All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/2] kvm/arm: make singlestep behaviour consistent
@ 2018-11-09 15:07 ` Mark Rutland
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2018-11-09 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel; +Cc: marc.zyngier, kvmarm

We don't consistently advance the singlestep state machine when emulating
instructions. We attempt to bodge around this when the host is stepping a
guest, and fake a debug exception, but we don't always get this right.
Additionally, we don't try to fix this up at all when a guest is stepping
itself, so guests cannot single-step emulated instructions reliably.

In both cases we're usually reliant on the HW singlestep state machine, so
let's have our instruction emulation consistently advance that. Thus, when we
return to a guest after emulating an instruction, the HW will generate the step
exception for us, routed to host or guest appropriately.

So far I have only compile-tested these patches. YMMV.

These patches do not ensure that guest-stepping is reliable in the presence of
host-stepping. We might need to say that it's userspace's responsibility to
virtualize the guest singlestep state machine when stepping the guest.
Otherwise, it's not clear to me if we can shadow this correctly within the
kernel.

Thanks,
Mark.

Mark Rutland (2):
  kvm/arm: skip MMIO insn after emulation
  kvm/arm: consistently advance singlestep when emulating instructions

 arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h          |  5 ----
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h     | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++------
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h        |  1 -
 arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c                   | 21 ----------------
 arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c             | 14 +----------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c              | 43 +++-----------------------------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c | 12 ++++++---
 virt/kvm/arm/arm.c                       |  2 --
 virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c            |  6 ++++-
 virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c                      | 11 ++++----
 10 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)

-- 
2.11.0

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/2] kvm/arm: make singlestep behaviour consistent
@ 2018-11-09 15:07 ` Mark Rutland
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2018-11-09 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

We don't consistently advance the singlestep state machine when emulating
instructions. We attempt to bodge around this when the host is stepping a
guest, and fake a debug exception, but we don't always get this right.
Additionally, we don't try to fix this up at all when a guest is stepping
itself, so guests cannot single-step emulated instructions reliably.

In both cases we're usually reliant on the HW singlestep state machine, so
let's have our instruction emulation consistently advance that. Thus, when we
return to a guest after emulating an instruction, the HW will generate the step
exception for us, routed to host or guest appropriately.

So far I have only compile-tested these patches. YMMV.

These patches do not ensure that guest-stepping is reliable in the presence of
host-stepping. We might need to say that it's userspace's responsibility to
virtualize the guest singlestep state machine when stepping the guest.
Otherwise, it's not clear to me if we can shadow this correctly within the
kernel.

Thanks,
Mark.

Mark Rutland (2):
  kvm/arm: skip MMIO insn after emulation
  kvm/arm: consistently advance singlestep when emulating instructions

 arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h          |  5 ----
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h     | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++------
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h        |  1 -
 arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c                   | 21 ----------------
 arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c             | 14 +----------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c              | 43 +++-----------------------------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c | 12 ++++++---
 virt/kvm/arm/arm.c                       |  2 --
 virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c            |  6 ++++-
 virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c                      | 11 ++++----
 10 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)

-- 
2.11.0

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] kvm/arm: skip MMIO insn after emulation
  2018-11-09 15:07 ` Mark Rutland
@ 2018-11-09 15:07   ` Mark Rutland
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2018-11-09 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel; +Cc: marc.zyngier, kvmarm

When we emulate an MMIO instruction, we advance the CPU state within
decode_hsr(), before emulating the instruction effects.

Having this logic in decode_hsr() is opaque, and advancing the state
before emulation is problematic. It gets in the way of applying
consistent single-step logic, and it prevents us from being able to fail
an MMIO instruction with a synchronous exception.

Clean this up by only advancing the CPU state *after* the effects of the
instruction are emulated.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
index dac7ceb1a677..08443a15e6be 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
@@ -117,6 +117,12 @@ int kvm_handle_mmio_return(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt, data);
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * The MMIO instruction is emulated and should not be re-executed
+	 * in the guest.
+	 */
+	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -144,11 +150,6 @@ static int decode_hsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool *is_write, int *len)
 	vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.sign_extend = sign_extend;
 	vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt = rt;
 
-	/*
-	 * The MMIO instruction is emulated and should not be re-executed
-	 * in the guest.
-	 */
-	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] kvm/arm: skip MMIO insn after emulation
@ 2018-11-09 15:07   ` Mark Rutland
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2018-11-09 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

When we emulate an MMIO instruction, we advance the CPU state within
decode_hsr(), before emulating the instruction effects.

Having this logic in decode_hsr() is opaque, and advancing the state
before emulation is problematic. It gets in the way of applying
consistent single-step logic, and it prevents us from being able to fail
an MMIO instruction with a synchronous exception.

Clean this up by only advancing the CPU state *after* the effects of the
instruction are emulated.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alex Benn?e <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
index dac7ceb1a677..08443a15e6be 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
@@ -117,6 +117,12 @@ int kvm_handle_mmio_return(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt, data);
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * The MMIO instruction is emulated and should not be re-executed
+	 * in the guest.
+	 */
+	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -144,11 +150,6 @@ static int decode_hsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool *is_write, int *len)
 	vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.sign_extend = sign_extend;
 	vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt = rt;
 
-	/*
-	 * The MMIO instruction is emulated and should not be re-executed
-	 * in the guest.
-	 */
-	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.11.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] kvm/arm: consistently advance singlestep when emulating instructions
  2018-11-09 15:07 ` Mark Rutland
@ 2018-11-09 15:07   ` Mark Rutland
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2018-11-09 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel; +Cc: marc.zyngier, kvmarm

When we emulate a guest instruction, we don't advance the hardware
singlestep state machine, and thus the guest will receive a software
step exception after a next instruction which is not emulated by the
host.

We bodge around this in an ad-hoc fashion. Sometimes we explicitly check
whether userspace requested a single step, and fake a debug exception
from within the kernel. Other times, we advance the HW singlestep state
rely on the HW to generate the exception for us. Thus, the observed step
behaviour differs for host and guest.

Let's make this simpler and consistent by always advancing the HW
singlestep state machine when we skip an instruction. Thus we can rely
on the hardware to generate the singlestep exception for us, and never
need to explicitly check for an active-pending step, nor do we need to
fake a debug exception from the guest.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h          |  5 ----
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h     | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++------
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h        |  1 -
 arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c                   | 21 ----------------
 arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c             | 14 +----------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c              | 43 +++-----------------------------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c | 12 ++++++---
 virt/kvm/arm/arm.c                       |  2 --
 virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c            |  6 ++++-
 9 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 5ca5d9af0c26..c5634c6ffcea 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -296,11 +296,6 @@ static inline void kvm_arm_init_debug(void) {}
 static inline void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
 static inline void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
 static inline void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
-static inline bool kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-					     struct kvm_run *run)
-{
-	return false;
-}
 
 int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 21247870def7..506386a3edde 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
 
+#include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
 #include <asm/esr.h>
 #include <asm/kvm_arm.h>
 #include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
@@ -147,14 +148,6 @@ static inline bool kvm_condition_valid(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return true;
 }
 
-static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_wide_instr)
-{
-	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
-		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, is_wide_instr);
-	else
-		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
-}
-
 static inline void vcpu_set_thumb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) |= PSR_AA32_T_BIT;
@@ -424,4 +417,30 @@ static inline unsigned long vcpu_data_host_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return data;		/* Leave LE untouched */
 }
 
