[PATCH] proc: fixup map_files test on arm

[PATCH] proc: fixup map_files test on arm

[Alexey Dobriyan]

https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3782

Turns out arm doesn't allow to map address 0, so try minimum virtual
address instead.

Reported-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
---

 tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c |    9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
  * ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
  * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
  */
-/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with address 0. */
+/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with minimum address. */
 #include <errno.h>
 #include <sys/types.h>
 #include <sys/stat.h>
@@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ static void fail(const char *fmt, unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
 int main(void)
 {
 	const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
+#ifdef __arm__
+	unsigned long va = 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
+#else
+	unsigned long va = 0;
+#endif
 	void *p;
 	int fd;
 	unsigned long a, b;
@@ -55,7 +60,7 @@ int main(void)
 	if (fd == -1)
 		return 1;
 
-	p = mmap(NULL, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
+	p = mmap(va, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
 	if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
 		if (errno == EPERM)
 			return 2;

Re: [PATCH] proc: fixup map_files test on arm

[Rafael David Tinoco]

Including Shuah and kselftest list...

On Sat, Nov 10, 2018, at 4:49 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3782
> 
> Turns out arm doesn't allow to map address 0, so try minimum virtual
> address instead.
> 
> Reported-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
>  tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c |    9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
>   * ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT 
> OF
>   * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
>   */
> -/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with address 0. */
> +/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with minimum address. */
>  #include <errno.h>
>  #include <sys/types.h>
>  #include <sys/stat.h>
> @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ static void fail(const char *fmt, unsigned long a, 
> unsigned long b)
>  int main(void)
>  {
>  	const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
> +#ifdef __arm__
> +	unsigned long va = 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
> +#else
> +	unsigned long va = 0;
> +#endif
>  	void *p;
>  	int fd;
>  	unsigned long a, b;
> @@ -55,7 +60,7 @@ int main(void)
>  	if (fd == -1)
>  		return 1;
>  
> -	p = mmap(NULL, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
> +	p = mmap(va, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
>  	if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
>  		if (errno == EPERM)
>  			return 2;

I have sent a patch removing proc-self-map-files-002 AND making 001 to use as a
HINT for mmap (MAP_FIXED) *at least*  *(2 * PAGE_SIZE), which would, likely,
attend all  architectures, avoiding trying to make the test specific to one,
and, still, test the symlinks for issues (like bad chars, spaces, so on).

Both tests (001 and 002) have pretty much the same code, while they could have 2
tests in a single code, using kselftest framework. Is NULL hint + MAP_FIXED
something imperative for this test ? Why not to have all in a single test ? Are
you keeping the NULL hint just to test mmap, apart" from the core of this test ?

Sorry to insist.. If you want to keep it like this, I can create a similar test
in LTP - for the symlinks only, which seem important - and blacklist this one in
our function tests kselftest list (https://lkft.linaro.org/), then no change is
needed on your side.

Thanks 

[PATCH] proc: fixup map_files test on arm

[rafael.tinoco]

Including Shuah and kselftest list...

On Sat, Nov 10, 2018, at 4:49 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3782
> 
> Turns out arm doesn't allow to map address 0, so try minimum virtual
> address instead.
> 
> Reported-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan at gmail.com>
> ---
> 
>  tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c |    9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
>   * ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT 
> OF
>   * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
>   */
> -/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with address 0. */
> +/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with minimum address. */
>  #include <errno.h>
>  #include <sys/types.h>
>  #include <sys/stat.h>
> @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ static void fail(const char *fmt, unsigned long a, 
> unsigned long b)
>  int main(void)
>  {
>  	const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
> +#ifdef __arm__
> +	unsigned long va = 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
> +#else
> +	unsigned long va = 0;
> +#endif
>  	void *p;
>  	int fd;
>  	unsigned long a, b;
> @@ -55,7 +60,7 @@ int main(void)
>  	if (fd == -1)
>  		return 1;
>  
> -	p = mmap(NULL, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
> +	p = mmap(va, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
>  	if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
>  		if (errno == EPERM)
>  			return 2;

I have sent a patch removing proc-self-map-files-002 AND making 001 to use as a
HINT for mmap (MAP_FIXED) *at least*  *(2 * PAGE_SIZE), which would, likely,
attend all  architectures, avoiding trying to make the test specific to one,
and, still, test the symlinks for issues (like bad chars, spaces, so on).

