All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oscar Salvador <OSalvador@suse.com>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm, memory_hotplug: try to migrate full section worth of pages
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:33:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181120143353.4s7vl7wzgyunh46j@soleen.tm1wkky2jk1uhgkn0ivaxijq1c.bx.internal.cloudapp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181120134323.13007-2-mhocko@kernel.org>

On 18-11-20 14:43:21, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> 
> do_migrate_range has been limiting the number of pages to migrate to 256
> for some reason which is not documented. Even if the limit made some
> sense back then when it was introduced it doesn't really serve a good
> purpose these days. If the range contains huge pages then
> we break out of the loop too early and go through LRU and pcp
> caches draining and scan_movable_pages is quite suboptimal.
> 
> The only reason to limit the number of pages I can think of is to reduce
> the potential time to react on the fatal signal. But even then the
> number of pages is a questionable metric because even a single page
> might migration block in a non-killable state (e.g. __unmap_and_move).
> 
> Remove the limit and offline the full requested range (this is one
> membblock worth of pages with the current code). Should we ever get a
> report that offlining takes too long to react on fatal signal then we
> should rather fix the core migration to use killable waits and bailout
> on a signal.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

Looks good to me, I also do not see a reason for 256 pages limit.

Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>

Added Kame to CC, who introduced page offlining, and this limit, but as
far as I can tell the last time he was active on LKML was in 2016.

Pasha

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-20 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-20 13:43 [RFC PATCH 0/3] few memory offlining enhancements Michal Hocko
2018-11-20 13:43 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-20 13:43 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm, memory_hotplug: try to migrate full section worth of pages Michal Hocko
2018-11-20 13:43   ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-20 14:18   ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-20 14:25     ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-20 14:27       ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-20 14:33   ` Pavel Tatashin [this message]
2018-11-20 14:51   ` osalvador
2018-11-20 15:00     ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-20 13:43 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm, memory_hotplug: deobfuscate migration part of offlining Michal Hocko
2018-11-20 13:43   ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-20 14:26   ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-20 14:34     ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-20 14:34       ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-20 15:13   ` osalvador
2018-11-20 15:18     ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-20 13:43 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm, fault_around: do not take a reference to a locked page Michal Hocko
2018-11-20 13:43   ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-20 14:07   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-11-20 14:12     ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-20 14:17       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-11-20 14:25         ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-21  4:51       ` William Kucharski
2018-11-21  7:07         ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-20 14:33   ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-21  1:47   ` Hugh Dickins
2018-11-21  7:11     ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-22  2:27       ` Hugh Dickins
2018-11-22  9:05         ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-23 20:22           ` Hugh Dickins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181120143353.4s7vl7wzgyunh46j@soleen.tm1wkky2jk1uhgkn0ivaxijq1c.bx.internal.cloudapp.net \
    --to=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=OSalvador@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.