+static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_wide_instr)
+{
+	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
+		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, is_wide_instr);
+	else
+		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
+
+	/* advance the singlestep state machine */
+	*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Skip an instruction which has been emulated at hyp while most guest sysregs
+ * are live.
+ */
+static inline void __hyp_text __kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(elr);
+	vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate = read_sysreg_el2(spsr);
+
+	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
+
+	write_sysreg_el2(vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate, spsr);
+	write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), elr);
+}
+
 #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 52fbc823ff8c..7a5035f9c5c3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -445,7 +445,6 @@ void kvm_arm_init_debug(void);
 void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
-bool kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
 int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
 int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
index 00d422336a45..f39801e4136c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
@@ -236,24 +236,3 @@ void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		}
 	}
 }
-
-
-/*
- * After successfully emulating an instruction, we might want to
- * return to user space with a KVM_EXIT_DEBUG. We can only do this
- * once the emulation is complete, though, so for userspace emulations
- * we have to wait until we have re-entered KVM before calling this
- * helper.
- *
- * Return true (and set exit_reason) to return to userspace or false
- * if no further action is required.
- */
-bool kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
-{
-	if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP) {
-		run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG;
-		run->debug.arch.hsr = ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT;
-		return true;
-	}
-	return false;
-}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
index 35a81bebd02b..b0643f9c4873 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -229,13 +229,6 @@ static int handle_trap_exceptions(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 		handled = exit_handler(vcpu, run);
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * kvm_arm_handle_step_debug() sets the exit_reason on the kvm_run
-	 * structure if we need to return to userspace.
-	 */
-	if (handled > 0 && kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(vcpu, run))
-		handled = 0;
-
 	return handled;
 }
 
@@ -269,12 +262,7 @@ int handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
 	case ARM_EXCEPTION_IRQ:
 		return 1;
 	case ARM_EXCEPTION_EL1_SERROR:
-		/* We may still need to return for single-step */
-		if (!(*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) & DBG_SPSR_SS)
-			&& kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(vcpu, run))
-			return 0;
-		else
-			return 1;
+		return 1;
 	case ARM_EXCEPTION_TRAP:
 		return handle_trap_exceptions(vcpu, run);
 	case ARM_EXCEPTION_HYP_GONE:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
index 7cc175c88a37..4282f05771c1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
@@ -305,33 +305,6 @@ static bool __hyp_text __populate_fault_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return true;
 }
 
-/* Skip an instruction which has been emulated. Returns true if
- * execution can continue or false if we need to exit hyp mode because
- * single-step was in effect.
- */
-static bool __hyp_text __skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
-	*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(elr);
-
-	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu)) {
-		vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate = read_sysreg_el2(spsr);
-		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
-		write_sysreg_el2(vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate, spsr);
-	} else {
-		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
-	}
-
-	write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), elr);
-
-	if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP) {
-		vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2 =
-			(ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT) | 0x22;
-		return false;
-	} else {
-		return true;
-	}
-}
-
 static bool __hyp_text __hyp_switch_fpsimd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct user_fpsimd_state *host_fpsimd = vcpu->arch.host_fpsimd_state;
@@ -420,20 +393,12 @@ static bool __hyp_text fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
 		if (valid) {
 			int ret = __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(vcpu);
 
-			if (ret ==  1 && __skip_instr(vcpu))
+			if (ret == 1)
 				return true;
 
-			if (ret == -1) {
-				/* Promote an illegal access to an
-				 * SError. If we would be returning
-				 * due to single-step clear the SS
-				 * bit so handle_exit knows what to
-				 * do after dealing with the error.
-				 */
-				if (!__skip_instr(vcpu))
-					*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
+			/* Promote an illegal access to an SError.*/
+			if (ret == -1)
 				*exit_code = ARM_EXCEPTION_EL1_SERROR;
-			}
 
 			goto exit;
 		}
@@ -444,7 +409,7 @@ static bool __hyp_text fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
 	     kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu) == ESR_ELx_EC_CP15_32)) {
 		int ret = __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(vcpu);
 
-		if (ret == 1 && __skip_instr(vcpu))
+		if (ret == 1)
 			return true;
 	}
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
index 215c7c0eb3b0..9cbdd034a563 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static bool __hyp_text __is_be(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  * Returns:
  *  1: GICV access successfully performed
  *  0: Not a GICV access
- * -1: Illegal GICV access
+ * -1: Illegal GICV access successfully performed
  */
 int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
@@ -61,12 +61,16 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		return 0;
 
 	/* Reject anything but a 32bit access */
-	if (kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_as(vcpu) != sizeof(u32))
+	if (kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_as(vcpu) != sizeof(u32)) {
+		__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
 		return -1;
+	}
 
 	/* Not aligned? Don't bother */
-	if (fault_ipa & 3)
+	if (fault_ipa & 3) {
+		__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
 		return -1;
+	}
 
 	rd = kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_rd(vcpu);
 	addr  = hyp_symbol_addr(kvm_vgic_global_state)->vcpu_hyp_va;
@@ -88,5 +92,7 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, rd, data);
 	}
 
+	__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
+
 	return 1;
 }
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
index 23774970c9df..4adcee5fc126 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
@@ -674,8 +674,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 		ret = kvm_handle_mmio_return(vcpu, vcpu->run);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
-		if (kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(vcpu, vcpu->run))
-			return 0;
 	}
 
 	if (run->immediate_exit)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
index 616e5a433ab0..9652c453480f 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
@@ -1012,8 +1012,10 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	esr = kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu);
 	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu)) {
-		if (!kvm_condition_valid(vcpu))
+		if (!kvm_condition_valid(vcpu)) {
+			__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
 			return 1;
+		}
 
 		sysreg = esr_cp15_to_sysreg(esr);
 	} else {
@@ -1123,6 +1125,8 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	rt = kvm_vcpu_sys_get_rt(vcpu);
 	fn(vcpu, vmcr, rt);
 
+	__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
+
 	return 1;
 }
 
-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] kvm/arm: consistently advance singlestep when emulating instructions
@ 2018-11-09 15:07   ` Mark Rutland
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2018-11-09 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

When we emulate a guest instruction, we don't advance the hardware
singlestep state machine, and thus the guest will receive a software
step exception after a next instruction which is not emulated by the
host.

We bodge around this in an ad-hoc fashion. Sometimes we explicitly check
whether userspace requested a single step, and fake a debug exception
from within the kernel. Other times, we advance the HW singlestep state
rely on the HW to generate the exception for us. Thus, the observed step
behaviour differs for host and guest.

Let's make this simpler and consistent by always advancing the HW
singlestep state machine when we skip an instruction. Thus we can rely
on the hardware to generate the singlestep exception for us, and never
need to explicitly check for an active-pending step, nor do we need to
fake a debug exception from the guest.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alex Benn?e <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h          |  5 ----
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h     | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++------
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h        |  1 -
 arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c                   | 21 ----------------
 arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c             | 14 +----------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c              | 43 +++-----------------------------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c | 12 ++++++---
 virt/kvm/arm/arm.c                       |  2 --
 virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c            |  6 ++++-
 9 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 5ca5d9af0c26..c5634c6ffcea 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -296,11 +296,6 @@ static inline void kvm_arm_init_debug(void) {}
 static inline void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
 static inline void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
 static inline void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
-static inline bool kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-					     struct kvm_run *run)
-{
-	return false;
-}
 
 int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 21247870def7..506386a3edde 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
 
+#include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
 #include <asm/esr.h>
 #include <asm/kvm_arm.h>
 #include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
@@ -147,14 +148,6 @@ static inline bool kvm_condition_valid(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return true;
 }
 
-static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_wide_instr)
-{
-	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
-		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, is_wide_instr);
-	else
-		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
-}
-
 static inline void vcpu_set_thumb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) |= PSR_AA32_T_BIT;
@@ -424,4 +417,30 @@ static inline unsigned long vcpu_data_host_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return data;		/* Leave LE untouched */
 }
 