Both tests (001 and 002) have pretty much the same code, while they could have 2
tests in a single code, using kselftest framework. Is NULL hint + MAP_FIXED
something imperative for this test ? Why not to have all in a single test ? Are
you keeping the NULL hint just to test mmap, apart" from the core of this test ?

Sorry to insist.. If you want to keep it like this, I can create a similar test
in LTP - for the symlinks only, which seem important - and blacklist this one in
our function tests kselftest list (https://lkft.linaro.org/), then no change is
needed on your side.

Thanks 

[PATCH] proc: fixup map_files test on arm

[Rafael David Tinoco]

Including Shuah and kselftest list...

On Sat, Nov 10, 2018,@4:49 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3782
> 
> Turns out arm doesn't allow to map address 0, so try minimum virtual
> address instead.
> 
> Reported-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan at gmail.com>
> ---
> 
>  tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c |    9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
>   * ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT 
> OF
>   * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
>   */
> -/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with address 0. */
> +/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with minimum address. */
>  #include <errno.h>
>  #include <sys/types.h>
>  #include <sys/stat.h>
> @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ static void fail(const char *fmt, unsigned long a, 
> unsigned long b)
>  int main(void)
>  {
>  	const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
> +#ifdef __arm__
> +	unsigned long va = 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
> +#else
> +	unsigned long va = 0;
> +#endif
>  	void *p;
>  	int fd;
>  	unsigned long a, b;
> @@ -55,7 +60,7 @@ int main(void)
>  	if (fd == -1)
>  		return 1;
>  
> -	p = mmap(NULL, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
> +	p = mmap(va, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
>  	if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
>  		if (errno == EPERM)
>  			return 2;

I have sent a patch removing proc-self-map-files-002 AND making 001 to use as a
HINT for mmap (MAP_FIXED) *at least*  *(2 * PAGE_SIZE), which would, likely,
attend all  architectures, avoiding trying to make the test specific to one,
and, still, test the symlinks for issues (like bad chars, spaces, so on).

Both tests (001 and 002) have pretty much the same code, while they could have 2
tests in a single code, using kselftest framework. Is NULL hint + MAP_FIXED
something imperative for this test ? Why not to have all in a single test ? Are
you keeping the NULL hint just to test mmap, apart" from the core of this test ?

Sorry to insist.. If you want to keep it like this, I can create a similar test
in LTP - for the symlinks only, which seem important - and blacklist this one in
our function tests kselftest list (https://lkft.linaro.org/), then no change is
needed on your side.

Thanks 

Re: [PATCH] proc: fixup map_files test on arm

[Alexey Dobriyan]

On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 12:48:47AM -0200, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
> Including Shuah and kselftest list...
> 
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2018, at 4:49 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3782
> > 
> > Turns out arm doesn't allow to map address 0, so try minimum virtual
> > address instead.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c |    9 +++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
> > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
> >   * ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT 
> > OF
> >   * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
> >   */
> > -/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with address 0. */
> > +/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with minimum address. */
> >  #include <errno.h>
> >  #include <sys/types.h>
> >  #include <sys/stat.h>
> > @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ static void fail(const char *fmt, unsigned long a, 
> > unsigned long b)
> >  int main(void)
> >  {
> >  	const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
> > +#ifdef __arm__
> > +	unsigned long va = 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
> > +#else
> > +	unsigned long va = 0;
> > +#endif
> >  	void *p;
> >  	int fd;
> >  	unsigned long a, b;
> > @@ -55,7 +60,7 @@ int main(void)
> >  	if (fd == -1)
> >  		return 1;
> >  
> > -	p = mmap(NULL, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
> > +	p = mmap(va, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
> >  	if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
> >  		if (errno == EPERM)
> >  			return 2;
> 
> I have sent a patch removing proc-self-map-files-002 AND making 001 to use as a
> HINT for mmap (MAP_FIXED) *at least*  *(2 * PAGE_SIZE), which would, likely,
> attend all  architectures, avoiding trying to make the test specific to one,
> and, still, test the symlinks for issues (like bad chars, spaces, so on).

If the goal is to test the lowest address then going for 2*PAGE_SIZE is
a mistake.

Which BTW hints to add a test for the highest address.

> Both tests (001 and 002) have pretty much the same code, while they could have 2
> tests in a single code, using kselftest framework. Is NULL hint + MAP_FIXED
> something imperative for this test ? Why not to have all in a single test ?

I dislike tests which lump everything together into one process.

> Are you keeping the NULL hint just to test mmap, apart" from the core of
> this test ?

