All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* f8b39039cbf2a15f ("net: fs_enet: do not call phy_stop() in interrupts")
@ 2018-10-17  8:28 Christophe LEROY
  2018-10-17 11:58 ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christophe LEROY @ 2018-10-17  8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg KH, stable

Hi,

Could you please apply f8b39039cbf2a15f2b8c9f081e1cbd5dee00aaf5 to 4.9 
and 4.14 ?

Thanks
Christophe

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: f8b39039cbf2a15f ("net: fs_enet: do not call phy_stop() in interrupts")
  2018-10-17  8:28 f8b39039cbf2a15f ("net: fs_enet: do not call phy_stop() in interrupts") Christophe LEROY
@ 2018-10-17 11:58 ` Greg KH
  2018-11-08 12:59   ` Christophe LEROY
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2018-10-17 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe LEROY; +Cc: stable

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:28:00AM +0200, Christophe LEROY wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Could you please apply f8b39039cbf2a15f2b8c9f081e1cbd5dee00aaf5 to 4.9 and
> 4.14 ?

Please see the section on stable patches here:
	https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/networking/netdev-FAQ.html#netdev-faq
for how to do this properly.

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: f8b39039cbf2a15f ("net: fs_enet: do not call phy_stop() in interrupts")
  2018-10-17 11:58 ` Greg KH
@ 2018-11-08 12:59   ` Christophe LEROY
  2018-11-08 15:40     ` Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christophe LEROY @ 2018-11-08 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg KH; +Cc: stable, David Miller

Hi Greg

Le 17/10/2018 à 13:58, Greg KH a écrit :
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:28:00AM +0200, Christophe LEROY wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could you please apply f8b39039cbf2a15f2b8c9f081e1cbd5dee00aaf5 to 4.9 and
>> 4.14 ?
> 
> Please see the section on stable patches here:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/networking/netdev-FAQ.html#netdev-faq
> for how to do this properly.

I didn't get any response from davem to my request (You are in CC).

In the meantime, I see in the netdev-FAQ:

A: Due to capacity, Dave could only take care of the backports for the 
last two stable releases. For earlier stable releases, each stable 
branch maintainer is supposed to take care of them. If you find any 
patch is missing from an earlier stable branch, please notify 
stable@vger.kernel.org with either a commit ID or a formal patch 
backported, and CC Dave and other relevant networking developers.

The last two stable releases being 4.19 and 4.18, I think 4.14 and 4.9 
fall into the second category.

Therefore, what should be the way forward ?

Thanks,
Christophe

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: f8b39039cbf2a15f ("net: fs_enet: do not call phy_stop() in interrupts")
  2018-11-08 12:59   ` Christophe LEROY
@ 2018-11-08 15:40     ` Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2018-11-08 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe LEROY; +Cc: Greg KH, stable, David Miller

On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 01:59:27PM +0100, Christophe LEROY wrote:
>Hi Greg
>
>Le 17/10/2018 � 13:58, Greg KH a �crit�:
>>On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:28:00AM +0200, Christophe LEROY wrote:
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>Could you please apply f8b39039cbf2a15f2b8c9f081e1cbd5dee00aaf5 to 4.9 and
>>>4.14 ?
>>
>>Please see the section on stable patches here:
>>	https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/networking/netdev-FAQ.html#netdev-faq
>>for how to do this properly.
>
>I didn't get any response from davem to my request (You are in CC).
>
>In the meantime, I see in the netdev-FAQ:
>
>A: Due to capacity, Dave could only take care of the backports for the 
>last two stable releases. For earlier stable releases, each stable 
>branch maintainer is supposed to take care of them. If you find any 
>patch is missing from an earlier stable branch, please notify 
>stable@vger.kernel.org with either a commit ID or a formal patch 
>backported, and CC Dave and other relevant networking developers.
>
>The last two stable releases being 4.19 and 4.18, I think 4.14 and 4.9 
>fall into the second category.

That's indeed the case.

>Therefore, what should be the way forward ?

I've queued it for 4.9 and 4.14. Thank you.

--
Thanks,
Sasha

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-09  1:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-10-17  8:28 f8b39039cbf2a15f ("net: fs_enet: do not call phy_stop() in interrupts") Christophe LEROY
2018-10-17 11:58 ` Greg KH
2018-11-08 12:59   ` Christophe LEROY
2018-11-08 15:40     ` Sasha Levin

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.