+static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_wide_instr)
+{
+	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
+		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, is_wide_instr);
+	else
+		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
+
+	/* advance the singlestep state machine */
+	*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Skip an instruction which has been emulated at hyp while most guest sysregs
+ * are live.
+ */
+static inline void __hyp_text __kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(elr);
+	vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate = read_sysreg_el2(spsr);
+
+	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
+
+	write_sysreg_el2(vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate, spsr);
+	write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), elr);
+}
+
 #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 52fbc823ff8c..7a5035f9c5c3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -445,7 +445,6 @@ void kvm_arm_init_debug(void);
 void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
-bool kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
 int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
 int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
index 00d422336a45..f39801e4136c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
@@ -236,24 +236,3 @@ void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		}
 	}
 }
-
-
-/*
- * After successfully emulating an instruction, we might want to
- * return to user space with a KVM_EXIT_DEBUG. We can only do this
- * once the emulation is complete, though, so for userspace emulations
- * we have to wait until we have re-entered KVM before calling this
- * helper.
- *
- * Return true (and set exit_reason) to return to userspace or false
- * if no further action is required.
- */
-bool kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
-{
-	if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP) {
-		run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG;
-		run->debug.arch.hsr = ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT;
-		return true;
-	}
-	return false;
-}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
index 35a81bebd02b..b0643f9c4873 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -229,13 +229,6 @@ static int handle_trap_exceptions(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 		handled = exit_handler(vcpu, run);
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * kvm_arm_handle_step_debug() sets the exit_reason on the kvm_run
-	 * structure if we need to return to userspace.
-	 */
-	if (handled > 0 && kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(vcpu, run))
-		handled = 0;
-
 	return handled;
 }
 
@@ -269,12 +262,7 @@ int handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
 	case ARM_EXCEPTION_IRQ:
 		return 1;
 	case ARM_EXCEPTION_EL1_SERROR:
-		/* We may still need to return for single-step */
-		if (!(*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) & DBG_SPSR_SS)
-			&& kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(vcpu, run))
-			return 0;
-		else
-			return 1;
+		return 1;
 	case ARM_EXCEPTION_TRAP:
 		return handle_trap_exceptions(vcpu, run);
 	case ARM_EXCEPTION_HYP_GONE:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
index 7cc175c88a37..4282f05771c1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
@@ -305,33 +305,6 @@ static bool __hyp_text __populate_fault_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return true;
 }
 
-/* Skip an instruction which has been emulated. Returns true if
- * execution can continue or false if we need to exit hyp mode because
- * single-step was in effect.
- */
-static bool __hyp_text __skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
-	*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(elr);
-
-	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu)) {
-		vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate = read_sysreg_el2(spsr);
-		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
-		write_sysreg_el2(vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate, spsr);
-	} else {
-		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
-	}
-
-	write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), elr);
-
-	if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP) {
-		vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2 =
-			(ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT) | 0x22;
-		return false;
-	} else {
-		return true;
-	}
-}
-
 static bool __hyp_text __hyp_switch_fpsimd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct user_fpsimd_state *host_fpsimd = vcpu->arch.host_fpsimd_state;
@@ -420,20 +393,12 @@ static bool __hyp_text fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
 		if (valid) {
 			int ret = __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(vcpu);
 
-			if (ret ==  1 && __skip_instr(vcpu))
+			if (ret == 1)
 				return true;
 
-			if (ret == -1) {
-				/* Promote an illegal access to an
-				 * SError. If we would be returning
-				 * due to single-step clear the SS
-				 * bit so handle_exit knows what to
-				 * do after dealing with the error.
-				 */
-				if (!__skip_instr(vcpu))
-					*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
+			/* Promote an illegal access to an SError.*/
+			if (ret == -1)
 				*exit_code = ARM_EXCEPTION_EL1_SERROR;
-			}
 
 			goto exit;
 		}
@@ -444,7 +409,7 @@ static bool __hyp_text fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
 	     kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu) == ESR_ELx_EC_CP15_32)) {
 		int ret = __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(vcpu);
 
-		if (ret == 1 && __skip_instr(vcpu))
+		if (ret == 1)
 			return true;
 	}
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
index 215c7c0eb3b0..9cbdd034a563 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static bool __hyp_text __is_be(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  * Returns:
  *  1: GICV access successfully performed
  *  0: Not a GICV access
- * -1: Illegal GICV access
+ * -1: Illegal GICV access successfully performed
  */
 int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
@@ -61,12 +61,16 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		return 0;
 
 	/* Reject anything but a 32bit access */
-	if (kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_as(vcpu) != sizeof(u32))
+	if (kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_as(vcpu) != sizeof(u32)) {
+		__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
 		return -1;
+	}
 
 	/* Not aligned? Don't bother */
-	if (fault_ipa & 3)
+	if (fault_ipa & 3) {
+		__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
 		return -1;
+	}
 
 	rd = kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_rd(vcpu);
 	addr  = hyp_symbol_addr(kvm_vgic_global_state)->vcpu_hyp_va;
@@ -88,5 +92,7 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, rd, data);
 	}
 
+	__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
+
 	return 1;
 }
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
index 23774970c9df..4adcee5fc126 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
@@ -674,8 +674,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 		ret = kvm_handle_mmio_return(vcpu, vcpu->run);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
-		if (kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(vcpu, vcpu->run))
-			return 0;
 	}
 
 	if (run->immediate_exit)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
index 616e5a433ab0..9652c453480f 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
@@ -1012,8 +1012,10 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	esr = kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu);
 	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu)) {
-		if (!kvm_condition_valid(vcpu))
+		if (!kvm_condition_valid(vcpu)) {
+			__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
 			return 1;
+		}
 
 		sysreg = esr_cp15_to_sysreg(esr);
 	} else {
@@ -1123,6 +1125,8 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	rt = kvm_vcpu_sys_get_rt(vcpu);
 	fn(vcpu, vmcr, rt);
 
+	__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
+
 	return 1;
 }
 
-- 
2.11.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] kvm/arm: skip MMIO insn after emulation
  2018-11-09 15:07   ` Mark Rutland
@ 2018-11-09 15:43     ` Alex Bennée
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Alex Bennée @ 2018-11-09 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Rutland
  Cc: marc.zyngier, peter.maydell, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, christoffer.dall


Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> writes:

> When we emulate an MMIO instruction, we advance the CPU state within
> decode_hsr(), before emulating the instruction effects.
>
> Having this logic in decode_hsr() is opaque, and advancing the state
> before emulation is problematic. It gets in the way of applying
> consistent single-step logic, and it prevents us from being able to fail
> an MMIO instruction with a synchronous exception.
>
> Clean this up by only advancing the CPU state *after* the effects of the
> instruction are emulated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c | 11 ++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
> index dac7ceb1a677..08443a15e6be 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
> @@ -117,6 +117,12 @@ int kvm_handle_mmio_return(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt, data);
>  	}
>
> +	/*
> +	 * The MMIO instruction is emulated and should not be re-executed
> +	 * in the guest.
> +	 */
> +	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -144,11 +150,6 @@ static int decode_hsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool *is_write, int *len)
>  	vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.sign_extend = sign_extend;
>  	vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt = rt;
>
> -	/*
> -	 * The MMIO instruction is emulated and should not be re-executed
> -	 * in the guest.
> -	 */
> -	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
>  	return 0;
>  }


--
Alex Bennée

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] kvm/arm: skip MMIO insn after emulation
@ 2018-11-09 15:43     ` Alex Bennée
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Alex Bennée @ 2018-11-09 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel


Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> writes:

> When we emulate an MMIO instruction, we advance the CPU state within
> decode_hsr(), before emulating the instruction effects.
>
> Having this logic in decode_hsr() is opaque, and advancing the state
> before emulation is problematic. It gets in the way of applying
> consistent single-step logic, and it prevents us from being able to fail
> an MMIO instruction with a synchronous exception.
>
> Clean this up by only advancing the CPU state *after* the effects of the
> instruction are emulated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Alex Benn?e <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Alex Benn?e <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c | 11 ++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
> index dac7ceb1a677..08443a15e6be 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
> @@ -117,6 +117,12 @@ int kvm_handle_mmio_return(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt, data);
>  	}
>
> +	/*
> +	 * The MMIO instruction is emulated and should not be re-executed
> +	 * in the guest.
> +	 */
> +	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -144,11 +150,6 @@ static int decode_hsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool *is_write, int *len)
>  	vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.sign_extend = sign_extend;
>  	vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt = rt;
>
> -	/*
> -	 * The MMIO instruction is emulated and should not be re-executed
> -	 * in the guest.
> -	 */
> -	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
>  	return 0;
>  }


--
Alex Benn?e

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] kvm/arm: consistently advance singlestep when emulating instructions
  2018-11-09 15:07   ` Mark Rutland
@ 2018-11-09 16:58     ` Alex Bennée
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Alex Bennée @ 2018-11-09 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Rutland; +Cc: marc.zyngier, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel


Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> writes:

> When we emulate a guest instruction, we don't advance the hardware
> singlestep state machine, and thus the guest will receive a software
> step exception after a next instruction which is not emulated by the
> host.
>
> We bodge around this in an ad-hoc fashion. Sometimes we explicitly check
> whether userspace requested a single step, and fake a debug exception
> from within the kernel. Other times, we advance the HW singlestep state
> rely on the HW to generate the exception for us. Thus, the observed step
> behaviour differs for host and guest.
>
> Let's make this simpler and consistent by always advancing the HW
> singlestep state machine when we skip an instruction. Thus we can rely
> on the hardware to generate the singlestep exception for us, and never
> need to explicitly check for an active-pending step, nor do we need to
> fake a debug exception from the guest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

For reference I'm leaving this kernel boot soaking overnight. In theory
there may be a branch to self but we shall see:

  https://gist.github.com/stsquad/ddfb00787cb133b4b658756cb6c47f63

> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h          |  5 ----
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h     | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h        |  1 -
>  arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c                   | 21 ----------------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c             | 14 +----------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c              | 43 +++-----------------------------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c | 12 ++++++---
>  virt/kvm/arm/arm.c                       |  2 --
>  virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c            |  6 ++++-
>  9 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 5ca5d9af0c26..c5634c6ffcea 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -296,11 +296,6 @@ static inline void kvm_arm_init_debug(void) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> -static inline bool kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> -					     struct kvm_run *run)
> -{
> -	return false;
> -}
>
>  int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index 21247870def7..506386a3edde 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>
>  #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>
> +#include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
>  #include <asm/esr.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_arm.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
> @@ -147,14 +148,6 @@ static inline bool kvm_condition_valid(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return true;
>  }
>
> -static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_wide_instr)
> -{
> -	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
> -		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, is_wide_instr);
> -	else
> -		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
> -}
> -
>  static inline void vcpu_set_thumb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) |= PSR_AA32_T_BIT;
> @@ -424,4 +417,30 @@ static inline unsigned long vcpu_data_host_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	return data;		/* Leave LE untouched */
>  }
>
> +static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_wide_instr)
> +{
> +	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
> +		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, is_wide_instr);
> +	else
> +		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
> +
> +	/* advance the singlestep state machine */
> +	*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Skip an instruction which has been emulated at hyp while most guest sysregs
> + * are live.
> + */
> +static inline void __hyp_text __kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(elr);
> +	vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate = read_sysreg_el2(spsr);
> +
> +	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> +
> +	write_sysreg_el2(vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate, spsr);
> +	write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), elr);
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 52fbc823ff8c..7a5035f9c5c3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -445,7 +445,6 @@ void kvm_arm_init_debug(void);
>  void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> -bool kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
>  int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
>  int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
> index 00d422336a45..f39801e4136c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
> @@ -236,24 +236,3 @@ void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		}
>  	}
>  }
> -
> -
> -/*
> - * After successfully emulating an instruction, we might want to
> - * return to user space with a KVM_EXIT_DEBUG. We can only do this
> - * once the emulation is complete, though, so for userspace emulations
> - * we have to wait until we have re-entered KVM before calling this
> - * helper.
> - *
> - * Return true (and set exit_reason) to return to userspace or false
> - * if no further action is required.
> - */
> -bool kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> -{
> -	if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP) {
> -		run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG;
> -		run->debug.arch.hsr = ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT;
> -		return true;
> -	}
> -	return false;
> -}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> index 35a81bebd02b..b0643f9c4873 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> @@ -229,13 +229,6 @@ static int handle_trap_exceptions(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  		handled = exit_handler(vcpu, run);
>  	}
>
> -	/*
> -	 * kvm_arm_handle_step_debug() sets the exit_reason on the kvm_run
> -	 * structure if we need to return to userspace.
> -	 */
> -	if (handled > 0 && kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(vcpu, run))
> -		handled = 0;
> -
>  	return handled;
>  }
>
> @@ -269,12 +262,7 @@ int handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
>  	case ARM_EXCEPTION_IRQ:
>  		return 1;
>  	case ARM_EXCEPTION_EL1_SERROR:
> -		/* We may still need to return for single-step */
> -		if (!(*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) & DBG_SPSR_SS)
> -			&& kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(vcpu, run))
> -			return 0;
> -		else
> -			return 1;
> +		return 1;
>  	case ARM_EXCEPTION_TRAP:
>  		return handle_trap_exceptions(vcpu, run);
>  	case ARM_EXCEPTION_HYP_GONE:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> index 7cc175c88a37..4282f05771c1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> @@ -305,33 +305,6 @@ static bool __hyp_text __populate_fault_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return true;
>  }
>
> -/* Skip an instruction which has been emulated. Returns true if
> - * execution can continue or false if we need to exit hyp mode because
> - * single-step was in effect.
> - */
> -static bool __hyp_text __skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> -	*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(elr);
> -
> -	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu)) {
> -		vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate = read_sysreg_el2(spsr);
> -		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> -		write_sysreg_el2(vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate, spsr);
> -	} else {
> -		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
> -	}
> -
> -	write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), elr);
> -
> -	if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP) {
> -		vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2 =
> -			(ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT) | 0x22;
> -		return false;
> -	} else {
> -		return true;
> -	}
> -}
> -
>  static bool __hyp_text __hyp_switch_fpsimd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	struct user_fpsimd_state *host_fpsimd = vcpu->arch.host_fpsimd_state;
> @@ -420,20 +393,12 @@ static bool __hyp_text fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
>  		if (valid) {
>  			int ret = __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(vcpu);
>
> -			if (ret ==  1 && __skip_instr(vcpu))
> +			if (ret == 1)
>  				return true;
>
> -			if (ret == -1) {
> -				/* Promote an illegal access to an
> -				 * SError. If we would be returning
> -				 * due to single-step clear the SS
> -				 * bit so handle_exit knows what to
> -				 * do after dealing with the error.
> -				 */
> -				if (!__skip_instr(vcpu))
> -					*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
> +			/* Promote an illegal access to an SError.*/
> +			if (ret == -1)
>  				*exit_code = ARM_EXCEPTION_EL1_SERROR;
> -			}
>
>  			goto exit;
>  		}
> @@ -444,7 +409,7 @@ static bool __hyp_text fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
>  	     kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu) == ESR_ELx_EC_CP15_32)) {
>  		int ret = __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(vcpu);
>
> -		if (ret == 1 && __skip_instr(vcpu))
> +		if (ret == 1)
>  			return true;
>  	}
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
> index 215c7c0eb3b0..9cbdd034a563 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static bool __hyp_text __is_be(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   * Returns:
>   *  1: GICV access successfully performed
>   *  0: Not a GICV access
> - * -1: Illegal GICV access
> + * -1: Illegal GICV access successfully performed
>   */
>  int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> @@ -61,12 +61,16 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		return 0;
>
>  	/* Reject anything but a 32bit access */
> -	if (kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_as(vcpu) != sizeof(u32))
> +	if (kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_as(vcpu) != sizeof(u32)) {
> +		__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
>  		return -1;
> +	}
>
>  	/* Not aligned? Don't bother */
> -	if (fault_ipa & 3)
> +	if (fault_ipa & 3) {
> +		__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
>  		return -1;
> +	}
>
>  	rd = kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_rd(vcpu);
>  	addr  = hyp_symbol_addr(kvm_vgic_global_state)->vcpu_hyp_va;
> @@ -88,5 +92,7 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, rd, data);
>  	}
>
> +	__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
> +
>  	return 1;
>  }
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index 23774970c9df..4adcee5fc126 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -674,8 +674,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  		ret = kvm_handle_mmio_return(vcpu, vcpu->run);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
> -		if (kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(vcpu, vcpu->run))
> -			return 0;
>  	}
>
>  	if (run->immediate_exit)
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> index 616e5a433ab0..9652c453480f 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> @@ -1012,8 +1012,10 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
>  	esr = kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu);
>  	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu)) {
> -		if (!kvm_condition_valid(vcpu))
> +		if (!kvm_condition_valid(vcpu)) {
> +			__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
>  			return 1;
> +		}
>
>  		sysreg = esr_cp15_to_sysreg(esr);
>  	} else {
> @@ -1123,6 +1125,8 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	rt = kvm_vcpu_sys_get_rt(vcpu);
>  	fn(vcpu, vmcr, rt);
>
> +	__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
> +
>  	return 1;
>  }