[PATCH] proc: fixup map_files test on arm

[adobriyan]

On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 12:48:47AM -0200, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
> Including Shuah and kselftest list...
> 
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2018, at 4:49 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3782
> > 
> > Turns out arm doesn't allow to map address 0, so try minimum virtual
> > address instead.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco at linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan at gmail.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c |    9 +++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
> > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
> >   * ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT 
> > OF
> >   * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
> >   */
> > -/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with address 0. */
> > +/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with minimum address. */
> >  #include <errno.h>
> >  #include <sys/types.h>
> >  #include <sys/stat.h>
> > @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ static void fail(const char *fmt, unsigned long a, 
> > unsigned long b)
> >  int main(void)
> >  {
> >  	const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
> > +#ifdef __arm__
> > +	unsigned long va = 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
> > +#else
> > +	unsigned long va = 0;
> > +#endif
> >  	void *p;
> >  	int fd;
> >  	unsigned long a, b;
> > @@ -55,7 +60,7 @@ int main(void)
> >  	if (fd == -1)
> >  		return 1;
> >  
> > -	p = mmap(NULL, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
> > +	p = mmap(va, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
> >  	if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
> >  		if (errno == EPERM)
> >  			return 2;
> 
> I have sent a patch removing proc-self-map-files-002 AND making 001 to use as a
> HINT for mmap (MAP_FIXED) *at least*  *(2 * PAGE_SIZE), which would, likely,
> attend all  architectures, avoiding trying to make the test specific to one,
> and, still, test the symlinks for issues (like bad chars, spaces, so on).

If the goal is to test the lowest address then going for 2*PAGE_SIZE is
a mistake.

Which BTW hints to add a test for the highest address.

> Both tests (001 and 002) have pretty much the same code, while they could have 2
> tests in a single code, using kselftest framework. Is NULL hint + MAP_FIXED
> something imperative for this test ? Why not to have all in a single test ?

I dislike tests which lump everything together into one process.

> Are you keeping the NULL hint just to test mmap, apart" from the core of
> this test ?

[PATCH] proc: fixup map_files test on arm

[Alexey Dobriyan]

On Sun, Nov 11, 2018@12:48:47AM -0200, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
> Including Shuah and kselftest list...
> 
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2018,@4:49 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3782
> > 
> > Turns out arm doesn't allow to map address 0, so try minimum virtual
> > address instead.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco at linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan at gmail.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c |    9 +++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
> > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
> >   * ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT 
> > OF
> >   * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
> >   */
> > -/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with address 0. */
> > +/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with minimum address. */
> >  #include <errno.h>
> >  #include <sys/types.h>
> >  #include <sys/stat.h>
> > @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ static void fail(const char *fmt, unsigned long a, 
> > unsigned long b)
> >  int main(void)
> >  {
> >  	const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
> > +#ifdef __arm__
> > +	unsigned long va = 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
> > +#else
> > +	unsigned long va = 0;
> > +#endif
> >  	void *p;
> >  	int fd;
> >  	unsigned long a, b;
> > @@ -55,7 +60,7 @@ int main(void)
> >  	if (fd == -1)
> >  		return 1;
> >  
> > -	p = mmap(NULL, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
> > +	p = mmap(va, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
> >  	if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
> >  		if (errno == EPERM)
> >  			return 2;
> 
> I have sent a patch removing proc-self-map-files-002 AND making 001 to use as a
> HINT for mmap (MAP_FIXED) *at least*  *(2 * PAGE_SIZE), which would, likely,
> attend all  architectures, avoiding trying to make the test specific to one,
> and, still, test the symlinks for issues (like bad chars, spaces, so on).

If the goal is to test the lowest address then going for 2*PAGE_SIZE is
a mistake.

Which BTW hints to add a test for the highest address.

> Both tests (001 and 002) have pretty much the same code, while they could have 2
> tests in a single code, using kselftest framework. Is NULL hint + MAP_FIXED
> something imperative for this test ? Why not to have all in a single test ?

I dislike tests which lump everything together into one process.

> Are you keeping the NULL hint just to test mmap, apart" from the core of
> this test ?

