIRTIO specification: struct virtio_blk_discard_write_zeroes { le64 sector; le32 num_sectors; struct { le32 unmap:1; le32 reserved:31; } flags; }; Since the VIRTIO spec says these fields are little-endian, I think these fields should be declared just __u32 and __u64 instead of __virtio32 and __virtio64. Stefan [-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 183 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-26 8:08 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-06-06 4:19 [PATCH v6] virtio_blk: add DISCARD and WRIET ZEROES commands support Changpeng Liu 2018-06-07 13:10 ` Stefan Hajnoczi 2018-06-07 23:07 ` Liu, Changpeng 2018-06-08 10:20 ` Stefan Hajnoczi 2018-06-11 3:37 ` Liu, Changpeng 2018-06-12 16:05 ` Stefan Hajnoczi 2018-08-28 22:25 ` [PATCH v7] virtio_blk: add discard and write zeroes support Daniel Verkamp 2018-10-12 21:06 ` [PATCH v8] " Daniel Verkamp 2018-10-12 21:06 ` Daniel Verkamp 2018-10-15 0:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2018-10-15 0:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2018-10-15 9:21 ` Ming Lei 2018-10-15 9:27 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-10-15 9:27 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-10-15 23:16 ` Daniel Verkamp 2018-10-15 23:16 ` Daniel Verkamp 2018-10-16 1:45 ` Liu, Changpeng 2018-10-16 1:45 ` Liu, Changpeng 2018-10-16 1:40 ` Liu, Changpeng 2018-10-16 1:40 ` Liu, Changpeng 2018-10-25 23:28 ` Paolo Bonzini 2018-10-25 23:28 ` Paolo Bonzini 2018-10-26 8:26 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-10-26 8:26 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-10-29 3:21 ` Liu, Changpeng 2018-10-29 3:21 ` Liu, Changpeng 2018-10-29 18:03 ` Paolo Bonzini 2018-10-29 18:03 ` Paolo Bonzini 2018-10-26 8:08 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message] 2018-10-26 8:08 ` Stefan Hajnoczi 2018-10-26 14:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2018-10-26 14:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2018-10-29 5:05 ` Stefan Hajnoczi 2018-10-29 5:05 ` Stefan Hajnoczi 2018-11-01 21:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2018-11-01 21:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2018-11-01 22:18 ` Daniel Verkamp 2018-11-01 22:18 ` Daniel Verkamp 2018-11-01 22:40 ` [PATCH v9] " Daniel Verkamp 2018-11-01 22:40 ` Daniel Verkamp 2018-11-01 23:43 ` Dongli Zhang 2018-11-01 23:43 ` Dongli Zhang 2018-11-02 18:25 ` Daniel Verkamp 2018-11-02 18:25 ` Daniel Verkamp 2018-11-02 4:17 ` Stefan Hajnoczi 2018-11-02 4:17 ` Stefan Hajnoczi 2018-12-05 9:46 ` Liu, Changpeng 2018-12-05 9:46 ` Liu, Changpeng 2018-12-05 13:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2018-12-05 13:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20181026080838.GB4234@stefanha-x1.localdomain \ --to=stefanha@redhat.com \ --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \ --cc=changpeng.liu@intel.com \ --cc=dverkamp@chromium.org \ --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mst@redhat.com \ --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.