--
Alex Bennée
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] kvm/arm: consistently advance singlestep when emulating instructions
@ 2018-11-09 16:58     ` Alex Bennée
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Alex Bennée @ 2018-11-09 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel


Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> writes:

> When we emulate a guest instruction, we don't advance the hardware
> singlestep state machine, and thus the guest will receive a software
> step exception after a next instruction which is not emulated by the
> host.
>
> We bodge around this in an ad-hoc fashion. Sometimes we explicitly check
> whether userspace requested a single step, and fake a debug exception
> from within the kernel. Other times, we advance the HW singlestep state
> rely on the HW to generate the exception for us. Thus, the observed step
> behaviour differs for host and guest.
>
> Let's make this simpler and consistent by always advancing the HW
> singlestep state machine when we skip an instruction. Thus we can rely
> on the hardware to generate the singlestep exception for us, and never
> need to explicitly check for an active-pending step, nor do we need to
> fake a debug exception from the guest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Alex Benn?e <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Alex Benn?e <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Alex Benn?e <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

For reference I'm leaving this kernel boot soaking overnight. In theory
there may be a branch to self but we shall see:

  https://gist.github.com/stsquad/ddfb00787cb133b4b658756cb6c47f63

> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h          |  5 ----
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h     | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h        |  1 -
>  arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c                   | 21 ----------------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c             | 14 +----------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c              | 43 +++-----------------------------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c | 12 ++++++---
>  virt/kvm/arm/arm.c                       |  2 --
>  virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c            |  6 ++++-
>  9 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 5ca5d9af0c26..c5634c6ffcea 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -296,11 +296,6 @@ static inline void kvm_arm_init_debug(void) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> -static inline bool kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> -					     struct kvm_run *run)
> -{
> -	return false;
> -}
>
>  int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index 21247870def7..506386a3edde 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>
>  #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>
> +#include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
>  #include <asm/esr.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_arm.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
> @@ -147,14 +148,6 @@ static inline bool kvm_condition_valid(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return true;
>  }
>
> -static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_wide_instr)
> -{
> -	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
> -		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, is_wide_instr);
> -	else
> -		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
> -}
> -
>  static inline void vcpu_set_thumb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) |= PSR_AA32_T_BIT;
> @@ -424,4 +417,30 @@ static inline unsigned long vcpu_data_host_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	return data;		/* Leave LE untouched */
>  }
>
> +static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_wide_instr)
> +{
> +	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
> +		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, is_wide_instr);
> +	else
> +		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
> +
> +	/* advance the singlestep state machine */
> +	*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Skip an instruction which has been emulated at hyp while most guest sysregs
> + * are live.
> + */
> +static inline void __hyp_text __kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(elr);
> +	vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate = read_sysreg_el2(spsr);
> +
> +	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> +
> +	write_sysreg_el2(vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate, spsr);
> +	write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), elr);
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 52fbc823ff8c..7a5035f9c5c3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -445,7 +445,6 @@ void kvm_arm_init_debug(void);
>  void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> -bool kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
>  int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
>  int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
> index 00d422336a45..f39801e4136c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
> @@ -236,24 +236,3 @@ void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		}
>  	}
>  }
> -
> -
> -/*
> - * After successfully emulating an instruction, we might want to
> - * return to user space with a KVM_EXIT_DEBUG. We can only do this
> - * once the emulation is complete, though, so for userspace emulations
> - * we have to wait until we have re-entered KVM before calling this
> - * helper.
> - *
> - * Return true (and set exit_reason) to return to userspace or false
> - * if no further action is required.
> - */
> -bool kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> -{
> -	if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP) {
> -		run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG;
> -		run->debug.arch.hsr = ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT;
> -		return true;
> -	}
> -	return false;
> -}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> index 35a81bebd02b..b0643f9c4873 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> @@ -229,13 +229,6 @@ static int handle_trap_exceptions(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  		handled = exit_handler(vcpu, run);
>  	}
>
> -	/*
> -	 * kvm_arm_handle_step_debug() sets the exit_reason on the kvm_run
> -	 * structure if we need to return to userspace.
> -	 */
> -	if (handled > 0 && kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(vcpu, run))
> -		handled = 0;
> -
>  	return handled;
>  }
>
> @@ -269,12 +262,7 @@ int handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
>  	case ARM_EXCEPTION_IRQ:
>  		return 1;
>  	case ARM_EXCEPTION_EL1_SERROR:
> -		/* We may still need to return for single-step */
> -		if (!(*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) & DBG_SPSR_SS)
> -			&& kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(vcpu, run))
> -			return 0;
> -		else
> -			return 1;
> +		return 1;
>  	case ARM_EXCEPTION_TRAP:
>  		return handle_trap_exceptions(vcpu, run);
>  	case ARM_EXCEPTION_HYP_GONE:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> index 7cc175c88a37..4282f05771c1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> @@ -305,33 +305,6 @@ static bool __hyp_text __populate_fault_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return true;
>  }
>
> -/* Skip an instruction which has been emulated. Returns true if
> - * execution can continue or false if we need to exit hyp mode because
> - * single-step was in effect.
> - */
> -static bool __hyp_text __skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> -	*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(elr);
> -
> -	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu)) {
> -		vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate = read_sysreg_el2(spsr);
> -		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> -		write_sysreg_el2(vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate, spsr);
> -	} else {
> -		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
> -	}
> -
> -	write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), elr);
> -
> -	if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP) {
> -		vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2 =
> -			(ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT) | 0x22;
> -		return false;
> -	} else {
> -		return true;
> -	}
> -}
> -
>  static bool __hyp_text __hyp_switch_fpsimd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	struct user_fpsimd_state *host_fpsimd = vcpu->arch.host_fpsimd_state;
> @@ -420,20 +393,12 @@ static bool __hyp_text fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
>  		if (valid) {
>  			int ret = __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(vcpu);
>
> -			if (ret ==  1 && __skip_instr(vcpu))
> +			if (ret == 1)
>  				return true;
>
> -			if (ret == -1) {
> -				/* Promote an illegal access to an
> -				 * SError. If we would be returning
> -				 * due to single-step clear the SS
> -				 * bit so handle_exit knows what to
> -				 * do after dealing with the error.
> -				 */
> -				if (!__skip_instr(vcpu))
> -					*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
> +			/* Promote an illegal access to an SError.*/
> +			if (ret == -1)
>  				*exit_code = ARM_EXCEPTION_EL1_SERROR;
> -			}
>
>  			goto exit;
>  		}
> @@ -444,7 +409,7 @@ static bool __hyp_text fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
>  	     kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu) == ESR_ELx_EC_CP15_32)) {
>  		int ret = __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(vcpu);
>
> -		if (ret == 1 && __skip_instr(vcpu))
> +		if (ret == 1)
>  			return true;
>  	}
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
> index 215c7c0eb3b0..9cbdd034a563 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static bool __hyp_text __is_be(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   * Returns:
>   *  1: GICV access successfully performed
>   *  0: Not a GICV access
> - * -1: Illegal GICV access
> + * -1: Illegal GICV access successfully performed
>   */
>  int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> @@ -61,12 +61,16 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		return 0;
>
>  	/* Reject anything but a 32bit access */
> -	if (kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_as(vcpu) != sizeof(u32))
> +	if (kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_as(vcpu) != sizeof(u32)) {
> +		__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
>  		return -1;
> +	}
>
>  	/* Not aligned? Don't bother */
> -	if (fault_ipa & 3)
> +	if (fault_ipa & 3) {
> +		__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
>  		return -1;
> +	}
>
>  	rd = kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_rd(vcpu);
>  	addr  = hyp_symbol_addr(kvm_vgic_global_state)->vcpu_hyp_va;
> @@ -88,5 +92,7 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, rd, data);
>  	}
>
> +	__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
> +
>  	return 1;
>  }
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index 23774970c9df..4adcee5fc126 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -674,8 +674,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  		ret = kvm_handle_mmio_return(vcpu, vcpu->run);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
> -		if (kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(vcpu, vcpu->run))
> -			return 0;
>  	}
>
>  	if (run->immediate_exit)
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> index 616e5a433ab0..9652c453480f 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> @@ -1012,8 +1012,10 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
>  	esr = kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu);
>  	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu)) {
> -		if (!kvm_condition_valid(vcpu))
> +		if (!kvm_condition_valid(vcpu)) {
> +			__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
>  			return 1;
> +		}
>
>  		sysreg = esr_cp15_to_sysreg(esr);
>  	} else {
> @@ -1123,6 +1125,8 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	rt = kvm_vcpu_sys_get_rt(vcpu);
>  	fn(vcpu, vmcr, rt);
>
> +	__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
> +
>  	return 1;
>  }