Re: [PATCH] proc: fixup map_files test on arm

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 05:14:57PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
...
> > >  int main(void)
> > >  {
> > >  	const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
> > > +#ifdef __arm__
> > > +	unsigned long va = 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
> > > +#else
> > > +	unsigned long va = 0;
> > > +#endif
...
> > 
> > I have sent a patch removing proc-self-map-files-002 AND making 001 to use as a
> > HINT for mmap (MAP_FIXED) *at least*  *(2 * PAGE_SIZE), which would, likely,
> > attend all  architectures, avoiding trying to make the test specific to one,
> > and, still, test the symlinks for issues (like bad chars, spaces, so on).
> 
> If the goal is to test the lowest address then going for 2*PAGE_SIZE is
> a mistake.
> 
> Which BTW hints to add a test for the highest address.
> 
> > Both tests (001 and 002) have pretty much the same code, while they could have 2
> > tests in a single code, using kselftest framework. Is NULL hint + MAP_FIXED
> > something imperative for this test ? Why not to have all in a single test ?
> 
> I dislike tests which lump everything together into one process.
> 
> > Are you keeping the NULL hint just to test mmap, apart" from the core of
> > this test ?

Guys, lets simply stick with Alexey's patch. I personnally think that
testing mappings should be a separate test in vm/, but seriously this
took too long already :) If Alexey's patch fixes the problem with arm
I think we're fine.

[PATCH] proc: fixup map_files test on arm

[gorcunov]

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 05:14:57PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
...
> > >  int main(void)
> > >  {
> > >  	const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
> > > +#ifdef __arm__
> > > +	unsigned long va = 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
> > > +#else
> > > +	unsigned long va = 0;
> > > +#endif
...
> > 
> > I have sent a patch removing proc-self-map-files-002 AND making 001 to use as a
> > HINT for mmap (MAP_FIXED) *at least*  *(2 * PAGE_SIZE), which would, likely,
> > attend all  architectures, avoiding trying to make the test specific to one,
> > and, still, test the symlinks for issues (like bad chars, spaces, so on).
> 
> If the goal is to test the lowest address then going for 2*PAGE_SIZE is
> a mistake.
> 
> Which BTW hints to add a test for the highest address.
> 
> > Both tests (001 and 002) have pretty much the same code, while they could have 2
> > tests in a single code, using kselftest framework. Is NULL hint + MAP_FIXED
> > something imperative for this test ? Why not to have all in a single test ?
> 
> I dislike tests which lump everything together into one process.
> 
> > Are you keeping the NULL hint just to test mmap, apart" from the core of
> > this test ?

Guys, lets simply stick with Alexey's patch. I personnally think that
testing mappings should be a separate test in vm/, but seriously this
took too long already :) If Alexey's patch fixes the problem with arm
I think we're fine.

[PATCH] proc: fixup map_files test on arm

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018@05:14:57PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
...
> > >  int main(void)
> > >  {
> > >  	const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
> > > +#ifdef __arm__
> > > +	unsigned long va = 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
> > > +#else
> > > +	unsigned long va = 0;
> > > +#endif
...
> > 
> > I have sent a patch removing proc-self-map-files-002 AND making 001 to use as a
> > HINT for mmap (MAP_FIXED) *at least*  *(2 * PAGE_SIZE), which would, likely,
> > attend all  architectures, avoiding trying to make the test specific to one,
> > and, still, test the symlinks for issues (like bad chars, spaces, so on).
> 
> If the goal is to test the lowest address then going for 2*PAGE_SIZE is
> a mistake.
> 
> Which BTW hints to add a test for the highest address.
> 
> > Both tests (001 and 002) have pretty much the same code, while they could have 2
> > tests in a single code, using kselftest framework. Is NULL hint + MAP_FIXED
> > something imperative for this test ? Why not to have all in a single test ?
> 
> I dislike tests which lump everything together into one process.
> 
> > Are you keeping the NULL hint just to test mmap, apart" from the core of
> > this test ?

Guys, lets simply stick with Alexey's patch. I personnally think that
testing mappings should be a separate test in vm/, but seriously this
took too long already :) If Alexey's patch fixes the problem with arm
I think we're fine.

Re: [PATCH] proc: fixup map_files test on arm

[Rafael David Tinoco]

