From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> To: <linux-mm@kvack.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Oscar Salvador <OSalvador@suse.com>, Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] few memory offlining enhancements Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:43:20 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20181120134323.13007-1-mhocko@kernel.org> (raw) I have been chasing memory offlining not making progress recently. On the way I have noticed few weird decisions in the code. The migration itself is restricted without a reasonable justification and the retry loop around the migration is quite messy. This is addressed by patch 1 and patch 2. Patch 3 is targeting on the faultaround code which has been a hot candidate for the initial issue reported upstream [1] and that I am debugging internally. It turned out to be not the main contributor in the end but I believe we should address it regardless. See the patch description for more details. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181114070909.GB2653@MiWiFi-R3L-srv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> To: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Oscar Salvador <OSalvador@suse.com>, Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] few memory offlining enhancements Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:43:20 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20181120134323.13007-1-mhocko@kernel.org> (raw) I have been chasing memory offlining not making progress recently. On the way I have noticed few weird decisions in the code. The migration itself is restricted without a reasonable justification and the retry loop around the migration is quite messy. This is addressed by patch 1 and patch 2. Patch 3 is targeting on the faultaround code which has been a hot candidate for the initial issue reported upstream [1] and that I am debugging internally. It turned out to be not the main contributor in the end but I believe we should address it regardless. See the patch description for more details. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181114070909.GB2653@MiWiFi-R3L-srv
next reply other threads:[~2018-11-20 13:44 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-11-20 13:43 Michal Hocko [this message] 2018-11-20 13:43 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] few memory offlining enhancements Michal Hocko 2018-11-20 13:43 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm, memory_hotplug: try to migrate full section worth of pages Michal Hocko 2018-11-20 13:43 ` Michal Hocko 2018-11-20 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand 2018-11-20 14:25 ` Michal Hocko 2018-11-20 14:27 ` David Hildenbrand 2018-11-20 14:33 ` Pavel Tatashin 2018-11-20 14:51 ` osalvador 2018-11-20 15:00 ` Michal Hocko 2018-11-20 13:43 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm, memory_hotplug: deobfuscate migration part of offlining Michal Hocko 2018-11-20 13:43 ` Michal Hocko 2018-11-20 14:26 ` David Hildenbrand 2018-11-20 14:34 ` Michal Hocko 2018-11-20 14:34 ` David Hildenbrand 2018-11-20 15:13 ` osalvador 2018-11-20 15:18 ` Michal Hocko 2018-11-20 13:43 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm, fault_around: do not take a reference to a locked page Michal Hocko 2018-11-20 13:43 ` Michal Hocko 2018-11-20 14:07 ` Kirill A. Shutemov 2018-11-20 14:12 ` Michal Hocko 2018-11-20 14:17 ` Kirill A. Shutemov 2018-11-20 14:25 ` Michal Hocko 2018-11-21 4:51 ` William Kucharski 2018-11-21 7:07 ` Michal Hocko 2018-11-20 14:33 ` David Hildenbrand 2018-11-21 1:47 ` Hugh Dickins 2018-11-21 7:11 ` Michal Hocko 2018-11-22 2:27 ` Hugh Dickins 2018-11-22 9:05 ` Michal Hocko 2018-11-23 20:22 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20181120134323.13007-1-mhocko@kernel.org \ --to=mhocko@kernel.org \ --cc=OSalvador@suse.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=david@redhat.com \ --cc=jack@suse.cz \ --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=mhocko@suse.com \ --cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.