--
Alex Benn?e

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] kvm/arm: consistently advance singlestep when emulating instructions
  2018-11-09 15:07   ` Mark Rutland
@ 2018-12-11  8:30     ` Christoffer Dall
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Christoffer Dall @ 2018-12-11  8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Rutland; +Cc: marc.zyngier, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel

On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 03:07:11PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> When we emulate a guest instruction, we don't advance the hardware
> singlestep state machine, and thus the guest will receive a software
> step exception after a next instruction which is not emulated by the
> host.
> 
> We bodge around this in an ad-hoc fashion. Sometimes we explicitly check
> whether userspace requested a single step, and fake a debug exception
> from within the kernel. Other times, we advance the HW singlestep state
> rely on the HW to generate the exception for us. Thus, the observed step
> behaviour differs for host and guest.
> 
> Let's make this simpler and consistent by always advancing the HW
> singlestep state machine when we skip an instruction. Thus we can rely
> on the hardware to generate the singlestep exception for us, and never
> need to explicitly check for an active-pending step, nor do we need to
> fake a debug exception from the guest.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h          |  5 ----
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h     | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h        |  1 -
>  arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c                   | 21 ----------------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c             | 14 +----------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c              | 43 +++-----------------------------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c | 12 ++++++---
>  virt/kvm/arm/arm.c                       |  2 --
>  virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c            |  6 ++++-
>  9 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 5ca5d9af0c26..c5634c6ffcea 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -296,11 +296,6 @@ static inline void kvm_arm_init_debug(void) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> -static inline bool kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> -					     struct kvm_run *run)
> -{
> -	return false;
> -}
>  
>  int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index 21247870def7..506386a3edde 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>  
> +#include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
>  #include <asm/esr.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_arm.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
> @@ -147,14 +148,6 @@ static inline bool kvm_condition_valid(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> -static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_wide_instr)
> -{
> -	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
> -		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, is_wide_instr);
> -	else
> -		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
> -}
> -
>  static inline void vcpu_set_thumb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) |= PSR_AA32_T_BIT;
> @@ -424,4 +417,30 @@ static inline unsigned long vcpu_data_host_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	return data;		/* Leave LE untouched */
>  }
>  
> +static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_wide_instr)
> +{
> +	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
> +		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, is_wide_instr);
> +	else
> +		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
> +
> +	/* advance the singlestep state machine */
> +	*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Skip an instruction which has been emulated at hyp while most guest sysregs
> + * are live.
> + */
> +static inline void __hyp_text __kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(elr);
> +	vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate = read_sysreg_el2(spsr);
> +
> +	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> +
> +	write_sysreg_el2(vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate, spsr);
> +	write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), elr);
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 52fbc823ff8c..7a5035f9c5c3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -445,7 +445,6 @@ void kvm_arm_init_debug(void);
>  void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> -bool kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
>  int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
>  int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
> index 00d422336a45..f39801e4136c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
> @@ -236,24 +236,3 @@ void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		}
>  	}
>  }
> -
> -
> -/*
> - * After successfully emulating an instruction, we might want to
> - * return to user space with a KVM_EXIT_DEBUG. We can only do this
> - * once the emulation is complete, though, so for userspace emulations
> - * we have to wait until we have re-entered KVM before calling this
> - * helper.
> - *
> - * Return true (and set exit_reason) to return to userspace or false
> - * if no further action is required.
> - */
> -bool kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> -{
> -	if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP) {
> -		run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG;
> -		run->debug.arch.hsr = ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT;
> -		return true;
> -	}
> -	return false;
> -}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> index 35a81bebd02b..b0643f9c4873 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> @@ -229,13 +229,6 @@ static int handle_trap_exceptions(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  		handled = exit_handler(vcpu, run);
>  	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * kvm_arm_handle_step_debug() sets the exit_reason on the kvm_run
> -	 * structure if we need to return to userspace.
> -	 */
> -	if (handled > 0 && kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(vcpu, run))
> -		handled = 0;
> -
>  	return handled;
>  }
>  
> @@ -269,12 +262,7 @@ int handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
>  	case ARM_EXCEPTION_IRQ:
>  		return 1;
>  	case ARM_EXCEPTION_EL1_SERROR:
> -		/* We may still need to return for single-step */
> -		if (!(*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) & DBG_SPSR_SS)
> -			&& kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(vcpu, run))
> -			return 0;
> -		else
> -			return 1;
> +		return 1;
>  	case ARM_EXCEPTION_TRAP:
>  		return handle_trap_exceptions(vcpu, run);
>  	case ARM_EXCEPTION_HYP_GONE:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> index 7cc175c88a37..4282f05771c1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> @@ -305,33 +305,6 @@ static bool __hyp_text __populate_fault_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> -/* Skip an instruction which has been emulated. Returns true if
> - * execution can continue or false if we need to exit hyp mode because
> - * single-step was in effect.
> - */
> -static bool __hyp_text __skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> -	*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(elr);
> -
> -	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu)) {
> -		vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate = read_sysreg_el2(spsr);
> -		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> -		write_sysreg_el2(vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate, spsr);
> -	} else {
> -		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
> -	}
> -
> -	write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), elr);
> -
> -	if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP) {
> -		vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2 =
> -			(ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT) | 0x22;
> -		return false;
> -	} else {
> -		return true;
> -	}
> -}
> -
>  static bool __hyp_text __hyp_switch_fpsimd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	struct user_fpsimd_state *host_fpsimd = vcpu->arch.host_fpsimd_state;
> @@ -420,20 +393,12 @@ static bool __hyp_text fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
>  		if (valid) {
>  			int ret = __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(vcpu);
>  
> -			if (ret ==  1 && __skip_instr(vcpu))
> +			if (ret == 1)
>  				return true;
>  
> -			if (ret == -1) {
> -				/* Promote an illegal access to an
> -				 * SError. If we would be returning
> -				 * due to single-step clear the SS
> -				 * bit so handle_exit knows what to
> -				 * do after dealing with the error.
> -				 */
> -				if (!__skip_instr(vcpu))
> -					*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
> +			/* Promote an illegal access to an SError.*/
> +			if (ret == -1)
>  				*exit_code = ARM_EXCEPTION_EL1_SERROR;
> -			}
>  
>  			goto exit;
>  		}
> @@ -444,7 +409,7 @@ static bool __hyp_text fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
>  	     kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu) == ESR_ELx_EC_CP15_32)) {
>  		int ret = __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(vcpu);
>  
> -		if (ret == 1 && __skip_instr(vcpu))
> +		if (ret == 1)
>  			return true;
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
> index 215c7c0eb3b0..9cbdd034a563 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static bool __hyp_text __is_be(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   * Returns:
>   *  1: GICV access successfully performed
>   *  0: Not a GICV access
> - * -1: Illegal GICV access
> + * -1: Illegal GICV access successfully performed
>   */
>  int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> @@ -61,12 +61,16 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	/* Reject anything but a 32bit access */
> -	if (kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_as(vcpu) != sizeof(u32))
> +	if (kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_as(vcpu) != sizeof(u32)) {
> +		__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
>  		return -1;
> +	}
>  
>  	/* Not aligned? Don't bother */
> -	if (fault_ipa & 3)
> +	if (fault_ipa & 3) {
> +		__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
>  		return -1;
> +	}
>  
>  	rd = kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_rd(vcpu);
>  	addr  = hyp_symbol_addr(kvm_vgic_global_state)->vcpu_hyp_va;
> @@ -88,5 +92,7 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, rd, data);
>  	}
>  
> +	__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
> +
>  	return 1;
>  }
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index 23774970c9df..4adcee5fc126 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -674,8 +674,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  		ret = kvm_handle_mmio_return(vcpu, vcpu->run);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
> -		if (kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(vcpu, vcpu->run))
> -			return 0;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (run->immediate_exit)
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> index 616e5a433ab0..9652c453480f 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> @@ -1012,8 +1012,10 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  	esr = kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu);
>  	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu)) {
> -		if (!kvm_condition_valid(vcpu))
> +		if (!kvm_condition_valid(vcpu)) {
> +			__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
>  			return 1;
> +		}
>  
>  		sysreg = esr_cp15_to_sysreg(esr);
>  	} else {
> @@ -1123,6 +1125,8 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	rt = kvm_vcpu_sys_get_rt(vcpu);
>  	fn(vcpu, vmcr, rt);
>  
> +	__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
> +
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  