On 11/12/18 1:55 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 05:14:57PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> ...
>>>>   int main(void)
>>>>   {
>>>>   	const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
>>>> +#ifdef __arm__
>>>> +	unsigned long va = 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
>>>> +#else
>>>> +	unsigned long va = 0;
>>>> +#endif
> ...
>>>
>>> I have sent a patch removing proc-self-map-files-002 AND making 001 to use as a
>>> HINT for mmap (MAP_FIXED) *at least*  *(2 * PAGE_SIZE), which would, likely,
>>> attend all  architectures, avoiding trying to make the test specific to one,
>>> and, still, test the symlinks for issues (like bad chars, spaces, so on).
>>
>> If the goal is to test the lowest address then going for 2*PAGE_SIZE is
>> a mistake.
>>
>> Which BTW hints to add a test for the highest address.
>>
>>> Both tests (001 and 002) have pretty much the same code, while they could have 2
>>> tests in a single code, using kselftest framework. Is NULL hint + MAP_FIXED
>>> something imperative for this test ? Why not to have all in a single test ?
>>
>> I dislike tests which lump everything together into one process.
>>
>>> Are you keeping the NULL hint just to test mmap, apart" from the core of
>>> this test ?
> 
> Guys, lets simply stick with Alexey's patch. I personnally think that
> testing mappings should be a separate test in vm/, but seriously this
> took too long already :) If Alexey's patch fixes the problem with arm
> I think we're fine.
> 

Fine for me. It works in armhf.

Tested-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@linaro.org>

Note: Maybe you should amend the patch and cast "va" in mmap() to avoid:

In file included from proc-self-map-files-002.c:7:
/usr/include/arm-linux-gnueabihf/sys/mman.h:57:14: note: expected ‘void 
*’ but argument is of type ‘long unsigned int’
  extern void *mmap (void *__addr, size_t __len, int __prot,

--
Rafael D. Tinoco
Linaro Kernel Validation

[PATCH] proc: fixup map_files test on arm

[rafael.tinoco]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1928 bytes --]

On 11/12/18 1:55 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 05:14:57PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> ...
>>>>   int main(void)
>>>>   {
>>>>   	const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
>>>> +#ifdef __arm__
>>>> +	unsigned long va = 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
>>>> +#else
>>>> +	unsigned long va = 0;
>>>> +#endif
> ...
>>>
>>> I have sent a patch removing proc-self-map-files-002 AND making 001 to use as a
>>> HINT for mmap (MAP_FIXED) *at least*  *(2 * PAGE_SIZE), which would, likely,
>>> attend all  architectures, avoiding trying to make the test specific to one,
>>> and, still, test the symlinks for issues (like bad chars, spaces, so on).
>>
>> If the goal is to test the lowest address then going for 2*PAGE_SIZE is
>> a mistake.
>>
>> Which BTW hints to add a test for the highest address.
>>
>>> Both tests (001 and 002) have pretty much the same code, while they could have 2
>>> tests in a single code, using kselftest framework. Is NULL hint + MAP_FIXED
>>> something imperative for this test ? Why not to have all in a single test ?
>>
>> I dislike tests which lump everything together into one process.
>>
>>> Are you keeping the NULL hint just to test mmap, apart" from the core of
>>> this test ?
> 
> Guys, lets simply stick with Alexey's patch. I personnally think that
> testing mappings should be a separate test in vm/, but seriously this
> took too long already :) If Alexey's patch fixes the problem with arm
> I think we're fine.
> 

Fine for me. It works in armhf.

Tested-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco at linaro.org>

Note: Maybe you should amend the patch and cast "va" in mmap() to avoid:

In file included from proc-self-map-files-002.c:7:
/usr/include/arm-linux-gnueabihf/sys/mman.h:57:14: note: expected ‘void 
*’ but argument is of type ‘long unsigned int’
  extern void *mmap (void *__addr, size_t __len, int __prot,

--
Rafael D. Tinoco
Linaro Kernel Validation

[PATCH] proc: fixup map_files test on arm

[Rafael David Tinoco]

On 11/12/18 1:55 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018@05:14:57PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> ...
>>>>   int main(void)
>>>>   {
>>>>   	const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
>>>> +#ifdef __arm__
>>>> +	unsigned long va = 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
>>>> +#else
>>>> +	unsigned long va = 0;
>>>> +#endif
> ...
>>>
>>> I have sent a patch removing proc-self-map-files-002 AND making 001 to use as a
>>> HINT for mmap (MAP_FIXED) *at least*  *(2 * PAGE_SIZE), which would, likely,
>>> attend all  architectures, avoiding trying to make the test specific to one,
>>> and, still, test the symlinks for issues (like bad chars, spaces, so on).
>>
>> If the goal is to test the lowest address then going for 2*PAGE_SIZE is
>> a mistake.
>>
>> Which BTW hints to add a test for the highest address.
>>
>>> Both tests (001 and 002) have pretty much the same code, while they could have 2
>>> tests in a single code, using kselftest framework. Is NULL hint + MAP_FIXED
>>> something imperative for this test ? Why not to have all in a single test ?
>>
>> I dislike tests which lump everything together into one process.
>>
>>> Are you keeping the NULL hint just to test mmap, apart" from the core of
>>> this test ?
> 
> Guys, lets simply stick with Alexey's patch. I personnally think that
> testing mappings should be a separate test in vm/, but seriously this
> took too long already :) If Alexey's patch fixes the problem with arm
> I think we're fine.
> 

Fine for me. It works in armhf.