I would have preferred either calling __kvm_skip_instr() at the callsite
for the GIC emulation functions or using a goto out construct in the two
functions, but I'm not sure it's worth respinning for that reason:

Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] kvm/arm: consistently advance singlestep when emulating instructions
@ 2018-12-11  8:30     ` Christoffer Dall
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Christoffer Dall @ 2018-12-11  8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Rutland
  Cc: marc.zyngier, peter.maydell, alex.bennee, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel

On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 03:07:11PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> When we emulate a guest instruction, we don't advance the hardware
> singlestep state machine, and thus the guest will receive a software
> step exception after a next instruction which is not emulated by the
> host.
> 
> We bodge around this in an ad-hoc fashion. Sometimes we explicitly check
> whether userspace requested a single step, and fake a debug exception
> from within the kernel. Other times, we advance the HW singlestep state
> rely on the HW to generate the exception for us. Thus, the observed step
> behaviour differs for host and guest.
> 
> Let's make this simpler and consistent by always advancing the HW
> singlestep state machine when we skip an instruction. Thus we can rely
> on the hardware to generate the singlestep exception for us, and never
> need to explicitly check for an active-pending step, nor do we need to
> fake a debug exception from the guest.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h          |  5 ----
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h     | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h        |  1 -
>  arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c                   | 21 ----------------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c             | 14 +----------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c              | 43 +++-----------------------------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c | 12 ++++++---
>  virt/kvm/arm/arm.c                       |  2 --
>  virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c            |  6 ++++-
>  9 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 5ca5d9af0c26..c5634c6ffcea 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -296,11 +296,6 @@ static inline void kvm_arm_init_debug(void) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> -static inline bool kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> -					     struct kvm_run *run)
> -{
> -	return false;
> -}
>  
>  int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index 21247870def7..506386a3edde 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>  
> +#include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
>  #include <asm/esr.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_arm.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
> @@ -147,14 +148,6 @@ static inline bool kvm_condition_valid(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> -static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_wide_instr)
> -{
> -	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
> -		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, is_wide_instr);
> -	else
> -		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
> -}
> -
>  static inline void vcpu_set_thumb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) |= PSR_AA32_T_BIT;
> @@ -424,4 +417,30 @@ static inline unsigned long vcpu_data_host_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	return data;		/* Leave LE untouched */
>  }
>  
> +static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_wide_instr)
> +{
> +	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
> +		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, is_wide_instr);
> +	else
> +		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
> +
> +	/* advance the singlestep state machine */
> +	*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Skip an instruction which has been emulated at hyp while most guest sysregs
> + * are live.
> + */
> +static inline void __hyp_text __kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(elr);
> +	vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate = read_sysreg_el2(spsr);
> +
> +	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> +
> +	write_sysreg_el2(vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate, spsr);
> +	write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), elr);
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 52fbc823ff8c..7a5035f9c5c3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -445,7 +445,6 @@ void kvm_arm_init_debug(void);
>  void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> -bool kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
>  int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
>  int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
> index 00d422336a45..f39801e4136c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
> @@ -236,24 +236,3 @@ void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		}
>  	}
>  }
> -
> -
> -/*
> - * After successfully emulating an instruction, we might want to
> - * return to user space with a KVM_EXIT_DEBUG. We can only do this
> - * once the emulation is complete, though, so for userspace emulations
> - * we have to wait until we have re-entered KVM before calling this
> - * helper.
> - *
> - * Return true (and set exit_reason) to return to userspace or false
> - * if no further action is required.
> - */
> -bool kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> -{
> -	if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP) {
> -		run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG;
> -		run->debug.arch.hsr = ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT;
> -		return true;
> -	}
> -	return false;
> -}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> index 35a81bebd02b..b0643f9c4873 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> @@ -229,13 +229,6 @@ static int handle_trap_exceptions(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  		handled = exit_handler(vcpu, run);
>  	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * kvm_arm_handle_step_debug() sets the exit_reason on the kvm_run
> -	 * structure if we need to return to userspace.
> -	 */
> -	if (handled > 0 && kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(vcpu, run))
> -		handled = 0;
> -
>  	return handled;
>  }
>  
> @@ -269,12 +262,7 @@ int handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
>  	case ARM_EXCEPTION_IRQ:
>  		return 1;
>  	case ARM_EXCEPTION_EL1_SERROR:
> -		/* We may still need to return for single-step */
> -		if (!(*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) & DBG_SPSR_SS)
> -			&& kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(vcpu, run))
> -			return 0;
> -		else
> -			return 1;
> +		return 1;
>  	case ARM_EXCEPTION_TRAP:
>  		return handle_trap_exceptions(vcpu, run);
>  	case ARM_EXCEPTION_HYP_GONE:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> index 7cc175c88a37..4282f05771c1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> @@ -305,33 +305,6 @@ static bool __hyp_text __populate_fault_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> -/* Skip an instruction which has been emulated. Returns true if
> - * execution can continue or false if we need to exit hyp mode because
> - * single-step was in effect.
> - */
> -static bool __hyp_text __skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> -	*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(elr);
> -
> -	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu)) {
> -		vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate = read_sysreg_el2(spsr);
> -		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> -		write_sysreg_el2(vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.regs.pstate, spsr);
> -	} else {
> -		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
> -	}
> -
> -	write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), elr);
> -
> -	if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP) {
> -		vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2 =
> -			(ESR_ELx_EC_SOFTSTP_LOW << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT) | 0x22;
> -		return false;
> -	} else {
> -		return true;
> -	}
> -}
> -
>  static bool __hyp_text __hyp_switch_fpsimd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	struct user_fpsimd_state *host_fpsimd = vcpu->arch.host_fpsimd_state;