Tested-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco at linaro.org>

Note: Maybe you should amend the patch and cast "va" in mmap() to avoid:

In file included from proc-self-map-files-002.c:7:
/usr/include/arm-linux-gnueabihf/sys/mman.h:57:14: note: expected ‘void 
*’ but argument is of type ‘long unsigned int’
  extern void *mmap (void *__addr, size_t __len, int __prot,

--
Rafael D. Tinoco
Linaro Kernel Validation

[PATCH v2] proc: fixup map_files test on arm

[Alexey Dobriyan]

https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3782

Turns out arm doesn't allow to map address 0, so try minimum virtual
address instead.

Reported-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
---

 tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c |    9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
  * ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
  * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
  */
-/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with address 0. */
+/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with minimum address. */
 #include <errno.h>
 #include <sys/types.h>
 #include <sys/stat.h>
@@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ static void fail(const char *fmt, unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
 int main(void)
 {
 	const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
+#ifdef __arm__
+	unsigned long va = 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
+#else
+	unsigned long va = 0;
+#endif
 	void *p;
 	int fd;
 	unsigned long a, b;
@@ -55,7 +60,7 @@ int main(void)
 	if (fd == -1)
 		return 1;
 
-	p = mmap(NULL, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
+	p = mmap((void *)va, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
 	if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
 		if (errno == EPERM)
 			return 2;

[PATCH v2] proc: fixup map_files test on arm

[adobriyan]

https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3782

Turns out arm doesn't allow to map address 0, so try minimum virtual
address instead.

Reported-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco at linaro.org>
Tested-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco at linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan at gmail.com>
---

 tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c |    9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
  * ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
  * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
  */
-/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with address 0. */
+/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with minimum address. */
 #include <errno.h>
 #include <sys/types.h>
 #include <sys/stat.h>
@@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ static void fail(const char *fmt, unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
 int main(void)
 {
 	const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
+#ifdef __arm__
+	unsigned long va = 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
+#else
+	unsigned long va = 0;
+#endif
 	void *p;
 	int fd;
 	unsigned long a, b;
@@ -55,7 +60,7 @@ int main(void)
 	if (fd == -1)
 		return 1;
 
-	p = mmap(NULL, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
+	p = mmap((void *)va, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
 	if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
 		if (errno == EPERM)
 			return 2;

[PATCH v2] proc: fixup map_files test on arm

[Alexey Dobriyan]

https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3782

Turns out arm doesn't allow to map address 0, so try minimum virtual
address instead.

Reported-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco at linaro.org>
Tested-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco at linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan at gmail.com>
---

 tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c |    9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
  * ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
  * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
  */
-/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with address 0. */
+/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with minimum address. */
 #include <errno.h>
 #include <sys/types.h>
 #include <sys/stat.h>
@@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ static void fail(const char *fmt, unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
 int main(void)
 {
 	const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
+#ifdef __arm__
+	unsigned long va = 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
+#else
+	unsigned long va = 0;
+#endif
 	void *p;
 	int fd;
 	unsigned long a, b;
@@ -55,7 +60,7 @@ int main(void)
 	if (fd == -1)
 		return 1;
 
-	p = mmap(NULL, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
+	p = mmap((void *)va, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
 	if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
 		if (errno == EPERM)
 			return 2;

Re: [PATCH v2] proc: fixup map_files test on arm

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 07:54:46PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3782
> 
> Turns out arm doesn't allow to map address 0, so try minimum virtual
> address instead.
> 
> Reported-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>

Thank you!

[PATCH v2] proc: fixup map_files test on arm

[gorcunov]

On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 07:54:46PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3782
> 
> Turns out arm doesn't allow to map address 0, so try minimum virtual
> address instead.
> 
> Reported-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco at linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan at gmail.com>
Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov at gmail.com>

Thank you!

[PATCH v2] proc: fixup map_files test on arm

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On Tue, Nov 13, 2018@07:54:46PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3782
> 
> Turns out arm doesn't allow to map address 0, so try minimum virtual
> address instead.
> 
> Reported-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco at linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan at gmail.com>
Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov at gmail.com>

Thank you!