> @@ -420,20 +393,12 @@ static bool __hyp_text fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
>  		if (valid) {
>  			int ret = __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(vcpu);
>  
> -			if (ret ==  1 && __skip_instr(vcpu))
> +			if (ret == 1)
>  				return true;
>  
> -			if (ret == -1) {
> -				/* Promote an illegal access to an
> -				 * SError. If we would be returning
> -				 * due to single-step clear the SS
> -				 * bit so handle_exit knows what to
> -				 * do after dealing with the error.
> -				 */
> -				if (!__skip_instr(vcpu))
> -					*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
> +			/* Promote an illegal access to an SError.*/
> +			if (ret == -1)
>  				*exit_code = ARM_EXCEPTION_EL1_SERROR;
> -			}
>  
>  			goto exit;
>  		}
> @@ -444,7 +409,7 @@ static bool __hyp_text fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
>  	     kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu) == ESR_ELx_EC_CP15_32)) {
>  		int ret = __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(vcpu);
>  
> -		if (ret == 1 && __skip_instr(vcpu))
> +		if (ret == 1)
>  			return true;
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
> index 215c7c0eb3b0..9cbdd034a563 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static bool __hyp_text __is_be(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   * Returns:
>   *  1: GICV access successfully performed
>   *  0: Not a GICV access
> - * -1: Illegal GICV access
> + * -1: Illegal GICV access successfully performed
>   */
>  int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> @@ -61,12 +61,16 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	/* Reject anything but a 32bit access */
> -	if (kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_as(vcpu) != sizeof(u32))
> +	if (kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_as(vcpu) != sizeof(u32)) {
> +		__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
>  		return -1;
> +	}
>  
>  	/* Not aligned? Don't bother */
> -	if (fault_ipa & 3)
> +	if (fault_ipa & 3) {
> +		__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
>  		return -1;
> +	}
>  
>  	rd = kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_rd(vcpu);
>  	addr  = hyp_symbol_addr(kvm_vgic_global_state)->vcpu_hyp_va;
> @@ -88,5 +92,7 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, rd, data);
>  	}
>  
> +	__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
> +
>  	return 1;
>  }
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index 23774970c9df..4adcee5fc126 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -674,8 +674,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  		ret = kvm_handle_mmio_return(vcpu, vcpu->run);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
> -		if (kvm_arm_handle_step_debug(vcpu, vcpu->run))
> -			return 0;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (run->immediate_exit)
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> index 616e5a433ab0..9652c453480f 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> @@ -1012,8 +1012,10 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  	esr = kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu);
>  	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu)) {
> -		if (!kvm_condition_valid(vcpu))
> +		if (!kvm_condition_valid(vcpu)) {
> +			__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
>  			return 1;
> +		}
>  
>  		sysreg = esr_cp15_to_sysreg(esr);
>  	} else {
> @@ -1123,6 +1125,8 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	rt = kvm_vcpu_sys_get_rt(vcpu);
>  	fn(vcpu, vmcr, rt);
>  
> +	__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
> +
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  

I would have preferred either calling __kvm_skip_instr() at the callsite
for the GIC emulation functions or using a goto out construct in the two
functions, but I'm not sure it's worth respinning for that reason:

Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] kvm/arm: skip MMIO insn after emulation
  2018-11-09 15:07   ` Mark Rutland
@ 2018-12-11  8:30     ` Christoffer Dall
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Christoffer Dall @ 2018-12-11  8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Rutland; +Cc: marc.zyngier, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel

On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 03:07:10PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> When we emulate an MMIO instruction, we advance the CPU state within
> decode_hsr(), before emulating the instruction effects.
> 
> Having this logic in decode_hsr() is opaque, and advancing the state
> before emulation is problematic. It gets in the way of applying
> consistent single-step logic, and it prevents us from being able to fail
> an MMIO instruction with a synchronous exception.
> 
> Clean this up by only advancing the CPU state *after* the effects of the
> instruction are emulated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c | 11 ++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
> index dac7ceb1a677..08443a15e6be 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
> @@ -117,6 +117,12 @@ int kvm_handle_mmio_return(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt, data);
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * The MMIO instruction is emulated and should not be re-executed
> +	 * in the guest.
> +	 */
> +	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -144,11 +150,6 @@ static int decode_hsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool *is_write, int *len)
>  	vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.sign_extend = sign_extend;
>  	vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt = rt;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * The MMIO instruction is emulated and should not be re-executed
> -	 * in the guest.
> -	 */
> -	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] kvm/arm: skip MMIO insn after emulation
@ 2018-12-11  8:30     ` Christoffer Dall
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Christoffer Dall @ 2018-12-11  8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Rutland
  Cc: marc.zyngier, peter.maydell, alex.bennee, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel

On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 03:07:10PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> When we emulate an MMIO instruction, we advance the CPU state within
> decode_hsr(), before emulating the instruction effects.
> 
> Having this logic in decode_hsr() is opaque, and advancing the state
> before emulation is problematic. It gets in the way of applying
> consistent single-step logic, and it prevents us from being able to fail
> an MMIO instruction with a synchronous exception.
> 
> Clean this up by only advancing the CPU state *after* the effects of the
> instruction are emulated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c | 11 ++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
> index dac7ceb1a677..08443a15e6be 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
> @@ -117,6 +117,12 @@ int kvm_handle_mmio_return(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt, data);
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * The MMIO instruction is emulated and should not be re-executed
> +	 * in the guest.
> +	 */
> +	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -144,11 +150,6 @@ static int decode_hsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool *is_write, int *len)
>  	vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.sign_extend = sign_extend;
>  	vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt = rt;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * The MMIO instruction is emulated and should not be re-executed
> -	 * in the guest.
> -	 */
> -	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-12-11  8:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-11-09 15:07 [PATCH 0/2] kvm/arm: make singlestep behaviour consistent Mark Rutland
2018-11-09 15:07 ` Mark Rutland
2018-11-09 15:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] kvm/arm: skip MMIO insn after emulation Mark Rutland
2018-11-09 15:07   ` Mark Rutland
2018-11-09 15:43   ` Alex Bennée
2018-11-09 15:43     ` Alex Bennée
2018-12-11  8:30   ` Christoffer Dall
2018-12-11  8:30     ` Christoffer Dall
2018-11-09 15:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] kvm/arm: consistently advance singlestep when emulating instructions Mark Rutland
2018-11-09 15:07   ` Mark Rutland
2018-11-09 16:58   ` Alex Bennée
2018-11-09 16:58     ` Alex Bennée
2018-12-11  8:30   ` Christoffer Dall
2018-12-11  8:30     ` Christoffer Dall

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.